Sudden terrible gas mileage
#1
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
Sudden terrible gas mileage
I regularly drive from So Cal to Nor Cal and I get a stated 30 mpg on my OEM fuel computer. I drive about the same speed each time and i take the same route. Since the last trip, I got 20" rims which are heavier 15 lbs each maybe), I installed my RLM bumper, and I made a lower trey to go under the bumper and part of the engine compartment. Also, I was carrying more weigh in the form of my daughter, her luggage, and my bowling ball (total of about 170 lbs). This time I got 20 mpg!!!! That's a difference of 33%!!! Could it be the extra weight? Is the engine running rich? O2 sensors??? Any idea as to what would cause a sudden drop in mileage like this?
Last edited by DeusExMaxima; 06-30-2011 at 03:28 PM.
#2
I regularly drive from So Cal to Nor Cal and I get a stated 30 mpg on my OEM fuel computer. I drive about the same speed each time and i take the same route. Since the last trip, I got 20" rims which are heavier 15 lbs each maybe), I installed my RLM bumper, and I made a lower trey to go under the bumper and part of the engine compartment. Also, I was carrying more weigh in the form of my daughter, her luggage, and my bowling ball (total of about 170 lbs). This time I got 20 mpg!!!! That's a difference of 33%!!! Could it be the extra weight? Is the engine running rich? O2 sensors??? Any idea as to what would cause a sudden drop in mileage like this?
an extra 200 lbs will take a little bit of gas mileage away, maybe 1-2 mpg on highway, and 4-10 on city. think inertia.
but if i were to guess, its the larger rims that took away your gas mileage.
usually, larger rims means less wheel revolutions per engine stroke = lower rpm and better gas mileage, but it also means your engine is working harder to turn a bigger wheel which kills gas mileage.
ill explain it another way, it would make sense that with a bigger wheel you are covering more ground per engine revolution right? but.. even tho you are covering a greater distance per revolution of the tire wheel assembly, your car is exerting a constant torque, and the way that torque is calculated, it means your car is exerting the same amount of force over a greater perpendicular distance (or moment), which means that it actually has to work harder and expend more fuel than with the original setup.
think of it on a larger scale, say 100" rims (i know this is impossible but bear with me) think about the extra energy it will take to get moving with a wheel that large on a stock gearing ratio. also, the larger size wheel the slower acceleration..
Last edited by twentyeggs; 06-30-2011 at 03:50 PM.
#3
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
I thought about the possibility of the heavier rims. But with respect to inertia, it seems to me that mileage would be affected more in the city, than in the highway because of the stops and starts in the city. I believe it is more than the heavier rims but i could be wrong. Has anyone with heavier rims seen a drop in mileage?
#4
I thought about the possibility of the heavier rims. But with respect to inertia, it seems to me that mileage would be affected more in the city, than in the highway because of the stops and starts in the city. I believe it is more than the heavier rims but i could be wrong. Has anyone with heavier rims seen a drop in mileage?
#5
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
I suppose I could experiment. I could drive my car as is, with no passengers and see if my mileage is still down. If it is still low, then we can eliminate the passenger and carrying weight as a problem area. I could also swap my lighter rims and see if the mileage returns to normal. If that doesnt work then it is probably an engine problem. I cannot imagine that my bumper or undertray would adversely affect the mileage. To the contrary, it should have increased the gas mileage.
#6
I suppose I could experiment. I could drive my car as is, with no passengers and see if my mileage is still down. If it is still low, then we can eliminate the passenger and carrying weight as a problem area. I could also swap my lighter rims and see if the mileage returns to normal. If that doesnt work then it is probably an engine problem. I cannot imagine that my bumper or undertray would adversely affect the mileage. To the contrary, it should have increased the gas mileage.
......................it isnt your engine, it isn't your bumper, and its not your passenger with baggage... you are losing gas mileage because of your new rims. not because they are heavier, but because they are larger. your 20" rims are hurting your gas mileage.
your larger 20" rims are the primary reason for a decline in your gas mileage.
#7
if you don't believe me do this... take a 5 mile drive on the freeway with no passenger and nothing in your car. document your mileage.
go home and swap our your rims for the factory rims, find 60lbs of stuff and throw it in your trunk (this is to match the weight of your 15lbs each heavier 20" rims) take a drive on the same stretch of road.
make sure you do this when there is no traffic.
what you will see is you get worse gas mileage with your 20" rims, and because you took into account the extra 60 lbs for your second test run that eliminates the weight variable. leaving the only difference in the size of the wheel.
what people don't understand when they go out and buy different sized rims in our cars are not made for them, so it is going to mess with the fuel economy, your performance (slower acceleration) and the speedometer. so your 800 dollar rims are really costing your many many times that, in fuel costs over time.
go home and swap our your rims for the factory rims, find 60lbs of stuff and throw it in your trunk (this is to match the weight of your 15lbs each heavier 20" rims) take a drive on the same stretch of road.
make sure you do this when there is no traffic.
what you will see is you get worse gas mileage with your 20" rims, and because you took into account the extra 60 lbs for your second test run that eliminates the weight variable. leaving the only difference in the size of the wheel.
what people don't understand when they go out and buy different sized rims in our cars are not made for them, so it is going to mess with the fuel economy, your performance (slower acceleration) and the speedometer. so your 800 dollar rims are really costing your many many times that, in fuel costs over time.
