Pics of my SCed maxima are up.
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
340hp? I thought it doses the car to 280 @ wheel?
just wondering.
340hp? I thought it doses the car to 280 @ wheel?
just wondering.
Originally posted by DMan_2KMax
Hey guys I got my maxima web page back up and posted some new pics. You can check them out by clicking on the link below my sig picture.
Hey guys I got my maxima web page back up and posted some new pics. You can check them out by clicking on the link below my sig picture.
very nice ....what are your 0-60 and 1/4 mile times? it would be nice to know what a SCd auto is capable of.
Also do you have a dyno chart you can post, I'm really interested in seeing how boost alters the maxima torque curve.
looks awesome Diedrick
i got a ques. though... most people when they get boost put at least a A/F gauge... u not worried what ur ratio is?
i like the less gauges the better but arent u worried about like other readings and stuff thats happening?
i cant wait to get more $$$ to do the SC... ill stick with NOS in the meantime... its cheaper...
i got a ques. though... most people when they get boost put at least a A/F gauge... u not worried what ur ratio is?
i like the less gauges the better but arent u worried about like other readings and stuff thats happening?
i cant wait to get more $$$ to do the SC... ill stick with NOS in the meantime... its cheaper...
Originally posted by DMan_2KMax
Hey I just had a thought, does the dyno take into account the outside temp when computing the hp and torque figures?
Hey I just had a thought, does the dyno take into account the outside temp when computing the hp and torque figures?
We just dynoed a friends supercharged VR6 at 9 psi boost in 101 F heat and high humidity (dewpoint was about 80 F). His correction factor was surprisingly only about 1.02 to 1.03, meaning his corrected values were about 2-3% higher than the actual values.
Ive tested my NA Maxima in both warm and cool temps. When I dyno tested at 72 F, my actual wheel hp (211 hp) was about 6 hp more than when I tested around 90F (205 hp). But, after the SAE correction, they were both within 0.5 hp of each other at around 205 .
So, go dyno that thing and post the results!
I'm considering it . . .
Originally posted by psing23
looks awesome Diedrick
i got a ques. though... most people when they get boost put at least a A/F gauge... u not worried what ur ratio is?
i like the less gauges the better but arent u worried about like other readings and stuff thats happening?
i cant wait to get more $$$ to do the SC... ill stick with NOS in the meantime... its cheaper...
looks awesome Diedrick
i got a ques. though... most people when they get boost put at least a A/F gauge... u not worried what ur ratio is?
i like the less gauges the better but arent u worried about like other readings and stuff thats happening?
i cant wait to get more $$$ to do the SC... ill stick with NOS in the meantime... its cheaper...
Re: I'm considering it . . .
Originally posted by DMan_2KMax
I asked Stillen and my mechanic about the need for an A/F gauge and they both said that it would be nice to have but not a necessity. My mechanic highly recommended the boost gauge so that I can closely monitor the S/Cer. If I'm running stock internals and haven't modified the Stillen kit, which is specifically designed for this car, do I really need an A/F gauge? How would I be able to adjust the A/F ratio anyway if I noticed it was running to lean or too rich? Thanks in advance.
I asked Stillen and my mechanic about the need for an A/F gauge and they both said that it would be nice to have but not a necessity. My mechanic highly recommended the boost gauge so that I can closely monitor the S/Cer. If I'm running stock internals and haven't modified the Stillen kit, which is specifically designed for this car, do I really need an A/F gauge? How would I be able to adjust the A/F ratio anyway if I noticed it was running to lean or too rich? Thanks in advance.
well if its too rich im not sure but then again its not hazardous to the car... but if its lean i think it means that you have to get a bigger fuel pump to pump more gas... and lean = very bad
Re: Re: I'm considering it . . .
Originally posted by psing23
well if its too rich im not sure but then again its not hazardous to the car... but if its lean i think it means that you have to get a bigger fuel pump to pump more gas... and lean = very bad
well if its too rich im not sure but then again its not hazardous to the car... but if its lean i think it means that you have to get a bigger fuel pump to pump more gas... and lean = very bad
I had originally ordered one from . . .
Originally posted by BottleFedMax
Where did you get your pillar pod from and for how much? Thanks.
Where did you get your pillar pod from and for how much? Thanks.
Re: I had originally ordered one from . . .
Talking about all these dyno runs. Whew! I've been to the dyno quite a few times already with the max. I don't quite understand where some of these numbers are coming from. I have the induction kit, muffler, y-pipe, and an adjustable fuel pressure regulator. After letting the car cool down quite a bit, best hp figure i could squeeze out was 208. That was adjusting quite a bit for the added fuel the stock computer was adding. My A/f was around 11 before, now its up around 13.4 at WOT. At 11.3 before the fuel regulator i was only pushing 203. so a 5 hp gain, but temps were different, and the car had around 9-10 passes to get the fuel set right. Where you got 211 or more from i is not sure. Especially with hotter weather.
