5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Cattman VQ30DE headers pics - for ALL 95-01 Maximas/I30s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 02:21 AM
  #1  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Cattman VQ30DE headers pics - for ALL 95-01 Maximas/I30s

Sorry for the delay while I was away, but here are the pics we shot today of the Cattman Performance VQ30DE header system. I'll let the picture pretty much speak for itself, but will note that the quality of welding and craftsmanship is outstanding, my Kiwi mates did well.



Also note the one-piece primaries and equal length secondaries. This illustrates why the system has to be designed as a whole, including the y-pipe. All the flanges are extra thick, the flex is strong and lined. The sound made by the equal length tubing is like music - the classic deep warble, instead of a harsh buzz - unlike any y-pipe I've ever heard.

Price is $750. All gaskets and hardware needed are an extra $20. These are on the shelf, ready to ship and will fit ALL 1995-2001 VQ30DE engines. I finally realized all that's needed to make these work on the CA/NLEV vehicles is the same solution used for conversion to Federal-spec manifolds, i.e. simply re-positioning the rear 2 O2 sensors behind the cat.

Note that it breaks down into 4 pieces and the shipping rates aren't that bad. We do include installation instructions, but not for the fainthearted or inexperienced.

The following dyno chart compares the headers with a stock y-pipe on a rather tired 97 SE with 100k+ miles. Note that the tested headers were not ceramic coated, and this will have a significant effect on heat retention and tubing wall friction (which will likely be good for a couple more horsepower).



Although peak horsepower increased by 16.4hp and peak torque by 14.9 ft/lbs, this does not describe how the power curve was extended by 500+ rpm instead of falling off a cliff. The Cattman headers added 16.5-18.6 more hp from 4800-6200 rpm and 15.5-18.5 more ft/lbs of torque from 4600-5800 rpm.

[BTW, have to say, the photographer did well on this. If anyone wants a more detailed image, feel free to contact me directly, I have a version you could use for a poster (and a shot without the gaskets).]

Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 03:12 AM
  #2  
02'maxed-out's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 710
nice....can't wait for the 02 headers if you have that in the making...
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 04:33 AM
  #3  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
definatly nice gains throughout the rpm range.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 06:55 AM
  #4  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
good to hear. i was curious if you had any kind of time frame for the release of the cali spec headers? i understand what is involved and i would just rather wait for the cali specific than screwing up a 750 header trying to convert it.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 06:57 AM
  #5  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally Posted by sloppymax
good to hear. i was curious if you had any kind of time frame for the release of the cali spec headers? i understand what is involved and i would just rather wait for the cali specific than screwing up a 750 header trying to convert it.

I think they are the same... he mentions that the downstream O2 sensors need to be relocated to behind the cat... The front precat must be removed as well to bolt these up.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 07:01 AM
  #6  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by UMD_MaxSE
I think they are the same... he mentions that the downstream O2 sensors need to be relocated to behind the cat... The front precat must be removed as well to bolt these up.
so ill need to add an o2 bung and relocate the sensor behind the cat?
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 07:01 AM
  #7  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally Posted by sloppymax
so ill need to add an o2 bung and relocate the sensor behind the cat?

drill in two bungs into your b-pipe and lengthen the sensor wires and there you go
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 07:47 AM
  #8  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Damn, these are calling my name. I got an idea to make these work for my turbo setup. I can actually make these work now that I think about it.

Dixit
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 08:50 AM
  #9  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Hmm.. i have a spare VQ35 sitting on a stand in the garage. Id like to see how these bolt up.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #10  
HKMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 737
It would also be nice to see side-by-side shot with the stock headers.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #11  
VQvroom's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 390
Hey is it possible to get a pic of the OEM exhaust assembly in this thread? to sorta have a before and after pic i would like to compare what i got now (stock) with this beautiful PIC. TIA


Duh i didnt even see the post above mine, but im askinig the same thing he is.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #12  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Anyone who wants to see what's pretty much involved in extending the 02-sensors or what the STOCK headers vs. Catman headers look like, check here:

Manifolds:
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/Fed_YPipe.html

Stock FRONT manifold is on RIGHT side:


O2-sensor relocation:
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/O2_Sensor.html
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #13  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
BTW, don't forget THOSE dynos are for a 4th gen VQ30DE, which does NOT have the 5th gen variable intake manifold.