#8
You can't just say this is due to the diameter of the wheel without taking into account the tire size he has now and the tire size he had before. If he chose the correct tire size for his 20" wheels, then the diameter of the tire should almost be the same, which would mean it's not the diameter that's the issue. A 245/35/20 tire is 0.27% larger than the OEM 245/45/18 tire, which would hardly be the cause of decreased gas mileage.
#9
You can't just say this is due to the diameter of the wheel without taking into account the tire size he has now and the tire size he had before. If he chose the correct tire size for his 20" wheels, then the diameter of the tire should almost be the same, which would mean it's not the diameter that's the issue. A 245/35/20 tire is 0.27% larger than the OEM 245/45/18 tire, which would hardly be the cause of decreased gas mileage.
to the OP what size tire do you have on your rims?
Last edited by twentyeggs; 06-30-2011 at 08:08 PM.
#10
I'm reading this thread and it's got me confused a bit. You're accounting for rim size and weight as a factor for the drastic reduction in gas mileage. Should, for arguments sake, he have 20' rims that are light weight (say, less than factory) wouldn't that help since, even though you have a rim that has more of a diameter to push, it's light weight and would theoretically require less energy??
(of course I do realize his rims are heavier, but I'm just trying to grasp the physics of this...something seems off)
(of course I do realize his rims are heavier, but I'm just trying to grasp the physics of this...something seems off)
#11
I'm reading this thread and it's got me confused a bit. You're accounting for rim size and weight as a factor for the drastic reduction in gas mileage. Should, for arguments sake, he have 20' rims that are light weight (say, less than factory) wouldn't that help since, even though you have a rim that has more of a diameter to push, it's light weight and would theoretically require less energy??
(of course I do realize his rims are heavier, but I'm just trying to grasp the physics of this...something seems off)
(of course I do realize his rims are heavier, but I'm just trying to grasp the physics of this...something seems off)
well yea, the lighter rims would help with MPG, but the larger diameter hits MPG more than weight does..
so say his rim were 15 lbs each lighter that oem... he will be 60 lbs lighter and will gain (for arguments sake) 1 mpg, the larger wheel diameter is still taking away 10 mpg, so he ends up with 9 mpg total that he loses.
mpg is very fickle, infact going up a grade of only 5%. can hurt gas economy by a lot! even strong wind blowing at you can kill economy.
there was a mythbusters episode on drafting a truck for fuel economy. they got up to 60% better fuel economy basically because the truck took away wind resistance. that would give our cars like 45MPG.
when we are talking about putting any strain on the engine we are talking big changes. a larger wheel will do this.
#12
well yea, the lighter rims would help with MPG, but the larger diameter hits MPG more than weight does..
so say his rim were 15 lbs each lighter that oem... he will be 60 lbs lighter and will gain (for arguments sake) 1 mpg, the larger wheel diameter is still taking away 10 mpg, so he ends up with 9 mpg total that he loses.
mpg is very fickle, infact going up a grade of only 5%. can hurt gas economy by a lot! even strong wind blowing at you can kill economy.
there was a mythbusters episode on drafting a truck for fuel economy. they got up to 60% better fuel economy basically because the truck took away wind resistance. that would give our cars like 45MPG.
when we are talking about putting any strain on the engine we are talking big changes. a larger wheel will do this.
so say his rim were 15 lbs each lighter that oem... he will be 60 lbs lighter and will gain (for arguments sake) 1 mpg, the larger wheel diameter is still taking away 10 mpg, so he ends up with 9 mpg total that he loses.
mpg is very fickle, infact going up a grade of only 5%. can hurt gas economy by a lot! even strong wind blowing at you can kill economy.
there was a mythbusters episode on drafting a truck for fuel economy. they got up to 60% better fuel economy basically because the truck took away wind resistance. that would give our cars like 45MPG.
when we are talking about putting any strain on the engine we are talking big changes. a larger wheel will do this.
#13
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
The size of the tires slips my mind but I recall that the diameter is very slightly LARGER than factory which should bring down the rpms slightly at any given speed - 255 35 20 is what I recall the size of the tires (I didnt drive it to work today so I cant check at the moment).
#15
#16
The size of the tires slips my mind but I recall that the diameter is very slightly LARGER than factory which should bring down the rpms slightly at any given speed - 255 35 20 is what I recall the size of the tires (I didnt drive it to work today so I cant check at the moment).
