Maximizing tire contact patch on 97-99...
Maximizing tire contact patch on 97-99...
Hey folks,
I need some opinions on tires. What I’m looking for is personal experience on what is the maximum section/tread width tires that would fit on a 97-99 Maxima.
---
I plan to use the original rim, 16x6.5, to keep the stock appearance.
---
Right now I’m just looking to settle on the tire size, so that the speedo is not way off and they don’t rub, and after that will do some research on which brand sticks better.
---
I know most 235 and up tires recommend a 7”+ rim, but I’m sure they is some slack in that figure. So, looking for opinions on mounting 235+ on 6.5” rim. Handling is not much of an importance as getting the largest contact patch on the front tires.
I need some opinions on tires. What I’m looking for is personal experience on what is the maximum section/tread width tires that would fit on a 97-99 Maxima.
---
I plan to use the original rim, 16x6.5, to keep the stock appearance.
---
Right now I’m just looking to settle on the tire size, so that the speedo is not way off and they don’t rub, and after that will do some research on which brand sticks better.
---
I know most 235 and up tires recommend a 7”+ rim, but I’m sure they is some slack in that figure. So, looking for opinions on mounting 235+ on 6.5” rim. Handling is not much of an importance as getting the largest contact patch on the front tires.
Re: Maximizing tire contact patch on 97-99...
Originally posted by SUPER-6
Hey folks,
I need some opinions on tires. What I’m looking for is personal experience on what is the maximum section/tread width tires that would fit on a 97-99 Maxima.
---
I plan to use the original rim, 16x6.5, to keep the stock appearance.
---
Right now I’m just looking to settle on the tire size, so that the speedo is not way off and they don’t rub, and after that will do some research on which brand sticks better.
---
I know most 235 and up tires recommend a 7”+ rim, but I’m sure they is some slack in that figure. So, looking for opinions on mounting 235+ on 6.5” rim. Handling is not much of an importance as getting the largest contact patch on the front tires.
Hey folks,
I need some opinions on tires. What I’m looking for is personal experience on what is the maximum section/tread width tires that would fit on a 97-99 Maxima.
---
I plan to use the original rim, 16x6.5, to keep the stock appearance.
---
Right now I’m just looking to settle on the tire size, so that the speedo is not way off and they don’t rub, and after that will do some research on which brand sticks better.
---
I know most 235 and up tires recommend a 7”+ rim, but I’m sure they is some slack in that figure. So, looking for opinions on mounting 235+ on 6.5” rim. Handling is not much of an importance as getting the largest contact patch on the front tires.
Well, it is not really in question that 235 profiles will fit on a 6.5 rim".
---
One example being Pirelli P6000 235/50/16 will fit even on a 6" rim, per manufacturer’s recommended rim size of 6-8.5", as will Sumitomo HTR 4 245/50/16 with recommended rim 6.5-8.5". And at the extreme BFGoodrich Comp T/A 255/50/16 with recommended rim starting at 6.5".
---
One tid bit of information which I just found on tirerack.com which reinforces my previous theory that even the minimum rim width figures have slack in them:
---
What I'm looking for is personal experience, if someone tried that, and what were the results
---
One example being Pirelli P6000 235/50/16 will fit even on a 6" rim, per manufacturer’s recommended rim size of 6-8.5", as will Sumitomo HTR 4 245/50/16 with recommended rim 6.5-8.5". And at the extreme BFGoodrich Comp T/A 255/50/16 with recommended rim starting at 6.5".
---
One tid bit of information which I just found on tirerack.com which reinforces my previous theory that even the minimum rim width figures have slack in them:
Additionally, some vehicle manufacturers and tire companies have permitted rim widths that are not within the tire's original approved rim width range. For example: BMW has combined 235/40R17 sized tires on 17x7.5" rims (which are 0.5" less than the narrowest 8.0" wide rim listed for the size) on certain M3 models; and Chevrolet has combined 255/50R16 sized tires on optional 16x9.5" rims (which are 0.5" wider than the 9.0" wide rim now listed for the size) on certain Corvette models. While these applications have received the approval of the vehicle and tire manufacturers, staying within the approved rim width range helps assure that the tire's internal stresses are within its design parameters.
What I'm looking for is personal experience, if someone tried that, and what were the results
Not good.
Originally posted by SUPER-6
Well, it is not really in question that 235 profiles will fit on a 6.5 rim".
---
One example being Pirelli P6000 235/50/16 will fit even on a 6" rim, per manufacturer’s recommended rim size of 6-8.5", as will Sumitomo HTR 4 245/50/16 with recommended rim 6.5-8.5". And at the extreme BFGoodrich Comp T/A 255/50/16 with recommended rim starting at 6.5".
