4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

New car... Jetta or Maxima?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #1  
cscm094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 532
New car... Jetta or Maxima?

So thinking of a new car. I found two I like.

96 Maxima SE 5 spd. Blue, black leather, every option. 100k miles.

98 Jetta GLX 5 spd. VR6 black on black leather. every option. 88k miles.


Both cars are from a very reputable dealer and come with a 1 year warrentee. The max is $7500 and the Jetta is $7900.

What do you maxima guys think about vr6 jettas? I had a 95 maxima so I know what they are like. Gimme your opinions! Thanks!
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
MaxedOutOfCash's Avatar
Pizda Boy
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,785
go with the max.....
vr6 in my opinion is going to have much more problems than the max...
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #3  
maxNYC's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 990
more costly to fix and maintain a vr6.

If you only had these two, i'd suggest the max.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #4  
DoGGy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VW parts are alot more expensive than nissan.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #5  
MaXtUneD's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 777
I'd choose the vr6. little modifications will give it more power...
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #6  
polishpunk68's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 198
and aren't nissans a lot more reliable than vws?

and btw, I believe you can get a better price on that max... milk the stealer for every penny
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:10 PM
  #7  
cscm094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 532
Thanks for your advice guys. I do like the product support for the VR6, but its not as reliable as the VQ. I'll have to think about it.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:24 PM
  #8  
knight71's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 686
Originally Posted by cscm094
So thinking of a new car. I found two I like.

96 Maxima SE 5 spd. Blue, black leather, every option. 100k miles.

98 Jetta GLX 5 spd. VR6 black on black leather. every option. 88k miles.


Both cars are from a very reputable dealer and come with a 1 year warrentee. The max is $7500 and the Jetta is $7900.

What do you maxima guys think about vr6 jettas? I had a 95 maxima so I know what they are like. Gimme your opinions! Thanks!

check out carsurvey.org..you'll see why majority of the people here will tell you the maxima is the better and reliable car
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
endus's Avatar
An atavistic endeavor...
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,209
The Max...the Jetta to get is the 1.8T anyway.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #10  
happyricefob's Avatar
V^___^V
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,400
From: Fremont, CA
i go for the max
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:55 PM
  #11  
MaxedOutOfCash's Avatar
Pizda Boy
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,785
looks like everyone wants you to go for the max...
now create the same kind of thread on the vw forum....i bet 95% will be go for the vr6....
it's really up to you, you'll be driving the car and you'll be maintaining it...
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #12  
Maciek's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 522
Good answer Sam,
I would go for the max. Engine is 7 year best V-6 on the market. Exterior in my opinion maxima has better, interior definately the max, back seats are very uncomfortable in almost all VolksWagens.
Reliability definately maxima.
You have to look at both vehicles separately (knwing that maxima is a better car overall) and see which one is in a better shape. Mileage is important, but also check vehicle history on carfax for how many owners it had and possible accidents. And bottm line: drive it! Whichever feels better you should go for.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #13  
MAXSRB's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 417
Originally Posted by MaxedOutOfCash
looks like everyone wants you to go for the max...
now create the same kind of thread on the vw forum....i bet 95% will be go for the vr6....
it's really up to you, you'll be driving the car and you'll be maintaining it...
Hes right. My opinion is that you should test drive both cars, really "well" and see which one you like better. Im assuming your gonna mod it, in which case both cars are fun to mod, and both are fun cars to drive.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 02:16 PM
  #14  
DoGGy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
the jetta is uglier as well and much smaller. not as roomy as a max. + it has 172 hp and 173 torque and weights the same as the max
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #15  
Wisky97SE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,119
From: Bergen County NJ
They're both good peppy cars. . .the Maxima is a little faster though, and the VW probably handles better stock. Drive both and see which one you feel better in.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #16  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
The reliability of the VW Jetta during that time period worries me.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #17  
maximum98se's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22
one word....... MAXIMA! In my opinion, the max is faster, better looking, and more reliable.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #18  
HOMERUN4THGLE's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 164
From: Raleigh,NC
I have owned and driven both types. The Jetta is a strong little car and I emphasize 'little' compared to the Max. My Jetta was very reliable and simple to maintain. But compare these facts. The Jetta comes in different engine sizes. The Max is strictly a V6. No variables on engines with Nissan. Test driving (thoroughly) stomp it, stop it put it through the paces. Figure in gas and maintenance. 93 octane can be a big factor with this because that is the Maxima's t-bone to keeping an already solid car running in A-1 condition. Auto or 5-speed either one will be fun to drive. Last but not least an un-scientific and un-orthodox approach which ever car causes you to loose sleep buy it. The last technique has not failed me yet. Mind you I thoroughly checked and priced the car first.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #19  
spiff56747's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,370
VWs have far superior interiors (build quality and appearance) to a Maxima IMO. However, I think thats pretty much the only thing thats better about the Jetta.

