Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking Talk about suspension geometry, advanced handling/chassis setup, custom brakes, etc. NOT your basic brake pads and "best drop" Information.

5th gen adjustable traction bars are now available

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2007, 05:20 PM
  #1  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
5th gen adjustable traction bars are now available

check out my for sale thread

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....31#post6127431




I decided to start a group buy list. If I get 10 or more confirmed orders by January 7th 2008, the shipping and handling cost will be dropped. If I don't get 10 confirmed orders by then then the price will still be $220 including shipping and handling.


1. Doublea
2. secondtonone317
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Last edited by absoundlab; 12-17-2007 at 09:37 AM.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 05:41 PM
  #2  
I R The Law
iTrader: (39)
 
The Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,094
In for what the guru's have to say.
The Law is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 06:57 PM
  #3  
I'm watching you, boy...
iTrader: (21)
 
SilverGLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,262
^ Ditto.
SilverGLE is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 07:02 PM
  #4  
Turbo'd Saab
iTrader: (17)
 
DrunkieTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 35,838
They look very nice and look very useful, for an every day 5th gen this could prove useful for guys who are FI and those who are manual and don't have and LSD tranny I guess this could be useful. This will tighten up the front end and prove to help in the aid of take offs, they tend to be found in big SUVs and High powered Rear wheel drive cars, as they help to keep the wheels planted in the ground
DrunkieTheBear is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 07:46 PM
  #5  
nycnissans
iTrader: (12)
 
secondtonone317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,596
so whats the science behind this? how does it work?
secondtonone317 is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 08:17 PM
  #6  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The traction bars connect the lower control arm, which is a movable part, to the lower radiator support, which is a stable part. When you accelerate, the lower control arm wants to pull backwards and causes wheel hop, and a loss of traction. The traction bar prevents the lower control arm from moving backwards which eliminates wheel hop and greatly improves traction upon acceleration and shifting.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:26 PM
  #7  
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
irish44j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 27,289
odd that JClaw wasn't able to come up with a good 5th gen setup after all the 4th gen bars he made....
irish44j is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 08:31 PM
  #8  
nycnissans
iTrader: (12)
 
secondtonone317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,596
Originally Posted by absoundlab
The traction bars connect the lower control arm, which is a movable part, to the lower radiator support, which is a stable part. When you accelerate, the lower control arm wants to pull backwards and causes wheel hop, and a loss of traction. The traction bar prevents the lower control arm from moving backwards which eliminates wheel hop and greatly improves traction upon acceleration and shifting.
is the rad support strong enough to hold this force? I would think the rad support would flex......no?
secondtonone317 is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 08:37 PM
  #9  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
the main lower radiator support is a very large and sturdy frame piece. the amount of force that is going to be exerted on the radiator support is no where near enough to flex or twist it. most traction bars that exist on the market connect to the lower radiator support
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:41 PM
  #10  
nycnissans
iTrader: (12)
 
secondtonone317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,596
Originally Posted by absoundlab
the main lower radiator support is a very large and sturdy frame piece. the amount of force that is going to be exerted on the radiator support is no where near enough to flex or twist it. most traction bars that exist on the market connect to the lower radiator support
makes sense......sorry for the newbie like question but I never understood these things, thanks for clearing that up
secondtonone317 is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 08:53 PM
  #11  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
no problem, there are no stupid questions with a part like this.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 10:13 PM
  #12  
L.M.L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by absoundlab
The traction bars connect the lower control arm, which is a movable part, to the lower radiator support, which is a stable part. When you accelerate, the lower control arm wants to pull backwards and causes wheel hop, and a loss of traction. The traction bar prevents the lower control arm from moving backwards which eliminates wheel hop and greatly improves traction upon acceleration and shifting.
to my knowledge, in FWD cars LCAs don't "pull backwards" while accelerating.
if front wheels pull, what's the vector of the force?
 
Old 12-10-2007, 10:33 PM
  #13  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well first of all you are incorrect, LCAs do have pull no matter what kind of drive the vehicle is. As long as there is friction between the tires and ground there will be pull. Second of all, it is impossible to measure the force without knowing the strength of each individual engine and transmission mount, the tire traction rating, the road conditions, the exact weight of the vehicle, the vehicle's weight displacement, the amount of torque and horsepower, the size of the wheels and so on. If you are just trying to disprove the effectiveness of traction bars in general, you will not be able to. If it was a legitimate question then there is your answer.
 
