My 2000 Max SE Auto Dyno results.....
#81
op, as for the vi check at what rpm your 2nd gear comes in at at full throttle, then et the vafc2 100rpm under that rpm. imo it would make an auto dek real nice... Vias always open at wot
#82
Re: the VIAS, rule of thumb back when was to dyno it with it completely open, and completely closed, and overlay them and use that as a guide as to when it was optimal to switch it over.
And for clarification, the DEK VIAS is just like the MEVI, just inverted, so there aren't actual longer and shorter runners, still uses the same dynamic supercharging principle.
The only VQ taht I know that has actual longer and shorter runners is the one found in the VQ40 Pathfinder, maybe even the Pathy 3.5's, either way, the DEK inverted MEVI is still superior to both the MEVI and the 02-08 VIAS.
#84
I have headers with test pipe and stoc catback n muffler.... don't do it, rasp city... I at wait to change mines now lol... again, screw the Ypipe, grab a OBX header system and take the better gains better sound... straight pipes are overrated n ricey in most cases... more noise and little to no additional power gain... unless u are getting rid of oem cat
#85
I have headers with test pipe and stoc catback n muffler.... don't do it, rasp city... I at wait to change mines now lol... again, screw the Ypipe, grab a OBX header system and take the better gains better sound... straight pipes are overrated n ricey in most cases... more noise and little to no additional power gain... unless u are getting rid of oem cat
#86
Right now i have the v8 grumble off the line. Ive read y pipe makes this go away (frown). If i get the ypipe basically everything will be straight except the stock muffler putting a cork on the drone. So theres no chance of y pipe making it sound even meaner? Im not getting headers, so its ypipe...or skip to safc or vafc and see what i can gain from that big tuning.
#87
Pre cats wont mess up my readings..lol As you can see from my dyno the readings are loud n clear. Im running rich!
#88
V8 rumble?... Aint never heard a max pull that off before... Id love to hear it.......
Im sure a equal length cattman y can help sound... But for the same price as a obx header... Mmmmm lol...
My afr dips to 10.7 lol, if only my finances was as rich lmmfao
Im sure a equal length cattman y can help sound... But for the same price as a obx header... Mmmmm lol...
My afr dips to 10.7 lol, if only my finances was as rich lmmfao
#89
I have headers with test pipe and stoc catback n muffler.... don't do it, rasp city... I at wait to change mines now lol... again, screw the Ypipe, grab a OBX header system and take the better gains better sound... straight pipes are overrated n ricey in most cases... more noise and little to no additional power gain... unless u are getting rid of oem cat
And for rasp control, use what I did as a resonator.
Originally Posted by Me somewhere on this forum
Here’s comparing AFR w/ and without a test pipe. Lean graph = w/o test pipe (functioning main cat) the richer version is without a cat (test pipe)
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-27-2013 at 06:50 AM.
#90
Right now i have the v8 grumble off the line. Ive read y pipe makes this go away (frown). If i get the ypipe basically everything will be straight except the stock muffler putting a cork on the drone. So theres no chance of y pipe making it sound even meaner? Im not getting headers, so its ypipe...or skip to safc or vafc and see what i can gain from that big tuning.
Once you do that, you would get gains and sound would still be good.
AND you can safc or vafc later and still get even more gains.
Your OEM Y pipe is really holding you back.
Interesting graphs.....its like the ECU can't account for the lower back pressure of the test pipe, like it assumes a certain amount from the cat.
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-27-2013 at 09:53 AM.
#91
I think the cat itself affects the reading, as in if I had a WB before the cat, and after the cat, the graphs would look the way they do in that graph.
Also, irrelevant or not, it's a good topic for discussion this is my dyno comparing a test pipe and removal of the Helmholtz as the only "mods".
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-27-2013 at 09:55 AM.
#92
I don't think our ECU's are that smart.
