5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Performance differences between Federal and Califoria specs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
Galo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,467
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Performance differences between Federal and Califoria specs?

Does anyone know of any documented performance differences between the '49 state' Maximas versus the NLEV/California emmission spec cars?
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
the two main differences I know of are the exhaust and the intake manifold. The front exhaust manifold has a pre-cat built right into it rather than in the y-pipe. Also, the intake manfold has some sort of a swirl control valve or something that is not present on the fed-spec maximas. There are most likely some ECU differences because of this also. In terms of performance, I think someone dyno'd a fed spec and cali spec maxima side by side.... can't recall the results though
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Don't the 2001+ cars ALL have Cali spec now?
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 10:10 AM
  #4  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Originally posted by medicsonic
Don't the 2001+ cars ALL have Cali spec now?
Yup.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 10:12 AM
  #5  
punkdork's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,528
I've got one of the last great ones. It's an automagic to be feared. I can even beat kev! Should I start listing "fed-spec" as a performance mod?
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
..

Originally posted by medicsonic
Don't the 2001+ cars ALL have Cali spec now?
Yes.

So far a couple FED specs have shown around 10ft/lbs. MORE torque than a Cali spec.

The ECUs are also different between the FED/CALI and even the AE.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 11:35 AM
  #7  
woosh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 956
Re: ..

Originally posted by IceY2K1


Yes.

So far a couple FED specs have shown around 10ft/lbs. MORE torque than a Cali spec.

The ECUs are also different between the FED/CALI and even the AE.
I couldn't find the picture but I know I saw it somewhere here before. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but the visual way to tell if you have cali spec is there are 4 connector plugs at the front of block just behind and a little below the radiator instead of 3? Right?
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 11:53 AM
  #8  
Max_Gator's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,039
Re: Re: ..

Originally posted by woosh


I couldn't find the picture but I know I saw it somewhere here before. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but the visual way to tell if you have cali spec is there are 4 connector plugs at the front of block just behind and a little below the radiator instead of 3? Right?
Instead of 2.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 11:54 AM
  #9  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Originally posted by punkdork
I've got one of the last great ones. It's an automagic to be feared. I can even beat kev! Should I start listing "fed-spec" as a performance mod?
And we will all at you when you do.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 03:08 PM
  #10  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Now I take it when I go to get my emissions test done, they are going to take the numbers for a CALI SPEC and not just a wheather i pass the Fed Spec.

Cause if it is just FedSpec numbers they look at, then hell, I am removing some crap.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 03:19 PM
  #11  
punkdork's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,528
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Now I take it when I go to get my emissions test done, they are going to take the numbers for a CALI SPEC and not just a wheather i pass the Fed Spec.

Cause if it is just FedSpec numbers they look at, then hell, I am removing some crap.
Depends on the smog laws where you live. I would assume if you don't live in a state that required cali-spec they won't test at cali levels.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 06:27 PM
  #12  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Performance differences between Federal and Califoria specs?

Originally posted by Galo
Does anyone know of any documented performance differences between the '49 state' Maximas versus the NLEV/California emmission spec cars?
No performance difference. Dyno proven.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 06:28 PM
  #13  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: ..

Oh? How can you say by my dyno results?

184hp and 193TQ? Thats what I thought

No difference in performance.

Originally posted by IceY2K1


Yes.

So far a couple FED specs have shown around 10ft/lbs. MORE torque than a Cali spec.

The ECUs are also different between the FED/CALI and even the AE.
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 06:29 PM
  #14  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: ..

Originally posted by Max_Gator


Instead of 2.
http://www.5thgenmaximas.com/russmax...ver/day2-1.jpg

Calif spec, see the 4 connectors?
Old Nov 12, 2001 | 10:08 PM
  #15  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Re: Re: ..

Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Oh? How can you say by my dyno results?

184hp and 193TQ? Thats what I thought

No difference in performance.

Ok. Just because your Max pulled 184/193 doesn't mean $hit. Different cars on different dynos.

Several dynos show FED models typically have 10ft/lbs more torque, but not all. It doesn't mean it's a guarantee, since all cars are not created equal.

Yes, there is a difference in performance, but nothing that you'll be able to tell EXCEPT on a dyno.
Old Nov 13, 2001 | 04:54 AM
  #16  
Max_Gator's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,039
We dyno tested a 2k5spd Cali spec w/ SI and Y, vs. two stock fed sped 2k 5spd. The Cali with mods dyno'd out at about the same as the two stock fed specs. However, the Cali had more miles AND aftermarket heavier wheels. When re-dyno'd later with lighter wheels, it improved significantly. I'll see if I can find the plot somewhere - but I don't have the re-dyno.

Short of it is that the difference is not that significant and hard to test on a dyno because you can't account for differences between individual cars. I'd think the only way to truly know the difference would be to do a large sample.

If as Russ says he dyno'd at 184/193, that compared to my dyno is 9 hp off stock but 4 above in torque (see my dyno link below).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James92SE
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
142
Jan 2, 2024 09:23 AM
doctorpullit
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
60
Dec 12, 2015 09:39 AM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Sep 26, 2015 12:01 PM
lux97Max
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
0
Sep 11, 2015 01:12 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.