---
One tid bit of information which I just found on tirerack.com which reinforces my previous theory that even the minimum rim width figures have slack in them:
---
What I'm looking for is personal experience, if someone tried that, and what were the results
Well, it is not really in question that 235 profiles will fit on a 6.5 rim".
---
One example being Pirelli P6000 235/50/16 will fit even on a 6" rim, per manufacturer’s recommended rim size of 6-8.5", as will Sumitomo HTR 4 245/50/16 with recommended rim 6.5-8.5". And at the extreme BFGoodrich Comp T/A 255/50/16 with recommended rim starting at 6.5".
---
One tid bit of information which I just found on tirerack.com which reinforces my previous theory that even the minimum rim width figures have slack in them:
---
What I'm looking for is personal experience, if someone tried that, and what were the results
tire size
I know some guys have run 245, but the rim offset might make a difference if there is rubbing or not. As for the stock rim, the biggest I've heard of on there are 225, and most tire installers I've talked to will say that you are pushing the limit of how well the bead will set, meaning if you corner hard you could loose the seating and the air in the tire. I haven't heard of that happening, but frankly, I'd be surprised if a good tire shop would even mount a 235 on a 6.5" rim, at least without trying to give you some warning.
here's what the #'s mean
Ok, 215/55/16 =
215 is the width of the tread in MM. In this example, 215 mm.
55 is the aspect ratio, or the height of the sidewall with respect to the width of the tire. In this case, 55% of 215 mm, or about 118 mm sidewall height.
16 is the diameter of the wheel on which that the tire s/b mounted. A lot of times there will be a letter associated with the wheel size, like "VR16", or "ZR16". People will talk about "V" or "Z" rated tires. The V or Z (or whatever it happens to be) relates to the speed rating, of which there are many. Generally, the later in the alphabet, the higher the speed rating. The "R" used with the size and the speed rating means radial.
There are a bunch of other numbers and letters that relate to treadwear, rain traction, load, rubber compound, heat dissipation characteristics and date of manufacture (my personal favorite if you want to impress). See http://www.tirerack.com for details.
BTW, there are bunches of things that you can do that will make the tires work better without going to a +1 or +2 or whatever size. Assuming that you're after performance rather than cosmetics, tire pressure, alignment, and suspension s/b set up properly before deciding you need something else. Best way to do this is run a few hot laps and take tire temps right away to be sure the tire is heating evenly a-x the entire tread.
If its for looks however, just disregard the previous paragraph and do what you want.
215 is the width of the tread in MM. In this example, 215 mm.
55 is the aspect ratio, or the height of the sidewall with respect to the width of the tire. In this case, 55% of 215 mm, or about 118 mm sidewall height.
16 is the diameter of the wheel on which that the tire s/b mounted. A lot of times there will be a letter associated with the wheel size, like "VR16", or "ZR16". People will talk about "V" or "Z" rated tires. The V or Z (or whatever it happens to be) relates to the speed rating, of which there are many. Generally, the later in the alphabet, the higher the speed rating. The "R" used with the size and the speed rating means radial.
There are a bunch of other numbers and letters that relate to treadwear, rain traction, load, rubber compound, heat dissipation characteristics and date of manufacture (my personal favorite if you want to impress). See http://www.tirerack.com for details.
BTW, there are bunches of things that you can do that will make the tires work better without going to a +1 or +2 or whatever size. Assuming that you're after performance rather than cosmetics, tire pressure, alignment, and suspension s/b set up properly before deciding you need something else. Best way to do this is run a few hot laps and take tire temps right away to be sure the tire is heating evenly a-x the entire tread.
If its for looks however, just disregard the previous paragraph and do what you want.
I know what you wanna know, but I'm not using anything out of the ordinary so can't help much. I'm running 225/50/16's on the stock SE rims if it helps, I think that is the widest you can go on those rims without any problems. Plus I don't think it'd be practical to put a wider tire on a narrow rim like that.
Originally posted by SUPER-6
Well, so far I have not got a single response to my original question as to what tire size you are running. This is tougher than I thought
Well, so far I have not got a single response to my original question as to what tire size you are running. This is tougher than I thought
Sorry to be so OT, but a question came to mind. I have Borbet Type Es in 16x7.5, wrapped with Potenza RE730s 225/55/16. First of all...do not get these tires! They're great for perforamnce but that's about it! They're really harsh and noisy.