Old 12-11-2007, 05:27 AM
  #14  
L.M.L.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by absoundlab
Well first of all you are incorrect, LCAs do have pull no matter what kind of drive the vehicle is. As long as there is friction between the tires and ground there will be pull. Second of all, it is impossible to measure the force without knowing the strength of each individual engine and transmission mount, the tire traction rating, the road conditions, the exact weight of the vehicle, the vehicle's weight displacement, the amount of torque and horsepower, the size of the wheels and so on. If you are just trying to disprove the effectiveness of traction bars in general, you will not be able to. If it was a legitimate question then there is your answer.
tht's my point exactly. while accelerating, a forwad thrust applied to the LCAs (from wheels that PULL forward), so they tend to move FORWARD in this case, NOT backward. It all reverses tho when brakes are used. please don't ***_u_me that everyone is stupid here.
 
Old 12-11-2007, 05:58 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Yeah I was wondering why you said the LCAs were pulled rearward.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:12 AM
  #16  
nycnissans
iTrader: (12)
 
secondtonone317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,596
if the wheel spins forward.......the LCA would shift backward...........unless you're launching in reverse, its like a pencil standing on its eraser. If you hit the bottom of the pencil forward the top will fall backwards. Same concept when you launch forward the contact patch of the tire = the bottom of the pencil and the LCA is the top of the pencil.....
secondtonone317 is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:32 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Originally Posted by secondtonone317
if the wheel spins forward.......the LCA would shift backward...........unless you're launching in reverse, its like a pencil standing on its eraser. If you hit the bottom of the pencil forward the top will fall backwards. Same concept when you launch forward the contact patch of the tire = the bottom of the pencil and the LCA is the top of the pencil.....
That is not quite correct.

I will leave you with this: The LCAs are the main point of longitudinal linkage between the drive wheels and the chassis. If the LCAs are shifting rearward then they are pushing the car rearward. What, then, is accelerating the car forward?

Last edited by MorpheusZero; 12-11-2007 at 06:37 AM.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:00 AM
  #18  
nycnissans
iTrader: (12)
 
secondtonone317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,596
I think they'll work.........but cant prove it until springtime. My car is in pieces.
secondtonone317 is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:19 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
No one's saying they won't work, they perform the same function--limiting longitudinal movement of the LCA. However the LCA is not being pulled back by the wheels when you launch. It is being pulled forward and then oscillating backward when the wheel hops off the ground.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 08:14 AM
  #20  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
The rad support is more than strong enough for this. Do the bars attach to the hole in the middle of the 5th gen control arm? (they pass over or under the control arm?)
JClaw is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 08:28 AM
  #21  
Lightly modded
iTrader: (32)
 
95maxrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 7,679
Originally Posted by JClaw
The rad support is more than strong enough for this. Do the bars attach to the hole in the middle of the 5th gen control arm? (they pass over or under the control arm?)
Not knocking you or anyone in here, but my rad supports have bent a slight amount after installing your TB's....I'm thinking of getting them reinforced or getting stronger metal welded in there to support them better.
95maxrider is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 09:05 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Yeah, depending on where you secure the traction bars there will be some suspension binding upon compression and decompression, and this could possibly bend your rad support a bit or mush up your LCA bushings (less likely since it will be pulling away from them if you set the length of the TBs as neutral for static ride height). If there was a way to secure the traction bars on or close to the axis of the LCA bushing pin it would solve that problem.

Unfortunately though it has been awhile since I have been under my car so I don't know how doable that is.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 04:32 PM
  #23  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well now that we have everyones opinion, I think we can all agree that they work. If you would like to buy a set please post a reply or PM me thank you.
 
Old 12-11-2007, 06:37 PM
  #24  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Matt93SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
Originally Posted by secondtonone317
if the wheel spins forward.......the LCA would shift backward...........unless you're launching in reverse, its like a pencil standing on its eraser. If you hit the bottom of the pencil forward the top will fall backwards. Same concept when you launch forward the contact patch of the tire = the bottom of the pencil and the LCA is the top of the pencil.....
Time to take a refresher in statics.
you're forgetting one part and messing up another.
1. the wheel is rotating about the axle, which is connected to the rest of the car via a bearing. thus there is no rotational forces anywhere but on the engine/transmission and driven wheels.
2. the control arms are between the axis of rotation and the ground.

when the wheels push forward, the forces will be pushing the entire car forward. there is no backwards force anywhere on the front end of the car. (the rears will have a small rearward force due to friction in the bearings and against the road, but that's not the point of the discussion).

since the axle transfers rotational torque into forward force, it is the point where all of the forward force acts on the car. The large majority-around 95%- of the forward force will be on the control arms, with the additional 5% at the top of the strut.

