Best $960.00 I've Spent In A While (Tires)
Best $960.00 I've Spent In A While (Tires)
Just got my Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 235/50/17 installed today.
Yeah, best mod available for this car, hands down. If you have the cash, buy them. If you don't, save up.
I'll post pics tomorrow. It fills out the fender nicely.
Yeah, best mod available for this car, hands down. If you have the cash, buy them. If you don't, save up.
I'll post pics tomorrow. It fills out the fender nicely.
Originally posted by Green 2kSE
That's good to hear, I probably will buy a set in the next few months. BTW, why didn't you get the 225/50/17 size?
That's good to hear, I probably will buy a set in the next few months. BTW, why didn't you get the 225/50/17 size?
These tires are hands down, in a different league than the OEM Potenzas.
Originally posted by slickrick
people say that on 17x7 oem the widest is 225. who put on the tires? id like 235s also after i wear out these craptenzas
people say that on 17x7 oem the widest is 225. who put on the tires? id like 235s also after i wear out these craptenzas
The 235 50/17 is within spec. (And looks way cooler).

I'll post a side by side pic tomorrow...err....later today.
Yeah, I know. They don't give 'em away. That's for sure. But $960.00 out the door was by far the best price I could find. Most places were charging $1100 - $1200.
Besides, I just can't see putting $100.00 tires on a performance sedan. To me, it's like hooking up Kmart speakers to your state-of-the-art home theatre system.
Besides, I just can't see putting $100.00 tires on a performance sedan. To me, it's like hooking up Kmart speakers to your state-of-the-art home theatre system.
Originally posted by GMAN01SE
$960....OUCH!
I was planning on 235/50's when my time is due. It looks like I need to start saving now.
Can't wait for the pics...Thanks.
$960....OUCH!
I was planning on 235/50's when my time is due. It looks like I need to start saving now.
Can't wait for the pics...Thanks.
Jjames...how many miles did you get out of your crapotenzas? I am up to 28,5XX on mine, and they seem to be lasting real good. Not the greatest performing tire for sure...especially in wet or snow conditions. They are lasting good tho...which is almost too bad...
Originally posted by T-bone
BTW, I'm at 51K with my craptenzas; they still have some tread and they're ok on dry roads, but when it rains I get scarred
NOOOO GRIP
BTW, I'm at 51K with my craptenzas; they still have some tread and they're ok on dry roads, but when it rains I get scarred
NOOOO GRIP
Well at least I know theres time to save up for the good Michelens...
I want to see what those 235's look like on Jjames Maxx
yeah, the 235/50/17's is within spec for GLE rims as well. can't wait til my turanzas (horrible tire by the way, i'm willing to bet that they're worse than potenzas) wear down.
GLE rims are 6.5x17 and oem tires are 215/55/17...has anyone seen this size tire????
GLE rims are 6.5x17 and oem tires are 215/55/17...has anyone seen this size tire????
Originally posted by jjames
I believe the rec. rim width for 235/50/17 is 6.5 - 8.0. A lot of forum members have inquired about putting 235/45/17s on the stock rims, which is out of spec.
The 235 50/17 is within spec. (And looks way cooler).
I'll post a side by side pic tomorrow...err....later today.
I believe the rec. rim width for 235/50/17 is 6.5 - 8.0. A lot of forum members have inquired about putting 235/45/17s on the stock rims, which is out of spec.
The 235 50/17 is within spec. (And looks way cooler).

I'll post a side by side pic tomorrow...err....later today.
Yep, sure did. By the time I had them shipped and had them mounted and balanced, I was better off local. I have road hazzard also.
Originally posted by 2000 SE
did you check tire rack for prices? Your tires are only $848 on that site and not to mention a lot of other tires for even less.tire rack
did you check tire rack for prices? Your tires are only $848 on that site and not to mention a lot of other tires for even less.tire rack
About 53,000 miles. Lasted good, but driving in wet conditions got to be very dangerous.
Originally posted by Y2KSilvahSE
Jjames...how many miles did you get out of your crapotenzas? I am up to 28,5XX on mine, and they seem to be lasting real good. Not the greatest performing tire for sure...especially in wet or snow conditions. They are lasting good tho...which is almost too bad...
Jjames...how many miles did you get out of your crapotenzas? I am up to 28,5XX on mine, and they seem to be lasting real good. Not the greatest performing tire for sure...especially in wet or snow conditions. They are lasting good tho...which is almost too bad...
