Maxima Forums

Maxima Forums (https://maxima.org/forums/)
-   Dyno Discussion and Slips (https://maxima.org/forums/dyno-discussion-slips-33/)
-   -   Dyno'd two 5.5 gens today (https://maxima.org/forums/dyno-discussion-slips/546359-dynod-two-5-5-gens-today.html)

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 03:52 PM

Dyno'd two 5.5 gens today
 
OK...so me first. I have an 03 se AUTO :( These are the best two runs for me. During both runs, the front part of the stock intake was taken off (attached close to grill on chassis). On second run, i took off the filter holder also and left filter sitting in. Didnt think that small hole would make a diff since i already had the front taken off but i was wrong. I was told the car was pinging though...im not sure why since i run 93 octane. ANYWAYS, my only mod is the GAB. Runs were done is 3rd gear.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/e...tdynos1129.jpg


Now the 6spd. Belongs to my boy, he goes by shady33e on the forums. His only mod is a berk intake. On the first run he let off on the gas so thats the reason for the drop. Pretty much the same numbers on both runs. Runs were done in 4th gear.

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/e...obestdynos.jpg

Sooooo...what does everybody think?

DasYears Nov 29, 2007 04:02 PM

seems like inflated numbers on the 6spd....very

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 04:15 PM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6100279)
seems like inflated numbers on the 6spd....very

Just because your car didnt dyno that high with just an intake doesnt mean you have to hate :rolleyes: streetzlegend and 95blkmax can back me up as they were there. I also posted them as SAE not STD which gives lower numbers. Trust me i thought these numbers were high as well but as he went first and i went after, my numbers are about right sooooo....he has a factory freak what can i say :D

NmexMAX Nov 29, 2007 04:38 PM

Got runfiles? :naughty:

Numbers seem about right for the Auto, a little high for the 6MT, BUT, since they were done on the machine, those 6MT #'s aren't inflated IMO. They are what they are.

What kind of wheel/tire is everybody rocking?


STD #’s don’t ALWAYS give higher #’s. It depends on the RH, but I know fellas are in a place where RH is horrific, so yeah, in your case, the STD #’s will definitely be higher.

95BLKMAX Nov 29, 2007 04:44 PM

yea I can second these. I've done my last bunch of dynos at this same shop and my #s are right where they should be.

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 04:48 PM

Yea i have all the runfiles. We both have the stock se 17's. I Have falken ze-912's and he has yokohamas of some sort. My tires were at 31 psi if that makes any difference.

DasYears Nov 29, 2007 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by ShIft_uR FacE (Post 6100300)
Just because your car didnt dyno that high with just an intake doesnt mean you have to hate :rolleyes:

not hating, just saying theyre high, relax. and i never dyno'd with just an intake, so dont hate

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 04:53 PM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6100395)
not hating, just saying theyre high, relax. and i never dyno'd with just an intake, so dont hate

lol touche.

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 05:06 PM


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6100370)
Got runfiles? :naughty:

Numbers seem about right for the Auto, a little high for the 6MT, BUT, since they were done on the machine, those 6MT #'s aren't inflated IMO. They are what they are.

What kind of wheel/tire is everybody rocking?


STD #’s don’t ALWAYS give higher #’s. It depends on the RH, but I know fellas are in a place where RH is horrific, so yeah, in your case, the STD #’s will definitely be higher.

So should i stick with the SAE graph numbers or STD? (lol) You're the man I need to ask...besides headers (for power), what would be the next best mod to do? I was thinking either TS ECU or LR MAF with AFC...opinions?

DasYears Nov 29, 2007 05:36 PM


Originally Posted by ShIft_uR FacE (Post 6100431)
TS ECU or LR MAF with AFC...opinions?

well the TS would be best combined with an SSIM to make the best use of the extended rev limiter. IMO (yeah i know im not nmex) i would go with the LRMAF and AFC because it will get you better power at the curent rev limit and the LRMAF will help you out even more when you go the the TS.

