Tokico blues with stock springs?
Originally posted by 02'maxed-out
why would you want to put aftermarket struts on stock springs... doesn't make sense... save your money... but if u decide to put aftermarket springs... then do it.. but otherwise, forget it..
why would you want to put aftermarket struts on stock springs... doesn't make sense... save your money... but if u decide to put aftermarket springs... then do it.. but otherwise, forget it..
Thanks
alright, it doesn't make sense to have toks on stock springs... why waste your money??? unless your stocks struts are blown, then go ahead, but thats highly unlikely... and u should be covered by warranty if you have under 36,000 or 3yrs...
But u got H&R's... so your good to go... the toks will handle the stress of the lowered springs, but not stocks...
But u got H&R's... so your good to go... the toks will handle the stress of the lowered springs, but not stocks...
Originally posted by mattattax
Some people don't know any better (me included). Could someone explain why it doesn't make sense? I have Tokico blues with H&R springs and love the ride.
Thanks
Some people don't know any better (me included). Could someone explain why it doesn't make sense? I have Tokico blues with H&R springs and love the ride.
Thanks
Although it probably would not be worth it in this case because in my opinion (and most everyone else on the .org) the maxima is too high off the ground with the stock setup. So general concensus here is that the first order of business in the suspension tuning (after throwing a sway bar on that body-roll prone rear end) is to bring the center of gravity down a bit with lowering springs.
General idea here is that shorter, stiffer springs will a) lower center of gravity for better stability and b) make the suspension more taught and resistant to roll/pitch/dive (Eibach calls it "horsepower for the turns"). Stiffer struts will control wheel-bouncing, control body motions to some degree, control rebound of the springs, and get rid of oscillations in the suspension.
I agree the order of greatest improvement for the money if you are going for all-out performance is 1) RSB/FSTB 2) springs and THEN 3) struts.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by tita6
Upgrading struts could make sense to someone who was trying to get rid of some floatiness/rebound in their suspension. There are many different ways to tune your suspension, and strut valving/damping rates is one area you can adjust.
Although it probably would not be worth it in this case because in my opinion (and most everyone else on the .org) the maxima is too high off the ground with the stock setup. So general concensus here is that the first order of business in the suspension tuning (after throwing a sway bar on that body-roll prone rear end) is to bring the center of gravity down a bit with lowering springs.
General idea here is that shorter, stiffer springs will a) lower center of gravity for better stability and b) make the suspension more taught and resistant to roll/pitch/dive (Eibach calls it "horsepower for the turns"). Stiffer struts will control wheel-bouncing, control body motions to some degree, control rebound of the springs, and get rid of oscillations in the suspension.
I agree the order of greatest improvement for the money if you are going for all-out performance is 1) RSB/FSTB 2) springs and THEN 3) struts.
Upgrading struts could make sense to someone who was trying to get rid of some floatiness/rebound in their suspension. There are many different ways to tune your suspension, and strut valving/damping rates is one area you can adjust.
Although it probably would not be worth it in this case because in my opinion (and most everyone else on the .org) the maxima is too high off the ground with the stock setup. So general concensus here is that the first order of business in the suspension tuning (after throwing a sway bar on that body-roll prone rear end) is to bring the center of gravity down a bit with lowering springs.
General idea here is that shorter, stiffer springs will a) lower center of gravity for better stability and b) make the suspension more taught and resistant to roll/pitch/dive (Eibach calls it "horsepower for the turns"). Stiffer struts will control wheel-bouncing, control body motions to some degree, control rebound of the springs, and get rid of oscillations in the suspension.
I agree the order of greatest improvement for the money if you are going for all-out performance is 1) RSB/FSTB 2) springs and THEN 3) struts.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by 02'maxed-out
well said... , but still dont' just buy struts, buy the whole package or wait and save up for it.
well said... , but still dont' just buy struts, buy the whole package or wait and save up for it.
Originally posted by y2kse
So for those of us who (1) don't want to lower our cars and (2) already installed a FSTB and a RSB and (3) do want to tighten up our suspension, are you saying that replacing the stock struts with Tokico Blues is a waste of money?
So for those of us who (1) don't want to lower our cars and (2) already installed a FSTB and a RSB and (3) do want to tighten up our suspension, are you saying that replacing the stock struts with Tokico Blues is a waste of money?
Just curious, why r u against a little drop> Do you go off road often?
Originally posted by y2kse
So for those of us who (1) don't want to lower our cars and (2) already installed a FSTB and a RSB and (3) do want to tighten up our suspension, are you saying that replacing the stock struts with Tokico Blues is a waste of money?
So for those of us who (1) don't want to lower our cars and (2) already installed a FSTB and a RSB and (3) do want to tighten up our suspension, are you saying that replacing the stock struts with Tokico Blues is a waste of money?
that's exactly my question, i dont want to make it lower, i just want to get new struts and shocks cuz mine suck already.
so is it ok or not? the toks will hold at stock spring height?
Originally posted by 2001SE
Nicely put y2kse
that's exactly my question, i dont want to make it lower, i just want to get new struts and shocks cuz mine suck already.
so is it ok or not? the toks will hold at stock spring height?
Nicely put y2kse
that's exactly my question, i dont want to make it lower, i just want to get new struts and shocks cuz mine suck already.
so is it ok or not? the toks will hold at stock spring height?
The OEM struts are made by TOKICO.
OEM STRUT PIC
OEM STRUT PIC
I replaced the front struts on my 2k3 SE, kept the stock springs and couldn't be happier. I did not want to lower the car but I did want to get rid of the front bounce and float which is, in part, due to the very soft stock front stuts on the 2k3. BTW, there are 2 suppliers of stuts to Nissan and Tokico is one. Mine were NOT Tokicos. The replacement Tockico blues are signifincantly better than the stock ones. No more bounce and float, kept the stock hight and the ride is still good.
