Dyno with Air/Fuel Ratio - anyone else done one?
Here is my dyno of mods with air/fuel ratio.
Keep in mind that the dyno may be suspect so the numbers above 5100rpm and peak hp numbers are probably incorrect.
The only other dyno with air/fuel ratio I've seen was in the Stillen instructions Russ posted on his site. Has anyone else done one? Mine seems kinda rich.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/maxgator/airfuel.BMP
Stillen's:
http://www.5thgenmaximas.com/howto/scinstall/dyno4.jpg
Keep in mind that the dyno may be suspect so the numbers above 5100rpm and peak hp numbers are probably incorrect.
The only other dyno with air/fuel ratio I've seen was in the Stillen instructions Russ posted on his site. Has anyone else done one? Mine seems kinda rich.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/maxgator/airfuel.BMP
Stillen's:
http://www.5thgenmaximas.com/howto/scinstall/dyno4.jpg
Originally posted by Max_Gator
Here is my dyno of mods with air/fuel ratio.
Keep in mind that the dyno may be suspect so the numbers above 5100rpm and peak hp numbers are probably incorrect.
The only other dyno with air/fuel ratio I've seen was in the Stillen instructions Russ posted on his site. Has anyone else done one? Mine seems kinda rich.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/maxgator/airfuel.BMP
Here is my dyno of mods with air/fuel ratio.
Keep in mind that the dyno may be suspect so the numbers above 5100rpm and peak hp numbers are probably incorrect.
The only other dyno with air/fuel ratio I've seen was in the Stillen instructions Russ posted on his site. Has anyone else done one? Mine seems kinda rich.
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/maxgator/airfuel.BMP
I bet you would see a gain in power from 4000-REDLINE with a fuel-pressure regulator.
Originally posted by IceY2K1
It looks rich below 2750(supposed to be, I think), perfect till 4000, but you start to lean till redline.
I bet you would see a gain in power from 4000-REDLINE with a fuel-pressure regulator.
It looks rich below 2750(supposed to be, I think), perfect till 4000, but you start to lean till redline.
I bet you would see a gain in power from 4000-REDLINE with a fuel-pressure regulator.
The bigger the number for the air-fuel mixture, the more air and the less fuel = the "leaner" mixture.
The smaller the number for the air-fuel mixture, the less air and the more fuel = the "richer" the mixture.
Think about "rich" and "lean" as the amount of fuel for a given amount of air. This is the INVERSE of the air/fuel ratio.
At 14.6 there is the perfect amount of fuel for the amount of air. If there is more fuel than can be burned with the amount of air - then the mixture is "rich." If there is not enough fuel for the amount of air then the mixture is "lean."
If I got this correct, thanks go to madmax2k. If I got it wrong . . . oh well!
Originally posted by Max_Gator
Actually, I think it is lean early and rich later. Here's my attempt to explain; I usually get it confused.
The bigger the number for the air-fuel mixture, the more air and the less fuel = the "leaner" mixture.
The smaller the number for the air-fuel mixture, the less air and the more fuel = the "richer" the mixture.
Think about "rich" and "lean" as the amount of fuel for a given amount of air. This is the INVERSE of the air/fuel ratio.
At 14.6 there is the perfect amount of fuel for the amount of air. If there is more fuel than can be burned with the amount of air - then the mixture is "rich." If there is not enough fuel for the amount of air then the mixture is "lean."
If I got this correct, thanks go to madmax2k. If I got it wrong . . . oh well!
Actually, I think it is lean early and rich later. Here's my attempt to explain; I usually get it confused.
The bigger the number for the air-fuel mixture, the more air and the less fuel = the "leaner" mixture.
The smaller the number for the air-fuel mixture, the less air and the more fuel = the "richer" the mixture.
Think about "rich" and "lean" as the amount of fuel for a given amount of air. This is the INVERSE of the air/fuel ratio.
At 14.6 there is the perfect amount of fuel for the amount of air. If there is more fuel than can be burned with the amount of air - then the mixture is "rich." If there is not enough fuel for the amount of air then the mixture is "lean."
If I got this correct, thanks go to madmax2k. If I got it wrong . . . oh well!
Originally posted by Max_Gator
Actually, I think it is lean early and rich later. Here's my attempt to explain; I usually get it confused.
The bigger the number for the air-fuel mixture, the more air and the less fuel = the "leaner" mixture.
The smaller the number for the air-fuel mixture, the less air and the more fuel = the "richer" the mixture.
Think about "rich" and "lean" as the amount of fuel for a given amount of air. This is the INVERSE of the air/fuel ratio.
At 14.6 there is the perfect amount of fuel for the amount of air. If there is more fuel than can be burned with the amount of air - then the mixture is "rich." If there is not enough fuel for the amount of air then the mixture is "lean."
If I got this correct, thanks go to madmax2k. If I got it wrong . . . oh well!
Actually, I think it is lean early and rich later. Here's my attempt to explain; I usually get it confused.
The bigger the number for the air-fuel mixture, the more air and the less fuel = the "leaner" mixture.
The smaller the number for the air-fuel mixture, the less air and the more fuel = the "richer" the mixture.
Think about "rich" and "lean" as the amount of fuel for a given amount of air. This is the INVERSE of the air/fuel ratio.
At 14.6 there is the perfect amount of fuel for the amount of air. If there is more fuel than can be burned with the amount of air - then the mixture is "rich." If there is not enough fuel for the amount of air then the mixture is "lean."
If I got this correct, thanks go to madmax2k. If I got it wrong . . . oh well!
Actually, "perfect" or stoichoimetric A/F ratio with gasolin is 14.7 to 1.
I think your plot is correct. This A/F ratio trace seems to be about how a manufacturer would tune a car. The ratio is very steady, and makes small adjustments to the rich side as the revs increase. This is "safer" as a richer mixture is less likely to pre-ignite or detonate with varying qualities of fuel and engine condition. Im sure a few hp could be coaxed out of it with an adjustable FRP and leaning it out some. But, it might only be a few hp and the cost of the FPR might not be worth it.
Im leaving mine alone.
I did a little reading and one reason cars in general run lean is for fuel economy and MOSTLY for lower emissions. However, you produce MORE torque(to a point) running rich vs. lean. Damn emissions!
Originally posted by IceY2K1
I did a little reading and one reason cars in general run lean is for fuel economy and MOSTLY for lower emissions. However, you produce MORE torque(to a point) running rich vs. lean. Damn emissions!
I did a little reading and one reason cars in general run lean is for fuel economy and MOSTLY for lower emissions. However, you produce MORE torque(to a point) running rich vs. lean. Damn emissions!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Serotta33
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Sep 17, 2015 12:14 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM




