4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Are the 1995-99 Maxima(s) faster than...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
indy_84maxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 69
Are the 1995-99 Maxima(s) faster than...

Are the 1995-99 Maxima(s) faster than the 1993-94 Maxima SE(s) with Twin Cam? Any other thoughts about 1993-94 Maxima Twin Cam reliability?
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #2  
CystumMax's Avatar
Well I should wrap this up before I start to ramble.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,830
Go do a massive search in public Library.
Hint: There are many Sticky on this site....
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
Max_Out's Avatar
Under the radar
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,178
From: Snowshoe, WV, Centreville, VA
The 3rd Gens Have the option of the 160 hp engine and the 190 hp as the fourth gens. i would say the 4th gens (95-99) are faster because their alittle newer.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:53 PM
  #4  
Wills98MaxSE's Avatar
1 of few unmodded 4G Maxs
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,827
From: Commerce Twp., MI
Originally Posted by indy_84maxima
Any other thoughts about 1993-94 Maxima Twin Cam reliability?
try the 3rd gen forums for that answer
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
cefiro8701's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,397
i would say...maybe the 3rd gen is faster...
mainly becuz of this entry
https://maxima.org/modules.php?name=30_comparisons
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #6  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
4th gen has more low-end power
3rd gen feels nicer to ring out to redline
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:06 PM
  #7  
matty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,163
From: Northern Jersey
The 95-99 engine is 108 lbs lighter than the earlier year 93 and 94 thus producing more power and reving quicker and smoother

-matt
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #8  
Magikone69's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,509
From: S.FL
Originally Posted by Max_Out
i would say the 4th gens (95-99) are faster because their alittle newer.

cant go by that, a 2001 camry is newer and also has more hp but i still took one on. if comparing 5sp to 5sp i think the 4th gen did come out on top, there was a huge forum and comparison on this comparing 3rd,4th, and 5th gens (2k and 2k1) and they were all close. hopefully someone can find it. my guess is the 4th gen is faster only because of weight differences maybe, as far as reliability you'd ave to check the 3rd gen forums.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #9  
indy_84maxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 69
Keep posting your thoughts...

I have posted this question in both forums. I am in the process of buying another Maxima -- as a younger sibling to my 1984.

Please give me reasons to buy a 1995-99 over the 1993/94 SE Twin Cam.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #10  
Turk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,154
I know that the 1995-1996 Maxima's are faster than all of the 3rd gens and some 4th gens and maybe 5th gens. I heard the the 1997-1999 are more restricted. Someone correct me on this. I heard the fastest max is the 1995 GXE its ligther than the SE's.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #11  
Turk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by indy_84maxima
Keep posting your thoughts...

I have posted this question in both forums. I am in the process of buying another Maxima -- as a younger sibling to my 1984.

Please give me reasons to buy a 1995-99 over the 1993/94 SE Twin Cam.


If you want speed go with the 1995-1996 Maxima 5-speed and GXE.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #12  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
IBTL .. can of worms offically opened... Read the stickys you've been here long enough.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #13  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Quad cam ... not twin, twin/head X 2 heads ..= 4 ...
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #14  
indy_84maxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Quad cam ... not twin, twin/head X 2 heads ..= 4 ...
As you can tell from my ignorance, I am a first-gen guy. Actually, I am a Gen Zero guy, because I once drove a Datsun 810 -- the father of all Maxima(s).

So Quad-cam it is.

I don't wish to open any wounds or sores. I want 1996-99 guys to give me reasons to buy a 4th gen. I want 1993-94 guys to give me reasons to buy a 3rd gen SE.

My father purchased my 1984 Maxima new from the dealership. I inheirited the car from him. It is still going strong -- over 185K miles. So, maintenance problems won't really scare me away from either 3rd or 4th gen. It is just that 3rd and 4th gen are nothing like 810 and 1st gen. I am totally ignorant about 3rd and 4th gen model years.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #15  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Originally Posted by indy_84maxima
Keep posting your thoughts...

I have posted this question in both forums. I am in the process of buying another Maxima -- as a younger sibling to my 1984.

