All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Dyno results - 35 longblock with 30 timing components

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
Broaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
Dyno results - 35 longblock with 30 timing components

Some of you may know that I'm running a 35 right now in my S13. I've been doing this all summer with 30 timing components, cams and USIM. For this fall I decided to go to the dyno to help me decide how far I need to take power levels this winter. I'm already nearly satisfied with the quickness of the car as is but as the dyno proves this is largely due to the extreme lightweight of the thing. So, I thought I'd post this up to give everyone a heads up that getting a 35 longblock up and running temporarily on 30 stuff is totally feasible if you haven't the abilities, time, etc to do all the 35 stuff correctly.
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #2  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Would be nice if the scale was a little friendlier (higher resolution). You still @ 2060 w/o driver?
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #3  
Broaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
Yeah, sorry. Cardomain won't host it any larger. Key notes are peak TQ was 202. HP is of course 181 but I found it interesting that it happened at ~5200. Is this pointing to the fact that the manifold is choking it out before the cams? Also, for some reason A/F was fairly fat at 12.5 for most of the pulls. Dropping FP didn't raise A/F. I can't understand why TQ and HP would cross at 4700 rather than 5200. Anyone? I forgot about that until just now. I'm gonna swing by the shop soon. Its a dynodynamics BTW which reads significantly lower than a Dynojet/Mustang Dyno.

I haven't weighted it this summer but I was thinking it'd be only a hair lighter if not the same.
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #4  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Yeah, sorry. Cardomain won't host it any larger. Key notes are peak TQ was 202.
What RPM?
HP is of course 181 but I found it interesting that it happened at ~5200.
USDM IM, seems logical and constant when compared to past dynos. I realize that no one has really ever gone this route.

Is this pointing to the fact that the manifold is choking it out before the cams?
That's my guess. Got any other data?

I can't understand why TQ and HP would cross at 4700 rather than 5200.
Because the scale is not the same on both Y axes.

I'm gonna swing by the shop soon. Its a dynodynamics BTW which reads significantly lower than a Dynojet/Mustang Dyno.
hmm, I've seen A32's put down about 170 w/ BO's on those.
I haven't weighted it this summer but I was thinking it'd be only a hair lighter if not the same.
Jesus, that's the kicker right there.

Last edited by NmexMAX; Nov 8, 2007 at 03:23 PM.
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #5  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
USIM? Are you running 3.0 heads?
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #6  
pmohr's Avatar
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,329
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Gotta love how the shop labeled the runs as VG 240sx...
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 09:53 PM
  #7  
Broaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
Peak TQ was at 4200'ish.

Definitely nobody down this road before. Thats why I'm not sure which Z33 IM option to go with. No real data on my part. Just kinda intuition.

Different scales! Makes sense.

What are BO's?


Jesus, that's the kicker right there.
Well theres that and then the super short gearing.

Tatanko, the heads are 35 and LIM is 30. The ports are mismatched as hell and probably causing a huge flow hindrance.

Yeah, dude labels it vg even though he knows me fairly well.
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
why did you use 3.0 LIM and USIM on 3.5 heads
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #9  
96blkonblkse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,862
From: Vancouver
Nice man. Was expecting higher till i read your only using the 3.5 long block only. I am also wondering why you used the 3.0 LIM and USIM with the 3.5 heads? Would it not have been easier to do 3.5 LIM + 3.5 IM?

Must be a reason perhaps i missed it.

Nice swap though, and damn 2060lbs!!!
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 07:16 AM
  #10  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
He's only running the 3.0 LIM/IM temporarally guys.
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Ok, so what are the future plans?
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #12  
Broaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
Yeap, Nismo's got it. Its a temp setup. The 35 I got was a FWD version and there was no way I could use the FWD 35 IM. I wasn't able to get all the Z33 IM stuff at that time so I just ran the 30 stuff to tool around on some backroads a bit. If the Cosworth stuff would ever become officially available that'd be what I'd get but they won't release the d@mn thing.