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 29, 2007 06:21 PM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6100486)
well the TS would be best combined with an SSIM to make the best use of the extended rev limiter. IMO (yeah i know im not nmex) i would go with the LRMAF and AFC because it will get you better power at the curent rev limit and the LRMAF will help you out even more when you go the the TS.

I asked for Nmex's advice because he has an auto and an extensive modlist BUT everyones opinion counts. Thank you :D Have you had any experience with either mentioned items?

Shady33e Nov 29, 2007 07:55 PM

isnt there another run where it shows my highest hp @ 228.75 and torque 236 lol goddamnit...

and yea i swear to god all i got is a berk intake w/ AEM filter...

Shady33e Nov 29, 2007 08:13 PM

oh....nvm i guess its different with sea# and std#s....

DasYears Nov 29, 2007 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by ShIft_uR FacE (Post 6100582)
I asked for Nmex's advice because he has an auto

i know, i was just pullin your leg


Originally Posted by ShIft_uR FacE (Post 6100582)
Have you had any experience with either mentioned items?

i have a BBMAF, its not LR but the same idea. i cant really state my experience because mine is considerably different from everyone else's. where as most people go very lean, my car richened up to about 10:1 afr. using the afc i have corrections as high as -12. but the dyno's ive seen point to what i told you above

gtr_rider Nov 29, 2007 11:04 PM

I have the LRMAF when youre ready.. :wavey:

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 12:46 AM

In the past, LRMAF has shown great responsiveness, but not great peak power. In then end, my throttle response was/is better than you think, anyhow, there has been trivial evidence on this mod, so, my advice is: if you have an AFC, Do eeeeiiit! if not, do more researchm and in the end j00's makes moar whp than teh Nmex. :sadpace:

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 01:19 AM


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6101720)
in the end j00's makes moar whp than teh Nmex. :sadpace:

nono, shift was asking and he's auto

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 01:26 AM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6101755)
nono, shift was asking and he's auto

> j00..


:wall:

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 01:28 AM

not with those mods...but maybe in the future

PS: z33 injectors to be in on dec 10th, driving/AF tuning impressions to follow.

ShIft_uR FacE Nov 30, 2007 08:16 AM

I guess LRMAF it is for now. I dont have an AFC so...vafc or safc? I understand the vafc has more tuning points but can they be used properly on the max? Also, would you guys recommend the same for the 6spd or a different approach? Thanks.

95BLKMAX Nov 30, 2007 09:16 AM

Dont use the VAFC if you know you're going to change the MAF. No adjustment for MAF IN/OUT. So you'd have to add fuel across the board. Where as with an SAFC you can just change the MAF IN and the SAFC (be it the 1 or the 2, preferably the 2 for more tuning points) interpolates the corrections for ya and its just easier to deal with

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 09:16 AM

SAFC makes the LRMAF easier to 'tune', but SAFC does have more 'tuning' points (vs VAFCII). IMO, SAFC would be the way to go (less headaches re: LARMAF)

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 10:41 AM

when i tried this with my VAFC-2 it seemed like 6 and 4 made a 2pt difference. not sure which way (6 in, 4 out or 4 in, 6 out) went more rich since it was a lot harder to get info on this than i thought. but there is DEF an MAF correction. my guess is people havent gotten it to work because the correction is either too much or too little for them. its not like its hard to tune part throttle and idle with it, i have my car running pretty lean on part throttle and everytime i check it the part throttle readings are right where i want them. i dont doubt its easier with the safc, i just think if you are willing to spend some time getting it right that the vafc would be better cause of the many correction points

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6102746)
when i tried this:russ::russ::russ:

Yeah, hence the headache comment.


So, how lean are you @ part throttle?

