Its Alive!!!!
12-28-2004, 08:26 PM
#83
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
with full bolt ons and slicks....very low 13's maybe
SR20DEN already went a 13.19 and that was a 3.5 in a 5th gen.
I expect tilley could possibly get it to go a little faster than that.
Good job man. 
:bash:
12-29-2004, 10:49 AM
#89
Well #s are in 
didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
12-29-2004, 10:52 AM
#90
Originally Posted by TILLEYS99
Well #s are in didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
12-29-2004, 05:42 PM
#92
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Originally Posted by UNCDooD
SR20DEN already went a 13.19 and that was a 3.5 in a 5th gen. I expect tilley could possibly get it to go a little faster than that.
I expect tilley could possibly get it to go a little faster than that.
12-30-2004, 08:26 AM
#95
Originally Posted by TILLEYS99
Well #s are in didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
01-04-2005, 11:11 AM
#98
What did your AFR look like?
2K2 injectors/rail, but return style fuel lines?
2K2 injectors/rail, but return style fuel lines?
Originally Posted by TILLEYS99
Well #s are in didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
didnt gain much peak power but did gain alot of mid range (20whp/26tq between 4.2 and 5.2k). 232.79whp 230.09tq. 2k2 manifold has poor flow compared to the 00VI both HP/Tq dropped after 5.5k so there is more power to gain especially on top end.
05-07-2005, 03:48 PM
#102
3K to do this? Its worth driving out there from california! How many days would it be out of operation, about? This beats super/turbo charging in my book.
PS yes, Im reviving the thread... I'd be down to get this done professionally
PS yes, Im reviving the thread... I'd be down to get this done professionally
05-07-2005, 09:20 PM
#105
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
^^ Same here, but instead of the car needing to be inoperable, I have a different dilema, $$. I have the 03 to drive around, jsut need the 3k ..
05-09-2005, 07:43 AM
#107
Disco Biscuit
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,791
Originally Posted by deezo
Just put a little away at a time. That's what I'm doing. Most of my funds takes care of the family so I really don't have the cash unless I don't pay my mortgage for a couple of months.
05-21-2005, 07:36 PM
#110
A couple question about this:
If I did this:
I would be ok keeping the JWT ECU (cali spec, 5-spd still, obviously)??
I would get the 00vi intake as well?
If the answer to both would be yes, that would put me in the very strange position of being OK with my engine blowing up. Straight neener-neener twilight zone mode....
If I did this:
I would be ok keeping the JWT ECU (cali spec, 5-spd still, obviously)??
I would get the 00vi intake as well?
If the answer to both would be yes, that would put me in the very strange position of being OK with my engine blowing up. Straight neener-neener twilight zone mode....
06-01-2005, 09:57 AM
#113
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 16
Does anyone use a stand alone to resolve the ECUs problems ???
With a standalone controlling the spark/timing and fuel system, this can be the ultimate answer.
Some brand offers programmable outputs to controls things like, variable intake manifold, H2o injection or even nitrous.
With a standalone, the VQ35 N/A can be run to his best potentiel .!!!
With a standalone controlling the spark/timing and fuel system, this can be the ultimate answer.
Some brand offers programmable outputs to controls things like, variable intake manifold, H2o injection or even nitrous.
With a standalone, the VQ35 N/A can be run to his best potentiel .!!!
06-01-2005, 12:43 PM
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
what things were switched over to make this swap work...and if using the 3.5 ecu what is necessary to get it to work with a 4th gen accessories and ish
06-02-2005, 11:58 AM
#116
Originally Posted by JClaw
Just use the 1995 Fuel Pressure Regulator at the end of the 3.5 fuel rail. Some grinding at both ends. It's a 5 minute deal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
njmaxseltd
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
15
01-21-2003 11:31 AM
ny96max
Audio and Electronics
9
12-28-2001 11:46 PM