Maxima will be more reliable, faster, and cheaper to maintain as well. I like the Jetta overall but I would go for a 1.8t instead of a VR6.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 05:31 PM
  #20  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
I might have bought a Jetta or Passat if VW's weren't so darned unreliable. The VR6 is a sweet little motor, as is the 1.8T. I need a reliable car, so I would get the Max.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 05:38 PM
  #21  
MaximaZX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 238
From: Tampa, FL
the vw would be much more costly to repair (in the event of problems). they are both peppy cars from the factory. it all depends on preference...



ps- why would you all take the 1.8t over the vr6?¿? i dont understand, a 1.8 liter 4 banger (i know, i know, turbo) is expected to power a car as heavy as the jetta? there is much more potential with the vr6 IMO
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #22  
xCarreraGTx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 195
i'd take the max~ no offense but jetta looks like a girl car to me
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 08:27 PM
  #23  
dantheman598's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by HOMERUN4THGLE
I have owned and driven both types. The Jetta is a strong little car and I emphasize 'little' compared to the Max. My Jetta was very reliable and simple to maintain. But compare these facts. The Jetta comes in different engine sizes. The Max is strictly a V6. No variables on engines with Nissan. Test driving (thoroughly) stomp it, stop it put it through the paces. Figure in gas and maintenance. 93 octane can be a big factor with this because that is the Maxima's t-bone to keeping an already solid car running in A-1 condition. Auto or 5-speed either one will be fun to drive. Last but not least an un-scientific and un-orthodox approach which ever car causes you to loose sleep buy it. The last technique has not failed me yet. Mind you I thoroughly checked and priced the car first.
the different engine sizes youre bringing up doesnt matter because both cars are used. plus, you can always mod everything on either car. 93 octane is 1 dollar more per 5 gallons, 3 dollars more per tank pretty much. 48 bucks a year for performance like that? i'll take it... theyre also both foreign cars so parts are going to be a bit more expensive, but theres a ton more maximas than jettas so parts are probably going to be a bit cheaper.

i think the maxima youre looking at has 100k miles? thats the only problem i can see, because with how fun it is, the miles are gonna rack up in no time
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 09:49 PM
  #24  
DoGGy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by spiff56747
VWs have far superior interiors (build quality and appearance) to a Maxima IMO. However, I think thats pretty much the only thing thats better about the Jetta.

Maxima will be more reliable, faster, and cheaper to maintain as well. I like the Jetta overall but I would go for a 1.8t instead of a VR6.
ummm

Old Sep 19, 2003 | 09:57 PM
  #25  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by dantheman598
the different engine sizes youre bringing up doesnt matter because both cars are used. plus, you can always mod everything on either car.[/b]
It would take a crap load of mods on the VR6 to make up the 30 lb-ft torque difference between the two motors.

93 octane is 1 dollar more per 5 gallons, 3 dollars more per tank pretty much. 48 bucks a year for performance like that? i'll take it...
So you fill-up a little more than once per month? What if they drive a lot and fillup once per week. When I had my Accord V6 I was putting 30k miles on it per year. Part of the reason I got it was because it only needed 87 octane and that alone saved me about $500/yr. I drive a lot less now so I don't mind having to put 93 in the Maxima.

theyre also both foreign cars so parts are going to be a bit more expensive, but theres a ton more maximas than jettas so parts are probably going to be a bit cheaper.
Last year 145,000 Jettas were sold. Compare that to 98,000 Maximas. Year to year numbers don't fluctuate very much so it's safe to say that VW probably consistently sells around 50k more Jettas per year than Nissan does Maximas. Oh and that doesn't include numbers for the Golf and Beetle, all of which are on the same platform and share many of the same parts. The Maxima was on pretty much its own platform in the US and the VQ was not used in any other US engine. As for how all of this would relate to parts prices, I have no idea.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #26  
DoGGy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SteVTEC