Anybody got an idea why it'd be running at 12.5/1? Injectors and MAF are both A32 so what's the deal? I played with the FP dropping it all the way to 29PSI idle and the A/F only leaned out slightly. WTF?
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #13  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
BBMAF/CVTC remap/Equal length headers/Semi aggressive cams/ARP RB's/7500 rev limit.
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #14  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
BBMAF/CVTC remap/Equal length headers/Semi aggressive cams/ARP RB's/7500 rev limit.
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #15  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
@ using A32 software/hardware. Sue me,
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #16  
96blkonblkse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,862
From: Vancouver
AHhh i see. See i didnt know about the hood clearence thing. Makes sense, and i guess for the guys who want to do a bare bones setup or just to get the car up and running asap this would be good to know.

Have you thought about the pathfinder R50 IM? Not sure if that would work in your case, and i believe the Z33 IM is better in terms of top end power, but i really dont know. The pathfinder IM is pretty good design, super long runners for low-mid range, and the short runners for top end it almost dumps it straight into the LIM. I think someone did it around here and the results were pretty good.
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #17  
1chewabacha1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 781
From: Murderapolis
Don't you think it would have been easier to go with the more common SR20DET swap for that kinda power?

My bro has a 91 240sx w/ sr20det stock motor, basic bolt ons and run dyno'd 190 hp w/ only 12 psi.

But then again, the torque curve is nothing like what you got there..... and everybody has an SR20DET swap.... And the SR is TURBO'd while you're still NA with that power.... and you'll most likely kill an SR20 powered 240 running on their stock turbo......

So.... I guess I kinda answered my own question.... CAN"T WAIT TO SEE WHAT ELSE YOU HAVE IN STORE>
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 10:17 PM
  #18  
KRRZ350's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,572
From: Middleboro/Carver, Ma
Like whoa, 3.0 cams and usim?

What's wrong with cruising down backroads with no hood? Or was it that the 3.5 tb location wouldn't clear other 'stuff'?
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 09:55 AM
  #19  
Fred Allen Burge's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
Broan,
Thanks for the dyno, it's very helpful! If you are interested I can hook you up with a 350z complete intake manifold (all 3 pieces)for a reasonable price. PM from my site if you're interested as I don't visit here very often lately.

I'd looooooooooove to see a follow up dyno with the Z intake manifold (and no other changes)! I bet the increase would be substantial.

Then I'd looooooooove to see what some long tube headers w/ a nice merge collector and megaphones would do

Thanks,
Fred
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #20  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Ah I totally forgot about hood clearance issues. How much further does the FWD 3.5 intake manifold stick up than the 3.0 IM?

You're going to gain huge power when you swap intake manifolds, it's hard to imagine the massive power loss you're experiencing with ports that are so ill-matched.
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #21  
Broaner's Avatar
Thread Starter
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
Wow lots to respond to guys.

Pathy IM won't work due to hood clearance. I've definitely thought about doing that before but quickly nixed that.

Actually KZZR, I don't have a hood on it anyway.

Neal, 35 IM sticks up a ton further than the USIM. That said the USIM still won't clear the hood either. I just didn't wanna screw with the FF IM when I knew it would ultimately be a Z33 piece.

Thanks Fred. I'll be dropping you a line in the coming months about that. It would be interesting to see the gain from just the IM. I'll think about doing that.
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #22  
Mymax97's Avatar
Hi
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,247
From: broomall pa 19008
well itll deffinatlly be a fun car once you have it all done. Ive seen tilleys s13 3.5 turbo untuned run 11.2x at the track. Good luck with everything!
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 06:59 PM
  #23  
Soravia's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
You would get a whole lot more power with 2000 VI and intake cam timing mod. Just have it open a bit longer.

I'm making a custom manifold mod myself. I'm not cutting any firewall nor hood.

Last edited by Soravia; Apr 25, 2008 at 07:01 PM.
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:01 PM
  #24  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Soravia
You would get a whole lot more power with 2000 VI and intake cam timing mod. Just have it open a bit longer.
He'd make even more with all the 3.5 components.
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:05 PM
  #25  
Soravia's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Using all VQ35DE components would mean a whole lot more wiring and electronics. The only advantage would be having variable intake cam for low end torque with high end horsepower. I'm not messing with all that stuff myself.
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #26  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
I smell old thread
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ben2003GLE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
31
Jul 17, 2016 08:13 AM
Slamrod
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
6
Sep 3, 2015 07:38 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:54 PM.