....
Originally posted by maximadriven
Is the wheel gap closed because of the tires being a 50? I am in the market and if my car could look like that I would buy them immediately.
Is the wheel gap closed because of the tires being a 50? I am in the market and if my car could look like that I would buy them immediately.
remember, all tire manufacturers DO NOT make the same dimension tires...i.e. one make of a 225/50-17 will not necessarily be the same real world width and height as someone elses, even under the same size numbers. It is important to research overall diameter for any tire make/model to see what the relationship might be to stock.
Man, I'm gettin jealous! Both rides looks sooo much better. I hate the wheel gap up front also. Problem solved.
Either of you have hny comments on ride quality and handling characteristics? Any noticeable improvements?
Either of you have hny comments on ride quality and handling characteristics? Any noticeable improvements?
Got my Pilot Sport A/S 235/50-17's at COSTCO for $896.72, including 6% NJ sales tax.
I highly recommend COSTCO. Anyone going there might find the info below helpful from thread http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....hreadid=136768
"Got my 235/50-17 Pilot Sports A/S's installed by Costco last week! They initially refused to place the order for this size, but agreed after they checked and found that 225/50-17's were out of stock. The guy said the computer came up with 235/45-17. I didn't want 235/45-17.
I nicely explained that the 235/45-17 required 7.5" rims, that the OEM 17's were only 7.0" wide, and the 235/50 only required 7.0" rims. I suggested he could check multiple posts on this forum where people had gone with 235/50-17 and not had rubbing problems. I also suggested he check the Michelin web-site to confirm my information. I guess I sounded like I knew what I was talking about (Thanks maxima.org!!!), because he agreed that the 235/50-17 would be fine, placed the order, and installed them 10 days later after they arrived."
I highly recommend COSTCO. Anyone going there might find the info below helpful from thread http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....hreadid=136768
"Got my 235/50-17 Pilot Sports A/S's installed by Costco last week! They initially refused to place the order for this size, but agreed after they checked and found that 225/50-17's were out of stock. The guy said the computer came up with 235/45-17. I didn't want 235/45-17.
I nicely explained that the 235/45-17 required 7.5" rims, that the OEM 17's were only 7.0" wide, and the 235/50 only required 7.0" rims. I suggested he could check multiple posts on this forum where people had gone with 235/50-17 and not had rubbing problems. I also suggested he check the Michelin web-site to confirm my information. I guess I sounded like I knew what I was talking about (Thanks maxima.org!!!), because he agreed that the 235/50-17 would be fine, placed the order, and installed them 10 days later after they arrived."
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by jjames
I believe the rec. rim width for 235/50/17 is 6.5 - 8.0. A lot of forum members have inquired about putting 235/45/17s on the stock rims, which is out of spec.
The 235 50/17 is within spec. (And looks way cooler).
I'll post a side by side pic tomorrow...err....later today.
I believe the rec. rim width for 235/50/17 is 6.5 - 8.0. A lot of forum members have inquired about putting 235/45/17s on the stock rims, which is out of spec.
The 235 50/17 is within spec. (And looks way cooler).

I'll post a side by side pic tomorrow...err....later today.
45 is 45% of the width is the height of the tire. Same goes for 50. You have the same WIDTH, but getting a mini-van tire. lol
...
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
How can 50 be in spec and 45 not?
45 is 45% of the width is the height of the tire. Same goes for 50. You have the same WIDTH, but getting a mini-van tire. lol
How can 50 be in spec and 45 not?
45 is 45% of the width is the height of the tire. Same goes for 50. You have the same WIDTH, but getting a mini-van tire. lol
part has to do with the taller sidewall of a 50 series tire allowing more range of 'tilt' toward a rim...a 45 is too rigid...
not sure what is meant by the mini-van comment....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ...
Originally posted by jjs
there have been numerous discussions on this...
part has to do with the taller sidewall of a 50 series tire allowing more range of 'tilt' toward a rim...a 45 is too rigid...
not sure what is meant by the mini-van comment....
there have been numerous discussions on this...
part has to do with the taller sidewall of a 50 series tire allowing more range of 'tilt' toward a rim...a 45 is too rigid...
not sure what is meant by the mini-van comment....
Re: Re: ...
