Pro's and Con's of the famous multilink beam suspension
Pro's and Con's of the famous multilink beam suspension
Ne input into this topic i'm just kinda wondering what u guys thought were the pro's and con's about it
tried search but didn't come up with ne thing
tried search but didn't come up with ne thing
Pros-
1-Excellent cornering and camber on flat and smooth surfaces
2-Very lightweight
3-Simple design, yet very effective
4-More trunk room
5-Quicker turn-in
6-Generates better handling numbers on the skidpad and slalom than the 3rd gen...even though 3rd gen owners completely deny this
Cons-
1-Harsher ride
2-Rear end "wiggle" and pitching over uneven surfaces
3-Worse handling over bumpy surfaces
4-Higher NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) due to the tires being tied together
5-Doesn't take well to lowering springs (increases harshness, wiggle, and tendency to bottom out quicker)
Dave
1-Excellent cornering and camber on flat and smooth surfaces
2-Very lightweight
3-Simple design, yet very effective
4-More trunk room
5-Quicker turn-in
6-Generates better handling numbers on the skidpad and slalom than the 3rd gen...even though 3rd gen owners completely deny this

Cons-
1-Harsher ride
2-Rear end "wiggle" and pitching over uneven surfaces
3-Worse handling over bumpy surfaces
4-Higher NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) due to the tires being tied together
5-Doesn't take well to lowering springs (increases harshness, wiggle, and tendency to bottom out quicker)
Dave
A rear suspension only an Astro van owner could love 

Originally posted by Dave B
Pros-
6-Generates better handling numbers on the skidpad and slalom than the 3rd gen...even though 3rd gen owners completely deny this
Dave
Pros-
6-Generates better handling numbers on the skidpad and slalom than the 3rd gen...even though 3rd gen owners completely deny this

Dave
I love people (especially 3rd genners) who love to talk about how crappy the multi-beam is.
Well first of all, we're FWD with like a 62/38 distibution. Frankly it doesn't even matter, it's rigid enough, we wouldn't see any additional performance gains from independent except on uneven and bumpy terrain (terrain I avoid speeding around).
Not a day goes by that I'm ever even the slightest bit ****ed about the multibeam, I wouldn't pay $1 to change it, but that's my preference. I had a GSR before that was independent rear end, didn't care about that either.
What I would change if I could is LSD options on 5spds in the USA, and of course RWD, now that's some worthwild stuff.
Well first of all, we're FWD with like a 62/38 distibution. Frankly it doesn't even matter, it's rigid enough, we wouldn't see any additional performance gains from independent except on uneven and bumpy terrain (terrain I avoid speeding around).
Not a day goes by that I'm ever even the slightest bit ****ed about the multibeam, I wouldn't pay $1 to change it, but that's my preference. I had a GSR before that was independent rear end, didn't care about that either.
What I would change if I could is LSD options on 5spds in the USA, and of course RWD, now that's some worthwild stuff.
Originally posted by Dave B
Pros-
2-Very lightweight
Pros-
2-Very lightweight
Cons-
1-Harsher ride
4- Higher NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) due to the tires being tied together
Re: Pro's and Con's of the famous multilink beam suspension
Originally posted by 2K255HP
Ne input into this topic i'm just kinda wondering what u guys thought were the pro's and con's about it
tried search but didn't come up with ne thing
Ne input into this topic i'm just kinda wondering what u guys thought were the pro's and con's about it
tried search but didn't come up with ne thing
Con: An Oldsmobile Alero holds more g's on a skidpad than a Maxima, and is also quicker through the slalom.
Ok to the people that think the independent rear vs. beam doesnt matter since it is FWD *ahem* Brian *ahem* that is not true, you still have to turn correct? fwd or not you still have to turn correct? ok, so if the body is turning it is going to matter. It is good on "Flat" surfaces but start hitting the bumps like on a regular street and the independent will win.
Okay so IRS helps better on bumpy roads, and the 4th-5th gens rear beam suspension does better on smooth roads; therefore, 4th-5th gens handle better at the track correct? No wonder I dont see many 3rd gens getting as much honor as 4th-5th gens...
j/p.. all in good fun
j/p.. all in good fun
Actually the track is bumpy, I have yet to drive on a smooth road also. Just because the beam handles well on the smooth surface doesnt mean IRS doesnt handle just as well...Every true sports car has independent
Originally posted by dmontzmax
It is good on "Flat" surfaces but start hitting the bumps like on a regular street and the independent will win.
It is good on "Flat" surfaces but start hitting the bumps like on a regular street and the independent will win.
Dave
My fault dude, I thought he was talking the twisty track, not 1/4. The beam is more effective in the straight line, since it has less weight, just look at the mustang community
but the twisties out here have pot holes, etc...so do some of the 1/4 tracks.
but the twisties out here have pot holes, etc...so do some of the 1/4 tracks.
Originally posted by dmontzmax
My fault dude, I thought he was talking the twisty track, not 1/4. The beam is more effective in the straight line, since it has less weight, just look at the mustang community
but the twisties out here have pot holes, etc...so do some of the 1/4 tracks.
My fault dude, I thought he was talking the twisty track, not 1/4. The beam is more effective in the straight line, since it has less weight, just look at the mustang community
but the twisties out here have pot holes, etc...so do some of the 1/4 tracks.
.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
CAN-Toronto FS: Basement cleaning
knight_yyz
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
12
Nov 1, 2015 01:34 PM
JakeOfAllTrades
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
1
Sep 30, 2015 03:16 PM




