5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Question about Gasoline Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 03:43 AM
  #1  
kcwolf200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 55
Question about Gasoline Octane

I just bought a 2002 SE and I absolutely love it! I was glancing through the owners manual and noticed that it stated that 91+ octane was recommended. It also stated that if it is not available, 87 octane could be used. I bought the car in another city and before driving it home, I filled it up with 87 octane (not having read the manual yet). So far, no knocking or pinging heard but I don't want to screw up my new car. Should I be using the 91 octane or does 87 also work. Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 04:08 AM
  #2  
steaLthyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 562
87 will work but if you want to keep your car, i suggest you start using 91 from now on..as it will prevent knocking and pinging..also gives the best mileage, or so i've noticed.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 04:27 AM
  #3  
ISELKARS2's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 99
Originally Posted by steaLthyMax
87 will work but if you want to keep your car, i suggest you start using 91 from now on..as it will prevent knocking and pinging..also gives the best mileage, or so i've noticed.
I concur. The few cents you pay extra for quality (CHEVRON etc.) premium gas will payoff down the road in mileage, performance and smile factor when you kick someone's butt off the line with NO hesitation, knocking, etc.!! Good luck!
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 05:03 AM
  #4  
MrPoisse's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 104
it won't knock with 87 octane if you keep it low in rev... but the chances get higher as the revs go up... I too suggest to use the 91 octane.

and about pinging, I've been told that the car of today is often too well insulated from engine noises for us to hear the "slight" pings... you'll hear the strong ones, but the smaller one will go unnoticed, and meanwhile your engine will get more and more damaged.

the few cents are worth it IMO
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:34 AM
  #5  
spotbass's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
There is not a production (non-performance) vehicle that should not run just fine in daily driving scenarios on 87 octane gas. With computer controled timing pinging should not occur in these situations. I think Nissan has used this 91 octane recommendation as an excuse for design flaws. I was given this excuse from a dealer and the factory support line.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 06:40 AM
  #6  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by spotbass
91 octane recommendation as an excuse for design flaws. I was given this excuse from a dealer and the factory support line.
Nissan doesn't recommend 91, just premium, as some locations do not have 91 octane.


Check the article in the FAQ/Stickys, you might learn a few things.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 07:03 AM
  #7  
Rayn4est's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 222
From: Newington, CT
I have heard (from my own engine and other orgers) of pinging even with 91 octane at ~1500-2000rpm with moderate load. I've heard theories of lean fuel mixtures being the culprit. Higher octane reduces detonation (pinging), expecially in high compression engines. Like spotbass says, the engine will run on 87 (my ex-boss runs 87 only, because she's cheap), but the ECU must compensate. I spend the extra few $ and avoid any pinging I can. I don't need any extra wear on the engine, I was driving 70 miles a day.
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #8  
kcwolf200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 55
Thanks everyone for the input. I plan on keeping the car for a long time, so the few extra cents for the "good stuff" would probably be worth it. I agree with everyone that it's better to not take any chances. Anyways thanks again!
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #9  
00Max00's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by spotbass
I think Nissan has used this 91 octane recommendation as an excuse for design flaws. I was given this excuse from a dealer and the factory support line.
I've never ever heard about the VQ engines have design flaws. A best engine 9 years in rows has design flaws??? Sounds weird. Actually more and more new cars now have more than 10:1 compression ratio for better efficiency. This is where the higher octane requirement comes from. For the vehicles over 10:1 compression that claim only need regular, just because the knock sensor retards timing when knock happen, what almost guarantees the engine always perform poorer than what it should be on a good premium, and of course prepare to replace the knock sensor soon.
my .02
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Apr 2, 2016 05:42 AM
Stagnet04
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
Oct 11, 2015 08:16 PM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Sep 26, 2015 12:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 AM.