#17
I regularly drive from So Cal to Nor Cal and I get a stated 30 mpg on my OEM fuel computer. I drive about the same speed each time and i take the same route. Since the last trip, I got 20" rims which are heavier 15 lbs each maybe), I installed my RLM bumper, and I made a lower trey to go under the bumper and part of the engine compartment. Also, I was carrying more weigh in the form of my daughter, her luggage, and my bowling ball (total of about 170 lbs). This time I got 20 mpg!!!! That's a difference of 33%!!! Could it be the extra weight? Is the engine running rich? O2 sensors??? Any idea as to what would cause a sudden drop in mileage like this?
#18
I had 20" rims for 5 yrs on my max n I get 20 mpg. I thought somethin wrong with the engine, but nope that my 20" rim lol. Im thinking off putting back my stock 17" wheels on the max maybe, so I can get all my peformance back until next year I get 20" vossen cvcs 3 wheel (hope).
#19
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
Deus, If anyone would know the answer to this I thought it would be you. You autocross in your Max and you put on smaller diameter tires because it takes less power to accelerate with all of the science behind unsrung weight, Rotational mass, inertia, etc. which means better efficiency of the drivetrain. Thats why you don't see race cars, F1, Nascar, LeMans, etc riding on 20's.
#20
I know, but I have always known you to be on top of these kind of questions, not to mention the aerodynamics of the Max to squeeze the most out of it. Still love your black and red theme- Timeless. Later.
#21
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
Thanks. Appreciate the kind words. The 20s are the opposite way I have been going since they are heavy but they help raise up the car a little. I know that my lighter rims help performance and mileage but I wondered if the heavier rims made that much of a difference. Im going to try to get my lighter rims on the car when it cools off and see how the mileage is affected and report back here.
#23
How much wider were the tires on the 20 rims compared to the stock 18? the more tire in contact with the road the better traction but you also lose mpg. that along with weight. if you could put 205's on car would get better mpg with less rolling resistance and really ***tty handling. Also are the larger diameter wheels affecting the computer in some way? just my few thoughts
#24
Your cars computer calculates gas milage buy each mile driven. With larger diameter wheels it will throw your speedo off the ECM programmed specs. Thus milage will suffer. Ill bet your off by say, 2mph nominal. This should calculate to aprox. 22%. Check your speedo by your gps if you have 1.
#26
Yes Nissan engineers need to go back to school. Mine always says i am getting 23.4 mpg yet when i check at pump it is more like 21.7, however it is better when doing a trip with all highway driving. I have to say family members who have had Chryslers over the years, those computers calculate mpg better.
#27
My i35's onboard computer says like 33.5 to 36 mpg at 65 mph freeway. At pump when i do the math I get about 22 to 26. I don't drive it like I stole it alot. I like my tranny. Oh and don't have 2,500 large for a new one. Lmao
Last edited by infiniti medic; 11-14-2011 at 06:52 AM.
#29
Sounds like you got some heavy *** wheels! Happened to me unfortunately most aftermarket 20" wheels aren't manufactured with performance in mind since the "big rim" crowd is in it for the "hey look at me" result. I did have some MPW 20s that were really light compared to other 20s but trying to keep the same diameter as stock or close to it with rubberband tires the ride was terrible! Even switching from some motegi 18s to stock felt way better and yielded better mpg and performance. That's why now I stay away from aftermarket rims, unless they are up their with stock or better in terms of quality and performance, which is usually when wheels get crazy expensive.
#30
Bigger doesn't automatically mean heavier. My 19" Nismos are somehere around 19 lbs, far lighter then stock offerings.
Quality rims are lighter by default but come with a hefty price tag. From what I've seen for most people around the city the bigger the better no matter the sacrifice. I've seen rims where you couldn't pay me to "wear them"
Quality rims are lighter by default but come with a hefty price tag. From what I've seen for most people around the city the bigger the better no matter the sacrifice. I've seen rims where you couldn't pay me to "wear them"
#32
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
My tires are 255s so only 10mm wider. The diameter of the tires are actually slightly larger than stock so technically, all things being equal, my gas mileage should be better because the rpms at a given speed is going to be slightly less. I know these rims are quite heavy and the only reason I got them was because they look good and they raise up the car a little so the front bumper doesnt scrape so much. I suspect its the weight of the rims. What I should do is install the older lighter 18s and run it around and see if the mileage improves.
#33
You will gain your mileage back if you put the 18s back on had 20s and when switched to 18s gained the least of 50 miles to the tank in the city a 17-20% increase and highway way even better....
#34
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 7,353
Problem solved. I looked under my car the other day and saw an O2 sensor wire resting on the exhaust pipe. I think it melted on the pipe and was shorting out. I mounted it high above the pipe. I then got the same good gas mileage I was getting before - high 20s to low 30s on highway and high teens to low 20s in the city. I think the city mileage is not as good as it used to be cuz of the heavier dubs but its close.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
12-20-2021 06:57 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
06-06-2017 02:01 PM