3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

JWT ECU and Knock Sensor thread split

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #1  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
IMHO it's a REAL bad idea to bypass the ks.
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
tripleGmax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,492
yeah suzy soccermom needs a knock sensor no doubt haha

http://maxima.gregg-henry.com/grace_imports/

here are all the pics youve sent me.
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #3  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
I've had my ks bypassed (with advanced timing) for a while and I haven't had any problems (just have to use premium fuel and listen for pinging)
Originally Posted by Brad92SE
Engine looks great!! Regarding the knock sensor, everyone is gonna say its a bad idea, but I ran mine bypassed for a couple months N/A and for about 8 months while FI, and I haven't had a single problem. I have even overboosted the engine once and nothing broke (luckily ). As long as you don't push the timing too far and keep good gas in it like you said, then it should be fine. I can't wait to see some dyno numbers!
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
Cliff Clavin's Avatar
Way out West
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,564
From: Oregon
You might be able to just relocated the KS to somewhere easier to access. I don't think I would delete it. You can gain hp with timing advanced, but I wouldn't do it without a KS. It's not that big of an expense for a little piece of mind.

The build looks delicious, BTW. I wish I could put that in my car.
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,646
From: 127.0.0.1
after having a SAFC-II hooked up I would not bypass the KS

especially with an increased CR, but thats just me
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 11:55 PM
  #6  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by MrGone
after having a SAFC-II hooked up I would not bypass the KS

especially with an increased CR, but thats just me





......
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:55 AM
  #7  
tripleGmax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,492
Originally Posted by 505max94se
I've had my ks bypassed (with advanced timing) for a while and I haven't had any problems (just have to use premium fuel and listen for pinging)
if your ks is bypassed then what do you do if you hear pinging......
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 05:09 AM
  #8  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Originally Posted by tripleGmax
if your ks is bypassed then what do you do if you hear pinging......

If you have it bypassed and are useing premium fuel[you must use premium if you bypass!] then you need to replace the k/s...
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #9  
Brad92SE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,232
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by MrGone
after having a SAFC-II hooked up I would not bypass the KS

especially with an increased CR, but thats just me
With the SAFC-II though, can't you monitor the engine knock? Or does it need to connect to the knock sensor to do that?
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #10  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
i guess if you feel it's ok..then go with it.
Why not, all with JWT ecus are running without any timing or fuel knock maps anyways..
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #11  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Can you expand on that? I don't believe JWT would program the ecu to ignore the ks and fuel maps. How can the engine run w/o a fuel maps? You mean ignore the 02 sensor? I get great mileage with my jwt ecu. I have to think it's still using the 02 sensor.

Originally Posted by lanedrifters
Why not, all with JWT ecus are running without any timing or fuel knock maps anyways..
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #12  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
Actually I meant that the stock nissan programs have 2+ different timing and fuel maps for knock or high load (4th or 5th gear) where as JWT sets all the maps the same..= no retarded timing or richened fuel for knock conditions. Ive looked at both a stock ve 5spd bin and A JWT ve 5spd bin.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:08 AM
  #13  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Odd as alot of my gains I feel from the JWT is the low end/low rpm. Great response. And of course the higher rev limiter.

But what you say makes some sense as they tell you premium fuel only.

I ran the ks bypass on my JWT ecu VE. Let's just say during the summer on 91 octane, that was no-no.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #14  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
The JWT timing maps are set +2 degrees across the map vs. a stock no knock timing map. The stock ecu only looks for knock up to about 3500 rpm anyways. The JWT ecu also has the fuel map richened up alot at high load /rpms. When I first dynoed my max with the stock ecu the afr's were pretty good but could have been richened up a bit. I have dynoed with a JWT yet but ive heard they run way rich.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #15  
subs1000w's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,371
apperently ford didnt start using knock sensors on the mustang untill the 99 cobra and look at all the guys runing all kinds of crazy high conpression and FI motors in all those old stangs with no complaints. and appearentlly disabling them isnt uncommon for newert cobras either somthing about false triggers during launch which pulls timing and scews up the run?

i moved mine to where the air box used to sit because for some reason when id bypass it it would throw a code but ive run it like that for almost 2 years with lots of spray and the last time i check my compression "before the motor died (bearings again)" it was all around 150-155

anyway really who cares what this does it sounds like hes got his **** together and if he wants to do it like that dont bother him
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #16  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
This is OT but ive always wondered how a resistor (bypass method) works when the ecu is looking for an ac voltage response from the knock sensor not a resistance?
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #17  
Grace_Imports's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 551
Originally Posted by lanedrifters
This is OT but ive always wondered how a resistor (bypass method) works when the ecu is looking for an ac voltage response from the knock sensor not a resistance?
Most sensors give a reading back to an ECU by varying amounts of resistance whether they take temp readings (thermistor) or position readings (potentiometer). In regards to a KS...The KS will recieve a certain amount of voltage. If things are running fine and normal then the ECU will recive a certain voltage. If a knock is detected then the sensor will give a different voltage reading back to the ECU so it can back off the timing. By using a resistor, you will give the ECU a constant reading that everything is ok. The catch is that the driver/mechanic/tuner has to be on top of their game and become the KS themselves.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #18  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,646
From: 127.0.0.1
Originally Posted by lanedrifters
Actually I meant that the stock nissan programs have 2+ different timing and fuel maps for knock or high load (4th or 5th gear) where as JWT sets all the maps the same..= no retarded timing or richened fuel for knock conditions. Ive looked at both a stock ve 5spd bin and A JWT ve 5spd bin.
then the JWT ECU has just become the sh1ttiest product I've ever heard of, and is far more harmful than a ebay resistor or soda pop can in the intake.

Also seeing as JWT has not released their bin files, you can forgive me for being skeptical.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 03:21 PM
  #19  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,646
From: 127.0.0.1
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Odd as alot of my gains I feel from the JWT is the low end/low rpm. Great response. And of course the higher rev limiter.

But what you say makes some sense as they tell you premium fuel only.

I ran the ks bypass on my JWT ecu VE. Let's just say during the summer on 91 octane, that was no-no.
if JWT does infact set the KS maps to match the regular maps, the resistor on a JWT equipped car wouldn't make a difference at all.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #20  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Originally Posted by MrGone
if JWT does infact set the KS maps to match the regular maps, the resistor on a JWT equipped car wouldn't make a difference at all.
Originally Posted by lanedrifters
The JWT timing maps are set +2 degrees across the map vs. a stock no knock timing map. The stock ecu only looks for knock up to about 3500 rpm anyways. The JWT ecu also has the fuel map richened up alot at high load /rpms. When I first dynoed my max with the stock ecu the afr's were pretty good but could have been richened up a bit. I have dynoed with a JWT yet but ive heard they run way rich.

Hot day, loading it at low rpm, no ks protection, crap 91 octane, going up steep hill, jwt ecu = ouch
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #21  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
They dont have to release anything, I own one (its for sale btw) and have pulled the bin from it using calumsult. And like I said before A resistor to ground cannot replicate an ac voltage which is what the knock sensor puts out to the ecu. So I dont think the resistors are really doing much?? Maybe allowing some transient voltage to go to ecu? I dont know, Im just a newb
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #22  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
There may be and extreme knock safety retard built in kind of like the limp home mode but I am not sure about that either.

BTW if you havent seen these site yet:
ZTECHZ
ECCS Tuning

Youll also find links to other nissan ecu sites as well from these
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #23  
tripleGmax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,492
i like how my post looks completely out of place, lol
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 07:09 PM
  #24  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,646
From: 127.0.0.1
Well I know of 2 members with JWT Equipped cars have blown stock engines. Regardless it makes me happy I went with an SAFC-II over a JWT
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #25  
Grace_Imports's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 551
Originally Posted by lanedrifters
This is OT but ive always wondered how a resistor (bypass method) works when the ecu is looking for an ac voltage response from the knock sensor not a resistance?
You're correct that an ECU is looking for voltage from a sensor. That sensor will use resistance to change the voltage signal that it is sending back to the ECU. Resistance causes a voltage drop. If you put a resistor with a given value (of resistance) in place of a KS then it is dropping the voltage going through that sensor to a given amount. In the case of the KS, you would use a resistor that gives a value back to the ECU that is the same that the ECU gets when things are normal for the KS. The bottom line is that resistance changes voltage value. I can explain further but, maybe that makes sense.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #26  
lanedrifters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 94
From: Ventura, Ca.
I understand what you are saying but the ks is a single wire unit. the ks ..itself.. produces an ac current/voltage its not like a temp sensor that is fed a voltage from the ecu and varies the output voltage due to resistance.. The piezo/elect. element, that is the ks, produces a voltage on its own due to vibration. it does not get any reference voltage from the ecu to vary.It is more like an o2 sensor(single wire) it creates its own voltage that is read by the ecu.. not a resistance.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #27  
maximaboi's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 402
ok I did my oil change the other day and I was listening for the VTCs and I heard a very faint knocking comming from the rear of the engine on the passengers side. when I bought this car it had a resistor on the KS. he said that it had a new KS but it needed a new wiring harness for it. he gave me the new wiring harness.

