Everyone Check this out, you think its worth a try?
07-05-2005, 08:14 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,145
Everyone Check this out, you think its worth a try?
http://look2myshop.com/032/fuelsaver/index.html
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
07-05-2005, 08:20 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,861
Originally Posted by 2001SE
http://look2myshop.com/032/fuelsaver/index.html
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
But if you indeed buy it and try it out and can notice a significant improvement, I will be the first to eat my words.
07-05-2005, 08:22 AM
#3
Originally Posted by 2001SE
http://look2myshop.com/032/fuelsaver/index.html
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
Looks like it would work, I am thinking its worth trying this to check if its really true
07-05-2005, 08:22 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 128
If It Worked Dont You Think The Factory Would Use It To Rase There Epa Ratings
07-05-2005, 08:43 AM
#5
Originally Posted by juniper9803
If It Worked Dont You Think The Factory Would Use It To Rase There Epa Ratings
hahahah...sadly, no I don't think Nissan would put this in there cars even if it was proven to help. They're not that nice.
07-05-2005, 08:55 AM
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,145
I showed it to this guy at my work. He told me he had an old 4runner that he put this thing in 2001. He usually got like 190 to a tank. After he added this he got like 230-235 average. So it did get like an extra 40 miles out of a tank. He also told me the car felt a little bit stronger. He is a cool guy, I am pretty sure he is not BSing me.
I think I'll try it.
I think I'll try it.
07-05-2005, 09:27 AM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 442
Ford tested it... FORD!!!!
Remember as you back from the product, do not make eye contact or run as this will induce a chase response.
And never try to stare down the feral product, it will see this as a threat.
Remember as you back from the product, do not make eye contact or run as this will induce a chase response.
And never try to stare down the feral product, it will see this as a threat.
07-05-2005, 09:31 AM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,861
Originally Posted by MacAlert
Might as well try this stuff too:
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
07-05-2005, 09:32 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 442
Originally Posted by 2001SE
I showed it to this guy at my work. He told me he had an old 4runner that he put this thing in 2001. He usually got like 190 to a tank. After he added this he got like 230-235 average. So it did get like an extra 40 miles out of a tank. He also told me the car felt a little bit stronger. He is a cool guy, I am pretty sure he is not BSing me.
I think I'll try it.
I think I'll try it.
07-05-2005, 09:51 AM
#13
Originally Posted by MacAlert
Might as well try this stuff too:
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
07-05-2005, 10:29 AM
#15
AS PER M.LYNCH, EXXON-MOBIL RESEARCH ENGINEER:
Originally Posted by M.Lynch
My guess is its BS. Like maybe they ran a car with it, got X miles per
gallon, then ran the car right after without (with that car still being
hot) and got Y miles to the gallon lower. But the difference was either
because the engine was already hot or some other thing they dont control.
OR maybe they just made up that stuff, it doesnt look official and they
dont have any of the offcial test jargon I see at work. Also if breaking
up the molecules really made it more efficient dont you think refineries
would do it ahead of time? I think that whole part is BS. If this
'resonating wave' or what ever cracks the molecules its just gonna make
lighter hydro carbons, like butane and propane. Fuels made to a certain
mol wt and octane so it will fire at the right time in your engine, light
fuels wont ignight with the same power or at the same time, it would
probably cause knocking. Also any cracking that was going on at the
molecular level would cause enourmous amounts of heat. That little
plastic thing couldnt handle it.
My guess is it is either a) completely phony or b) it does give you better
fuel economy but not by the means it says, like maybe it just restricts
the amount of gas that can get to your engine so its taking away power
basically making your car a 4 cylinder. If that was what you wanted you
wouldnt have bought a maxima you would have bought a sentra.
gallon, then ran the car right after without (with that car still being
hot) and got Y miles to the gallon lower. But the difference was either
because the engine was already hot or some other thing they dont control.
OR maybe they just made up that stuff, it doesnt look official and they
dont have any of the offcial test jargon I see at work. Also if breaking
up the molecules really made it more efficient dont you think refineries
would do it ahead of time? I think that whole part is BS. If this
'resonating wave' or what ever cracks the molecules its just gonna make
lighter hydro carbons, like butane and propane. Fuels made to a certain
mol wt and octane so it will fire at the right time in your engine, light
fuels wont ignight with the same power or at the same time, it would
probably cause knocking. Also any cracking that was going on at the
molecular level would cause enourmous amounts of heat. That little
plastic thing couldnt handle it.
My guess is it is either a) completely phony or b) it does give you better
fuel economy but not by the means it says, like maybe it just restricts
the amount of gas that can get to your engine so its taking away power
basically making your car a 4 cylinder. If that was what you wanted you
wouldnt have bought a maxima you would have bought a sentra.
07-05-2005, 10:50 AM
#16
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 371
Did you see the chart on the bottom? 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7 liter V-TEC(!!!!) 8-cylinder engine?
07-05-2005, 12:58 PM
#19
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 232
i have a few hundreds to waste...i'll buy 4...one for myself and three others who want a free try. let me know.
07-05-2005, 01:22 PM
#21
Originally Posted by Komax
i have a few hundreds to waste...i'll buy 4...one for myself and three others who want a free try. let me know.
07-05-2005, 03:16 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 295
what the hell is a 4.7 vtec V8.
07-05-2005, 06:40 PM
#29
Mass_Media™
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,812
Originally Posted by MacAlert
Might as well try this stuff too:
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
http://www.kalecoauto.com/fluids.htm
07-05-2005, 07:43 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 458
1. Neodymium is just a rare earth magnet. dime a dozen.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
07-06-2005, 12:38 PM
#31
Ford, GM, and Chrysler would kill for a device like this if it actually worked. They always struggle to meet the CAFE standards. Ford even went as far as to fill their engines with 5w-20 oil for the .5% gas mileage increase it gives in exchange for the protection that a 5w-30 oil gives.
07-06-2005, 12:53 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by itdood
1. Neodymium is just a rare earth magnet. dime a dozen.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
Wow.. you took those words out of my mouth... i can see at least there is someone else here besides me that paid attention in chemistry class
07-06-2005, 03:25 PM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 295
Originally Posted by itdood
1. Neodymium is just a rare earth magnet. dime a dozen.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
2. Super Conductors, the holy grail of electrical apps, requires TONS of cooling of the super conductor. "High temp" super conductors have to be cooled to -217 F to become super conducting. In other words they are lying when they call it "super conducting", unless they've somehow firgured out how to keep it that cool.
3. Magnetism, even from a super conductor, is a weak force and will not break atomic bonds. If it did people would melt when they got MRIs.
4. The whole concept of getting energy from gas is breaking the hydrocarbon bonds (a.k.a. burning). If you broke those bonds before it entered the engine, you'd get less energy out of the gas.
So you basically get a magnet wrapped around your fuel line. Save youself some money, get some magnets off your Mom's fridge and tape them on the fuel line. same thing.
Impressive, someone paid attention in chemistry class
07-06-2005, 10:00 PM
#34
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: las vegas
Posts: 34
stay away from that
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
11-15-2020 11:52 AM
RWCreative
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
9
09-21-2015 11:01 AM
ColdCananda
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
3
09-20-2015 10:45 PM