Couple pics of the turbo car taken with my buddy's Canon Eos 10D
Originally Posted by SpeedCrazie
Great Pictures, but NO engine pics FTL 
We took some, but trust me, the engine isn't nearly as good looking as the outside of the car. It's rather embarrassing honestly... I'll be working on that this winter when I totally rip everything out and redo basically every single thing under the hood.
that is so damn clean. the color is great too. My mind is made up, im getting a 97 front end. I dont htink i'll be able to keep it that shiney though, i dont know how yall keep the front kits and bumpers from getting weathered, my OEM on the 95 is DULL as hell.
You might notice the front lip has a big scrape in it... that's courtesy of my buddy brian a few weeks ago lol what a parking lot noob. The lip, front bumper, and front fenders are all getting fresh paint in the spring/summer next year because they aren't color matched perfectly, and rock chips are starting to take their toll anyways.
??!!?!?!?!
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
You might notice the front lip has a big scrape in it... that's courtesy of my buddy brian a few weeks ago lol what a parking lot noob. The lip, front bumper, and front fenders are all getting fresh paint in the spring/summer next year because they aren't color matched perfectly, and rock chips are starting to take their toll anyways.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
We took some, but trust me, the engine isn't nearly as good looking as the outside of the car. It's rather embarrassing honestly... I'll be working on that this winter when I totally rip everything out and redo basically every single thing under the hood.
Post 'em anyway!Nice pics, btw. I like your choice to stay with the stock orange corners, even though I hate them on my own CG2 car.
Is this the exif data you wanted?
This is for the hood up pic:
Canon EOS 10D
exposure .250s
Focal Length 38mm
35mm equivalent 61mm
f/5.6
iso 800
For the 2nd pic I posted:
15.0s
focal length 10mm
f/9.5
35mm equiv 16mm
iso 400
for the pic with me as a ghost in it:
6.0s
focal length 10mm
f/4.0
35mm equivalent 16mm
iso 400
for the still pic with the parking lights on:
30s
10mm
equiv 16mm
f/19.0
iso 400
for the moving pic:
0.500s
10mm
f/4.0
16mm
iso 400
This is for the hood up pic:
Canon EOS 10D
exposure .250s
Focal Length 38mm
35mm equivalent 61mm
f/5.6
iso 800
For the 2nd pic I posted:
15.0s
focal length 10mm
f/9.5
35mm equiv 16mm
iso 400
for the pic with me as a ghost in it:
6.0s
focal length 10mm
f/4.0
35mm equivalent 16mm
iso 400
for the still pic with the parking lights on:
30s
10mm
equiv 16mm
f/19.0
iso 400
for the moving pic:
0.500s
10mm
f/4.0
16mm
iso 400
Originally Posted by kingrukus
Post pics of the HLH0501 monster creation.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Is this the exif data you wanted?
This is for the hood up pic:
Canon EOS 10D
exposure .250s
Focal Length 38mm
35mm equivalent 61mm
f/5.6
iso 800
For the 2nd pic I posted:
15.0s
focal length 10mm
f/9.5
35mm equiv 16mm
iso 400
for the pic with me as a ghost in it:
6.0s
focal length 10mm
f/4.0
35mm equivalent 16mm
iso 400
for the still pic with the parking lights on:
30s
10mm
equiv 16mm
f/19.0
iso 400
for the moving pic:
0.500s
10mm
f/4.0
16mm
iso 400
This is for the hood up pic:
Canon EOS 10D
exposure .250s
Focal Length 38mm
35mm equivalent 61mm
f/5.6
iso 800
For the 2nd pic I posted:
15.0s
focal length 10mm
f/9.5
35mm equiv 16mm
iso 400
for the pic with me as a ghost in it:
6.0s
focal length 10mm
f/4.0
35mm equivalent 16mm
iso 400
for the still pic with the parking lights on:
30s
10mm
equiv 16mm
f/19.0
iso 400
for the moving pic:
0.500s
10mm
f/4.0
16mm
iso 400
Nealoc187, it seems that you are using a tripod for these nightshots. I just want to mention that the iso is set kinda high. With the stationary shots, you should use the lowest iso possible (100). The shutter speed will increase due to the lower sensitivity. The pro of this is: the pictures show a lot less graininess. You can only see it slightly in these minimized internet pictures, but if you look at the original photo at full 100% size, you will see the graininess. The pictures are awesome, IMO. Always room for improvment.
Originally Posted by whazzzzuup
Nealoc187, it seems that you are using a tripod for these nightshots. I just want to mention that the iso is set kinda high. With the stationary shots, you should use the lowest iso possible (100). The shutter speed will increase due to the lower sensitivity. The pro of this is: the pictures show a lot less graininess. You can only see it slightly in these minimized internet pictures, but if you look at the original photo at full 100% size, you will see the graininess. The pictures are awesome, IMO. Always room for improvment.
im not the one taking the pics, but i will pass the info along to my buddy - he's always looking to improve his technique (only been at the photog thing about 6 months or so so he's a newb). i just have a kodak point and shoot so I'm a lost cause lol.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
You might notice the front lip has a big scrape in it... that's courtesy of my buddy brian a few weeks ago lol what a parking lot noob.
Nice ghey pics....
Originally Posted by chillin014
i saw a video with that car but i have NEVER heard of it. even maxima.org is too mainstream for some of the REAL fast maximas, someone show me where its at...i want to build a monster too....
This is the same car that was sold to Nealoc187. It is a beast.
Originally Posted by chillin014
i saw a video with that car but i have NEVER heard of it. even maxima.org is too mainstream for some of the REAL fast maximas, someone show me where its at...i want to build a monster too....
Maybe its just because you havent been here long enough?
Car looks great Neal, really impressive. I didnt know you had picked up Hals car.