That should mean even better gains!
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #14  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245


Just make sure to add a flex section(flange also ).

Originally Posted by BigDogJonx
Damn, these are calling my name. I got an idea to make these work for my turbo setup. I can actually make these work now that I think about it.

Dixit
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 10:48 AM
  #15  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Originally Posted by IceY2K1


Just make sure to add a flex section(flange also ).
Oh dont you worry about that Hahahha I crave to use this welder at times. Ive cut up my left over pipes just to weld for fun. I just gotta figure out where Im going to put the flex. I may put two of them, one on the feed and one on the down.

Dixit
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #16  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by sloppymax
good to hear. i was curious if you had any kind of time frame for the release of the cali spec headers? i understand what is involved and i would just rather wait for the cali specific than screwing up a 750 header trying to convert it.
I've taken a new perspective on this and I may end up feeling a bit stupid about not figuring this out before telling 10,000 people that these won't work on the CA/NLEV 99-01 VG30DEs. I don't think we want to put any additional O2 ports in the headers, and they will physically fit the car in their current configuration. If someone sees flaws in the following logic, lets discuss. I'm not presenting this as gospel, so if I'm on the wrong track let me know.

I think the header is ready now for the Cali-spec cars because even if we put all the O2 sensors into the header, there would still be the emissions issues to solve, i.e. the O2 sensors that are meant to be on the downstream side of the precats will not signal a change in O2, since the precats are gone and will generate error codes.

There are two solutions, neither of which involves installing additional O2 sensors in the header. One could experiment with the bogus signal solution, which I don't know much about but involves substituting sender units that provide the correct signal (and, as I understand it, these do not need to be exposed to the exhaust stream so could be anywhere). The other is the solution pioneered by others when they did CA/NLEV-to-Federal conversions, i.e. installing two O2 ports in the mid-pipe and moving the two rear sensors back there so they do recognize a difference in O2 content and do not throw a code. This would involve going to a muffler shop for the welding and properly extending the wiring so that the O2 sensors can be moved back a little ways.

To facilitate this conversion, we may see about making one of our mid-pipes available with two sensor holes (they have one already) or possible taking a 95/96 RT cat, which has one O2 sensor installed on the downstream side already, and putting in another. But this would only be a convenience, there's nothing that challenging about relocating the two O2 sensors.

All well-intended input is appreciated.

Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Hmm.. i have a spare VQ35 sitting on a stand in the garage. Id like to see how these bolt up.

So would I!!! The first thing to check might be comparing the shape of the manifold gaskets, which we obviously have on hand.

We don't have the FWD VQ35DE engines in New Zealand yet, so we can't do the development there until they switch up. The Kiwis have been getting the Japanese-spec VQ30DE in a MEVI-type configuration through the 03 model year.

Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #18  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
You could always test this on my car for a FREE set of course Brian.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #19  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by HKMax
It would also be nice to see side-by-side shot with the stock headers.
Not a bad idea, I've got all the parts here to bolt the stock system together like I did with the headers. Don't think I'll have it professionally photographed like the headers (damn, those pics turned out nice!), but it would be a good comparison.

BCC
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #20  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Cattman
So would I!!! The first thing to check might be comparing the shape of the manifold gaskets, which we obviously have on hand.

We don't have the FWD VQ35DE engines in New Zealand yet, so we can't do the development there until they switch up. The Kiwis have been getting the Japanese-spec VQ30DE in a MEVI-type configuration through the 03 model year.

Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
You have email.
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #21  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by BigDogJonx
Damn, these are calling my name. I got an idea to make these work for my turbo setup. I can actually make these work now that I think about it.

Dixit

No reason why they wouldn't work, I was hoping the picture would help someone imagine just how that might be done.

BCC
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #22  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
BTW, don't forget THOSE dynos are for a 4th gen VQ30DE, which does NOT have the 5th gen variable intake manifold.

That should mean even better gains!

A valid observation, since they do have the effect of extending the power curve even in a cam- and intake plenum-limited '97. Once the headers are in a 5th gen, the engine can breathe well enough to take better advantage of the variable intake.

BCC
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #23  
Cattman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima.org Sponsor
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,162
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
You could always test this on my car for a FREE set of course Brian.

Gee, how could I possibley refuse an opportunity like that?

Glad to hear the testing would be free, now all you need to do is come up with $750 and a few hundred for installation. I've got a mechanic who can't wait to put on his second set.

BCC
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:34 AM
  #24  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
sorry if this sounds like a newbie question, but would relocating 2 o2 sensors behind the cat cause any issues with regard to a/f for the cali specs?
Old Sep 30, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #25  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
No, as long as the fronts are operating. During normal operation ONLY the fronts are used in closed-loop operation to adjust fuel-trim.

If the fronts die, the ECU will rely on the rears for limp-mode, but I'm sure the CEL or something would have lit by then.


Originally Posted by sloppymax
sorry if this sounds like a newbie question, but would relocating 2 o2 sensors behind the cat cause any issues with regard to a/f for the cali specs?
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 01:21 AM
  #26  
MyownNismo's Avatar
Future Camaro SS owner
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,204
From: MN
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
No, as long as the fronts are operating. During normal operation ONLY the fronts are used in closed-loop operation to adjust fuel-trim.

If the fronts die, the ECU will rely on the rears for limp-mode, but I'm sure the CEL or something would have lit by then.
Can you dyno the headers against your y-pipe. I don't want to fork out the $$$ if it's only going to give me 5 extra HP.
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 07:35 AM
  #27  
meccanoble's Avatar
Sports Button FTW
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,291
From: NJ
Originally Posted by MyownNismo
Can you dyno the headers against your y-pipe. I don't want to fork out the $$$ if it's only going to give me 5 extra HP.
yea! i wanted to ask that, how these compare to the y-pipe. The objective of these headers was to i guess present real gains versus a regular y-pipe which i believe u said wasnt really throwing out the 15-20 hp that we all kind of thought it did. I just want to see what gains it makes and how much longer.

i see these headers kind of work like VI's cause they increase the hp in the upper end power curve longer than y-pipe...better breathing does wonders iguess?
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 07:59 AM
  #28  
BLKMAX005SPD's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,565
so if we buy these headers...we don't need a y-pipe???
i gotta start saving now!!
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 09:44 AM
  #29  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Yes...........

Originally Posted by BLKMAX005SPD
so if we buy these headers...we don't need a y-pipe???
i gotta start saving now!!
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 10:34 AM
  #30  
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,304
it would be nice to see a dyno graph of an SC maxima with cattman header and cat-back.

any tips on removing the rear manifold?
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 10:39 AM
  #31  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally Posted by [maxi-overdose]
it would be nice to see a dyno graph of an SC maxima with cattman header and cat-back.

any tips on removing the rear manifold?

He already did.........

Originally Posted by Cattman
......come up with $750 and a few hundred for installation. I've got a mechanic who can't wait to put on his second set.

Old Oct 1, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #32  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by '[maxi-overdose
any tips on removing the rear manifold?
I have tried about every way possible and the easiest is to remove the center engine cradle then support the engine with a tripod. I always use a lift but I know most of you do not have that luxury.