I think the cat itself affects the reading, as in if I had a WB before the cat, and after the cat, the graphs would look the way they do in that graph.
Also, irrelevant or not, it's a good topic for discussion this is my dyno comparing a test pipe and removal of the Helmholtz as the only "mods".
I think the cat itself affects the reading, as in if I had a WB before the cat, and after the cat, the graphs would look the way they do in that graph.
Also, irrelevant or not, it's a good topic for discussion this is my dyno comparing a test pipe and removal of the Helmholtz as the only "mods".
Worst case scenario I can get a Ypipe.....put it on....with the stock muffler it might be a tiny bit raspy but itll be muffled well. If its really heinous, Ill get a cat and throw in on there instead of the test pipe.
#93
Are you supercharged or something? What the deuce...lol. Can that even still be considered relevant? FI is a whole 'nother ballgame.
Worst case scenario I can get a Ypipe.....put it on....with the stock muffler it might be a tiny bit raspy but itll be muffled well. If its really heinous, Ill get a cat and throw in on there instead of the test pipe.
Worst case scenario I can get a Ypipe.....put it on....with the stock muffler it might be a tiny bit raspy but itll be muffled well. If its really heinous, Ill get a cat and throw in on there instead of the test pipe.
#96
Oh I'm quite sure it does...I think its probably evident from my dyno as well. Which is why if I can bear it sound wise.....ypipe added and leaving the rest of my setup the way it is should give me a significant nudge in HP. Honestly my car sounds bone stock on the highway. It does not sound bone stock at cold idle...or in the lower rpms. Its very gurgly....i love it personally. WOT its also obvious ive got something going on. So if the ypipe only gives it a slight raise in overall noise it should not be a big deal at all. If its INSANE and changes the whole thing...thats another story
On a side note I think people have been getting something confused. Obviously headers are superior for most power gains, but some people have been saying the unequal ypipe will sound rice. According to the small amount of research Ive done on some other car types, the "unequal" Ypipes should actually cancel out a little rasp. Especially in the case of the cali one that retains 1 precat. The two banks firing will be a little separated noise wise so I think they would likely produce less DRONE characteristics. Ive read its more likely that equal headers in a straight through exhaust will be the droney candidate.
On a side note I think people have been getting something confused. Obviously headers are superior for most power gains, but some people have been saying the unequal ypipe will sound rice. According to the small amount of research Ive done on some other car types, the "unequal" Ypipes should actually cancel out a little rasp. Especially in the case of the cali one that retains 1 precat. The two banks firing will be a little separated noise wise so I think they would likely produce less DRONE characteristics. Ive read its more likely that equal headers in a straight through exhaust will be the droney candidate.
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-28-2013 at 06:37 AM.
#97
Never had any drone with my 03 with straight pipe and headers and stock catback. Same with my VQ30 with Stillen 1st gen and aftermarket chambered muffler. But when I went with the WSP Y for my VQ30, sounded like a tractor with an awful drone.
#98
Lol...well that's certainly not what I want. I think for now given that my car has a lot of miles and I don't want to mess with emissions (more than putting a cat back on once a year) I'll buy a used SAFC or VAFC and see what the numbers are once its tuned. Im already happy with it as is...and with another few horses, Im guessing mid 180's whp and breaking the 200wtrq mark I might be a-ok with it. Spend the ypipe money on a RSB Maybe a grounding kit for the tranny....
#99
Lol...well that's certainly not what I want. I think for now given that my car has a lot of miles and I don't want to mess with emissions (more than putting a cat back on once a year) I'll buy a used SAFC or VAFC and see what the numbers are once its tuned. Im already happy with it as is...and with another few horses, Im guessing mid 180's whp and breaking the 200wtrq mark I might be a-ok with it. Spend the ypipe money on a RSB Maybe a grounding kit for the tranny....