Nice
DROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL... Very nice. Love the sleeper look too. I think that's how I'm going to leave my ride when I drop in my SC. My friend's been telling me that I'll need to put in a new exhaust to really take advantage of it. Does keeping the stock exhaust pipe hamper the performance of the SC? I would prefer to keep the car looking bone stock from the outside.
Re: Re: I had originally ordered one from . . .
Originally posted by Foglght
Where you got 211 or more from i is not sure. Especially with hotter weather.
Where you got 211 or more from i is not sure. Especially with hotter weather.
Hmmm....its good to know that you are getting the same power readings as we have gotten here. More or less, 203-205 hp is about it with the intake and Y-pipe. Some of the dynos show 208 hp, but this is the peak value recorded when the rev limit is hit which causes a spike (see my plots). The actual peak is about 2-3 hp lower if the blip is removed.
Hmm...also good to know what the A/F ratio is on the Max. Ive never tested mine. I guess a few more ponies are available by leaning it out a bit.
Muffler
Originally posted by Y2K1MaximaDevil
DROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL... Very nice. Love the sleeper look too. I think that's how I'm going to leave my ride when I drop in my SC. My friend's been telling me that I'll need to put in a new exhaust to really take advantage of it. Does keeping the stock exhaust pipe hamper the performance of the SC? I would prefer to keep the car looking bone stock from the outside.
DROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL... Very nice. Love the sleeper look too. I think that's how I'm going to leave my ride when I drop in my SC. My friend's been telling me that I'll need to put in a new exhaust to really take advantage of it. Does keeping the stock exhaust pipe hamper the performance of the SC? I would prefer to keep the car looking bone stock from the outside.
Re: Muffler
Ran into problems this week. For those of you who read my last post, you need to read this. Well after a couple of days with the fuel pressure adjusted right my PCM decided it didn't like the addition. I would get a Check engine light. At work i pulled the codes and it said MAF! I thought that modifying the MAF to get rid of that square lip damaged the electronics (MAF's are very sensitive). The car would not respond over 1/4 throttle (classic MAF problem). Well, after many a debate with my other techs at the shop i decided to remove the new pressure regulator i bought. Problem solved. Why the computer was throwing a MAF code is a mystery to me. I've decided since i am going to throw a ZEX NOS kit on the car that the Apexi S-Afc is the best way to go for this one.
By the way my custom induction kit is comprised of a Civic Si pipe then a part of the prelude kit (i think its from a prelude. It ends up below the radiator in the little plastic tray on the bottom of the car. The car has such a sweet sound starting at 3k. It growls all the way up to 6.5k!
cya
Ryan
By the way my custom induction kit is comprised of a Civic Si pipe then a part of the prelude kit (i think its from a prelude. It ends up below the radiator in the little plastic tray on the bottom of the car. The car has such a sweet sound starting at 3k. It growls all the way up to 6.5k!
cya
Ryan
Re: Re: Muffler
Originally posted by Foglght
Ran into problems this week. For those of you who read my last post, you need to read this. Well after a couple of days with the fuel pressure adjusted right my PCM decided it didn't like the addition. I would get a Check engine light. At work i pulled the codes and it said MAF! I thought that modifying the MAF to get rid of that square lip damaged the electronics (MAF's are very sensitive). The car would not respond over 1/4 throttle (classic MAF problem). Well, after many a debate with my other techs at the shop i decided to remove the new pressure regulator i bought. Problem solved. Why the computer was throwing a MAF code is a mystery to me. I've decided since i am going to throw a ZEX NOS kit on the car that the Apexi S-Afc is the best way to go for this one.
By the way my custom induction kit is comprised of a Civic Si pipe then a part of the prelude kit (i think its from a prelude. It ends up below the radiator in the little plastic tray on the bottom of the car. The car has such a sweet sound starting at 3k. It growls all the way up to 6.5k!
cya
Ryan
Ran into problems this week. For those of you who read my last post, you need to read this. Well after a couple of days with the fuel pressure adjusted right my PCM decided it didn't like the addition. I would get a Check engine light. At work i pulled the codes and it said MAF! I thought that modifying the MAF to get rid of that square lip damaged the electronics (MAF's are very sensitive). The car would not respond over 1/4 throttle (classic MAF problem). Well, after many a debate with my other techs at the shop i decided to remove the new pressure regulator i bought. Problem solved. Why the computer was throwing a MAF code is a mystery to me. I've decided since i am going to throw a ZEX NOS kit on the car that the Apexi S-Afc is the best way to go for this one.
By the way my custom induction kit is comprised of a Civic Si pipe then a part of the prelude kit (i think its from a prelude. It ends up below the radiator in the little plastic tray on the bottom of the car. The car has such a sweet sound starting at 3k. It growls all the way up to 6.5k!
cya
Ryan
Thanks for the explanation.
I think its cool to see a Vortech on something besides mustangs (ex-GT man)! I would love to pull up next to a Max and hear that kinda high-pitched grinding the vortech makes!
Looks good man, keep us informed on dyno and 1/4 times.
Looks good man, keep us informed on dyno and 1/4 times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Greenmaxspeed
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
6
Aug 31, 2015 09:06 PM