Back to the real discussion here. The traction bars have proven themselves on the 4th gens many times over. with the exception of a couple small design changes I might suggest with them to beef up the radiator support, they work extremely well.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:48 PM
  #25  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the input Matt.
 
Old 12-11-2007, 07:07 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Way to be concise Matt.

Anyway I'd like to see a photo of beneath the car with these installed to get in mind how they are mounted. I've always been iffy on traction bars because they bind the suspension, but if we can fix that by connecting them on-axis with the LCA bushing pin then the arcs of travel would match up and there really wouldn't be a downside.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 08:25 PM
  #27  
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
irish44j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 27,289
my radiator support is so rusty where the motor support frame attaches......
irish44j is offline  
Old 12-11-2007, 08:42 PM
  #28  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
michaelnyden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,431
matt or irish, how do you see these helping on the autocross course...? I'm curious to see your take on this mod for racing...would it add any bumpsteer or do you think it would actively prevent unwanted toe changes?
michaelnyden is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 12:32 PM
  #29  
Turbo'd Saab
iTrader: (17)
 
DrunkieTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 35,838
Originally Posted by irish44j
my radiator support is so rusty where the motor support frame attaches......
same here, I welded a second Steel bar in there to cover the rust and also did some repairs to the severe areas.

I see this working very well for the guys who drag, but with the guys who autoX, I see this creating understeer and not helping with turn in, but I think the little we scarifice for that we will it help when we exit the corners and lay into the throttle it will benefit there. So the trade off then is even.
DrunkieTheBear is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 12:57 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
I'd definitely like a set, it should make the front end more solid.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 04:41 PM
  #31  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is a picture to show the clearance of the oil filter from the traction bar on a maxima that is lowered 3 inches.


This is a picture of the clearance with a 18 inch rim with a 245/40/18 tire turned all the way until full lock.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 04:44 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Nice. What's the offset on that wheel?
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 04:46 PM
  #33  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I decided to start a group buy list. If I get 10 or more confirmed orders by January 7th 2008, the shipping and handling cost will be dropped. If I don't get 10 confirmed orders by then then the price will still be $220 including shipping and handling.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Last edited by absoundlab; 12-12-2007 at 05:20 PM.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 04:49 PM
  #34  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The rim in that picture is a 42mm offset, which puts the tires closer to the traction bar but you still have plenty of clearance. If you have a lower offset rim then you'll have even more clearance than the picture shows.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 05:06 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
I am glad to see these being made again, maybe sometime you can make some for 4th gens.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 05:15 PM
  #36  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
4th gen traction bars are currently in R&D
 
Old 12-12-2007, 05:26 PM
  #37  
Driving is the next best thing
iTrader: (3)
 
DrKlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,023
Is it me, or traction bars cause some serious bumpsteer??

Basically, traction bar is essentially a solid bar that prevents the LCA move forward and backward. (the bar will not stretch or compress) So when the car goes over a bump (or suspension compresses in the corner) the with traction bars on, LCA (and the hub) moves upwards in a circular motion around the radiator support, instead of going straight up,(looking at the car from the side) thus pushing the LCA backward and changing toe.

Do you guys get what I'm saying?
DrKlop is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 05:34 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Originally Posted by DrKlop
Is it me, or traction bars cause some serious bumpsteer??

Basically, traction bar is essentially a solid bar that prevents the LCA move forward and backward. (the bar will not stretch or compress) So when the car goes over a bump (or suspension compresses in the corner) the with traction bars on, LCA (and the hub) moves upwards in a circular motion around the radiator support, instead of going straight up,(looking at the car from the side) thus pushing the LCA backward and changing toe.

Do you guys get what I'm saying?
This is what I have been saying for the past 4 posts. The arcs of travel do not match up unless the t-bar is secured along the axis of the LCA bushing pin. If we can do that then there is no downside to these.
MorpheusZero is offline  
Old 12-12-2007, 05:39 PM
  #39  
absoundlab
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The theory behind what you are saying makes perfect sense, but like I said I have fully road tested the traction bars on two different Maximas and have not seen any problems and certainly no bump steer.
 
Old 12-12-2007, 05:56 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
MorpheusZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,107
Well, when you look at it, the length of the traction bars compared to the length of the arm between the LCA swivel point and the LCA-tbar connection point means that there will be little fore-aft or left-right travel compared to suspension movement.

It'd be nice if a few people who've had traction bars long-term chimed in here.
MorpheusZero is offline  


Quick Reply: 5th gen adjustable traction bars are now available



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:43 AM.