My 2k3 Maxima vs modded Spec V
My 2k3 Maxima vs modded Spec V
Well today I had a little run in with a Sentra SE-R Spec V. The owner happened to be at this automotive class I'm taking at a local tech school here. Anyway he knew my car from when I was at the local 1/8 track here 3 weeks ago. He said he had ran his car down there also and his best time was 9.8. That's pretty good considering my best was only 9.7. The track here sucks by the way so I'm pretty sure that if I were to take my car to a better track preferable a 1/4 mile strip then I could pull alot better times. Who knows though, I may just suck at driving, but I think it's the track. Anyway we took our car's out on the main road and just did a little 0-60 run. I was truly impressed with this guys car. He stayed about 1/2 a car length behind me the whole way. Now this guy had an CAI, headers, exhaust, and a lightned crank pulley. Although the intake was not on at the time because he had just got the MAF replaced and of course had to return the intake back to stock before Nissan would work on it. Anyway tell me what you guys think. Did the race go like it should or should I have walked him? Thanks for any responses.
Originally Posted by 1BADMAX
Well today I had a little run in with a Sentra SE-R Spec V. The owner happened to be at this automotive class I'm taking at a local tech school here. Anyway he knew my car from when I was at the local 1/8 track here 3 weeks ago. He said he had ran his car down there also and his best time was 9.8. That's pretty good considering my best was only 9.7. The track here sucks by the way so I'm pretty sure that if I were to take my car to a better track preferable a 1/4 mile strip then I could pull alot better times. Who knows though, I may just suck at driving, but I think it's the track. Anyway we took our car's out on the main road and just did a little 0-60 run. I was truly impressed with this guys car. He stayed about 1/2 a car length behind me the whole way. Now this guy had an CAI, headers, exhaust, and a lightned crank pulley. Although the intake was not on at the time because he had just got the MAF replaced and of course had to return the intake back to stock before Nissan would work on it. Anyway tell me what you guys think. Did the race go like it should or should I have walked him? Thanks for any responses. 

Originally Posted by Quicksilver
It would be a good race at the track. With those mods he could pose a serios threat to relatively stock 5th Gens...
Tell him to remove his balance shaft stuff, then race again
Tell him to remove his balance shaft stuff, then race again

You did alright....
..i too raced a guy in my area with a spec -v withe following add-ons, chip,cat back-exhaust,filter. From a dead start he hung with me until 55 mph then my Max pulled on him considerably. I shut it down at 100 and he was 2-3 car behind with no intention of catching up. But i was very impressed, to say the least......
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
Originally Posted by Rafe
..i too raced a guy in my area with a spec -v withe following add-ons, chip,cat back-exhaust,filter. From a dead start he hung with me until 55 mph then my Max pulled on him considerably. I shut it down at 100 and he was 2-3 car behind with no intention of catching up. But i was very impressed, to say the least......
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
Just remember, headers are for ......
Originally Posted by 1BADMAX
He had some other mods, but I can't remember what he said they were. I know he said he's going to get cams and some other mods done. With the mods I've got should he have been that close to me. I guess hwen I get the headers for my Maxima then it may be a totally different story.
.....mid to high end punch. So he may still be nipping on your heals at the lower end of the spectrum. For more lower end punch you will need better gearing or internal work.Cams,lighter crank shaft,springs,bigger pistons w/bore,etc. Expensive yes, but who said performance is cheap..
Better gearing does not make the VQ35 cars any quicker. The 5 speed Altima has taller and longer gearing than the 6 speed Maxima and it is every bit as quick. A 9.7 1/8th mile is not impressive, you have much room for improvement as you should be running 9.3s or 9.4s.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Better gearing does not make the VQ35 cars any quicker. The 5 speed Altima has taller and longer gearing than the 6 speed Maxima and it is every bit as quick. A 9.7 1/8th mile is not impressive, you have much room for improvement as you should be running 9.3s or 9.4s.
Originally Posted by 1BADMAX
Yeah I wasn't impressed with my time. In my defense though I didn't take out the spare tire or jack and I left all my crap in the trunk. Car care products...etc. Anyway I beat a G35 Coupe 6spd and a 99-up Mustang GT. That's why I say it's the track and not me.
I beg to differ.....
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Better gearing does not make the VQ35 cars any quicker. The 5 speed Altima has taller and longer gearing than the 6 speed Maxima and it is every bit as quick. A 9.7 1/8th mile is not impressive, you have much room for improvement as you should be running 9.3s or 9.4s.
If you have shorter gearing you will have better acceleration.Your top end will be considerably less, but your acceleration will be greatly increased. And vice versa with taller gearing.
Just like why the TTZ(90-96) guys always are looking for N/A Z(90-96) cars that have been in a accident. The N/A has 4.1 gears, and TT have 3.7. 3.7 is great for top end racing, but for drag racing you want the 4.1 gears.I should know i switched the rear end out of my TTZ and put in a N/A rear end.My top end dropped a tad but the 4.1 gears made up for it in acceleration. The car was more responsive overall in the lower spectrum of things.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I am talking about full inteiror with the spare and jack and at least 1/2 tank of gas.
