What is the optimum RPM shift point?
I was wondering at what RPM level would you be able to get the most performance out of the Maxima. The info I've heard from my friends have been contradictory. One of them say @ peak torque, the other says a peak HP. The problem I have is that you want a medium or halfway point between the two. Basicly in the middle of peak torque and peak horspower. Any of you know this RPM shift point? Would it matter in which gear it is?
What what I remember (I could be wrong), you should shift at redline in 1st, shift at about 6K in 2nd, and 6K in 3rd. Try searching in the General forum because I remember it being discussed in there (keywords: "shift point").
In a 2k Max, shifting at redline will give the best results. Shifting any sooner, will give a slower ET. Ive tried it at the track. Shifting at even 6000 instead of 6500 rpm gave an ET of about 0.1 sec slower or so if I remember correctly.
Originally posted by madmax2k
In a 2k Max, shifting at redline will give the best results. Shifting any sooner, will give a slower ET. Ive tried it at the track. Shifting at even 6000 instead of 6500 rpm gave an ET of about 0.1 sec slower or so if I remember correctly.
In a 2k Max, shifting at redline will give the best results. Shifting any sooner, will give a slower ET. Ive tried it at the track. Shifting at even 6000 instead of 6500 rpm gave an ET of about 0.1 sec slower or so if I remember correctly.
If I get gear specs and final drive specs, I can do some calculations once I have some spare time (which is never! lol)
>You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
My only beef w/ this is that fuel cut is only a 100 or so rpms later. And w/ the tendency of this engine to 'overrun' just a bit when you take your foot off the gas, you'll be bouncing off the rev limiter. Unless, of course, you have the reflexes of a cat and the speed of a mongoose!
In case any out there didn't know, bouncing off the rev limiter is not a good thing. Ya heard it here first!!
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
My only beef w/ this is that fuel cut is only a 100 or so rpms later. And w/ the tendency of this engine to 'overrun' just a bit when you take your foot off the gas, you'll be bouncing off the rev limiter. Unless, of course, you have the reflexes of a cat and the speed of a mongoose!
In case any out there didn't know, bouncing off the rev limiter is not a good thing. Ya heard it here first!!
Originally posted by got rice?
in 2nd and 3rd gear, shifting at redline isn't quite as useful since the revs will be beyond where the torque begins to peak. You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
If I get gear specs and final drive specs, I can do some calculations once I have some spare time (which is never! lol)
Originally posted by madmax2k
In a 2k Max, shifting at redline will give the best results. Shifting any sooner, will give a slower ET. Ive tried it at the track. Shifting at even 6000 instead of 6500 rpm gave an ET of about 0.1 sec slower or so if I remember correctly.
In a 2k Max, shifting at redline will give the best results. Shifting any sooner, will give a slower ET. Ive tried it at the track. Shifting at even 6000 instead of 6500 rpm gave an ET of about 0.1 sec slower or so if I remember correctly.
If I get gear specs and final drive specs, I can do some calculations once I have some spare time (which is never! lol)
Ok...I just ran the numbers for a STOCK 2K 5 speed Maxima. These were based on my car's dyno plot when stock. I used a redline of 6500 rpm and the stock 17" wheels and tires (225/50/17 Potenzas).
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6500 rpm / 36 mph
2 / 6500 rpm / 65 mph
3 / 6500 rpm / 95 mph
4 / 6500 rpm / 128 mph
Just for yucks, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile (the program can do this as well) and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph, which is pretty close to what a stock 2k Max 5 speed can do. Top speed calculated to be 144 mph.
Ive got a dyno plot on a 1998 4th gen Max 5 speed here as well and Ill calculate the optimum shift points for that car next. Just by looking at it, its obvious redline will not be optimum.