Last year 145,000 Jettas were sold. Compare that to 98,000 Maximas. Year to year numbers don't fluctuate very much so it's safe to say that VW probably consistently sells around 50k more Jettas per year than Nissan does Maximas. Oh and that doesn't include numbers for the Golf and Beetle, all of which are on the same platform and share many of the same parts. The Maxima was on pretty much its own platform in the US and the VQ was not used in any other US engine. As for how all of this would relate to parts prices, I have no idea.

jetta is not in the same class as a maxima so u cant compare the twoe by looking at the numbers sold. jetta is much cheaper and alot of teenagers like the looks and can afford the prices. thats not very true about the maxima. if u look around ull see that alot of teens drive the jetta.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #27  
Oblongshapes's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
thats a stupid question to ask on a page devoted to MAXIMA fans isnt it? derf.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:04 PM
  #28  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MaximaZX
ps- why would you all take the 1.8t over the vr6?¿? i dont understand, a 1.8 liter 4 banger (i know, i know, turbo) is expected to power a car as heavy as the jetta? there is much more potential with the vr6 IMO
"more potential" with the VR6?


You do know that a simple little $500 chip on a 1.8T gives you like 40hp and 80tq right?
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #29  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by DoGGy
jetta is not in the same class as a maxima so u cant compare the twoe by looking at the numbers sold.
He said there are a lot more Maximas around than Jettas. What does "class" have to do with that? Nothing.

Originally Posted by DoGGy
jetta is much cheaper and alot of teenagers like the looks and can afford the prices. thats not very true about the maxima. if u look around ull see that alot of teens drive the jetta.
There are a lot of teens in this forum too. Maxima resale sucks which puts it within easy reach of a lot of younger folks.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #30  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by Oblongshapes
thats a stupid question to ask on a page devoted to MAXIMA fans isnt it? derf.
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:32 PM
  #31  
DoGGy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
He said there are a lot more Maximas around than Jettas. What does "class" have to do with that? Nothing.

There are a lot of teens in this forum too. Maxima resale sucks which puts it within easy reach of a lot of younger folks.

he said that more jettas were sold and that doesnt mean anything. last year prolly less than 1000 ferraries were sold, does that mean they are bad? no. maxima is more expensive and harder to afford. plus, our maxima's are USED, not NEW
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 10:53 PM
  #32  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,036
I was a teenager when i got my 1st max and i would never chose a VW over a Maxima....MAXIMA ALL THE WAY
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 08:50 AM
  #33  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by DoGGy
he said that more jettas were sold and that doesnt mean anything. last year prolly less than 1000 ferraries were sold, does that mean they are bad? no. maxima is more expensive and harder to afford. plus, our maxima's are USED, not NEW
WTH are you talking about?

More Jettas were sold. Period.
That means there are more Jettas around than Maximas. Period.

If Toyota sells 400k Camrys per year and Nissan only sells 98k Maximas, that means that there are a TON more Camrys around than Maximas. PERIOD.


Old Sep 20, 2003 | 09:37 AM
  #34  
99Maxima5sp's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,748
not a fan of the pre-99 body style. I think they are some of the ugliest cars on the road... As well as the interior, and i dont think the VR6 (in that gen) could catch up with the VQ mod for mod...



Eric
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 09:38 AM
  #35  
99Maxima5sp's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,748
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
WTH are you talking about?

More Jettas were sold. Period.
That means there are more Jettas around than Maximas. Period.

If Toyota sells 400k Camrys per year and Nissan only sells 98k Maximas, that means that there are a TON more Camrys around than Maximas. PERIOD.


just dont waste your breath steve, some people just dont understand how to read....


Eric
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #36  
seno76's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 49
VW was founded by Hitler.
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #37  
driver824's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,020
look at it this way... you can do all this work to the and still fit a childse at in the back. and its already modded for a 5 point seatbelt.
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #38  
RastaManMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,013
If you do get the Jetta, opt for the cheaper 1.8T version... Chip it, exhaust and intake and you're going to be very fast... Maxima still gets my vote for looks/performance/reliability, but still gotta respect the 1.8T's

LEMAR
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 05:38 PM
  #39  
spiff56747's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,370
Originally Posted by DoGGy
ummm

hmm yea for some reason i thought the newest generation jetta came out in 98... I agree the 98 Jetta interior looks like crap... I'm saying if you look at current VWs, their interiors are way better than any Maxima IMO..
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #40  
99MaximaSE-L
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's your choice, do you want a good looking Maxima, thats pretty damn fast, or a Ugly Jetta that's not fast? your choice man



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 PM.