Front lower strut bar
#1
Front lower strut bar
Hey guys so i ordered a front upper strut bar to tie down the front suspension a bit more and for the look, but i got sent a lower front strut bar by accident the bar is a sport jdm lower strut bar for a 95-99 maxima and just looking around seeing if any one has or has used a lower strut bar for the front of the car. Ive seen the rear lower bars and i know how those are installed but i was wondering where this bar actually goes on to, like i know the front upper mounts to the top of the strut... does the bottom bar mount to the bottom of the strut? If not where if anyone knows
#4
#5
As far as I know both the front and rear strut bars were upper, especially considering that the rear suspension is a multi-link beam. You may be confusing sway bars and strut bars. Can you post a pic?
#6
Nah i know it is a strut bar because they have a rear one that mounts to the bottom bolt of the strut and ties the strut towers together, ill post a pic when im home but its not a sway bar
#7
#12
OK I see it now.
Patm-a32, I would suggest you return it and get the right part that mounts on top of the strut. Down below there's too many compromises like an indirect link to the strut if it mounts to the LCA bushing, a moving part therefore it won't be as effective. For the rear setup, Wherever you mount it below the strut it becomes part of the rear suspension as unsprung weight. You don't want that. Besides, the rear suspension is a multi-link beam. It doesn't need any help keeping the rear wheels in parallel. A bottom mounted rear strut bar would probably also affect the scott russel link's job in the middle of the multi-link beam suspension as well.
The rear suspension's weakness, lack of independence, is also it's strength
I suggest you do an FSTB on top of the front struts and be done with it. That is my plan. Remember that nearly 2/3s of the car's weight is in front, so any stiffening you do to the front will be felt more than in the back.
Patm-a32, I would suggest you return it and get the right part that mounts on top of the strut. Down below there's too many compromises like an indirect link to the strut if it mounts to the LCA bushing, a moving part therefore it won't be as effective. For the rear setup, Wherever you mount it below the strut it becomes part of the rear suspension as unsprung weight. You don't want that. Besides, the rear suspension is a multi-link beam. It doesn't need any help keeping the rear wheels in parallel. A bottom mounted rear strut bar would probably also affect the scott russel link's job in the middle of the multi-link beam suspension as well.
The rear suspension's weakness, lack of independence, is also it's strength
I suggest you do an FSTB on top of the front struts and be done with it. That is my plan. Remember that nearly 2/3s of the car's weight is in front, so any stiffening you do to the front will be felt more than in the back.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lowpost99
1st & 2nd Generation Maxima (1981-1984 and 1985-1988)
22
09-02-2015 04:38 PM
soon2ownmax
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
0
08-13-2015 02:19 PM
laparka66
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
08-06-2015 09:36 AM