[Edited by madmax2k on 12-30-2000 at 06:21 AM]
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6500 rpm / 36 mph
2 / 6500 rpm / 65 mph
3 / 6500 rpm / 95 mph
4 / 6500 rpm / 128 mph
Just for yucks, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile (the program can do this as well) and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph, which is pretty close to what a stock 2k Max 5 speed can do. Top speed calculated to be 144 mph.
Ive got a dyno plot on a 1998 4th gen Max 5 speed here as well and Ill calculate the optimum shift points for that car next. Just by looking at it, its obvious redline will not be optimum.
[Edited by madmax2k on 12-30-2000 at 06:21 AM]
Heres the data for 1998 5 speed Maxima. These were based on a friend's dyno plot when modified with CAI, Y-pipe, exhaust. I used a redline of 6500 rpm and the stock 15" wheels and tires with 215/60 tires.
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6440 rpm / 32 mph
2 / 6200 rpm / 62 mph
3 / 5940 rpm / 87 mph
4 / 5600 rpm / 110 mph
Again, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph. This exact same car ran 14.73 @ 94.1 mph last week, so I know the program is assuming a lower level of traction at the launch than this car actually acheived. But, the trap speed as predicted and as achieved is identical. Top speed calculared to be 137 mph.
Can anyone wh has made alot of runs verify that the above shiftpoints are optimum at the track for a 4th gen?
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6440 rpm / 32 mph
2 / 6200 rpm / 62 mph
3 / 5940 rpm / 87 mph
4 / 5600 rpm / 110 mph
Again, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph. This exact same car ran 14.73 @ 94.1 mph last week, so I know the program is assuming a lower level of traction at the launch than this car actually acheived. But, the trap speed as predicted and as achieved is identical. Top speed calculared to be 137 mph.
Can anyone wh has made alot of runs verify that the above shiftpoints are optimum at the track for a 4th gen?
Originally posted by madmax2k
Heres the data for 1998 5 speed Maxima. These were based on a friend's dyno plot when modified with CAI, Y-pipe, exhaust. I used a redline of 6500 rpm and the stock 15" wheels and tires with 215/60 tires.
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6440 rpm / 32 mph
2 / 6200 rpm / 62 mph
3 / 5940 rpm / 87 mph
4 / 5600 rpm / 110 mph
Again, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph. This exact same car ran 14.73 @ 94.1 mph last week, so I know the program is assuming a lower level of traction at the launch than this car actually acheived. But, the trap speed as predicted and as achieved is identical. Top speed calculared to be 137 mph.
Can anyone who has made alot of runs verify that the above shiftpoints are optimum at the track for a 4th gen?
Heres the data for 1998 5 speed Maxima. These were based on a friend's dyno plot when modified with CAI, Y-pipe, exhaust. I used a redline of 6500 rpm and the stock 15" wheels and tires with 215/60 tires.
GEAR/OPTIMUM SHIFT POINT/SPEED
1 / 6440 rpm / 32 mph
2 / 6200 rpm / 62 mph
3 / 5940 rpm / 87 mph
4 / 5600 rpm / 110 mph
Again, I ran this car in a simulated quarter mile and it netted a 15.0 @ 94 mph. This exact same car ran 14.73 @ 94.1 mph last week, so I know the program is assuming a lower level of traction at the launch than this car actually acheived. But, the trap speed as predicted and as achieved is identical. Top speed calculared to be 137 mph.
Can anyone who has made alot of runs verify that the above shiftpoints are optimum at the track for a 4th gen?
Re: What kind of program are you using, I need that program? n/m
Originally posted by The New CLIMAX
.
.
Originally posted by mhgsx
>You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
>You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
Originally posted by got rice?
Don't read into the statement too much. If you look at a B16A, the torque begins to climb at around 6000 RPM, so the engine needs to be revved up so that the engine speed stays in that area when it's shifted in the next gear.
Originally posted by mhgsx
>You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
>You want to shift at the point where the rpms in the next gear is at the point where torque begins to climb.
correct me if I'm wrong (or just being a smart-***), but taking what you've just said literally, we should all shift just past idle (750 rpm) since torque 'begins to climb' after, oh, 1 rpm !!!
Here's a counter point. Those w/ the 5th gen should realize a sudden surge of power as at 5K rpm, right when the manifold changes into the short runner config. Sort of like a 'V-Tec' or turbo rush feeling. Since you can really feel the increase in power (dyno graphs also show this increase) wouldn't it be wiser to be at, or as close to 5K rpm after shifting? If the above is true, then in order to have maximum acceleration, shifting at redline is necessary.
Originally posted by my01SE
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...

But, if you shift really fast, you can actually exceed the rev limiter by about 300 rpm without aqctually feeling the rev limiter hit. My revs usually spike to about 6800 rpm between shifts as the engine revs up a bit more as its unloaded between gears. Since theres no load on the engine for a brief instant, the computer doesnt seem to actually fuel cut.
But, if you shift really fast, you can actually exceed the rev limiter by about 300 rpm without aqctually feeling the rev limiter hit. My revs usually spike to about 6800 rpm between shifts as the engine revs up a bit more as its unloaded between gears. Since theres no load on the engine for a brief instant, the computer doesnt seem to actually fuel cut.
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
Originally posted by PIONEER
U CHEATER
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
But, if you shift really fast, you can actually exceed the rev limiter by about 300 rpm without aqctually feeling the rev limiter hit. My revs usually spike to about 6800 rpm between shifts as the engine revs up a bit more as its unloaded between gears. Since theres no load on the engine for a brief instant, the computer doesnt seem to actually fuel cut.
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
U CHEATER
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
Well what about when they loose grip in 2nd? Also larry tell me something, why are the whells hopping, MY stock RE-92z didn't hop much, but these RE-730 do a lot, Why, b/c they are heavier, More grip? Wider? whats the reason? I've tried with 44psi, 40psi, 38psi, 36psi and now running 32psi and still they hop. a little less at 32psi but still do. just can't figure out why
MadMax-
I recently dynoed my 96 Max and found that shifting at 6100 rpms on the 2-3 and 6000 on the 3-4 would be optimum. The 1-2 should be done at near redline so that you land deep into 2nd gear. 1st winds out so fast the car doesn't "feel" weak after 6000 rpms. Last season when I was racing, I was shifting way too late because I didn't know what kind of power I was making. I was shifting at an indicated 6400 which is about 300-400 rpms too late. I've adjusted my shiftpoints accordingly and my shift light is set up to go off at 5900 rpms so that by the time I shift I'm at 6100 rpms, except for 1st which I'll take up to 6500. I hope to shed a few tenths now that I know where my power is. I may try powershifting too.
Dave
I recently dynoed my 96 Max and found that shifting at 6100 rpms on the 2-3 and 6000 on the 3-4 would be optimum. The 1-2 should be done at near redline so that you land deep into 2nd gear. 1st winds out so fast the car doesn't "feel" weak after 6000 rpms. Last season when I was racing, I was shifting way too late because I didn't know what kind of power I was making. I was shifting at an indicated 6400 which is about 300-400 rpms too late. I've adjusted my shiftpoints accordingly and my shift light is set up to go off at 5900 rpms so that by the time I shift I'm at 6100 rpms, except for 1st which I'll take up to 6500. I hope to shed a few tenths now that I know where my power is. I may try powershifting too.
Dave
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Re: Re: What kind of program are you using, I need that program? n/m
Originally posted by madmax2k
Its called CARTEST, and it rocks!
Its called CARTEST, and it rocks!
http://home.earthlink.net/~patglenn/ct.html
[Edited by y2kse on 12-31-2000 at 02:30 PM]
Originally posted by Dave B
MadMax-
I recently dynoed my 96 Max and found that shifting at 6100 rpms on the 2-3 and 6000 on the 3-4 would be optimum. The 1-2 should be done at near redline so that you land deep into 2nd gear. 1st winds out so fast the car doesn't "feel" weak after 6000 rpms. Last season when I was racing, I was shifting way too late because I didn't know what kind of power I was making. I was shifting at an indicated 6400 which is about 300-400 rpms too late. I've adjusted my shiftpoints accordingly and my shift light is set up to go off at 5900 rpms so that by the time I shift I'm at 6100 rpms, except for 1st which I'll take up to 6500. I hope to shed a few tenths now that I know where my power is. I may try powershifting too.
Dave
MadMax-
I recently dynoed my 96 Max and found that shifting at 6100 rpms on the 2-3 and 6000 on the 3-4 would be optimum. The 1-2 should be done at near redline so that you land deep into 2nd gear. 1st winds out so fast the car doesn't "feel" weak after 6000 rpms. Last season when I was racing, I was shifting way too late because I didn't know what kind of power I was making. I was shifting at an indicated 6400 which is about 300-400 rpms too late. I've adjusted my shiftpoints accordingly and my shift light is set up to go off at 5900 rpms so that by the time I shift I'm at 6100 rpms, except for 1st which I'll take up to 6500. I hope to shed a few tenths now that I know where my power is. I may try powershifting too.
Dave
It looks like your dyno must have been very similar to my friend's as his calculated shift points according to the program came out very close to what youve stated.
Someone just posted the link to the program below if you wish to d/l it. Its slick...you can play with it for hours, and even race compettive cars against each other! You can change gear ratios, power curves, etc, etc, and see how the outcomes are affected.
Originally posted by my01SE
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...
Originally posted by got rice?
you're doing nothing wrong to the car if you hit the rev limiter. it basically cuts the timing/spark and drops the rev several hundred RPMs for a split second.
Originally posted by my01SE
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...
How bad is it for your car if you hit the rev limiter? It seems to be a problem for me when I race. The limiter is so close to the redline, it makes it hard not to hit...
I hit it and the hood release jamed.
Originally posted by PIONEER
Let the clutch out slower and give it more throttle.
U CHEATER
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
What I want to know is how do I keep the damn tires from hopping, its the most annoying thing.
[/I][/QUOTE]If you are wheel hopping badly in 2nd gear then youve either got alot more power than I do, or you are on a traction limited surface.
When wheels are "hopping" the are alternately grabbing and spinning. Alot of this has to do with suspension geometry, which we could assume is fixed. Id guess if your RE-730 are hopping where your RE-92's didnt that the RE92's would have just spun in the same situation. But, I really cant see how a Maxima has enough torque to really wheel hop all that badly in 2nd gear. In any case, wheel hop is terrible on the drivetrain. It is the easiest way to blow out a tranny there is. So, try to avoid causing hop. Unless of course, you are in a race, and the Maxima's honor is at stake
If you are wheel hopping badly in 2nd gear then youve either got alot more power than I do, or you are on a traction limited surface.
When wheels are "hopping" the are alternately grabbing and spinning. Alot of this has to do with suspension geometry, which we could assume is fixed. Id guess if your RE-730 are hopping where your RE-92's didnt that the RE92's would have just spun in the same situation. But, I really cant see how a Maxima has enough torque to really wheel hop all that badly in 2nd gear. In any case, wheel hop is terrible on the drivetrain. It is the easiest way to blow out a tranny there is. So, try to avoid causing hop. Unless of course, you are in a race, and the Maxima's honor is at stake
Each of these shift points for the 2K max is beyond what the owners manual for my 2k1 SE 5spd AE max says is safe (i.e., max speed in 1 = 30, 2 = 55, 3 = 80). Is that not a problem? Could you run the same test on a 2K1 AE SE? I wonder if it would vary.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Apr 2, 2016 05:42 AM
magiconthetire
Audio and Electronics
2
Oct 26, 2015 09:03 PM
hayne
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Oct 5, 2015 11:53 AM
ef9
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Oct 4, 2015 08:43 AM




