5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

AFR a bit lean...

Old Feb 2, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #1  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
AFR a bit lean...

We had a local maxima dyno session today... Big thanks to BigDogJonx and SRT (the shop) for setting it up and organizing it... Anyhow, we all got our air/fuel ratios measured. It seemed that we were all running a bit lean since we all had AFRs in the 14-14.5 range. My AFR was flat throughout, but it was above 14... Any ideas as to why it could be lean? I used some fuel injector cleaner about 3000 miles ago, so injectors should be clean. The other thing I was thinking of was the fuel filter... sucks that ours is in the tank, or else I would have swapped that out. Any other suggestions?

Also, has anyone else get their AFR measured while on a dyno? BTW, this was on a 2k auto with midpipe/Apexi filter, Cattman y-pipe, RT cat, and UDP. Thanks!
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 06:20 PM
  #2  
Maximam's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,909
From: Reno, NV
Well if you go richer you will most likely loose power. Was it detonating?
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #3  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally posted by Maximam
Well if you go richer you will most likely loose power. Was it detonating?
no detonation/pinging as far as I could tell...

I was just thinking that I should be more around 13-14 rather than consistently above 14. Oh well... numbers were decent I guess....

180 hp
191 tq
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #4  
CalsonicSE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,152
From: Bay Area, CA
IMHO, I think their oxygen sniffer is wrong. It's really hard for a N/A car with only the basic bolt-ons to run that lean. Plus, you said ALL OF YOU were running that lean. I think that's pretty unlikely. All the N/A Maxima dynoes I've seen are around 12.0-12.5:1
Old Feb 2, 2003 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
Galo's Avatar
Maxima Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,467
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Perfectly stoichiometric A/F ratio is 14.7,

why do you think that between 14 and 14.5 is lean? That's perfect, IMHO.
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 06:18 AM
  #6  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
hmmm... I always thought that around 12-13 was normal...

As for the sensor they were using, I don't think it was off. A stock auto Acura TL-S dyno'd as well and the AFR was dead on around 12.1 for the whole run. He pulled 199 hp and around 180 torque.
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 06:27 AM
  #7  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
after looking at my AF plot carefully using the dynojet viewer, it is only above 14 between 3800 rpm and 5000 rpm. It is at 14 at 5000 rpm and decreases linearly down to around 13.5 at fuel cutoff. So it's not as high as I originally thought...
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 06:33 AM
  #8  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
So SRT is building Dixit's turbo...

That's a good amount of torque you have.
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 06:37 AM
  #9  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
So SRT is building Dixit's turbo...

That's a good amount of torque you have.

I'll let Dixit tell you about the turbo setup he is going with...

SRT is Lexus only for now... we should try and get them to make Nissan parts... their stuff is top notch...

The torque was pretty good... more than I expected... but I need to understand this AFR...
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 07:46 AM
  #10  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE
hmmm... I always thought that around 12-13 was normal...

As for the sensor they were using, I don't think it was off. A stock auto Acura TL-S dyno'd as well and the AFR was dead on around 12.1 for the whole run. He pulled 199 hp and around 180 torque.
The sensors could still be off. I know that Accord V6's run EXTREMELY RICH (10.x:1 range) at WOT. I'm not sure if the TL-S is the same, but if they usually run 10.0:1 but were being measured as 12.0:1 on the dyno - then 12:1 on a Maxima could have turned into 14:1.




But sounds fishy to me. Nice numbers, BTW
Old Feb 3, 2003 | 07:56 AM
  #11  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
yeah... their wideband sensor may have been off.. but who knows

Numbers were not bad... I'll post the dyno in the dyno forum later today perhaps...
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 01:29 AM
  #12  
CalsonicSE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,152
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: Perfectly stoichiometric A/F ratio is 14.7,

Originally posted by Galo
why do you think that between 14 and 14.5 is lean? That's perfect, IMHO.
It is lean (per se) because cars normally do not run that close to stoich from the factory. They run a bit richer (mostly for safety's sake). Even though 14.0 is technically on the rich side, it is lean compared to most N/A cars.

Nevertheless, your power numbers are normal and decent. Don't worry about anything; you won't blow your motor.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 06:54 AM
  #13  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Re: Re: Perfectly stoichiometric A/F ratio is 14.7,

Originally posted by CalsonicSE


Nevertheless, your power numbers are normal and decent. Don't worry about anything; you won't blow your motor.
thanks.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #14  
max'n out's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,443
I thought I remember seeing it come from the factory with a 13.5 to 13.8 somewhere b4.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Well normally close to stoich is okay. But on the dyno, you are running WOT correct? If you are running that close to stoich at WOT, I "might" be worried. Becuase the ecu runs a closed loop program that is richer than the normal open loop ( 02 ) program.

Although, I think your car is running fine, I would look into your fuel pressures or maybe your fuel pressure regulator. If your fuel pressure is a low, it "might" cause a lean(er) condition.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #16  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
yeah, dyno was at WOT...

I'll check out the fuel pressures and the fpr when the weather gets a little warmer. It's too cold to work on the car these days....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Apr 2, 2016 05:42 AM
mclasser
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
1
Sep 24, 2015 11:57 PM
dcam0326
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 18, 2015 04:52 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:59 PM.