5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

0-60 Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2003, 11:57 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ojman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 92
0-60 Question

he following quote is in a preview test of teh 2k Max in C&D...The last sentence kindof leaves a little bit of intrigue so I started searching for quicked tests..The quickest 5spd max I found reviewed was at 6.9 sec 0-60...does this make any sense considering the 4th gen car pulled a 6.7 and the power to weight ratio is better in the 5th gen????

...at the track, our early-build test car trailed the old Maxima by a smidge. Its 0-to-60-mph and quarter-mile performance, at 7.0 and 15.6 seconds, respectively, were each 0.3 second off the pace of the last SE five-speed we tested (C/D, January 1996). The new car weighs 175 pounds more, and yet its power-to-weight ratio shows an 11-percent improvement, with virtually no change in gearing, so we expect future examples to improve on that performance.
ojman is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 04:29 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Young04's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 534
Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by ojman
he following quote is in a preview test of teh 2k Max in C&D...The last sentence kindof leaves a little bit of intrigue so I started searching for quicked tests..The quickest 5spd max I found reviewed was at 6.9 sec 0-60...does this make any sense considering the 4th gen car pulled a 6.7 and the power to weight ratio is better in the 5th gen????

...at the track, our early-build test car trailed the old Maxima by a smidge. Its 0-to-60-mph and quarter-mile performance, at 7.0 and 15.6 seconds, respectively, were each 0.3 second off the pace of the last SE five-speed we tested (C/D, January 1996). The new car weighs 175 pounds more, and yet its power-to-weight ratio shows an 11-percent improvement, with virtually no change in gearing, so we expect future examples to improve on that performance.
lesson is never to magazine race...one example - edmunds got 6.3 second to sixty for the 6 speed max - there are several autos (g-tech estimated) that are getting that time. real world, given a good driver, an auto would never keep up with a stick.
Young04 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 04:55 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
Re: Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by Young04


lesson is never to magazine race...one example - edmunds got 6.3 second to sixty for the 6 speed max - there are several autos (g-tech estimated) that are getting that time. real world, given a good driver, an auto would never keep up with a stick.
An auto MAXIMA would'nt keep up with an stick MAXIMA. There's an ample supply of car models whose auto and stick have the same 1/4 mile times.
Virus is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 07:03 AM
  #4  
vqman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by ojman
he following quote is in a preview test of teh 2k Max in C&D...The last sentence kindof leaves a little bit of intrigue so I started searching for quicked tests..The quickest 5spd max I found reviewed was at 6.9 sec 0-60...does this make any sense considering the 4th gen car pulled a 6.7 and the power to weight ratio is better in the 5th gen????

...at the track, our early-build test car trailed the old Maxima by a smidge. Its 0-to-60-mph and quarter-mile performance, at 7.0 and 15.6 seconds, respectively, were each 0.3 second off the pace of the last SE five-speed we tested (C/D, January 1996). The new car weighs 175 pounds more, and yet its power-to-weight ratio shows an 11-percent improvement, with virtually no change in gearing, so we expect future examples to improve on that performance.
the HORSEpower to weight ratio is better in the 5th gen...

but I think with 205TQ in the 4th Gen and 217TQ in the 5th, that the TQ to weight ratio is better in the 4th...

just a theory though

-vq
 
Old 01-03-2003, 08:17 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Re: Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by Young04
lesson is never to magazine race...
But if you have to, use the same magazine like ojman did. At least the testing methods(and perhaps even drivers) will be the same.

You can't go comparing Motor Trend's 6k rpm clutch dropping starts to the granny-shifting methods of Consumer Reports. I think CR is the only magazine to get a near 7-sec 0-60mph for the WRX. Why do they even bother?
Black VQ is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 08:23 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
slickrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 9,228
motor trend is the best of the worst when it comes to 0-60 times.
slickrick is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 08:43 AM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ojman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 92
I have usually found MT to be a little slower than C&D...I guess I haven't compared alot though..just cars I am really interested in. What are the best times ppl are getting with a stock 2k-2k1 max 5spd with a G-tech?
ojman is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:38 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Young04's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 534
Re: Re: Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by Virus


An auto MAXIMA would'nt keep up with an stick MAXIMA. There's an ample supply of car models whose auto and stick have the same 1/4 mile times.
my bad, that's what i meant i know about the WS-6's, etc.
Young04 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:49 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,147
Originally posted by ojman
I have usually found MT to be a little slower than C&D...I guess I haven't compared alot though..just cars I am really interested in. What are the best times ppl are getting with a stock 2k-2k1 max 5spd with a G-tech?
Not sure about G-tech times, but I think number of people on this board ran high 14s 1/4 stock in 2000-2001 5-speed Max.
Dany is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 12:53 PM
  #10  
Dev
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,412
Re: Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by VQMAN


the HORSEpower to weight ratio is better in the 5th gen...

but I think with 205TQ in the 4th Gen and 217TQ in the 5th, that the TQ to weight ratio is better in the 4th...

just a theory though

-vq
something else to be taken into consideration is that the 5th gen's have higher peak hp, while the rest of the torque and hp curves are pretty much similar.
for the extra power past 5000 rpm, i think it is compensated by the additional weight of the 5th gens.
in the 1/4 mile, i think the 4th gen has the slightest edge, as opposed to the 5th gen vq30.
Dev is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 01:16 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
Re: Re: Re: Re: 0-60 Question

Originally posted by Young04


my bad, that's what i meant i know about the WS-6's, etc.
I know that's what you meant. Just bustin your *****
Virus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
04-02-2016 05:42 AM
Stagnet04
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
10-11-2015 08:16 PM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
09-26-2015 12:01 PM



Quick Reply: 0-60 Question



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:18 PM.