Hit my new Best!! 14.42 at 99.44 mph!!!! And a Auto at that

I am too happy I am going crazy!!

Out of 8-10 runs, most were 14.4 at 98.85s~, I was able to pull a 99.44 mph out of one run! Hell yea!!!!

Only OBX headers and HKS mufflers, only mods! HKS exhaust does nill on the dyno for my car already tested..

And ****ty stock tires.

No intake! Bone stock to the paper element.

http://www.acura-cl.org/silverbullet/track/track1.jpg Pic of car with #

http://www.acura-cl.org/silverbullet/track/track2.jpg Slip

I had a little problem with bogging off the line or wheel hop so my 60 could be a bit better.

 

nice numbers man....that trap speed is awesome

 

Damn I those headers helped a lot. Nice times

 

so how is that 50 shot working for ya nice numbers

 

Even if "someone" did ask you post this, isn't this OT?



























I belive I know I how this will be handled.

 

Nice times Russ. Great trap...that thing goes up top for an auto. Are you in top of 3rd at the 1/4? What rpm?

 

lol, only I wish.

 

3/4 of third I would say. I see 100 mph when the light kicks on the track.

 

Good times Russ !

 

Well, you dont have to worry about 5th gen auto maximas (including 2K2) and even most 5/6 speeds

Flame suit engaged

 

5.0THIS===> <=== Org Members with 2K2's ...

 

 

Yep, his CL-S would walk most 6 speeds in this Org. 99+ trap speeds are wicked for a 3.2 with just headers and two mufflers.

Dave

 

Nah, that track must be down hill!!!

J/K Good run...

 

My 6-speed still owns joo With a K&N and a Powertech. Good runs tho' strong for an auto.

 

nice time & really high speed
but i don't get it why is it bone stock to the paper element?
doesn't header count?

 

Bone stock intake plumbing.. I was only talking about that.


Thanks guys, I was surprised myself. Jumped out of my car dancing around! lol

 

Footage of Russ Dancing outside his Honda, I mean.. Acura


J/K ... You asked for that one Russ !

 

I gotta give Russ credit on a pretty good run, but it isnt low 14s as he was proclaiming he was going to run. Also, he had his car track prepped and took out some weight. He gives Maxima guys **** about track prepping their cars, so I thought I would return the favor.

 

Intakes suck...I took mine off, and went faster

 

Im just guessing that if someone made good aftermarket headers for a 2K2 and a Y pipe, our times would be a lot lower than that ... Am I wrong ??

 

Hmm spare tire and jack out. Weird.

I didn't remove my seats like Max guys do. lol or some should I say.

Why run if you don't track prep your car.

And a 14.42 fine by me. As I told others, I didn't expect lower than 14.5-14.6.

 

My 2k1 Max went faster stock instead of with a intake. I can't say why either, it freaked me out.

 

Well, maybe or maybe not. Nissan has been known about tuning there exhausts very well. Honda on the other hand, well go figure.

But prove me wrong!

 

Do they make an Automatic Maxima?!?! Well they shouldn't!! Unless you only have one arm or one leg.....

 

Come on, you know me... I had a 6 speed WS6 and a 5 speed Mustang with a Tremec T5... I also now have a "wife"... which can rival any mod you guys can put on a Max.. should I have exchanged that for a 6 speed .....

 

LOL Russ....L O L

 

Yeah, and if his was a 6 spd CL-S he'd be owning joooo

 

But it's not, so he doesn't

 

 

Not to be mean, but your times are flawed.

Takes alot of mods for Emax to hit 101 and that is with a good 60 ft.

You have a 5 mph slower 1/8 mile. Something was obviously wrong with the clock at the track on that run or all the runs. With a 5 mph slower trap you will not run what Emax ran or what you did run. Go hit another track and prove it before saying anything back.

 

Flawed huh? It's an NHRA track. I have a stack of slips from that night, but maybe the 1/8th mile clocks were off, who knows. But I've got the slip, and that's all that counts....but wait a minute, didn't you run 76 in the 1/8th, and 99 and some change in the 1/4? So why the hell would my slip be any more flawed than yours? I guess it's not possible that Emax's track was off huh Compare your slip to mine, and you'll see that the times are almost identical, then come tell me again that I didn't run those times.

 

Because my car is geared for HIGH END not yours. I have Vtec that kicks in at 4800 all the way to 7200. It pulls hard above that. You do not and comparing your slips to others, something was wrong.

Also car test shows its not accurate either. Go figure.

 

First of all, here in AZ we are 1000ft higher than emax

Second, Dave has consistant trap speeds of close to and over 100mph.

Third, I love your "v-tech kicks in" statement.

Fourth, Dave has a stock 6spd and you have a Cl-S that has more than headers and exhaust! The sigs are gone but don't you have some type of tranny cooler/shift kit?

Last, Your Cl-S with all your mods would get schooled by 2k2_6spd.

 

Only a tranny cooler. They don't make a shift kit for our cars. Headers and mufflers, thats it. lol!

Hmmm. Well I still would like to see him run at a different track to prove the time. It just seems weird to be 5 mph slower than 5max but have a 100 mph trap. That is all.

Again, you have no clue what Vtec (NOT VTECH) does on our cars. Why you think most hondas are all about top end not TQ. LOL!

Also 1000ft higher would mean slower speeds not faster.

 

That is my point, this could be the reason that his 1/8 mile speed is slower!!

Lets see, I guess your VTEC is kind of like our Variable Intake???? But then again I have no idea...

And I don't know too many Honda's that are all about top end.

 

I also have a Variable Intake that kicks in at 3800 rpm. So no. Vtec is a more agreesive cam that kicks in.

Right, but his 1/4 would be also slower as well which is my point. But anyways, its just a bit weird to be 5 mph slower than emax in the 1.8 but have the 1/4 almost the same.

 

 

If you look at it from a more intelligent angle, you would see that with an 82.xx mph 1/8th, Emax should be trapping in the 103-104 range. Plus Firebird is an NHRA track, once again. The NHRA mandates that the clocks are accurate, because the world time trials are held there in January. And we have the Checker Nationals in Febuary. And doesn't the Maxima 3.5 have the CVTCS, or whatever thehell it is? Same as Vtec with a different name.

 

The CVTCS system that Nissan uses varies the cam phase angle only on the intake cams, which pretty much functionally equivalent to Toyota's VVT-i system.

VTEC actually uses a completely different cam lobe for high-RPM's with higher lift and more duration. The SOHC VTEC on the CL-S does this for the intake valves only. Exhaust valves use static timing.