3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

Does the 3rd Gen OEM Spoiler Decrease Fuel Efficiency?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
1993-VG30E-GXE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,159
From: Ontario, Canada
Does the 3rd Gen OEM Spoiler Decrease Fuel Efficiency?

Anyone?
Old May 20, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Actually, it decreases the drag coefficient a little, thus increasing fuel economy.
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #3  
92gxe/cg2's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 464
From: Chicago
Actually, since spoilers add to the down force of a car, they'd have to increase the drag and therefore reduce the fuel economy. The spoiler is unnecessary weight on a sedan like ours (from a reality standpoint) and is just added surface area for wind to work its way around.

P.S.- It barely will reduce fuel economy, but yes, it will...
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #4  
Chokko3131's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6
I took mine off and it seems to be the same, its all about how you drive the car, i can get between 450 and 500 out of a tank. How big is the tank anyway? is it a 55 or 60?
Old May 20, 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #5  
Wiking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,323
From: EU Scandinavia
Originally Posted by 92gxe/cg2
Actually, since spoilers add to the down force of a car, they'd have to increase the drag and therefore reduce the fuel economy. The spoiler is unnecessary weight on a sedan like ours (from a reality standpoint) and is just added surface area for wind to work its way around.

P.S.- It barely will reduce fuel economy, but yes, it will...
It also makes one drive more manly, causing rubber wear... On the other hand, maybe I have to keep up even more aggressively w/o the spoiler?

Why would FWD need more down force on rear wheels?

But it must be nice as my sons first mod for his stanza was a spoiler. Maybe it is.
Old May 21, 2008 | 04:21 AM
  #6  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Originally Posted by 92gxe/cg2
Actually, since spoilers add to the down force of a car, they'd have to increase the drag and therefore reduce the fuel economy. The spoiler is unnecessary weight on a sedan like ours (from a reality standpoint) and is just added surface area for wind to work its way around.

P.S.- It barely will reduce fuel economy, but yes, it will...
Spoilers like ours are not designed to add downforce, they were designed to disrupt the flow of air away from the rear of the car, swirling air at the rear creates drag, the 3rd gen spoiler disrupts this swirl effect, thus lessening the drag coefficient.


On the other hand, a rear Wing like in nascar/nhra and several other rwd motorsports are designed to push rear of the car down.
Old May 21, 2008 | 05:38 AM
  #7  
BenStoked's Avatar
Jesus was a Zombie.
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,962
From: OKC, OK
Originally Posted by Chokko3131
I took mine off and it seems to be the same, its all about how you drive the car, i can get between 450 and 500 out of a tank. How big is the tank anyway? is it a 55 or 60?
16 gallons or 60l
Old May 21, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #8  
Chris Gregg's Avatar
Get Off My Lawn
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: Johnson City, TN
Aero dynamics and drag coefficients are always interesting. Anyone see the Mythbusters episode where they show that trucks with tailgates up actually increases fuel economy? Just like Greeny said, it's all about the flow of air behind the vehicle.
Old May 21, 2008 | 07:01 AM
  #9  
Wiking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,323
From: EU Scandinavia
Originally Posted by benstoked
16 gallons or 60l
70 Liters says the Owners Manual
Old May 21, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #10  
Pearl93VE's Avatar
I can has?
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,860
From: St. Augustine, FL
The owners manual and FSM state 18.5 gallons, which is 70.030118 Liters. Though I've never personally been able to get this much in the tank. From almost completely empty so says the gauge (Below the Thick Line By The E) I have been able to get around 15-16 gallons in. Perhaps the gauge tells you ahead of time and keeps a 2 gallon reserve so you don't run out.
Old May 21, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #11  
BenStoked's Avatar
Jesus was a Zombie.
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,962
From: OKC, OK
Originally Posted by Pearl93VE
The owners manual and FSM state 18.5 gallons, which is 70.030118 Liters. Though I've never personally been able to get this much in the tank. From almost completely empty so says the gauge (Below the Thick Line By The E) I have been able to get around 15-16 gallons in. Perhaps the gauge tells you ahead of time and keeps a 2 gallon reserve so you don't run out.
lolz: I stand corrected. while i have driven forever on E, I could still only manage 16g into the tank.
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #12  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by benstoked
lolz: I stand corrected. while i have driven forever on E, I could still only manage 16g into the tank.
one time i put in 18.2 gallons. yes, I had to sputter my way into the gas station haha.
Old May 21, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
MaximaN00b's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Chokko3131
I took mine off and it seems to be the same, its all about how you drive the car, i can get between 450 and 500 out of a tank. How big is the tank anyway? is it a 55 or 60?
man I was jealous for a min, but then i realized youre talking KM, 450-500.. thats about.. 250 miles to a tank, correct??

i get about 300 miles to the tank, roughly.. was getting less when it was running bad. Maybe you have bad o2 sensors? I think they will suck gas, but go unnoticed as far as performance..
Old May 21, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #14  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by MaximaN00b
man I was jealous for a min, but then i realized youre talking KM, 450-500.. thats about.. 250 miles to a tank, correct??

i get about 300 miles to the tank, roughly.. was getting less when it was running bad. Maybe you have bad o2 sensors? I think they will suck gas, but go unnoticed as far as performance..
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...0&postcount=78
heh
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03VQMAX
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
2
Sep 25, 2015 04:19 PM
00MAXI
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 2, 2015 10:23 AM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM
ViciousVQ30
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
Aug 5, 2015 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.