I seriously doubt that. Same chassis, same suspension and as long as you compare two with the same weight and tires you get same handling.

 

I think what he means is that there probably is a bit more weight over the front wheels with the 3.5 so that would hurt the handling. BUT I belive the 3.5 is just a bored and stroked 3.0 so the engine really didn't gain any weight.(am I right about that?)

Mike S.

 

Yes, that is correct.

You'd have to compare the ground clearance and more specifics on other changes made to the front end to be sure, but I would venture to guess that there is no significant difference.

 

I heard people say that the 3.5 is a little bit softer(SE)

If you take the 3.0 and 3.5, 3.0 is better but you won't even feel the difference most likley

 

Don't the 2K2 comes with a bigger wheel/tire combo than the 2K1s?

 

2k1 SE's came with the 17" wheel/tire if you got the Comfort and Convenience package. Since most did, that is why they are most common.

With that having been said, no real difference between 2k1 and 2k2 in that area.

 

I heard the 3.0 can pull 0.8134 lateral g's.
whereas the 3.5 can pull 0.8133 lateral g's.

chalk one up for the 3.0~!

 

yes i think so,
b/c 3.5 has MORE POWER, therefore its had to control

 

the 3.5 blows.





























j/k