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6102761)
So, how lean are you @ part throttle?


not SUPER lean, but ive been trying to make sure that when it first goes into open loop @ part throttle that im getting leaner than 14.6:1 as opposed to the 12:1 i used to get. BTW, the throttle response is a lot better now too

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 11:00 AM

I hover @ 15:1 part throttle. :gotme:

I was 'raw' tuning re: LRMAF before SR told me to change the in out settings. It's a :mad: to tune that way but it is possible, but how important are those extra 12 points? 95BLK has proved that it's not THAT important since he only has 8 points. :ben:

BTW:
I MIGHT dyno tomorrow, BUT, I have 'detuned' so :slant:

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6102802)
I hover @ 15:1 part throttle.

awesome, guess im going to go a good deal leaner soon. i already noticed a pretty nice increase in mileage, can hardly imagine getting more


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6102802)
how important are those extra 12 points?

all i know is that anytime i go out with the WBO2 i wish i had a point every 50-100 rpm. probly just one of those things, once you go 24 points you dont go back.

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 01:13 PM

Still, AFC is a rough tune, meaning even if 2 runs were identical(same run/load/% correction), the AFR wouldn't always be flat/same as each other, since the MAF is reading airflow and it has a lot to do w/ atmospheric conditions.

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 01:53 PM

yeah, that it is. also depends a lot on how warm the car is. cold my car is running 14.2 WOT, but warm its 13.7...huge difference. unfortunately the next level up in accuracy is something like an EMU, and thats a big step

Shady33e Nov 30, 2007 06:44 PM

i guess my next mod should be those phelonic spacers...

NmexMAX Nov 30, 2007 06:52 PM

That was random :gotme:

DasYears Nov 30, 2007 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by Shady33e (Post 6104571)
i guess my next mod should be those phelonic spacers...

not if youre looking for raw power

streetzlegend Nov 30, 2007 08:15 PM

I second that Shady's numbers are accurate, came across him on the street(few days before the dyno), his car pulls pretty hard for being basically stock. So the 'inflated' numbers are accurate with how the car performs.

Shady33e Dec 1, 2007 10:45 AM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6104635)
not if youre looking for raw power

wut do u mean raw power...wut should i look into instead?

and if i do spend $500+ im going to invest into springs/struts first...
S-techs and iluminas, then cattman headers/ypipe


Originally Posted by NmexMAX (Post 6104614)
That was random :gotme:

lol its cuz i raced last nite my friends 06 WRX non-sti but still with mods (exhaust, wastegate, boost controller, idk wut else) and from a 30 roll we were neck to neck untill he shifted and since he has turbo lag i got ahead once i kicked into 3rd, i was lik a car ahead...and supposably his car needs tuning...

so he wants to rematch again soon after he 'tunes'...i need more power lol

btw sorry i dont hav a video but ima keep my digital camera in my car for next time

DasYears Dec 1, 2007 01:21 PM


Originally Posted by Shady33e (Post 6106146)
wut do u mean raw power...wut should i look into instead?

i mean there are things out there that will get you a lot more (headers basically, some pretty cheap tuning tricks to get power,...). the phenolic spacers are good for midrange power, but you dont really get anything at the top. its mostly just good for lowering the IM temps

Zack342 Dec 3, 2007 10:56 AM


Originally Posted by DasYears (Post 6100279)
seems like inflated numbers on the 6spd....very

Probally because they dynoed in 4th. 5th gear would have been better and resulted in 1:1.

nismology Dec 3, 2007 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by Zack342 (Post 6109932)
Probally because they dynoed in 4th. 5th gear would have been better and resulted in 1:1.

4th is the closest to 1:1 with FWD 6-speeds.

00SEMAX19 Dec 3, 2007 05:17 PM

Either way, those are great numbers for that 6-speed. Good job on getting the back to back comparison of your cars.

DasYears Dec 3, 2007 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by nismology (Post 6110029)
4th is the closest to 1:1 with FWD 6-speeds.

+1, and dynoing in a gear lower than 1:1 would give lower #'s, not higher

NmexMAX Dec 3, 2007 05:44 PM

I dyno higher in 3rd (1:1), vs 2nd(1.545:1).

Originally Posted by DasYears
+1, and dynoing in a gear lower than 1:1 would give lower #'s, not higher



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands