3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

How fast is VE Automatic?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
Thread Starter
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
How fast is VE Automatic?

Hey, I did some searching and found a few things, but I'd like to just ask some of you VE-Auto owners some questions about your Cars. I got my VE and it was running like crap, but with the MAF/CAI swap it seemed to fix it. Well my question is, what kind of times (0-60 or quarter mile) should I be looking at with a VE Automatic. (Only mod is CAI) Just a rough estimate would work; I just want to make sure my car is running as it should be (stock) before I go putting money into mods as I'm looking at Y-Pipes and UDP's.

Thanks in Advance.
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #2  
Gunther's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 539
I think 0-60 for me with a stock auto is 8 seconds or so. Based on the seconds on my CD player.
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #3  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
Thread Starter
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
So my VE With CAI definitely shouldn't be running late 8's early 9's ?
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #4  
Gunther's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 539
You should be running 5's AT LEAST with a CAI

It's probably cuz you don't have a racing stripe
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 07:06 PM
  #5  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
google knows.
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
Thread Starter
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
Originally Posted by Gunther
You should be running 5's AT LEAST with a CAI

It's probably cuz you don't have a racing stripe
Well ****, I have a pinstripe... doesn't that count for anything in this world?
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #7  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
Thread Starter
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
Originally Posted by Matt93SE
google knows.
I googled and found some other places and saw 8.8 seconds. But that's for stock, unmodified, and when it was new. Not a 13 year old car; that's why I was hoping to get some answers some from people with current VE's slightly modified.
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #8  
Cliff Clavin's Avatar
Way out West
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,564
From: Oregon
Ask Aaron, he will know...I think 1/4 mile (at a track) is easier to work with than 0-60 because the latter is going to be hard to time correctly.

Actually, your mpg (especially highway -- less variables) is probably going to be a better indicator than your 0-60 time. If you can drive normally and consistently pull down 25+ mpg hwy, your car is probably running pretty well. If not, look for things like leaking manifold studs, bad o2 sensor, bad knock sensor, old plugs, cracks in your coil packs, etc.

Even if you have some problems, an aftermarket y-pipe will help with exhaust restrictions the stock y has and will help you out in both performance and mpg.
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #9  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Cliff Clavin
Ask Aaron, he will know...
yeeah... Aaron knows all about VE A/T, considering he set the world record for a VE A/T all-motor quarter-mile. 13.something, and considering my car is VG A/T and is supposed to run 17sec for a quarter mile... 13.anything is darn quick. So with your extra power I'd say maybe you should be ~1 sec faster than a VG like mine in a quarter mile.
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 05:39 AM
  #10  
synoptic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 61
Originally Posted by capedcadaver
yeeah... Aaron knows all about VE A/T, considering he set the world record for a VE A/T all-motor quarter-mile. 13.something, and considering my car is VG A/T and is supposed to run 17sec for a quarter mile... 13.anything is darn quick. So with your extra power I'd say maybe you should be ~1 sec faster than a VG like mine in a quarter mile.
I just took my VG Auto to the drags and it managed a 17.6 on the 1/4 mile, completely stock. Not bad for a 17 year old car and a novice driver.

I would have to agree, with the VE being a more powerful engine, you should get a slightly quicker 1/4 mile than 17 seconds.
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #11  
hoyshnin's Avatar
Baby's on the Half Tip!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 407
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
I googled and found some other places and saw 8.8 seconds. But that's for stock, unmodified, and when it was new. Not a 13 year old car; that's why I was hoping to get some answers some from people with current VE's slightly modified.
Remember too, though, that new cars aren't broken in yet and run faster after they age a bit. If you test a car a year or two old, it will be considerably faster than it was brand new. 13 years, though, is probably TOO broken in to notice this change.
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #12  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
may car was still getting faster and faster until the day I blew it up.. at 230k miles.
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #13  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by hoyshnin
Remember too, though, that new cars aren't broken in yet and run faster after they age a bit. If you test a car a year or two old, it will be considerably faster than it was brand new. 13 years, though, is probably TOO broken in to notice this change.
similarly, if you are constantly running quarter-miles on a brand-new car, it probably won't last but 1 or 2 years anyhow because that's torture
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #14  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thats true if you change the oil every 3K miles*. Not if you change it often enough, and use GOOD oil then the engine wont wear out much at all. But a good oil and changing it often is the key to engine life.

*3K change interval is good for street cars not being beaten to the edge of their life, race cars or cars that are raced need their oil changed much more often..

~Alex
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #15  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by Matt93SE
may car was still getting faster and faster until the day I blew it up.. at 230k miles.
Yeah, that's wierd. My car seems to get faster with age too.

Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Hey, I did some searching and found a few things, but I'd like to just ask some of you VE-Auto owners some questions about your Cars. I got my VE and it was running like crap, but with the MAF/CAI swap it seemed to fix it. Well my question is, what kind of times (0-60 or quarter mile) should I be looking at with a VE Automatic. (Only mod is CAI) Just a rough estimate would work; I just want to make sure my car is running as it should be (stock) before I go putting money into mods as I'm looking at Y-Pipes and UDP's.

Thanks in Advance.
To answer your question, the VE Auto should run around 16.4-16.6 stock in the 1/4 mile. With your CAI, you should shave 1, MAYBE two tenths.

It all depends on the conditions you are running in. If you give me the exact track you plan to race at, the temp, barometric pressure, humidity, wind speed and direction, track prep, how much you plan to eat that day, and if you plan on vacuuming out your car prior to race day, then I can accurately estimate the 1/4 mile time you will run.

But like others have said, make sure your VE is running properly. If it is and you get a chance to run at a sea level track in 70 degree weather, then you should run mid 16s with your CAI easily.

With a little help from me, you'll be running low 14s in no time without any weight reduction!

You need a WSP Ypipe and also Phenolic Intake Spacers to eliminate that dreaded VE heat soak!
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #16  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What about a VE-5 IM? (I have one laying around I could sell )

~Alex
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #17  
Jon94SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 563
From: Washington
This sticky will probably help,

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=59388
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:42 AM
  #18  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
It all depends on the conditions you are running in. If you give me the exact track you plan to race at, the temp, barometric pressure, humidity, wind speed and direction, track prep, how much you plan to eat that day, and if you plan on vacuuming out your car prior to race day, then I can accurately estimate the 1/4 mile time you will run.
For a minute I thought you were serious...

btw you forgot to compensate fuel load weight

but yeah i was wondering about the Dropping Resistor too.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 06:20 AM
  #19  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE

With a little help from me, you'll be running low 14s in no time without any weight reduction!
I'm already running 14s bone stock.
though I may do some weight reduction, gotta get down from 3800lbs
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:09 AM
  #20  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by internetautomar
I'm already running 14s bone stock.
though I may do some weight reduction, gotta get down from 3800lbs
But you don't drive a VE Automatic.

Cape, I can't recommend unplugging the drop resistor to anybody with a 3rd gen. It hasn't been tested. I only mentioned this b/c it's a quick way to put the car down the 1/4 mile atleast for one run before the old motor and/or tranny blows with the 150 shot.

Also, I am serious about all the stuff I listed. The more info you give me, the more accurate I can make my estimate.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:25 AM
  #21  
maxitech's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,306
From: Houston, TX
Who is faster: a VG-5 with all the go-fast bolt-ons (my car or similar) or a stock VE Auto?

I may have to find out for myself at Maxus...
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #22  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by maxitech
Who is faster: a VG-5 with all the go-fast bolt-ons (my car or similar) or a stock VE Auto?

I may have to find out for myself at Maxus...
It really depends on what you need by all the go-fast bolt-ons. I assume they mean that it will be strictly a street tire race.

If the VG 5spd has intake, exhaust, UDP, ECU upgrade, flywheel, and good clutch. And the VE Auto has intake, exhaust, UDP, ECU upgrade, high stall torque converter and 23" street tires.

Then I'd have to say the VE Auto will win just b/c it's easier to drive. All the VE auto has to do is stomp on the gas as hard as he can and it will chirp the tires a tiny bit and you should have a 2.1-2.2 60' on street tires. VLSD and crappy low end make for an easy car to drive.