Originally Posted by Rafe
If you have shorter gearing you will have better acceleration.Your top end will be considerably less, but your acceleration will be greatly increased. And vice versa with taller gearing.
Just like why the TTZ(90-96) guys always are looking for N/A Z(90-96) cars that have been in a accident. The N/A has 4.1 gears, and TT have 3.7. 3.7 is great for top end racing, but for drag racing you want the 4.1 gears.I should know i switched the rear end out of my TTZ and put in a N/A rear end.My top end dropped a tad but the 4.1 gears made up for it in acceleration. The car was more responsive overall in the lower spectrum of things.
Just like why the TTZ(90-96) guys always are looking for N/A Z(90-96) cars that have been in a accident. The N/A has 4.1 gears, and TT have 3.7. 3.7 is great for top end racing, but for drag racing you want the 4.1 gears.I should know i switched the rear end out of my TTZ and put in a N/A rear end.My top end dropped a tad but the 4.1 gears made up for it in acceleration. The car was more responsive overall in the lower spectrum of things.
I wouldn't have said it if it had not already been proven. Explain why the Altima with the same weight, the same engine and taller gearing has the same acceleration. Also blubyu2k2's automatic will beat about 99% of all 6 speed cars from a dig to the 1/4 mile. His gearing is certainly taller than mine but I cannot beat him until third gear and I promise you that you can't either. Ther are many more factors that you are not considering such as torque curves and recirpcating masses that will negate any shorter gearing changes for the launch.
Originally Posted by 1BADMAX
Oh well maybe I just need improvement or I just plainly suck. 

Thats obvious.....
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I wouldn't have said it if it had not already been proven. Explain why the Altima with the same weight, the same engine and taller gearing has the same acceleration. Also blubyu2k2's automatic will beat about 99% of all 6 speed cars from a dig to the 1/4 mile. His gearing is certainly taller than mine but I cannot beat him until third gear and I promise you that you can't either. Ther are many more factors that you are not considering such as torque curves and recirpcating masses that will negate any shorter gearing changes for the launch.
the torque curve is the awnser to your question.The Altima uses it torque throughout the rev band where the maximas crest then falls off.
In race speaking term the Altima will continue to pull hard all the way to redline.
Also like you said, there are many other factors too. If i remember correctly the Altima was putting out better times then the MAX to.
5.9-0-60 Altima, 6.2 0-60 MAx
1/4-14.7 Altima,1/4-14.8 Max
3.5 v6 comparison
Not a mag racer, just going by specs from what was quoted from a magazine.. Trust me , i have had my fair share of racing. Spec racing,Formula ford racing(open wheel),auto crossing, and illegal.
Never had an opurtunity to run against an altima. The only thing that i can see is that maybe weight maybe a key factor as why your friend altima is keeping up or beating you.Is he a better driver, is your car mechanically sound,are you a heavy guy? These are things to keep in consideration, you never mentioned these things in your post.And i am not about to go assuming and make myself look bad.
Never had an opurtunity to run against an altima. The only thing that i can see is that maybe weight maybe a key factor as why your friend altima is keeping up or beating you.Is he a better driver, is your car mechanically sound,are you a heavy guy? These are things to keep in consideration, you never mentioned these things in your post.And i am not about to go assuming and make myself look bad.
Originally Posted by Rafe
Not a mag racer, just going by specs from what was quoted from a magazine.. Trust me , i have had my fair share of racing. Spec racing,Formula ford racing(open wheel),auto crossing, and illegal.
Never had an opurtunity to run against an altima. The only thing that i can see is that maybe weight maybe a key factor as why your friend altima is keeping up or beating you.Is he a better driver, is your car mechanically sound,are you a heavy guy? These are things to keep in consideration, you never mentioned these things in your post.And i am not about to go assuming and make myself look bad.
Never had an opurtunity to run against an altima. The only thing that i can see is that maybe weight maybe a key factor as why your friend altima is keeping up or beating you.Is he a better driver, is your car mechanically sound,are you a heavy guy? These are things to keep in consideration, you never mentioned these things in your post.And i am not about to go assuming and make myself look bad.
http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I personally havent raced an Altima either but from all the track results I have seen they are equally as quick. Try browsing around the timeslip section for more track data. Most of us have postings in there including myself and blu.
http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46
http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46
cool.....i'll do that.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I personally havent raced an Altima either but from all the track results I have seen they are equally as quick. Try browsing around the timeslip section for more track data. Most of us have postings in there including myself and blu.
http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46
http://forums.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=46
i have a spec v, and with intake headers and exhaust the guy should do better than a 9.8in the 1/8.. he should be getting like 9.6s... i get 9.8s with just intake with my spec v... best time so far i only ran it twice.. best so far 15.2 at 91 mph.. and the best with the pops 04 max auto se is a 14.64 with a 9.4 1/8 mile
Originally Posted by ga2000
i have a spec v, and with intake headers and exhaust the guy should do better than a 9.8in the 1/8.. he should be getting like 9.6s... i get 9.8s with just intake with my spec v... best time so far i only ran it twice.. best so far 15.2 at 91 mph.. and the best with the pops 04 max auto se is a 14.64 with a 9.4 1/8 mile
Originally Posted by Rafe
the torque curve is the awnser to your question.The Altima uses it torque throughout the rev band where the maximas crest then falls off.