Get yourself a 6 point 14mm socket, a swivel and plenty of extensions to remove the two hard to get two bolts. Many of you will make a mess if you try to use 12 point sockets.
In many cases the stud will come out with the nut but they're easy to separate once removed. A 1/4" socket will attach to the reverse star end of the stud so u can hold it while you remove the nut with a 14mm wrench.

When you remove the fans to make space for removing the front, cover the radiator with a large piece of cardboard to avoid scaring it up.
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #33  
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,304
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
He already did.........





are you talking about the dyno? I dont recall that i see one


Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I have tried about every way possible and the easiest is to remove the center engine cradle then support the engine with a tripod. I always use a lift but I know most of you do not have that luxury.

Get yourself a 6 point 14mm socket, a swivel and plenty of extensions to remove the two hard to get two bolts. Many of you will make a mess if you try to use 12 point sockets.
In many cases the stud will come out with the nut but they're easy to separate once removed. A 1/4" socket will attach to the reverse star end of the stud so u can hold it while you remove the nut with a 14mm wrench.

When you remove the fans to make space for removing the front, cover the radiator with a large piece of cardboard to avoid scaring it up.
thx for the tips. how's your engine swap?

ic...so you do have to move the engine a little to get the stock manifold out.

I noticed that 6 point socket works better than the 12 point most of the time. I arealdy stripped 2 12 point scokets.
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 01:23 PM
  #34  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by [maxi-overdose]
are you talking about the dyno? I dont recall that i see one




thx for the tips. how's your engine swap?

ic...so you do have to move the engine a little to get the stock manifold out.

I noticed that 6 point socket works better than the 12 point most of the time. I arealdy stripped 2 12 point scokets.
You do not have to move the engine, just remove clutter.
The engine swap is long since done and making good power. I trapped 98.6 MPH my first time out on the track last Friday night. Best NA trap for me.
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 03:41 PM
  #35  
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,304
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
You do not have to move the engine, just remove clutter.
The engine swap is long since done and making good power. I trapped 98.6 MPH my first time out on the track last Friday night. Best NA trap for me.

good job!

is your new engine a salvage engine?
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 07:16 AM
  #36  
6SPD_HLSD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 242
Before everybody gets all exited this is yust an FYI. Check it out and draw your own conlusions:
http://www.motorvate.ca/mvp.php/504


Originally Posted by Cattman
The following dyno chart compares the headers with a stock y-pipe on a rather tired 97 SE with 100k+ miles. Note that the tested headers were not ceramic coated, and this will have a significant effect on heat retention and tubing wall friction (which will likely be good for a couple more horsepower).



Although peak horsepower increased by 16.4hp and peak torque by 14.9 ft/lbs, this does not describe how the power curve was extended by 500+ rpm instead of falling off a cliff. The Cattman headers added 16.5-18.6 more hp from 4800-6200 rpm and 15.5-18.5 more ft/lbs of torque from 4600-5800 rpm.

[BTW, have to say, the photographer did well on this. If anyone wants a more detailed image, feel free to contact me directly, I have a version you could use for a poster (and a shot without the gaskets).]

Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 07:45 AM
  #37  
MaximaMan77's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,815
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by 6SPD_HLSD
Before everybody gets all exited this is yust an FYI. Check it out and draw your own conlusions:
http://www.motorvate.ca/mvp.php/504
Umm, what exactly does that have to do with headers? What are you trying to say?
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 08:52 AM
  #38  
6SPD_HLSD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 242
How good of a bang you get for your buck.

Originally Posted by maximaman777
Umm, what exactly does that have to do with headers? What are you trying to say?
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 09:05 AM
  #39  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
after seeing pics of the stillen headers I think I will wait on cattmans for the 02-03 or possibly look into g35c's...
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #40  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Cattman is releasing the 2K2+ Y-pipe, so don't hold your breath on a long-tube headers. It just wouldn't make business sense.

G35c? As in buying one?

Originally Posted by blubyu2k2
after seeing pics of the stillen headers I think I will wait on cattmans for the 02-03 or possibly look into g35c's...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 AM.