4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Help Me Pass CA Smog? (High nox) :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
Magnifico's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 173
From: Oakland, CA
Help Me Pass CA Smog? (High nox) :(

Hi, I'm having trouble passing CA smog with high NO levels. First had car tested around in May, failed with high NO at 15 mph, passed at 25.

That test results: (Max = maximum allowed emissions)

15 MPH- FAIL
HC: 26 (55 max)
CO: 0.02 (0.5 max)
NO: 937 (437 Max)

25 MPH- PASS
HC: 14 (39 Max)
CO: 0.03 (0.48 Max)
NO: 204 (724 Max)

I had just gotten the car back then. Since then I've done all basic maintenance, I've changed all 3 O2 sensors, I've replaced the PCV hose which had a leak, and I've cleaned the EGR Valve (along with the TB, MAF, and IACV on the way, per the directions on this forum. New gaskets for all)

I failed again today, after the above listed maintenance and the 3 month difference, my new results are even worse:

15mph-FAIL
HC: 49
CO: 0.0
NO: 1751

25mph - FAIL
HC: 52
CO: 0.0
NO: 1820

Smog tech doesn't really know what could be wrong as there are no check engine codes. Things that have been suggested to me are EGR tube (which I cleaned), and the Cat, but the smog tech told me that if the Cat were bad all of my numbers should be worse, instead of just NOx.

I'm pretty clueless as to what to do, so any suggestions, ideas, help, or even just experiences in this area I'd be really grateful for.

Thanks for reading!

P.S. I've tried the "Carb Cleaner spray on intake hoses" trick to look for vacuum leaks. I didn't find any obvious ones, but I don't feel super confident in that area so who knows.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
asand1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,942
From: Reedsport, OR
High nox is is directly related to high combustion temps. Clean you EGR tube first off, do you have functioning EGR? Could be a cooling problem too, is your engine running hot?Running lean would do it too, but you don't have a code so I'm guessing no.

Last edited by asand1; Sep 1, 2010 at 08:42 PM.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #3  
jasonaaronfox's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
From: Charlottesville, VA
You can install a water vapor injection system before the throttle body. Tends to lower combustion temps and pollution.

Very cheap to make, here's a basic schematic.

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_...earth/me3.html

If you used a 4" pvc pipe with an endcap and topcap, a 4" diameter round airstone from petsmart you could place the airstone directly on top of a 3/4" air stream inlet pipe inserted horizontally through the base of the 4" pipe with a check valve outside the on the outer end and the inner ending in a T with hole drilled into it at base of the 4" pvc pipe. On top of that you can place set of drilled pipes as spacers to prevent the airstone from moving up under pressure. Placing your vacuum inlet at the top of the container.

That's be a touch better and safer than the mockup in the article and would provide larger amounts of water/alcohol vapor.

Been shown to work on fuel injected too.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #4  
flyineagle96's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 67
From: massachusetts
Put a bottle of, "guaranteed to pass" in the fuel tank.That will lower your nos,you'll pass the test.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
When was the last time you changed your plugs? That would help and make sure you are using premium fuel. People don't realize the components of 87 octane is garbage for our compression engines.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #6  
cartman854's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
From: NOR☼CAL
Best in CA is 91, and at 3.59 a gallon..... its almost worth going 87 =(.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
Magnifico's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 173
From: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by asand1
High nox is is directly related to high combustion temps. Clean you EGR tube first off, do you have functioning EGR? Could be a cooling problem too, is your engine running hot?Running lean would do it too, but you don't have a code so I'm guessing no.
I cleaned the EGR tube only a few days ago before I got it retested, I got it as clean as I could. Didn't help my NO levels, in fact theyve risen since a couple months ago . Pretty sure I put everything back together tight, new gaskets, etc

Originally Posted by jasonaaronfox
You can install a water vapor injection system before the throttle body. Tends to lower combustion temps and pollution.
Thanks for your info, while I don't doubt you're on to something and I appreciate your insight, I'd personally prefer if I could pass with more conventional, "stock" methods

Originally Posted by flyineagle96
Put a bottle of, "guaranteed to pass" in the fuel tank.That will lower your nos,you'll pass the test.
Never heard of this. Looked it up now, I'll give it a shot if i can find it. Thanks.

Originally Posted by maxgtr2000
When was the last time you changed your plugs? That would help and make sure you are using premium fuel. People don't realize the components of 87 octane is garbage for our compression engines.
Plugs are new and in great condition, actually. I only use premium fuel, which as cartman says, here in CA is 91 octane

Thanks for the replies so far guys.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #8  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
If the plugs are new make sure they are gapped correctly, misfires can contribute to high nox.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 07:31 PM
  #9  
99greddymax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 691
From: Bloomington Ca
did you try testing the egr?
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #10  
Magnifico's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 173
From: Oakland, CA
I've cleaned the EGR pipe/tube, but I don't know how to test the valve

Last edited by Magnifico; Sep 3, 2010 at 03:24 PM.
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #11  
99MAXPIMP's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 227
MY CAR JUST FAILED TODAY I NEED A NEW CAT THAT COULD BE YOUR PROB ANY 1 NO WHERE TO GET A CAT THAT WILL PASS CA SMOG
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #12  
Flugel89's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
From: Carlsbad, CA
I know that NOX is created by extreme combustion tempratures. With what you've done I don't have much to advise.

A friend of mine from Schneider Cams told me something the other day. He runs 9 parts denatured alchohol to 1 part gasoline in the tank, just a gallon or so of it in a nearly empty tank. The car will run like **** since it's not tuned to run properly on alchohol but it supposedly runs extremely clean for the pipe test. I don't know if it would cause a CEL, but he's never had a problem.

By the way I'm not responsible for any damage to your car if you try this. It's something to research and look in to though. If anybody else has heard of this or knows anything about it please speak.

Last edited by Flugel89; Sep 4, 2010 at 02:26 PM.
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:36 PM
  #13  
swatspyder's Avatar
Gotcha!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 117
I know how you pass it, move way the hell away from California.
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #14  
aussie983's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,341
From: SF bay area
I'm willing to bet that its your O2 sensors that are at least contributing a good amount to the high NOx. I had the same issues and new ones helped me pass. Should be about $40 each for OEM plug in ones. 2 sensors are the same if i recall before the cat converter. One more sensor downstream from the cat. If you're limited on budget, replacing the 2 upstream ones would be the most beneficial.
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #15  
Magnifico's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 173
From: Oakland, CA
Thanks for the new suggestions. Unfortunately I've already changed both upstream AND the downstream o2 sensors, before I even took the first test . I acutally had a check code for the left upstream O2 sensor before the first test, so that was a no brainer (I just went ahead and changed them all)
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #16  
perkman87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 737
From: West Palm Beach
Originally Posted by jasonaaronfox
You can install a water vapor injection system before the throttle body. Tends to lower combustion temps and pollution.

Very cheap to make, here's a basic schematic.

http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_...earth/me3.html

If you used a 4" pvc pipe with an endcap and topcap, a 4" diameter round airstone from petsmart you could place the airstone directly on top of a 3/4" air stream inlet pipe inserted horizontally through the base of the 4" pipe with a check valve outside the on the outer end and the inner ending in a T with hole drilled into it at base of the 4" pvc pipe. On top of that you can place set of drilled pipes as spacers to prevent the airstone from moving up under pressure. Placing your vacuum inlet at the top of the container.

That's be a touch better and safer than the mockup in the article and would provide larger amounts of water/alcohol vapor.

Been shown to work on fuel injected too.
Do Not Do This!!
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #17  
aussie983's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,341
From: SF bay area
Originally Posted by Magnifico
Thanks for the new suggestions. Unfortunately I've already changed both upstream AND the downstream o2 sensors, before I even took the first test . I acutally had a check code for the left upstream O2 sensor before the first test, so that was a no brainer (I just went ahead and changed them all)
Sorry! I must have failed to see that you had already changed them in your initial post. My bad
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 01:33 AM
  #18  
96i30azn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,184
From: 92626
Originally Posted by cartman854
Best in CA is 91, and at 3.59 a gallon..... its almost worth going 87 =(.
if 91 is 3.59, 87 will be 3.39. saves you a whole $3.70 per $60 tank. nice math skillz genius
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 03:11 AM
  #19  
myblzurchn's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 81
From: S.L. UT.
I also say stick with the 91 octane, its barely more expensive and is SO much better for the engine etc. After all its what nissan recommends "for top performance" that is.
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 09:44 PM
  #20  
jasonaaronfox's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by perkman87
Do Not Do This!!
And why I might ask? Works great on my max.
Old Sep 6, 2010 | 11:23 PM
  #21  
99MAXPIMP's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 227
change your cat i did and i past like a new car. my nox was way higher than yours
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #22  
ef9's Avatar
ef9
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 689
From: Keaau, Hawaii
I heard the cost of catalytic convertors have gone way up. Also, thefts of catalytic convertors are on the rise because of this. Crazy!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
maxinout93
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Oct 31, 2015 02:04 AM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 AM.