#100
^^ doesn't matter unequal with tp sound bleh.
put The cat back on and get a y. Or get the y with a high flow cat (warpspeed sells as a package). It wont be raspy since you'd have a cat and a resonated cat back. Take a look and listen to my video in the other thread you made... It doesnt sound raspy but still prefer a sound with equal y. Plus It would sound better on yours up top since you have an 00vi stock.
put The cat back on and get a y. Or get the y with a high flow cat (warpspeed sells as a package). It wont be raspy since you'd have a cat and a resonated cat back. Take a look and listen to my video in the other thread you made... It doesnt sound raspy but still prefer a sound with equal y. Plus It would sound better on yours up top since you have an 00vi stock.
#101
Lol...well that's certainly not what I want. I think for now given that my car has a lot of miles and I don't want to mess with emissions (more than putting a cat back on once a year) I'll buy a used SAFC or VAFC and see what the numbers are once its tuned. Im already happy with it as is...and with another few horses, Im guessing mid 180's whp and breaking the 200wtrq mark I might be a-ok with it. Spend the ypipe money on a RSB Maybe a grounding kit for the tranny....
My last comparison, I gained 10hp, and less than 3 ft/lbs, peak. Even though that was the only peak, I gained nearly 20ft pounds in a different part of the range.
Not to mention, I've added a whole lotta area under there not including peak.
#103
Mine seems to be opposite. Im wondering if its because i still have the precats in. Looks like ive gained 20+ torque over stock....
I dont have a resonated cat back....i have mandel bent mid pipes and test pipe.
^^ doesn't matter unequal with tp sound bleh.
put The cat back on and get a y. Or get the y with a high flow cat (warpspeed sells as a package). It wont be raspy since you'd have a cat and a resonated cat back. Take a look and listen to my video in the other thread you made... It doesnt sound raspy but still prefer a sound with equal y. Plus It would sound better on yours up top since you have an 00vi stock.
put The cat back on and get a y. Or get the y with a high flow cat (warpspeed sells as a package). It wont be raspy since you'd have a cat and a resonated cat back. Take a look and listen to my video in the other thread you made... It doesnt sound raspy but still prefer a sound with equal y. Plus It would sound better on yours up top since you have an 00vi stock.
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-28-2013 at 10:39 AM.
#104
That torque thing will change, it's just the nature of the game. I used to make more torque than hp, then, the number slowly and proportionally proportionally reversed itself.
My dynos in order.
211/218
233/230
242/238
247/243
257/245
My dynos in order.
211/218
233/230
242/238
247/243
257/245
#105
Wonder what the safc will do. Its on deck. Got a good quote from my shop....for install/tune. Now I need a good used one.
#106
Best & worst:
All runs of that session:
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-28-2013 at 11:34 AM.
#107
#108
If it's a shop with a dyno, I'd assume they have one.
Back when, a lot of people would just go to the dyno and tune using the shops WB.
More recently, seems as if people are going with larger MAF's, so common sense says to get an on board wb to monitor.
In the OP's case, I'd say it's not necessary. It would only give him the opportunity to street tune so it's closer to being "dialed in" and might mean less runs/time/$$$ on the dyno. A WB is just another expense, and if he's going to spend the minimum of 200+$, then, I'd say that's better spent towards headers.
Also, like the domino effect, if he does decide to get a WB, might as well look into larger MAF's, etc.
Back when, a lot of people would just go to the dyno and tune using the shops WB.
More recently, seems as if people are going with larger MAF's, so common sense says to get an on board wb to monitor.
In the OP's case, I'd say it's not necessary. It would only give him the opportunity to street tune so it's closer to being "dialed in" and might mean less runs/time/$$$ on the dyno. A WB is just another expense, and if he's going to spend the minimum of 200+$, then, I'd say that's better spent towards headers.
Also, like the domino effect, if he does decide to get a WB, might as well look into larger MAF's, etc.
#109
If it's a shop with a dyno, I'd assume they have one.
Back when, a lot of people would just go to the dyno and tune using the shops WB.