do you think I should replace the KS because its knocking or should I just replace the wiring harness and see if that helps.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #28  
Grace_Imports's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 551
If you have a knocking sound at idle then it's probably not detonation. Detonation or pinging will usually occur when there is a load on the engine...uphill, low RPM in a higher gear, starting off etc. I would recommend replacing the harness if it needs it but you should also find out the source of your noise. It could be a lifter (HLA) or VTC.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #29  
maximaboi's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 402
ok well it must be my VTCs. maybe just the rear one is ticking. they would only tick after about 2.5k on an oil change but I guess they tick more often now that toyota changed the filter.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #30  
Grace_Imports's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 551
You can get a mechanics s***hoscope for cheap from most parts stores. They can be handy for trying to isolate an abnormal engine noise.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #31  
subs1000w's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,371
Originally Posted by MrGone
Well I know of 2 members with JWT Equipped cars have blown stock engines. Regardless it makes me happy I went with an SAFC-II over a JWT
can you define blown motor thats kinda vague are we talking about low/no compression in a few cylinders or developing a bearing knock or somthinhg else

i only know one person thats detonated so bad to destroyed some pistons NA it was a honda with 12:1 compresion that he never tuned and it started to burn oil really bad and when he pulled the head the pistons looked like this



i just dont see how a 10:1 engine with a well designed combustion chamber and 93oct would detonate bad enough to self destruct
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #32  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by tripleGmax
if your ks is bypassed then what do you do if you hear pinging......
drive it home and retard the ignition timing. I'm running a 20 degree advance with ks bypassed. I have't heard it knock or ping yet in 8 months, even this last HOT summer in albuquerque I have very good hearing and I'm always in tune with my car.

Other things can cause detonation as well, like carbon build up in the combustion chamber (causes higher compression, and possibly detonation).

From what Jeff said, I wouldn't use jwt without a ks.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #33  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,646
From: 127.0.0.1
Originally Posted by subs1000w
can you define blown motor thats kinda vague are we talking about low/no compression in a few cylinders or developing a bearing knock or somthinhg else

i only know one person thats detonated so bad to destroyed some pistons NA it was a honda with 12:1 compresion that he never tuned and it started to burn oil really bad and when he pulled the head the pistons looked like this

[img]http://www.ba-f-body.org/photos/flame/piston1.jpg[img]

i just dont see how a 10:1 engine with a well designed combustion chamber and 93oct would detonate bad enough to self destruct
#1 blown ring/cracked land
#2 thrown rod


To the best of my knowledge neither motor has been disassembled yet for a full inspection.

On a track only car, sure, why not... I guess, if you don't mind work. On a daily driver/street prepped car, I'd rather play it safe.
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #34  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by MrGone
#1 blown ring/cracked land
#2 thrown rod


To the best of my knowledge neither motor has been disassembled yet for a full inspection.

On a track only car, sure, why not... I guess, if you don't mind work. On a daily driver/street prepped car, I'd rather play it safe.
Was one of them matt's motor? Who had the other blown ve?
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #35  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127


Originally Posted by 505max94se
Was one of them matt's motor? Who had the other blown ve?
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:09 AM
  #36  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Dredging up bad memories huh.
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:39 AM
  #37  
Wiking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,323
From: EU Scandinavia
Originally Posted by MyGreenMax94
Dredging ...
Piezo element:
- no resistance 'sittin on table'
- resistance only when bending, R depends on force
- old KS bad: piezo lost its pretension. Like any Alu/Bronze metal piece would do.
- FSM: dont ever use KS element which has been dropped. (oh boy, is there one?)

ECU feeds voltage to KS, reads KS input:
- wire ok, bent piezo, some resistance, input is tied down, = NO ign retard signal
- wire broken, input is not tied down but floatin = ign retard signal
- wire ok, vibrated piezo, millisecond gaps in resistance, input is NOT continously tied down, = detonation = ign retard signal

Note: 'down' could be also up (no documentation), doesnt matter.

Bad KS cannot keep the input tied, like this

see http://www.cardomain.com/ride/748507/9

Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #38  
Grace_Imports's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 551
I don't see detonation causing a puked rod. The ARP rod bolts in my VE are IMO better insurance to keep the bottom happy than a KS would ever be. Enough detontation will break ring lands which I have seen, each in Hondas which are known for weak factory pistons when pushed anyway. If an engine was allowed to detonate until it destroyed itself I would blame that on the driver/tuner/mechanic rather than the knock sensor. The KS doesn't guarantee that detonation will be eliminated. The conditions may be as much that the detonation may exceed what pulling the timing back will resolve. Lean out a boosted engine enough once and see what happens. Carbon build up may raise the compression ratio but you also have to consider that peaks of carbon in the chamber will become hotspots thus becoming a source for preignition.
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #39  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Thread Starter
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
KS signal will tell the ecu to pull the timing back after the initial knock is heard. Thing is some ping/knock is not easily heard by the ear. You could be pinging and not hear it.
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #40  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Detonation can cause a rod bearing to be literally beaten out of place.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 PM.