FYI, the rear Tokicos are softer than stock and I did not replace the stock units. The stock rears are my car were, however, Tokico. Total cost was $200 and put them on myself.
FYI, the rear Tokicos are softer than stock and I did not replace the stock units. The stock rears are my car were, however, Tokico. Total cost was $200 and put them on myself.
Originally posted by nick778
I replaced the front struts on my 2k3 SE, kept the stock springs and couldn't be happier. I did not want to lower the car but I did want to get rid of the front bounce and float which is, in part, due to the very soft stock front stuts on the 2k3. BTW, there are 2 suppliers of stuts to Nissan and Tokico is one. Mine were NOT Tokicos. The replacement Tockico blues are signifincantly better than the stock ones. No more bounce and float, kept the stock hight and the ride is still good.
FYI, the rear Tokicos are softer than stock and I did not replace the stock units. The stock rears are my car were, however, Tokico. Total cost was $200 and put them on myself.
I replaced the front struts on my 2k3 SE, kept the stock springs and couldn't be happier. I did not want to lower the car but I did want to get rid of the front bounce and float which is, in part, due to the very soft stock front stuts on the 2k3. BTW, there are 2 suppliers of stuts to Nissan and Tokico is one. Mine were NOT Tokicos. The replacement Tockico blues are signifincantly better than the stock ones. No more bounce and float, kept the stock hight and the ride is still good.
FYI, the rear Tokicos are softer than stock and I did not replace the stock units. The stock rears are my car were, however, Tokico. Total cost was $200 and put them on myself.
I had H&R on toks and decided to go back to stock springs. When I did that, I just decided to keep the toks to help control the ride. In my opinion I think if you don't want to lower your car, but would like a more controlled feel, this is a good way to go.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
So it appears that we've a consensus on some points. The first is that Tokico Blues will work just fine with OEM springs. The second is that aftermarket struts (Tokico or KYB) will reduce oscillation.
Does everyone agree?
Does everyone agree?
Originally posted by maxman00
I had H&R on toks and decided to go back to stock springs. When I did that, I just decided to keep the toks to help control the ride. In my opinion I think if you don't want to lower your car, but would like a more controlled feel, this is a good way to go.
I had H&R on toks and decided to go back to stock springs. When I did that, I just decided to keep the toks to help control the ride. In my opinion I think if you don't want to lower your car, but would like a more controlled feel, this is a good way to go.
Originally posted by y2kse
So it appears that we've a consensus on some points. The first is that Tokico Blues will work just fine with OEM springs. The second is that aftermarket struts (Tokico or KYB) will reduce oscillation.
Does everyone agree?
So it appears that we've a consensus on some points. The first is that Tokico Blues will work just fine with OEM springs. The second is that aftermarket struts (Tokico or KYB) will reduce oscillation.
Does everyone agree?
Originally posted by NikaL
Why did you go back to stock? any problems with H&R's?
Why did you go back to stock? any problems with H&R's?
I am fortunate enough to be part of a 2-Max household.
My wife has a 2000 SE 5-spd, I have a 2002 SE 6-spd.
I was never really happy with the 02's suspension. Her 00 is much better planted and stiffer in my opinion, while the 02 felt under-damped. While by no means an expert, I consider myself as having a decent feel for suspension tuning having owned several cars in which I have done a mix of right and wrong things suspension-wise over the years.
I have learned that lowering a car is not always a good thing. While lowering C of G is one potential benefit, altering its relationship to the cars roll center is a potential detriment.
Living in New England I was not inclined to want to lower my car and reduce suspension travel or take a chance on increasing ride harshness too much. If I knew of aftermarket springs that kept the stock suspension height with a slight increase in spring rates I would certainly have considered them.
I decided to try the Toks with stock springs and could not be happier. My 02 feels "right" now, a much better spring/dampening match and more like my wife's stock 2000 SE.
To each his/her own. It's a matter of taste and what you are looking for in *your* car. I just wanted to share my experience and opinion on the topic.
Having said all of the above (sorry it was so long) I would guess that the 2001 models are set up more like the 2000s and therefore may not have the crappy, muchy stock dampers that my 2002 had - so the Toks may not make as much as a difference.
My wife has a 2000 SE 5-spd, I have a 2002 SE 6-spd.
I was never really happy with the 02's suspension. Her 00 is much better planted and stiffer in my opinion, while the 02 felt under-damped. While by no means an expert, I consider myself as having a decent feel for suspension tuning having owned several cars in which I have done a mix of right and wrong things suspension-wise over the years.
I have learned that lowering a car is not always a good thing. While lowering C of G is one potential benefit, altering its relationship to the cars roll center is a potential detriment.
Living in New England I was not inclined to want to lower my car and reduce suspension travel or take a chance on increasing ride harshness too much. If I knew of aftermarket springs that kept the stock suspension height with a slight increase in spring rates I would certainly have considered them.
I decided to try the Toks with stock springs and could not be happier. My 02 feels "right" now, a much better spring/dampening match and more like my wife's stock 2000 SE.
To each his/her own. It's a matter of taste and what you are looking for in *your* car. I just wanted to share my experience and opinion on the topic.
Having said all of the above (sorry it was so long) I would guess that the 2001 models are set up more like the 2000s and therefore may not have the crappy, muchy stock dampers that my 2002 had - so the Toks may not make as much as a difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James92SE
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
142
Jan 2, 2024 09:23 AM