Please give me reasons to buy a 1995-99 over the 1993/94 SE Twin Cam.
Drive them both, I much prefer my 93 over my 96... I can list why even though that might cause riot
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #16  
Wills98MaxSE's Avatar
1 of few unmodded 4G Maxs
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,827
From: Commerce Twp., MI
if it were me, IMO, I'd have both a 3rd and 4th gen, the 3rd gen being a daily driver
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #17  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
I'll stick with my 1995 SE, 5-speed, with 15" sawblades and a Budget y-pipe anyday. And by the way it has DOHC and LSD. I don't know what all this talk is about twin cams, both 4th Gens and 3rd Gens with 190hp have dual overhead cams, but the 4th Gen is lighter and has more torque. I like the 3rd Gen body style and have never driven a 1993/1994 Maxima, but will gladly stay with my 95 grocery getter as its barely broken in.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #18  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Will98--

But I'm actually one gerenation ahead, meaning I have a 4th and 5.5g and use the 4th gen as a daily driver.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #19  
crazy97's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,176
From: St Paul MN
I would gladly have the performance of my old 93 se back but before I got rid of it I was having a funny ticking noise coming out of the engine. Third gen reliable? Who knows, nissan got rid of variable valve timing for a reason.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #20  
Duckman540i's Avatar
VE Powah!!!
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,027
From: SoCal & Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Wills98MaxSE
if it were me, IMO, I'd have both a 3rd and 4th gen, the 3rd gen being a daily driver
Thats gonna be me soon. I'm getting a '97 SE 5-Speed soon & it will soon after be Forced Induction BTW: I think stock vs. stock VE 5-speed vs. VQ 5-speed, The VE would come out alittle on top, seeing as how everything is functioning properly.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #21  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
Originally Posted by Turk
I know that the 1995-1996 Maxima's are faster than all of the 3rd gens and some 4th gens and maybe 5th gens. I heard the the 1997-1999 are more restricted. Someone correct me on this. I heard the fastest max is the 1995 GXE its ligther than the SE's.
The 1995 GXE is a whopping 9 pounds lighter than the SE, transmission for transmission, with the 5-speed tranny being about 60 pounds lighter than the automatic. The GXE stock also has 205 tires vs 215 on the SE.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 08:12 PM
  #22  
BigLou93SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,581
From: Danbury, CT \ Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by Max_Out
The 3rd Gens Have the option of the 160 hp engine and the 190 hp as the fourth gens. i would say the 4th gens (95-99) are faster because their alittle newer.
What? The DOHC 93-94 Maxima's had 190 hp, the same as the fourth gen. Being newer has nothing to do with it. They also have LSD. This has been discussed so many times, and it comes down to a very close race, almost negligable.
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #23  
Supermax95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,263
Originally Posted by rmurdoch
The 1995 GXE is a whopping 9 pounds lighter than the SE, transmission for transmission, with the 5-speed tranny being about 60 pounds lighter than the automatic. The GXE stock also has 205 tires vs 215 on the SE.
and se's have a sportier suspension that also might help with traction.....
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #24  
Magikone69's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,509
From: S.FL
Originally Posted by rmurdoch
The 1995 GXE is a whopping 9 pounds lighter than the SE, transmission for transmission, with the 5-speed tranny being about 60 pounds lighter than the automatic. The GXE stock also has 205 tires vs 215 on the SE.
as far as 4th gens go id prefer a gxe over an SE, mainly because it will prob be cheaper, SE has the spoiler which i like, but other than that i dont care too much for its other upgrades, sure it has better tires, that is if the owner decided to replace them with similar size/performance based tires, i dont care for the stiffer suspension cause more than likely id swap it for performance suspension/drop, other than that what really makes the difference? if you plan on modding id rather save the extra 1-2k you would spend on an SE and get the bare bones GXE w/ 5 spd, unless you wanted leather and i believe gle's dont have 5spd so an SE 5sp w/ leather would be your best bet, good luck finding one of those tho.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #25  
Fr33way™'s Avatar
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,471
From: Atlanta
SE 5 speed with leather . . not hard to find

