Finally tuned Max at Lujan Motorsports
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
From: South Florida
Finally tuned Max at Lujan Motorsports
I finally got around to tuning the Maxima. I went to Lujan Motorsports today and had them install the 02 sim and the SAFC-II. I spent most of the day there, but I think it was worth it. Here is a pic of the dyno numbers before and after tuning. For those of you that notice the AFR, they did smooth it out after a few more runs.
Mods....http://www.cardomain.com/ride/793048
Mods....http://www.cardomain.com/ride/793048
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by s0ber
1st to say very impressive gains, so im guessing it was worth it??
do you feel the power? :P
EDIT: You didnt get any runfiles?
do you feel the power? :P
EDIT: You didnt get any runfiles?
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
Im interested to see why peak power is at 6500 (impossible at with stock IM) and why the graph is scaled to 500hp.
Wow those are some pretty good numbers.
However if you notice that at 6100 on your chart, your A/F takes a big fall. This is because you have the common SAFC-II random signal loss issue that I have. Sometimes at that rpm it just goes blind to the engine speed signal and when it does you get a 'zero' fuel adjustment. When it does this you have to completely power down the SAFC and turn it back on.
This is another reason I am trying to get people to avoid this thing. I haven't seen the VAFC-II do this yet. We may be able to solve this issue by using a different pickup.
edit: I just noticed you posted the numbers in 'STD'. Do you have the SAE numbers?
However if you notice that at 6100 on your chart, your A/F takes a big fall. This is because you have the common SAFC-II random signal loss issue that I have. Sometimes at that rpm it just goes blind to the engine speed signal and when it does you get a 'zero' fuel adjustment. When it does this you have to completely power down the SAFC and turn it back on.
This is another reason I am trying to get people to avoid this thing. I haven't seen the VAFC-II do this yet. We may be able to solve this issue by using a different pickup.
edit: I just noticed you posted the numbers in 'STD'. Do you have the SAE numbers?
Originally Posted by 95BLKMAX
Why its scaled at 500HP is useless. I would have asked them to redo the scale for a more accurate view of the graphs. However, Im looking at it and it seems as though peak power is plattau (sp*) from 5500-5900 RPM, then drops off. If you look they stay pretty much the same distance from the 250WHP mark, but by redline its at what I estimate 20WHP LESS than at that peak range
scaling makes a difference, when you are trying to see the discrete shape of the curve. you see a plateau because the scale is too small to accurately read.
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
scaling makes a difference, when you are trying to see the discrete shape of the curve. you see a plateau because the scale is too small to accurately read.
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
Im interested to see why peak power is at 6500 (impossible at with stock IM) and why the graph is scaled to 500hp.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
From: South Florida
I got the runfiles today, but I can not post attachments. Therefore, here is a link to a thread on the South Florida Maximas site where I have attached the runfiles. Go to post #16. SAE corrected numbers are 240 HP and 241 Torque. I will post a new graph soon.
http://www.southfloridamaximas.com/f...1686#post11686
http://www.southfloridamaximas.com/f...1686#post11686
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
Well, after looking at the runfile. They have the elevation set to 4500ft elevation....in Miami....then they are correcting for the altitude. What does that mean exactly....inflated HP #'s.
Originally Posted by NISMAX03
Here is an updated graph with the numbers SAE corrected....
[IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y145/NisMax03/MaximaDyno032006.jpg
[IMG]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y145/NisMax03/MaximaDyno032006.jpg
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
BTW, lujan motorsports WILL NOT give you the runfiles. Jrod1014 had the same issue.
Congrats on the numbers Jose... Truly impressive! How does it feel?
Good numbers
They numbers are what they are, but leaning out the AF does not normally result in gains like that. Anything else done during the tuning besides AF?
Same gear in all pulls right?
Just seems odd, but like I said they are what they are.
They numbers are what they are, but leaning out the AF does not normally result in gains like that. Anything else done during the tuning besides AF?
Same gear in all pulls right?
Just seems odd, but like I said they are what they are.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by jrod1014
Congrats on the numbers Jose... Truly impressive! How does it feel?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 566
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by I30tMikeD
Good numbers
They numbers are what they are, but leaning out the AF does not normally result in gains like that. Anything else done during the tuning besides AF?
Same gear in all pulls right?
Just seems odd, but like I said they are what they are.
They numbers are what they are, but leaning out the AF does not normally result in gains like that. Anything else done during the tuning besides AF?
Same gear in all pulls right?
Just seems odd, but like I said they are what they are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
Mar 12, 2020 12:06 AM
CAN-Toronto FS: Emanage Ultimate and plug/play Harness
knight_yyz
General Maxima Accessories (All Generations)
2
Nov 6, 2015 02:34 PM




