5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

19 x 10" in the rear - Will they fit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2010, 11:03 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
M1RAG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, ONT
Posts: 1,044
19 x 10" in the rear - Will they fit?

Is anyone running a 10 inch rear? I know 9.5 can fit with rolled fenders....but I cant remember anyone with the 5th gen running a 10 inch rear. I need something to fill out my rear wheel wells.

I was thinking of running a 275/30/19 tire (I beleive this would be the "correct" width for a 10" wheel) but I am wondering if a 255 is safe to run on such a wide wheel since I may have to reduce the tire width depending on rubbing issues.

These are the wheels: TENZO GF-7

Last edited by M1RAG3; 04-05-2010 at 11:09 PM.
M1RAG3 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 11:11 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
IHAVEA2KMAXIMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,428
Yes it will fit with the right offset which I believe it's in the 40s.
IHAVEA2KMAXIMA is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 11:18 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
NiZMo1o1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Florida /Wade County !
Posts: 4,246
wouldnt 255 on a 10 inch width make the tires stretch like them Vdub guys ?
NiZMo1o1 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 11:57 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Eg2707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 25
wow 10 thats wide
Eg2707 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:25 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 1,341
A 10" wide wheel is considered acceptable for 255/35 tires (just barely - 10" is generally the upper end of tire mfr acceptable width for that size). 10" is probably OK for most 255/40's and 255/30's as well, if perhaps a very mild stretch at ~1/2" above mfr recommendations for some tires.

In any case, there won't be much sidewall extending past the wheel flanges, so it might not be a good wheel/tire combination for people who may be more likely to scrape curbs or hit things/holes in the road.

45 and lower profile tires are not supposed to have a bulge-y sidewall shape that looks like 1960's Cadillac style (78 or taller profile) tires on the skinny rims of the time.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:10 AM
  #6  
Member
 
digitalbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
A 10" wide wheel is considered acceptable for 255/35 tires (just barely - 10" is generally the upper end of tire mfr acceptable width for that size)
That's crazy talk, particularly for a low profile tire. I don't understand why anyone would want to take a risk like that. 255/35-19 are the appropriate tires for my wheels, which are 19x8.5. A taller tire could get away with 265, but maybe in a 40% height on a smaller diameter rim.

How about a 295/30-19 for a 10" rim? That's more reasonable. If he can't fit the right tire (and I imagine that's the case), that should be an indicator of something...
digitalbow is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:54 AM
  #7  
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
essential1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1
Hi guys.

19x10 with a 22 offset here.

tires are 235/35/19

Never had a problem and I drive daily. I regularly see speeds up to and over 80mph. A friend of mine that drifts is currently running a 225/35 on his 10" wide drift setup and has never had a problem.

Stretching is not dangerous guys.
essential1 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:38 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 1,341
Originally Posted by digitalbow
That's crazy talk, particularly for a low profile tire.
Not crazy talk at all. What I posted is based on a bit more familiarity with tires than you might suspect, longer familiarity with tires than you have, and some very specific research that I actually did just before posting. Crazy talk is talk that is based on emotional response rather than technical content. More to the point, crazy talk is calling technical talk "crazy talk".

Tell you what, go over to tirerack.com and look up 235/35-19. Then report back on what you find. Hint: look at the range of recommended widths, not just the "measuring width". Or check over on discounttiredirect.com, if you prefer.


I don't understand why anyone would want to take a risk like that.
Unless you're a rather new driver, you ought to have some idea whether or not you're likely to give your wheels a case of curb rash. For those of us who don't (and after 45 years or so driving experience I think I can include myself in that group), any risk is pretty much theoretical. Yes, some risk is there (and I did hint that rim protection is something to consider), but for some of us it is not at all likely.

As a side topic/rant, it does seem that people are becoming unreasonably fearful about a lot of things in the automotive world.


255/35-19 are the appropriate tires for my wheels, which are 19x8.5. A taller tire could get away with 265, but maybe in a 40% height on a smaller diameter rim.
All tires are approved for fitment to a variety of width wheels. The OE wheel width was chosen by the mfr to suit the chosen tire size and his philosophy for the car (among other considerations). What that means to you is that while 19 x 8.5 is an acceptable width wheel for that size tire, it is by no means the only legitimate width wheel for that tire. Actually, 8.5" is on the "soft riding, soft cornering response" end of the wheel width spectrum for that particular size.

That may well be your preference, maybe you just haven't experienced anything different, or maybe you think that the way that 1960's tires looked is the way that tires should still look. At any rate, you don't have enough information or understanding to make such absolute-sounding statements.

Did you know that one US domestic manufacturer specifies a 235/50 tire on 8.5" wide wheels in some models, and 9.5" wide wheels for 255/45's? Should you care to relate those little pieces of information into the discussion of 19's at hand, keep in mind that as the profile drops, the wheel width range tends to shift "upward" (think 10" vs 9.5" here, as the profile drops from 45 to 35).

Do you know that there are stability benefits to be had when fitting tires to wheels up at or toward the maximum recommended width? It's true, and you don't have to be road-racing or autocrossing for that benefit to be of real use. I'm not kidding.