Try maybe black/black SE 5 speed with leather a LITTLE harder.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #26  
Supermax95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,263
Originally Posted by Magikone69
as far as 4th gens go id prefer a gxe over an SE, mainly because it will prob be cheaper, SE has the spoiler which i like, but other than that i dont care too much for its other upgrades, sure it has better tires, that is if the owner decided to replace them with similar size/performance based tires, i dont care for the stiffer suspension cause more than likely id swap it for performance suspension/drop, other than that what really makes the difference? if you plan on modding id rather save the extra 1-2k you would spend on an SE and get the bare bones GXE w/ 5 spd, unless you wanted leather and i believe gle's dont have 5spd so an SE 5sp w/ leather would be your best bet, good luck finding one of those tho.
most people dislike the chrome trim and door handles too...
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 03:42 AM
  #27  
95jr6708's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 207
dont know much about 3rd gens , but what i know about 4th gens i like. reliability, the body style, and the ride.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 04:07 AM
  #28  
garbury's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 337
I had confidence in my 3rd gen that it could easily take any 4th gen when i drove the streets of Tucson. I had a 5th gen (VQ30) auto guy on 20s trying to keep up with me the day before i crashed, and he was way behind. I would love to find a 5 speed VE again, but its nearly impossible. I'm looking for a 4th gen VQ 5 spd as we speak, you can't beat the aftermarket potential and the claimed one of the top ten engines ever. My friend bought one with nitrous and it was decent, but I was sure i would win (he never shot it though). BTW my VE never ticked and was faster than all hell. Only lost to a newer Audi S4, but he pulled on me pretty easily. I miss owning a powerful and fun max.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 07:25 AM
  #29  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
I own a 4th gen, but I would ****** up a 94 SE 3rd gen in a heartbeat if I could. They look great, have nice power, and are probably alot more fun on the highway stock for stock.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #30  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
WTF... I POSTED in this thread last night, even read the post after it was entered, and now it's gone? This happening to anyone else? I've noticed it a few times.

Anyways back to the topic at hand. Both cars have their advantages and disadvantages. It sounds like you are interested in speed/power/performance in which case you will want the 4th gen. The 4th gen is a little quicker stock, more torque, less weight, and keeps this advantage until speeds reach 130ish mph. 4th gen VQ has more power, more mods available, is newer, no VTC problems, and has more modding potential based on the amount of mods available for it, etc. I don't know how common VTC problems are on VEs, but from the reading I've done on here they seem to be pretty common.

In conclusion. If you want power you probably want the 4th gen.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #31  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
WTF... I POSTED in this thread last night, even read the post after it was entered, and now it's gone? This happening to anyone else? I've noticed it a few times.

Anyways back to the topic at hand. Both cars have their advantages and disadvantages. It sounds like you are interested in speed/power/performance in which case you will want the 4th gen. The 4th gen is a little quicker stock, more torque, less weight, and keeps this advantage until speeds reach 130ish mph. 4th gen VQ has more power, more mods available, is newer, no VTC problems, and has more modding potential based on the amount of mods available for it, etc. I don't know how common VTC problems are on VEs, but from the reading I've done on here they seem to be pretty common.

In conclusion. If you want power you probably want the 4th gen.
And who cares how much power they have beyond 130mph. About 8 years ago, I wound my 95SE, 5-speed, out for the first time to see if it could live up to Road & Tracks assertion that it could go 143mph and found out it could achieve that and more. After I filled my pants I shut it down and will never attempt that again.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #32  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Internetautomart would agree with me, VE ticking isn't as common as alot of people make them out to be. I don't even think I've heard a VE tick before and alot of time, the ticking is due to the owners not changing their oil at more frequent intervals or using a POS oil filter and develop sludge in the passage ways that lead to the VTC assemblies and starving it of oil during startup.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #33  
indy_84maxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 69
Thanks for all of your replies...

I was not aware of...
https://maxima.org/modules.php?name=30_comparisons

The variable timing of 1992-94 SE interests me -- something that I could tinker with. But, I am glad to hear the 1995-99 are just as quick -- I won't lose anything by moving up a generation.

Now back to shopping -- find out which car I enjoy driving the most.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #34  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by indy_84maxima
I am glad to hear the 1995-99 are just as quick --

They are quicker, and once modding starts the gap only widens.
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #35  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Originally Posted by indy_84maxima
Thanks for all of your replies...

I was not aware of...
https://maxima.org/modules.php?name=30_comparisons

The variable timing of 1992-94 SE interests me -- something that I could tinker with. But, I am glad to hear the 1995-99 are just as quick -- I won't lose anything by moving up a generation.

Now back to shopping -- find out which car I enjoy driving the most.
Advance timing for a DOHC 3rd gen is just a turn of a **** away
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #36  
maximariceboi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,354
Originally Posted by nismos14
I own a 4th gen, but I would ****** up a 94 SE 3rd gen in a heartbeat if I could. They look great, have nice power, and are probably alot more fun on the highway stock for stock.

hmmm..my aunt sold hers....94 SE for like 1500bux lol n got the 04 nissan quest last year
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaxInfamy
Forced Induction
3
Aug 24, 2015 12:01 PM
Goffery2uned
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
9
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 PM
Slamrod
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
Aug 10, 2015 12:33 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:14 AM.