Frankencar: Apexi vs. K&N
#1
Frankencar: Apexi vs. K&N
I've decided to get a Frankencar intake.
What is the difference between the K&N and the Apexi filter? Is it really worth the extra $55 to get the Apexi? I'll also be adding a Budget Y-pipe and a Cattman cat-back, if that matters. Also plan on getting Don's VB mod done.
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
<~~~ This icon f***ing rules.
What is the difference between the K&N and the Apexi filter? Is it really worth the extra $55 to get the Apexi? I'll also be adding a Budget Y-pipe and a Cattman cat-back, if that matters. Also plan on getting Don's VB mod done.
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
<~~~ This icon f***ing rules.
#5
Originally posted by maxspeed96CT
You wont fell or see a diffrence , i got a cone filter from advanced auto i think it is good cause it has a filer part in the front to let air in also. But basicly its all the same ****.
You wont fell or see a diffrence , i got a cone filter from advanced auto i think it is good cause it has a filer part in the front to let air in also. But basicly its all the same ****.
Frankencar did some dynos and the results showed that the Apexi performed better...
Personally, I got the K&N....
Instead of waiting for ppl to reply, use the search function at the
top right...easiest way.
FLO_BOY
#6
maxspeed96CT: You gotta come correct before replying so do the research before you give out the wrong information.
bk_r0x: I have the Monsterflow and the Apexi and I like both. Flo_Boy is correct about the dynos also. Apexi showed about a 3HP gain over the K&N when tested on the 3.5L VQ.
bk_r0x: I have the Monsterflow and the Apexi and I like both. Flo_Boy is correct about the dynos also. Apexi showed about a 3HP gain over the K&N when tested on the 3.5L VQ.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxima_Joe
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
16
11-25-2015 08:19 AM