More recently, seems as if people are going with larger MAF's, so common sense says to get an on board wb to monitor.
In the OP's case, I'd say it's not necessary. It would only give him the opportunity to street tune so it's closer to being "dialed in" and might mean less runs/time/$$$ on the dyno. A WB is just another expense, and if he's going to spend the minimum of 200+$, then, I'd say that's better spent towards headers.
Also, like the domino effect, if he does decide to get a WB, might as well look into larger MAF's, etc.
Back when, a lot of people would just go to the dyno and tune using the shops WB.
More recently, seems as if people are going with larger MAF's, so common sense says to get an on board wb to monitor.
In the OP's case, I'd say it's not necessary. It would only give him the opportunity to street tune so it's closer to being "dialed in" and might mean less runs/time/$$$ on the dyno. A WB is just another expense, and if he's going to spend the minimum of 200+$, then, I'd say that's better spent towards headers.
Also, like the domino effect, if he does decide to get a WB, might as well look into larger MAF's, etc.
BTW: It looks like your tune is very conservative near the top....I get why the tuner does it that way but it seems like you could be closer to 14:1 and get a few more ponies.
#110
My experience with tuning VQs leads me to think they like more fuel, my DEK made most power @ 12.6-12.8 AFR. My VQ35 will probably do the same.
#113
My best power wasn't the leanest, though I went quite lean to see if it made a difference it didn't, lost 2whp. Also, I've seen a VQ30 tuned at 13.8 put down a LOT of power, but my VQ35 doesn't like it that lean, I've seen on 2 occasions lost power after 13.5.
My car doesn't like mid or high 12's, it likes 13,0-13.5. They're all different, see what best first yours.
I've tried the high RPM lean, didn't seem to like it.
This AFR resulted in this hp curve:
Last edited by NmexMAX; 02-28-2013 at 03:43 PM.
#115
#116
I am the "tuner", which means I look at the AFR graph and adjust the SAFCII after. Check my threads for +/- on the SAFC and other analyses such as power:AFR ratio, etc.
My best power wasn't the leanest, though I went quite lean to see if it made a difference it didn't, lost 2whp. Also, I've seen a VQ30 tuned at 13.8 put down a LOT of power, but my VQ35 doesn't like it that lean, I've seen on 2 occasions lost power after 13.5.
My best power wasn't the leanest, though I went quite lean to see if it made a difference it didn't, lost 2whp. Also, I've seen a VQ30 tuned at 13.8 put down a LOT of power, but my VQ35 doesn't like it that lean, I've seen on 2 occasions lost power after 13.5.
Your car's AFR preferences could be due to the fact your SAFC is adding timing as you lean it out, so what you're seeing is a balance between AFR and indirect timing advance creating a best power situation.
2kmaxim if you use an AFC I would start at 13.0 and go from there.
#117
You should PM me about that VQ30 @13.8 I wanna see it.
Your car's AFR preferences could be due to the fact your SAFC is adding timing as you lean it out, so what you're seeing is a balance between AFR and indirect timing advance creating a best power situation.
2kmaxim if you use an AFC I would start at 13.0 and go from there.
Your car's AFR preferences could be due to the fact your SAFC is adding timing as you lean it out, so what you're seeing is a balance between AFR and indirect timing advance creating a best power situation.
2kmaxim if you use an AFC I would start at 13.0 and go from there.
op I thoughy you had an srs cat back... Either way good news about your exhaust mechanic :-D now u can enjoy a y pipe guilt free
#118
I wonder if I have to worry about my 2 degree timing advance now. Or maybe it will just work itself out in the air/fuel tune. SAFC's usually have a knock sensor that gets hooked up, so I guess my tuner can just stop adjusting if there starts to be knock.
#119
SAFC will not read the VQ30 knock sensor, and no you do not need to worry about knock when you add 2 degrees of timing with an AFR in the 13s.
#120