Bad (horrible) Track Time
Bad (horrible) Track Time
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
Re: Bad (horrible) Track Time
Originally posted by CanadianMaxima
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
Not to be a master of the obvious, but maybe try a faster car? What would have been a good time for you?
Have you done a whole tune-up recently? I know my car needs it and it certainly does help. You might have the same power problem that lots of 3rd gen's seem to suffer from. There are too many potential things that can malfunction in some sort of way and cause all these little decreases in performance. 1hp there and 1hp here doesn't sound like a lot but, it can all add up and seriously hurt performance. I'm having many of these problems lately such as 02 sensor replacement (meaning I need to!), half tune-up (i've already done half of it), possible vacuum leaks, cat malfunctioning, muffler malfunctioning, knock sensor retarding timing (not sure on this one yet). I'm just going to save myself some trouble and get a CAI, 02 sensor and the whole exhaust w/ a high flow cat. Hopefully that will solve some of the problems while I try and see if there is anything else I can fix. Sorry if none of this applies to you but, I thought I should at least mention it.
Re: Bad (horrible) Track Time
Originally posted by CanadianMaxima
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
Re: Re: Bad (horrible) Track Time
Originally posted by KLoWnPR109
Your 2.8 60' is killing you. Look at my time in my sig. I'm only 1 mph faster than your trapspeed and I beat you by .7. I think if you get a better launch then you will easily hit low 17s, high 16s.
Your 2.8 60' is killing you. Look at my time in my sig. I'm only 1 mph faster than your trapspeed and I beat you by .7. I think if you get a better launch then you will easily hit low 17s, high 16s.
Re: Bad (horrible) Track Time
It is all in the launch. Spinning that much killed any hope of a good ET. But from the 1/8 to 1/4 trap you gain around 16mph. That is pretty good, so your lacking on the bottom end. A 2.4x 60' would have gotten you a 16.8-17.0.
Originally posted by CanadianMaxima
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
i was looking at the 1/4th times and i think i might have the slowest. yes i know, i have an auto vg which was stock at the time but a 17.6? am i expecting too much?
heres the slip:
R/T: 1.133
60': 2.829
330: 7.607
1/8: 11.517
mph: 62.87
1000: 14.840
1/4: 17.685
mph: 78.69
i did have about half a tank of gas and my spare (the track is far from my house and i didn't want to risk it). i didn't do any fancy launching techniques. my car runs great so do you think it was just my extra weight? plus it had just finished raining so it was a little wet.
Yes it is however, the driver sometimes doesn't allow it
. Also where did you race and how high above sea level is it? Did you do a burnout in the water box or drive around it?
. Also where did you race and how high above sea level is it? Did you do a burnout in the water box or drive around it?
Originally posted by CanadianMaxima
i know that the auto vg isn't fast but isn't it capable of better than a 17.6ish?
i know that the auto vg isn't fast but isn't it capable of better than a 17.6ish?
Yes it is however, the driver sometimes doesn't allow it . Also where did you race and how high above sea level is it? Did you do a burnout in the water box or drive around it?
Originally posted by fenix
You should be able to drop 2 seconds off if you remove the maple leaves from your caps
You should be able to drop 2 seconds off if you remove the maple leaves from your caps
You should be able to drop 2 seconds off if you remove the maple leaves from your caps
ouch.. but actually i think they make me go faster
In FLA I would be careful, a lot of locals don't love Canadians (or should I say "Canadiens"). I guess it's safer than a "fleur de lys".
Originally posted by Chris91SE
i love em...i have new pics ya know
i love em...i have new pics ya know
now I cant wait for my hood and kit and new paint, soon though only another month or two.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsi6001
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
12
Oct 3, 2022 10:23 PM
FlaMark
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
25
Aug 28, 2015 10:15 AM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM
laparka66
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 6, 2015 09:36 AM




