![]() |
Something's wrong with my car.
Hey, it was my first time at the track, and the best I could do was a 15.1 at 91.51 mph. I also could not get past a 2.3xx 60'. My clutch was slipping, but i thought i could at least get into the 14's. i have a 1998 GLE fully loaded, converted to 5spd, y-pipe, no spare tire, no jack, ADR 17", 17lbs each, (did have a wooden board in the trunk, but i doubt that made any diff), on a slipping ACT stage 1 clutch. I took out my subs for the track run.
A friend from the .org showed up for his first time at the track as well, and his FIRST RUN was a 14.8 with a 2.3 60', and a slipping clutch. Before my car went to the track, it started making a weird ticking noise. I'm gonna track my car again, but I hope to get into the 14's. what do you reccommend, as far as mods, weight reduction? I'm only keeping the VQ30 for about one more month until i do the 3.5 swap. Thanks, -Freddy |
How bad is the clutch slipping? That is the most important question. If it's slipping significantly then your run was botched from the beginning so your 1/4 mile doesn't necessesarily indicate a problem (besides the slipping clutch).
|
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
How bad is the clutch slipping? That is the most important question. If it's slipping significantly then your run was botched from the beginning so your 1/4 mile doesn't necessesarily indicate a problem (besides the slipping clutch).
I verified this, and it WASNT an ACT Stage 1, it was a Daikin OEM replacement clutch. (Key Value) |
Originally Posted by tavarish
Hey, it was my first time at the track, and the best I could do was a 15.1 at 91.51 mph. I also could not get past a 2.3xx 60'. My clutch was slipping, but i thought i could at least get into the 14's. i have a 1998 GLE fully loaded, converted to 5spd, y-pipe, no spare tire, no jack, ADR 17", 17lbs each, (did have a wooden board in the trunk, but i doubt that made any diff), on a slipping ACT stage 1 clutch. I took out my subs for the track run.
A friend from the .org showed up for his first time at the track as well, and his FIRST RUN was a 14.8 with a 2.3 60', and a slipping clutch. Before my car went to the track, it started making a weird ticking noise. I'm gonna track my car again, but I hope to get into the 14's. what do you reccommend, as far as mods, weight reduction? I'm only keeping the VQ30 for about one more month until i do the 3.5 swap. Thanks, -Freddy Your trap seems a tad low. I think your trap does confirm your time. what did your friend trap when he ran 14.8? |
did you lets your car cool down befor you ran it. you got catback? get catback you might see some better result with it
|
i got a 94.?mph trap when i ran the 14.8, but i think that the track was very cold and that hurt the people that were on street tires...ill post up my slips later if anyone cares. ohh i also had a 2.3?? 60' on that first pass.
|
Originally Posted by tedo007
did you lets your car cool down befor you ran it. you got catback? get catback you might see some better result with it
|
Originally Posted by liqidvenom
i got a 94.?mph trap when i ran the 14.8, but i think that the track was very cold and that hurt the people that were on street tires...ill post up my slips later if anyone cares. ohh i also had a 2.3?? 60' on that first pass.
|
fred, i think its the slipping clutch, maybe the fac tu dont hvae more airry exhaust flow can be kickin u back a bit GL next time
|
fred, i think its the slipping clutch, maybe the fac tu dont hvae more airry exhaust flow can be kickin u back a bit GL next time
|
I also ran at EnglishTown, I ran a 14.75 @92.3 w/ a 2.37 60'. Don't you guys think my trap is low as well ? How could I run I think a good time with such a crappy 60' and trap? MODs: Y-pipe/Short Ram/Cat-back Sawblades.
|
not sure..u must have managed to leave the line and pull hard then maybe slow up a bit.
|
f'ucking factory freaks, is what it is.
|
tavarish is this your first run on the track, if so there are many factors that make your time. if you have run before and more than once then what were those numbers before if any? 15.1 isnt that bad considering a better take off could yield you a 14.9 which aint bad at all. i ran a 14.6 once and turned around and ran a 13.1 right behind it all because my first launch was horrible, but my mph remained the same 103-106mph. 92mph is just about right for your poer output. a 96 trap and up would put you in the 230hp range.
|
I must suck because all I could manage was 14.6 @ 98 in the 1/4 (that was without the nitrous only 00VI, intake, and y-pipe).
|
Originally Posted by SDot82
I must suck because all I could manage was 14.6 @ 98 in the 1/4 (that was without the nitrous only 00VI, intake, and y-pipe).
|
98mph is a great trap for a 4th gen....wat was ur launch strategy and u have a slip to post
|
Originally Posted by C MAX
tavarish is this your first run on the track, if so there are many factors that make your time. if you have run before and more than once then what were those numbers before if any? 15.1 isnt that bad considering a better take off could yield you a 14.9 which aint bad at all. i ran a 14.6 once and turned around and ran a 13.1 right behind it all because my first launch was horrible, but my mph remained the same 103-106mph. 92mph is just about right for your poer output. a 96 trap and up would put you in the 230hp range.
|
Originally Posted by C MAX
humn that trap sounds like a 60 shot, you sure thats without nitrous. what is your n/a hp.
|
Originally Posted by tavarish
yea, it was my first run at the track. I guess i gotta get me some more mods (read: DECENT , non-TICKING ENGINE) so I can get a better slip next time I go. I know with 200whp, you can get into the 13's with a good driver.
|
Originally Posted by liqidvenom
98mph is a great trap for a 4th gen....wat was ur launch strategy and u have a slip to post
Well this is the only one I could find its almost 98 if you round up:bonk: :slap: ... http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y19...2/timeslip.jpg |
Originally Posted by SDot82
Well this is the only one I could find its almost 98 if you round up:bonk: :slap: ...
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y19...2/timeslip.jpg |
I went this past friday and ran
60ft 2.374 330 6.622 1/8 10.093 1/4 15.713 mph 84.89 I think somethings wrong, I ran a 16.373 at 83mph 2 runs before with a 2.598 60ft |
Originally Posted by zack342
orly......200whp you say
|
Originally Posted by t6378tp
I went this past friday and ran
60ft 2.374 330 6.622 1/8 10.093 1/4 15.713 mph 84.89 I think somethings wrong, I ran a 16.373 at 83mph 2 runs before with a 2.598 60ft |
Originally Posted by t6378tp
I went this past friday and ran
60ft 2.374 330 6.622 1/8 10.093 1/4 15.713 mph 84.89 I think somethings wrong, I ran a 16.373 at 83mph 2 runs before with a 2.598 60ft |
Originally Posted by SDot82
Well this is the only one I could find its almost 98 if you round up:bonk: :slap: ...
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y19...2/timeslip.jpg |
Originally Posted by tavarish
krismax ran a 13.8 with similar mods to yours.
|
Originally Posted by tavarish
krismax ran a 13.8 with similar mods to yours.
|
Originally Posted by jmeister
Was that with his no rev limiter & serious weight reduction?
He also had a 00vi, and i doubt it makes any useable power at 8k rpms, so the rev limit that far up would be pretty much negligiblie, and valve float would be an issue. |
Originally Posted by liqidvenom
he also gutted his car and had a pathy tb if i recall
will you do NOT have the dirtiest 4th gen in jersey. |
Originally Posted by tavarish
rev limit at 8k, and some weight reduction, but nothing seriously bad, i've been in his car, it had a full interior.
He also had a 00vi, and i doubt it makes any useable power at 8k rpms, so the rev limit that far up would be pretty much negligiblie, and valve float would be an issue. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands