450whp 4th gen VS a 400whp acura intergra

Subscribe
Nov 23, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #41  
Hmm a ls block can hold a lot of boost..
Reply
Nov 23, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #42  
Theres a local guy here w/ an 60-1 in his LS teggy and it gets like 15ps at 5,000. Its running 9.5:1 comp, and managed a 7.13 in his integra with a 1.8 60ft last weekend at the 1/8 mile.


sweet my postcount is now 1320
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #43  
Quote: Theres a local guy here w/ an 60-1 in his LS teggy and it gets like 15ps at 5,000. Its running 9.5:1 comp, and managed a 7.13 in his integra with a 1.8 60ft last weekend at the 1/8 mile.


sweet my postcount is now 1320
That is sweet boost for that comp level. The 80-90s turbo Chryslers I play with, c/r is only 8.1 and most do not mod any higher.
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #44  
Quote: i havent noticed anyone mention how much tq these cars are making...

a 400hp teg with 230ft-lbs will get walked by a 500hp max with 450 ft-lbs.

the amount of tq/lb also plays a big factor in this.
"Torque wins races, Horse power sells cars!"
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #45  
Quote: "Torque wins races, Horse power sells cars!"
That's not really true either....
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #46  
Quote: I run 15psi, I haven't done a compression test lately, but it seems to be handling it fine.
t61@15Psi in a 3.0= 400whp Omg
You guys should post vids & dyno #'s
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #47  
450 whp??? DYNO please?

It's not that I doubt you, but that is an amazing feat in a 3.0.
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #48  
Man this thread is pointless and getting no where. No dyno no timeslip. Its been 18 days...
Reply
Nov 24, 2007 | 01:13 PM
  #49  
IBFTL
Reply
Nov 29, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #50  
Quote: That's not really true either....
That was a quote from Caroll Shelby, though he said the HP part first.

Here is a very good page on HP and torque.

http://craig.backfire.ca/pages/autos/horsepower
Reply
Nov 29, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #51  
Quote: That was a quote from Caroll Shelby, though he said the HP part first.

Here is a very good page on HP and torque.

http://craig.backfire.ca/pages/autos/horsepower
Preaching to the choir. My point is that the statement you quoted is/was a GROSS oversimplication.
Reply
Nov 29, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #52  
the 11.9s civic i raced sunday would say otherwise about the tq thing. being only ~ 1 s faster through the 1/8th and almost 2s faster in the 1/4 = massive hp/wt ratio and low tq/wt ratio
Reply
Nov 30, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #53  
Quote: Preaching to the choir. My point is that the statement you quoted is/was a GROSS oversimplication.
you seem to have developed jeff syndrome...maybe you can go back to being yourself and actually just say why you feel it is a GROSS oversimplication.
Reply
Nov 30, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #54  
Quote: Preaching to the choir. My point is that the statement you quoted is/was a GROSS oversimplication.
I just wanted to clear up that the quote was not mine.

The URL posted was an attempt to help shed more light on things, than what the quote did. Not necessarily for you, but anyone else who is interested. I know I found it a good read.
Reply
Dec 1, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #55  
Sorry guy the race bever happend and the 450 was just a guess but my wideband took a poop on me a and I could not finish tunning the car for the 18psi. But i did dyno a couple of days ago on a dyno mite load bearring dyno that reads about 15% less than a normal 248 dyno jet and still managed to put down 291whp and about 317wtp at a little 11psi. hx35's really start to move up in power after 12psi.On a dynojet I would have made around 340whp and 360wtp at the 15% loss from the load berring dyno
Reply
Dec 1, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #56  
Quote: No graph.
No care, you’ve done well ( ‘tune’ it nicely) But, there’s nothing to support your claims.
......................................
Reply
Dec 1, 2007 | 04:54 AM
  #57  
Dyno guy didn't have a tail-sniffer? You need to crank that thing up.........
Reply
Dec 2, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #58  
Quote: Dyno guy didn't have a tail-sniffer? You need to crank that thing up.........
yeah he did but before I could get the airfuel dialed in at low boost (11psi) the last 3 runs the cars started messing up with the plugs or maybe spark blowout. But give me some time And ill have it all out on paper with higher boost
Reply
Dec 7, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #59  
Quote: 450 whp??? DYNO please?

It's not that I doubt you, but that is an amazing feat in a 3.0.
Haven't we stated he has a DEK!?!
Reply
Dec 7, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #60  
Quote: Haven't we stated he has a DEK!?!
What difference does that make, it’s still a 3.0.
Reply
Dec 7, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #61  
I raced my SC max @ 10psi (dynoed at 328 whp at 13 psi) so easy to say i was at about 290-300 and 270 tq.

I raced against jcy98maxse awhile back on his old DEK and a gt35r at 17 psi with horrible tune, and j&s pulling timing like a mo fo. But his car held the boost for about a week.
Reply
Dec 7, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #62  
Quote: What difference does that make, it’s still a 3.0.
yea dont pay attention i thought he had a 3.5
Reply
Subscribe