In race speaking term the Altima will continue to pull hard all the way to redline.
Also like you said, there are many other factors too. If i remember correctly the Altima was putting out better times then the MAX to.
5.9-0-60 Altima, 6.2 0-60 MAx
1/4-14.7 Altima,1/4-14.8 Max
3.5 v6 comparison
In race speaking term the Altima will continue to pull hard all the way to redline.
Also like you said, there are many other factors too. If i remember correctly the Altima was putting out better times then the MAX to.
5.9-0-60 Altima, 6.2 0-60 MAx
1/4-14.7 Altima,1/4-14.8 Max
3.5 v6 comparison
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I wouldn't have said it if it had not already been proven. Explain why the Altima with the same weight, the same engine and taller gearing has the same acceleration. Also blubyu2k2's automatic will beat about 99% of all 6 speed cars from a dig to the 1/4 mile. His gearing is certainly taller than mine but I cannot beat him until third gear and I promise you that you can't either. Ther are many more factors that you are not considering such as torque curves and recirpcating masses that will negate any shorter gearing changes for the launch.
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
I read about that in SCC. Cut the chain with a chain cutter. hehe. Interesting!
Originally Posted by ga2000
i have a spec v, and with intake headers and exhaust the guy should do better than a 9.8in the 1/8.. he should be getting like 9.6s... i get 9.8s with just intake with my spec v... best time so far i only ran it twice.. best so far 15.2 at 91 mph.. and the best with the pops 04 max auto se is a 14.64 with a 9.4 1/8 mile
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Rafe
..i too raced a guy in my area with a spec -v withe following add-ons, chip,cat back-exhaust,filter. From a dead start he hung with me until 55 mph then my Max pulled on him considerably. I shut it down at 100 and he was 2-3 car behind with no intention of catching up. But i was very impressed, to say the least......
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
Because of there light weight, and slightly aggressive gearing, they can be a worthy opponent if slept on. They put more of a fight than those gutless Si civics.
when I went to MO/KAN back in February, my best time was a 14.99, and this guy in a much less modded SE-R ran a 15.5. I am not sure if it was a spec-V or not.
i have since ran a 14.8, but those little 2.5L's are pretty hot...to bad handling is no good on our muscle cars...
-vq
Originally Posted by VQMAN
when I went to MO/KAN back in February, my best time was a 14.99, and this guy in a much less modded SE-R ran a 15.5. I am not sure if it was a spec-V or not.
i have since ran a 14.8, but those little 2.5L's are pretty hot...to bad handling is no good on our muscle cars...
-vq
i have since ran a 14.8, but those little 2.5L's are pretty hot...to bad handling is no good on our muscle cars...
-vq
up to around 60 the Spec V isnt bad at all. However, at higher speeds they still trail the hp of a 3.5 by like 70 or 80... thats when the Maxima will pull away nicely. But the Spec V's are sharp lookin, nice handling little cars.
yeah my spec v is great up until 60 than the power drops off alittle when i bang third gear.. by the end of third gear it will pick up pretty good again... im in third gear by 60 though.. second gear tops out at 53 or so.. for a 4banger the car moves.. if i am doing 10 mph in first and stomp on it the tires will spin like a mo fo, alot of torque in that little car.. but the max is enough faster,
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
Tell him to remove his balance shaft stuff, then race again
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
You can actually remove the entire assembly by dropping the oil pan. You have to cut down the bolts like 2"...I used to have a link on it. It will add HP to that already stout engine...
Originally Posted by Igor911
i raced one of those spec-v's in my auto 2k and the guy had 1/2 car on me
From 0-50-60ish they should hang with you , slightly modded w/ chip,exhaust,cone filter. If stock , they would hang less,possibly to 35ish mph. There top end is weak, on a highway there easy pickings,lack of Hp/trq just doesn't give them the muscle to pull to top speed very quickly.
Also don't you roll on 19"'s? If so that could be a problem as well....more internal work would solve that problem real quick. Cams, springs,valve job,etc. Exhaust,filter , headers are 15% of the equation to go faster, but the source for speed lies within,actually building the engine,will net better results then just f/e/h/c/. I guess the ultimate question is how fast do you want to go and how deep are your pockets?
Originally Posted by ga2000
if i trap at 91 or so with just intake the top end in the spec isnt that bad...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAXSE5SPD
Other For Sale/Wanted
2
Aug 23, 2015 12:06 PM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM




