intake affect gas economic?
intake affect gas economic?
hey dudes how are you, first happy xmax, jejeje look i know this questions is very common but well, do you think the intakes affect the gas economic of the car? i know if i drive like a fast and the furios my gas will be in 2 racing....jejejej but if i drive normal, etc etc...it will be a difference if i use my intake(midpipe, maf, k&n filter) or the stock air box???
Supposedly, a good intake helps your engine breath (a good exhaust also contributes to this), in order to help maximize output.
But once you start getting addicted to the cool sound of the intake/exhaust(and the mod bug), you develop a lead foot and there goes your fuel economy.
But once you start getting addicted to the cool sound of the intake/exhaust(and the mod bug), you develop a lead foot and there goes your fuel economy.
Originally posted by pocketrocket
Supposedly, a good intake helps your engine breath (a good exhaust also contributes to this), in order to help maximize output.
But once you start getting addicted to the cool sound of the intake/exhaust(and the mod bug), you develop a lead foot and there goes your fuel economy.
Supposedly, a good intake helps your engine breath (a good exhaust also contributes to this), in order to help maximize output.
But once you start getting addicted to the cool sound of the intake/exhaust(and the mod bug), you develop a lead foot and there goes your fuel economy.
as stated earlier N/A mods are supposed to make your car more efficient, and as a byproduct better fuel economy.
however the realization of more hp causes severe lead foot. i have to make an effort to go easy on the car so i can get some decent milage. , more than 240/tank-city.
however the realization of more hp causes severe lead foot. i have to make an effort to go easy on the car so i can get some decent milage. , more than 240/tank-city.
Originally posted by DAREN
as stated earlier N/A mods are supposed to make your car more efficient, and as a byproduct better fuel economy.
however the realization of more hp causes severe lead foot. i have to make an effort to go easy on the car so i can get some decent milage. , more than 240/tank-city.
as stated earlier N/A mods are supposed to make your car more efficient, and as a byproduct better fuel economy.
however the realization of more hp causes severe lead foot. i have to make an effort to go easy on the car so i can get some decent milage. , more than 240/tank-city.
Well, if you are a granny driver, you might get the EPA mileage on your max. But chances are if you add an intake, you drive like what Tom and Ray (Cartalk) call a "wacko" so you will be leadfooting it, killing your gas mileage.
Hehe...count me as one of the wackos. I try to get good fuel economy, but the go pedal is just too much fun to press.
Hehe...count me as one of the wackos. I try to get good fuel economy, but the go pedal is just too much fun to press.
Guest
Posts: n/a
i drove from seaside heights NJ to poughkeepsie ny (home) with my intake and exhaust. It was about a 140 mile drive i think. i kept it in the 3-3500 rpm range at like 90 mph all the way down the garden state pkwy and I-87. i checked the milage when i got home and i got 44 MPG/avg. it was a nice cool day out not humid and there was no traffic so it was constant driving. i don' think an intake makes much difference. i think it's the lead foot factor. my highway driving MPG is probably double my city driving
Originally posted by Paonessa
i drove from seaside heights NJ to poughkeepsie ny (home) with my intake and exhaust. It was about a 140 mile drive i think. i kept it in the 3-3500 rpm range at like 90 mph all the way down the garden state pkwy and I-87. i checked the milage when i got home and i got 44 MPG/avg. it was a nice cool day out not humid and there was no traffic so it was constant driving. i don' think an intake makes much difference. i think it's the lead foot factor. my highway driving MPG is probably double my city driving
i drove from seaside heights NJ to poughkeepsie ny (home) with my intake and exhaust. It was about a 140 mile drive i think. i kept it in the 3-3500 rpm range at like 90 mph all the way down the garden state pkwy and I-87. i checked the milage when i got home and i got 44 MPG/avg. it was a nice cool day out not humid and there was no traffic so it was constant driving. i don' think an intake makes much difference. i think it's the lead foot factor. my highway driving MPG is probably double my city driving
One time I drove 60 miles and filled up a little over two gallons. I went woohoo!! Almost 30mpg. But then I realized it was due more to the fact that the less you fill up, the more inaccurate the mpg calculation is.
Originally posted by deezo
I get better gas mileage on the highway with my intake when I keep it at 75 or under 80. In the city, my gas mileages is lower than in stock form.
I get better gas mileage on the highway with my intake when I keep it at 75 or under 80. In the city, my gas mileages is lower than in stock form.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
hayne
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Oct 5, 2015 11:53 AM




