Mileage of Maxima??
My '95 has over 367,ooo. Someone PM'd me and told me not to lie on the board last time I said that. But it's what I got. Orignal eng, replaced, trans, alt, and batteries (of course). Need a knock sensor, main serpitne belt, and suspinson all around. So, there's a 95 (been driven HARD), over 367 thousand miles and running fine, other than the gas milage (think cuz of the KS), and the sound of needing to change my belt.
BTW, bought it in Jan of '99 from a "one owner" with between 60 /65k, and delivered pizzizas in it full time for 3 and a half years, and lived 30+ miles from work, is where most of the miles came from...
BTW, bought it in Jan of '99 from a "one owner" with between 60 /65k, and delivered pizzizas in it full time for 3 and a half years, and lived 30+ miles from work, is where most of the miles came from...
At least 250K. We'd see more 200K+ 4th gens if the owners would hold onto them. But, as they car ages, the owner does and typically sells it and gets a new(er) car. They leave the board or tracking the car ends and we don't hear any more about it. The VQ when properly maintained would outlast the chassis in my mind.
Actually, I have never heard that a VQ would just die. I think they run for a very long time in normal conditions. People just get rid of their cars because they look old and require a lot of maintenance. BTW: VQ is one of the 10 best engines ever produced in the world.
I can't belive you guys are saying 200k. That's crazy. There are thousands of Maximas over 250k all over the place. People here love their car, so you see low miles, but the advrage for a 95 would have to be around 250, and when your on the highway, think of how many 95/96's you see...
Originally Posted by THT
Assuming 15K miles per year, you're looking at about 150-160K on a 95. I wouldn't say 200K+ 4th gens are all THAT common.
You are probley right. My round trip is 60 (I don't want to live by the casinos), but maybe I'm just used to not living close to my job. I know if I had 20k a year, I couldn't phisicly do it. but maybe you guys are used to less driving.
Originally Posted by Mxrider52
What do you guys think the average life of a maxima...with no racing or revving of engine
Once you hear that VQ, you never go back to featherfootin' it around. Ahem, Responsibly, of course.
Originally Posted by 95MaxRB26-DETT
I think 15k a year is low. Thats really just work and back. That's also the reason alot of ppl dont lease, because they don't offer the ammount of miles ppl need. I can see AT LEAST 175/80 being common on a 95-96, not a 99. I mean, 2005 is almost over. Also, a good bit of people that work in big cities, live far form their jobs in the suburbs, ppl travel, and they are getting cheaper, so the kids are starting to get ahold of them.
Originally Posted by DrKlop
If someone can show me a blown N/A VQ I’ll be very surprised
Originally Posted by 95MaxRB26-DETT
I think 15k a year is low. Thats really just work and back. That's also the reason alot of ppl dont lease, because they don't offer the ammount of miles ppl need. I can see AT LEAST 175/80 being common on a 95-96, not a 99. I mean, 2005 is almost over. Also, a good bit of people that work in big cities, live far form their jobs in the suburbs, ppl travel, and they are getting cheaper, so the kids are starting to get ahold of them.
If people are willing to put new trannys in their car every few years or rebuild it, I think the engine would hold up past 200K easy. I don't know how reliable the autos are but my first manual tranny just went at 98K. I replaced it because the car is still clean but say in five years when the car is older, I probably would not replace it a second time. I bet alot of these manuals will end up junked earlier than some people think because of bad trannys. Say if you have a 95 with 150K on it right now, it might not be worth it to replace a dead trans. when you take blue book value into consideration.
Originally Posted by cydrive
I'd have to agree. Most people I know dont put 15k a year, its a lot more. I'm doing 500 miles a week -that's what 26k a year. I have a 96 SE, bought it 5.5yrs ago with 69k and just hit 205k. I figure I'll get another 150k on it -atleast! These VQ's will just keep on running, the tranny's on the other hand might be an issue- I just replaced mine at 196k for 2001- messed up input bearing shaft.
The average is close to whatever the average warranty breaks down to on an annual basis or slightly higher.
26K/year is not normal annual mileage by any stretch of the imagination!
Originally Posted by Bobo
The average is not well in excess of 15K a year. A few years ago the average car in the US was driven 12K/year. Since then, I believe it has crept up closer to 15K. In Canada, it is still close to 12K/year.
The average is close to whatever the average warranty breaks down to on an annual basis or slightly higher.
26K/year is not normal annual mileage by any stretch of the imagination!
The average is close to whatever the average warranty breaks down to on an annual basis or slightly higher.
26K/year is not normal annual mileage by any stretch of the imagination!
Originally Posted by cydrive
26k sure isn't normal or average for that matter, i never said it was. I just dont know anyone that's doing 12 or even 15k a year. In any case an average is just that, highs and lows, add them together and do the math.
Originally Posted by Bobo
I think the high gas prices have slowed some people's driving habits down somewhat since Labor Day and may have shortened a few Sunday drives.
Originally Posted by cydrive
Now, Bobo are you having the same problems with gas prices up there are we are? (pls excuse the ignorance)
The spread between grades of gasoline is also higher here.
Currently premium gas is about Cdn$1.15/litre or Cdn$4.35/US gallon.
Bringing that back to US$ at an exchange rate of about US$0.85 to C$1.00, translates to US$3.70 for a US gallon of premium (91 or 92 octane gas), with 94 octane being higher yet.
I only live about 30 miles from the US border and used to be able to go across the line and save about Cdn$12 on a tank of gas, but that is when the US dollar was considerably stronger relative to the Canadian dollar. The savings now makes it hardly worthwhile given the currency relativities and the price of gas in both countries, let alone the border delays since 9/11.
Yeah, and I know I will get flamed for this
but sometimes I dont think we realize how good we have it compared to other nations. With the exception of Saudi Arabia- I was taking a look at CNN the other day and these guys pay about 69c a gallon!
Anyway, what was the original point of this thread ?
but sometimes I dont think we realize how good we have it compared to other nations. With the exception of Saudi Arabia- I was taking a look at CNN the other day and these guys pay about 69c a gallon!Anyway, what was the original point of this thread ?




250K
:
