Chernmax 6th Gen Dyno Results

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:08 PM

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Chernmax 6th Gen Dyno Results

OK, most have been waiting to hear the dyno results of my 6th Gen:

Mods on car include:
Injen CAI
UDR Pulley
Hotshot Headers (From Alti SE-R)
Greddy SP-II catback
APEXi-Super AFC-II computer
Ground wiring kit

I had the dyno done at Swift Racing Technologies (SRT) in Beltsville, MD
Temp was 92 degrees with 20% humidity

The first 2 pulls where to tune the Apex

The 3rd pull was FTW!!!

WHP 253.1 (AT THE WHEEL!!!)
TQ 249

Big thanks to RedlineMax, DA-Max and SRT for getting my 6th Gen to this point. RedMax will post the actual Dyno sheet sometime tomorrow because they did not give me a printout but a computer disk and RedMax has the program software to print it so I gave him the disk.

OK, I'm out of here...

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:14 PM

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Runfiles to bizzy1999@hotmail.com

Great numbers!

SAE corrected? Where was peak hp...tq? Did they take it to fuel cut? What A/F did you tune for?

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:41 PM

Puppetmaster

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 16,551

From: Fairfax, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Runfiles to bizzy1999@hotmail.com

Great numbers!

SAE corrected? Where was peak hp...tq? Did they take it to fuel cut? What A/F did you tune for?

SRT typically gives out the STD corrected numbers (they did that at our dyno meet in April and on previous occassions), so I'd assume SAE corrected is something like 3-4% lower.

Those are decent numbers for a 5AT VQ35.

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:53 PM

ajcool2

Senior Member

iTrader: (43)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 10,550

From: Baltimore, Md

In for the charts.

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:54 PM

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Over in my neck of the woods STD is ALWAYS lower..

Low humidity FTW..

Jun 21, 2006 | 06:59 PM

steven88

Need A Light?

iTrader: (28)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 8,649

From: SoCal, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Over in my neck of the woods STD is ALWAYS lower..

Low humidity FTW..

super high elevation ftl

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:04 PM

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Nearest dyno is a mile high..

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:05 PM

vsamoylov

Guest

Posts: n/a

nice numbers for an auto

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:08 PM

SR20DEN

VQ Wizard

iTrader: (7)

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 6,661

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Runfiles to bizzy1999@hotmail.com

Great numbers!

SAE corrected? Where was peak hp...tq? Did they take it to fuel cut? What A/F did you tune for?

and vqtech@gmail.com

Thanks.

253 is impressive btw. I wasn't expecting that much. Good job guys.

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:43 PM

#10

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR20DEN

and vqtech@gmail.com

Thanks.

253 is impressive btw. I wasn't expecting that much. Good job guys.

I was expecting around 240, the first pull was 243, DA-Max treaked the Apex and the second pull was 249, One last tweak and the 3rd and final pull was 253.1

Today was a good day...

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:45 PM

#11

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

What did he tune for (A/F)?

Jun 21, 2006 | 07:48 PM

#12

SR20DEN

VQ Wizard

iTrader: (7)

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 6,661

From: Charlotte, NC

And the burning question now is, are those numbers quoted in SAE smoothing 5? And do you have the runfiles?

Jun 21, 2006 | 08:28 PM

#13

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR20DEN

And the burning question now is, are those numbers quoted in SAE smoothing 5? And do you have the runfiles?

RedMax has them because I don't have the software to display them. He will post them late today...

Jun 21, 2006 | 08:37 PM

#14

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Takes less than 5 mins to install. And its free. www.dynojet.com

Quote:

Originally Posted by chernmax

I don't have the software to display them.

Jun 21, 2006 | 08:51 PM

#15

SR20DEN

VQ Wizard

iTrader: (7)

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 6,661

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Takes less than 5 mins to install. And its free. www.dynojet.com

Aww come on. You can make it easier than that.

http://www.dynojet.com/downloads/zip/Winpep7.1.3.zip

Jun 21, 2006 | 08:58 PM

#16

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

250+whp... I think it's time to graduate from the bib....

Jun 21, 2006 | 09:12 PM

#17

DandyMax

3.5 in the works

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 2,477

From: Ontario, Canada

Congrats. Nice numbers! Run files too please to DandyMax @ auracom. com (no spaces).

Thanks.

Jun 21, 2006 | 09:26 PM

#18

DA-MAX

Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 13,978

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

What did he tune for (A/F)?

I got it down 13.0-13.5s+/-...not much guess work, 2-3% on the AFC from 4200-5800

Jun 22, 2006 | 03:41 AM

#19

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Takes less than 5 mins to install. And its free. www.dynojet.com

But he has the disk...

Jun 23, 2006 | 05:39 AM

#20

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Over in my neck of the woods STD is ALWAYS lower..

Low humidity FTW..

how is STD lower when the correction factor is more than SAE? Or did you mean STD is lower than uncorrected numbers?