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Such a tire makes the wheels and tires on the car look like they belong on a mini-van. The taller the sidewall the more flex you get, so the less handling you will get compared to a 45 series tire. Though anything is better than stock crap.
Such a tire makes the wheels and tires on the car look like they belong on a mini-van. The taller the sidewall the more flex you get, so the less handling you will get compared to a 45 series tire. Though anything is better than stock crap.
To your final comment:
Oh boy, you know it!!!!
Fuel Economy
Originally posted by MaxKlinger
Has anybody noticed any effects on fuel economy? How fast do these tires tend to wear? They appear to be unidirectional tires, do you have to pull them off the rims and switch in order to rotate them?
Has anybody noticed any effects on fuel economy? How fast do these tires tend to wear? They appear to be unidirectional tires, do you have to pull them off the rims and switch in order to rotate them?
Tires should wear well. RE92's have 160 rating (got 52k out of mine). Pilot Sport A/S's have 400 rating.
They ARE unidirectional. I only rotate front-to-back anyway, so not an issue for me.
The Pilot Sport A/S is the best tire I've ever owned hands down.
In the rain it is remarkable. I take turns in the water that I would never have even dreamed of with the crap stock tires.
They've worn well - despite my drag racing. Speaking of that, with the sports I normally get 2.1x 60' times although I think they may slow me down a bit on top speed (the 225/50s are definitely wider than the potenza 225/50s - maybe we can have a few pages on that issue!)
They are a bit louder on certain pavement.
But, I'd shell out the cash again.
In the rain it is remarkable. I take turns in the water that I would never have even dreamed of with the crap stock tires.
They've worn well - despite my drag racing. Speaking of that, with the sports I normally get 2.1x 60' times although I think they may slow me down a bit on top speed (the 225/50s are definitely wider than the potenza 225/50s - maybe we can have a few pages on that issue!)
They are a bit louder on certain pavement.
But, I'd shell out the cash again.
Re: Fuel Economy
Originally posted by jnovember
I do 90% highway. Very long commute. My mpg seems to have gone from 24-25 to 22-23. This even with keeping tire-pressure at 37psi.
Tires should wear well. RE92's have 160 rating (got 52k out of mine). Pilot Sport A/S's have 400 rating.
They ARE unidirectional. I only rotate front-to-back anyway, so not an issue for me.
I do 90% highway. Very long commute. My mpg seems to have gone from 24-25 to 22-23. This even with keeping tire-pressure at 37psi.
Tires should wear well. RE92's have 160 rating (got 52k out of mine). Pilot Sport A/S's have 400 rating.
They ARE unidirectional. I only rotate front-to-back anyway, so not an issue for me.
Re: Re: Fuel Economy
Originally posted by 00MaxSE
How did you get 25mpg?? The best I've gotten on my 2k 5spd is 21 mpg! Is there something wrong? I have 34k miles on it.So, the Pilot A/S's are unidirectional? That's sweet. I can't wait until my Potenzas wear out.
How did you get 25mpg?? The best I've gotten on my 2k 5spd is 21 mpg! Is there something wrong? I have 34k miles on it.So, the Pilot A/S's are unidirectional? That's sweet. I can't wait until my Potenzas wear out.
Make sure your tire-pressure is OK. With RE92's, I kept it at 35psi. With A/S's, have been doing 37psi. Would also make sure your air filter is clean and you are using premium gas.
Hope this helps!
Re: Re: Re: Fuel Economy
Originally posted by jnovember
No secret to getting 25mpg. Not doing anything special. Again, that is 90% highway at 65-75mph. I was actually not happy with 25mpg, having seen other posts where people where getting 28-31mpg (though with automatics).
Make sure your tire-pressure is OK. With RE92's, I kept it at 35psi. With A/S's, have been doing 37psi. Would also make sure your air filter is clean and you are using premium gas.
Hope this helps!
No secret to getting 25mpg. Not doing anything special. Again, that is 90% highway at 65-75mph. I was actually not happy with 25mpg, having seen other posts where people where getting 28-31mpg (though with automatics).
Make sure your tire-pressure is OK. With RE92's, I kept it at 35psi. With A/S's, have been doing 37psi. Would also make sure your air filter is clean and you are using premium gas.
Hope this helps!



Those look saweeet exunaja...no rubbing right?
Very true. It's where I got the idea. 