Anyway, it still looks like my tire is wider than my wheel. I know that my style of wheels are slighly deep dished, but despite this, it still looks like the tire is 1/4 too thick on one side.
is there an exception for the Potenzas I bought? could they possibly be wider than a normal 225? Should I get 215s on my next set of tires?
thanks
Anyway, it still looks like my tire is wider than my wheel. I know that my style of wheels are slighly deep dished, but despite this, it still looks like the tire is 1/4 too thick on one side.
is there an exception for the Potenzas I bought? could they possibly be wider than a normal 225? Should I get 215s on my next set of tires?
thanks
[i]
is there an exception for the Potenzas I bought? could they possibly be wider than a normal 225? Should I get 215s on my next set of tires?
thanks [/B]
is there an exception for the Potenzas I bought? could they possibly be wider than a normal 225? Should I get 215s on my next set of tires?
thanks [/B]
I had 225/50's on my 16x6.5. Fit fine but bad flex under hard cornering. Street I run 235/45's w 35 offset - getting large and rubbing the plastic fenderwall at full lock turns.
Again, anytime you mount a wide tire on a narrow rim and get < 75% ratio watch for the air leaks and sidewall flex. For cornering power I'm actually going opposite - trying to get > 85% ratio using a 215 tire on a 7.5" rim.
Here's a really helpful tool to help figure fitments
Tire/Wheel Combo Calc
Again, anytime you mount a wide tire on a narrow rim and get < 75% ratio watch for the air leaks and sidewall flex. For cornering power I'm actually going opposite - trying to get > 85% ratio using a 215 tire on a 7.5" rim.
Here's a really helpful tool to help figure fitments
Tire/Wheel Combo Calc
Dont be cheap and stay with a 6.5" wheel if you want a size 235 tire.
It will handle like crap
you will have mushy steering response
It will look stupid
If you want to judge the contact patch, turn your wheels left and right on a dry concrete surface... While keeping the wheel turned, move the car a few feet and look at the white scrub marks from the concrete -- you get a nice judgement of your contact patch just from that -- Generally, you want a nice square-ish shape that should be wide and long... not too narrow and circular in shape like typical super low profile tires provide.
Going beyond, get an IR temperature sensor and drive around for a while... Immediately when you are done, take a temperature probe of your tires on the inside, middle, and outside... If the temperatures are balanced, your camber angle and inflation pressure is O.K. If not, then you got some work to do.
Hope this helps
cjvurnis
cjvurnis
It will handle like crap
you will have mushy steering response
It will look stupid
If you want to judge the contact patch, turn your wheels left and right on a dry concrete surface... While keeping the wheel turned, move the car a few feet and look at the white scrub marks from the concrete -- you get a nice judgement of your contact patch just from that -- Generally, you want a nice square-ish shape that should be wide and long... not too narrow and circular in shape like typical super low profile tires provide.
Going beyond, get an IR temperature sensor and drive around for a while... Immediately when you are done, take a temperature probe of your tires on the inside, middle, and outside... If the temperatures are balanced, your camber angle and inflation pressure is O.K. If not, then you got some work to do.
Hope this helps
cjvurnis
cjvurnis
Re: tire size
Originally posted by OriginalMadMax
Interesting idea going with a smaller tire on a wider rim. Maybe that would mean a 225 on a 17x8, but I wonder if that would induce more sidwall rollowver in autocrossing?
Interesting idea going with a smaller tire on a wider rim. Maybe that would mean a 225 on a 17x8, but I wonder if that would induce more sidwall rollowver in autocrossing?
Dont be cheap and stay with a 6.5" wheel if you want a size 235 tire.
It will handle like crap
you will have mushy steering response
It will look stupid
It will handle like crap
you will have mushy steering response
It will look stupid
Re: Re: tire size
Originally posted by BEJAY1
Avg sect width on 225's is about 9.1" (fitted on 7" rim). Fit that over an 8" gives you 9.5". 8" / 9.5" = 84%. Very responsive handling.
Avg sect width on 225's is about 9.1" (fitted on 7" rim). Fit that over an 8" gives you 9.5". 8" / 9.5" = 84%. Very responsive handling.
Originally posted by MaximaRacer
235 on 6.5"? I dont think you should. I have 235 on 7" and that is stretching it already.
235 on 6.5"? I dont think you should. I have 235 on 7" and that is stretching it already.
235's on 6.5" wide is kinda pushing your luck. On my 7" wide rim, you can visibly see that the curve of the bead surface is slightly too large as it meets the sidewall of the tire on this wheel. I personally wouldn't try this same tire on a 6.5".
I think 7" wide is as low as you can go and still maintain a reasonable margin of safety (especially driving "at the limit" w/ 235's). Sorry, I know it's not what you want to hear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