BTW nice numbers, I'd like to see the chart also.

Jun 23, 2006 | 06:51 AM

#21

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu←

how is STD lower when the correction factor is more than SAE? Or did you mean STD is lower than uncorrected numbers?

It plays a part with humidity, do you want my runfiles? On average it's less than 1% (SAE vs STD in my area) (bout 2 whp)

A few of my run file data.

215.28 SAE
213.65 STD

233.66 SAE
232.24 STD

233.01 SAE
231.59 STD

Jun 23, 2006 | 07:31 AM

#22

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

I believe mine was:

253.1 SAE
252.5 STD

Jun 23, 2006 | 07:44 AM

#23

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chernmax

I believe mine was:

253.1 SAE
252.5 STD

HUMIDITY. plays a big role in STD and SAE. What were the run conditions? I had between 8% and 12% on all of my runs

Jun 23, 2006 | 07:46 AM

#24

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

It plays a part with humidity, do you want my runfiles? On average it's less than 1% (SAE vs STD in my area) (bout 2 whp)

thats odd, no worries...makes sense.

Jun 23, 2006 | 07:56 AM

#25

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

HUMIDITY. plays a big role in STD and SAE. What were the run conditions? I had between 8% and 12% on all of my runs

Temp was 92 degrees with 20% humidity

Jun 23, 2006 | 07:57 AM

#26

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Seems like you have the runfiles now.. Can i have them... please?

Jun 23, 2006 | 08:24 AM

#27

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Seems like you have the runfiles now.. Can i have them... please?

I wrote down everything from the screen during the dyno, RedMax has the runfiles...

Jun 23, 2006 | 08:30 AM

#28

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

What was the CF? (not SAE but 1.05, .98

)

Jun 23, 2006 | 09:19 AM

#29

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

What was the CF? (not SAE but 1.05, .98

)

OK, I wrote down everything but that...

Jun 27, 2006 | 09:56 PM

#30

kamski

.org extraordinaire

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 2,618

Could they email u the run files?

Thease would be great as you have every mod out for the car and Technosquare could use ur car as the baseline hi-end tune.

Kamski

Jun 27, 2006 | 10:11 PM

#31

SDot82

Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 555

Waiting on dyno sheet

............

Aug 11, 2006 | 10:38 AM

#32

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puppetmaster

Additionally, it looks really lean in the 3rd gear portion of the dyno, but the fact that AF is so constant in the high 14s leads me to believe it was still in closed loop and they were just doing that to get to a higher speed?

Why is smoothing set to 5??? Most I have seen are set to 0. Remove those graft it is confusing... And they do not represent the true power output that was displayed at SRT Engineering. This is the reason I don't want to give my run files to others...

Aug 11, 2006 | 10:54 AM

#33

chernmax

Thread Starter

Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 10,197

From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puppetmaster

This dyno was not done well and will not show the "true power output". How are the run files displayed here different from the ones at SRT?

You got PM...

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:09 AM

#34

Puppetmaster

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 16,551

From: Fairfax, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by chernmax

You got PM...

All files deleted at your request, and because you're freaking out.

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:12 AM

#35

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by chernmax

smoothing is set to 5 because thats what it should be set too. It reads higher with no smoothing because little spikes are everywhere and it doesn't represent the true power output. Looks like mid 230's is the correct.....not 250!

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:13 AM

#36

Puppetmaster

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 16,551

From: Fairfax, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by chernmax

Why is smoothing set to 5??? Most I have seen are set to 0. Remove those graft it is confusing... And they do not represent the true power output that was displayed at SRT Engineering. This is the reason I don't want to give my run files to others...

Chern, see this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SR20DEN

And the burning question now is, are those numbers quoted in SAE smoothing 5? And do you have the runfiles?

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:14 AM

#37

Puppetmaster

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 16,551

From: Fairfax, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu←

Thanks, I knew I wasn't wrong when I posted those graphs...

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:17 AM

#38

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puppetmaster

All files deleted at your request, and because you're freaking out.

I saw them and they looked a lot more accurate than some spikey choppy 0 smoothing graph.

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:19 AM

#39

Puppetmaster

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 16,551

From: Fairfax, VA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu←

I saw them and they looked a lot more accurate than some spikey choppy 0 smoothing graph.

Well, I had both sets up; one set with smoothing 5 and one set with smoothing 0, but he insisted that everything be taken down.

Aug 11, 2006 | 11:21 AM

#40

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puppetmaster

Well, I had both sets up; one set with smoothing 5 and one set with smoothing 0, but he insisted that everything be taken down.

looks like SRT displayed the wrong cars files then because runfiles dont lie and those numbers look to be exactly what every other 3.5 Auto dynos with his mods. 230ish whp that is, I didn't figure 250 was accurate.

Reply Share

First
Prev
1 / 2
Next
Last