Well like I said before it seems like the extra weight of the I35 must be up front because on the I35s the H&R drop looks more even.

This looks pretty DAMN even

even enough for me at least

check it out
http://www.cardomain.com/member_page...45_32_full.jpg

 

Congratulations?

Instead of all this talking about it why not just do it? You've obviously got it figured out in your head, so why bother posting about it?

 

I'm workin on it, and if the back sags I could put H-tech springs in the back which Irish said he didnt mind when it came to handling. I am just spreading some more info. Because the general consensus is that H&R provides an uneven drop and/or the *** sags and I am just pointing out that its not always the case although I do believe it does happen just like the maxspeeds sometimes start to ride like garbage after too many miles.

btw what springs are you on, in that pic? It looks like your back is tucked

 

The rear will be lower on H&R any way you look at it. Even in that pic it looks like the rear is slightly lower, it's just that the shadow above the tire and the tire itself isn't really discernible and hence the gap looks even front and rear in this pic.

My sig has H-Tech springs all around. The rear only looks tucked because the wheels are sunk back towards the rear of the car. You're seeing mostly the inside edge of the fender.

Furthermore, I have pics of my car with H&R front springs and H-Tech rear springs. Even then, while close, the rear sits slightly lower.

 

Meta just do what your Avitar states dude just let it go................................................ .......................................

 

LOL. Point taken my friend.