With the VG 5spd, getting a 2.1 is definitely possible. It's just really hard on street tires! REALLY hard! No VLSD and lots of low end power!

Regardless, this will be a close race I think. If the 60's are the same, I'd say it will be close since I expect the VE auto to put a car length on the VG 5spd before the half track mark. Then after that, I would expect the VG 5spd to pull back on the VE Auto slightly before the end of the 1/4 mile just due to the gearing advantage.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #23  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
But you don't drive a VE Automatic.

Cape, I can't recommend unplugging the drop resistor to anybody with a 3rd gen. It hasn't been tested. I only mentioned this b/c it's a quick way to put the car down the 1/4 mile atleast for one run before the old motor and/or tranny blows with the 150 shot.

Also, I am serious about all the stuff I listed. The more info you give me, the more accurate I can make my estimate.
I wasn't planning on touching the drop resistor, or looking for it, for that matter.. I was just asking what it is and what it does. (oh no wonder it was out of context here. I posted the drop resistor thing in the wrong thread... meant to post in "VE Savior" but whatev)

And on that VG 5spd, how much will the times drop if you take out the old VG-style 5spd and swap in a VE's VLSD 5spd, still running VG power?
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #24  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by capedcadaver
And on that VG 5spd, how much will the times drop if you take out the old VG-style 5spd and swap in a VE's VLSD 5spd, still running VG power?
I have no idea. Nobody has ever tested it.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #25  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well the only diffrence is the final drive is a little shorter correct? Then it would gain a few tenths in the 1/4. And the VLSD would help 0-60 a little.

~Alex
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:42 AM
  #26  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by Alex_V
Well the only diffrence is the final drive is a little shorter correct? Then it would gain a few tenths in the 1/4. And the VLSD would help 0-60 a little.

~Alex
I would only think it would help as much as traction allows. I am guessing 1-3 tenths in the 1/4 mile depending how much gain in traction you get.
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #27  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
Thread Starter
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
I found a few cheap calculators and compared a VE running a 16.4 quarter miles 1/8 time and found I should be right around 8.8 seconds. Guess I'm good to go. Thanks Aaron for all the help. I guess I'm just not used to the lack of low end...... my VG really feels like it throws you back, and the tires are squealing for a second, guess it's just those things that make you feel like you're going faster when you're really not. I noticed my VE really doesn't kick in until 3500rpms anyway... VTC's I guess. But yeah, now that it's running correctly you can bet I'll be buying some of your Intake Spacers here in the near future. Along with a Warpspeed...

Hah, sorry if this was a stupid post, just getting used to a different engine I guess...
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #28  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
I found a few cheap calculators and compared a VE running a 16.4 quarter miles 1/8 time and found I should be right around 8.8 seconds. Guess I'm good to go. Thanks Aaron for all the help. I guess I'm just not used to the lack of low end...... my VG really feels like it throws you back, and the tires are squealing for a second, guess it's just those things that make you feel like you're going faster when you're really not. I noticed my VE really doesn't kick in until 3500rpms anyway... VTC's I guess. But yeah, now that it's running correctly you can bet I'll be buying some of your Intake Spacers here in the near future. Along with a Warpspeed...

Hah, sorry if this was a stupid post, just getting used to a different engine I guess...
Yeap, you got it! The VG 5spd "FEELS" much faster than a VE Auto. But they run the same track times. If you mash the gas on a VE Auto, sometimes the tires won't even chirp! Mash the gas on a VG Auto or 5spd and you get wheelspin.

But race a VE Auto from a 60mph roll and you'll see that the VG 5spd gets walked on.

I've had people ride in my car and say, "I was expecting it to feel faster. My 5.0 Mustang feels much much faster!". Then when you line them up at the track, my car runs 13s while the 5.0 Stang may only run high 14s!

It's the lack of low end torque that fools people into thinking I'm slow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
MaxStock
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Dec 5, 2016 05:19 PM
ef9
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Oct 4, 2015 08:43 AM
Andy29
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 29, 2015 05:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 PM.