How about a 295/30-19 for a 10" rim? That's more reasonable. If he can't fit the right tire (and I imagine that's the case), that should be an indicator of something...
A 295/30-19 generally belongs on wheels between 10" and 11" wide, so once again you're on the narrow end of the spectrum. I'm not trying to claim that you're wrong, just that the range of choices is wider than what you're apparently willing to accept.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 04-06-2010 at 06:55 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:51 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 1,341
Originally Posted by essential1
Hi guys.

19x10 with a 22 offset here.

tires are 235/35/19

Never had a problem and I drive daily. I regularly see speeds up to and over 80mph. A friend of mine that drifts is currently running a 225/35 on his 10" wide drift setup and has never had a problem.

Stretching is not dangerous guys.
I won't go so far as to endorse any absolute statements concerning stretching, either.

I'll go half an inch "above spec" in many cases, which is where your 235/35-19 on 10's is. And drive on it daily, though not for having any appearance factor in mind for doing so. As "stretches" go, the half inch out of spec here is relatively mild.

I'm a lot less sure about going a whole inch wider. Maybe for a dedicated competition tire that is not expected to see street duty, but not generally.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 07:19 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nismopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 1,806
Now that's some good stuff from the man himself...










j/k - Good information!!
nismopc is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 11:49 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
J2FRESH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA/Las Vegas, NV/Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,728
whoaa nice.... 19x10 yea would work w/ the right offset of course, most likely a high offset in 40's range like mentioned above (ihavea2kmaxima), & i had a camrao z28 & had 20x10 in back w/ a 255/35/20 tires i would peel out, & donut like everyday no problems & no im not exaggerating & it was my daily driver, not to mention a gas guzzler, just my .02
J2FRESH is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 12:33 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Pullin3RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by essential1
Hi guys.

19x10 with a 22 offset here.

tires are 235/35/19

Never had a problem and I drive daily. I regularly see speeds up to and over 80mph. A friend of mine that drifts is currently running a 225/35 on his 10" wide drift setup and has never had a problem.

Stretching is not dangerous guys.
Great info.
Pullin3RD is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 12:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
McSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 730
I think the OP wanted those specific wheels for cosmetic purposes and not necessarily performance wise... Considering a 19x10 wheel must weigh quite a lot. Also the reason people choose (or I would) that wide of wheels is for the nice thick lip on those. If you get that wheel in the right offset, does it still retain that lip? I have the G35 19s with a 5mm spacer and they sit almost flush, thus filling out the wheel well.
McSteve is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:10 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by essential1
Hi guys.

19x10 with a 22 offset here.

tires are 235/35/19

Never had a problem and I drive daily. I regularly see speeds up to and over 80mph. A friend of mine that drifts is currently running a 225/35 on his 10" wide drift setup and has never had a problem.

Stretching is not dangerous guys.
well seeing as though you already reffered yourself, im done here
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:03 PM
  #15  
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
essential1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by Pullin3RD
Great info.
I forgot to tell you that I saw you the other day. The max looks clean rolling.
I was in my girls thunderbird though. lol


Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
well seeing as though you already reffered yourself, im done here
I give you permission to reffer me...



Please....




Do it...
essential1 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:06 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
Hey OP i believe essential1 is running 19x10 and it seems to be working for him, looks great to be honest, you might wanna hit him up to see whats the exact setup and tips he has to offer...
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:10 PM
  #17  
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
essential1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
Hey OP i believe essential1 is running 19x10 and it seems to be working for him, looks great to be honest, you might wanna hit him up to see whats the exact setup and tips he has to offer...
Thanks, I'll elaborate...

Hi guys.

19x10 with a 22 offset here.

tires are 235/35/19

Never had a problem and I drive daily. I regularly see speeds up to and over 80mph. A friend of mine that drifts is currently running a 225/35 on his 10" wide drift setup and has never had a problem.

Stretching is not dangerous guys.
essential1 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:26 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,827
answer thread/ lol
Grand_hustle17 is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 04:54 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
phatboislim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,162
i'm dying to put some 10" wheels on my mine
phatboislim is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:04 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Gemner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,393
Originally Posted by essential1
Stretching is not dangerous guys.
this is only true if you dont consider the danger of looking like a tool
Gemner is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 05:52 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 1,341
Beauty - or for that matter "looking like a tool" - is in the eye of the beholder. And there are no standards for individual "taste".

A mild stretch may look all wrong to somebody who chooses wide tires for narrow rims. But that doesn't necessarily make mounting tires out at or around the max recommended width technically wrong. Not even if the wheels are enough wider to differ noticeably from more typical Maxima wheel choices.

I'll question the choices of those who mount tires on under-spec rims, as in why would anyone bother to spend money for wider tires and then throw a lot of that extra performance potential away by squeezing them down onto too-narrow rims? A very common 5th Gen forum topic a few years ago was 235/45's on 17 x 7 OE wheels, actually. And half an inch below spec. Suggesting different solutions was a reasonable way to proceed there. Calling the people wishing to do wide tires on narrow rims names wouldn't fix the technical issue, so you wouldn't have ever caught me doing that.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 04-06-2010 at 05:58 PM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 06:55 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
hot_wax_tree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,044
c6 corvett has on the base model 19x10" wheels with 285/35 that give you a hint of the proper size...why would you even want wheels that wide in the rear only? it makes no sense AT ALL
hot_wax_tree is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 07:33 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nismopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 1,806
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
A very common 5th Gen forum topic a few years ago was 235/45's on 17 x 7 OE wheels, actually. And half an inch below spec.
I had a set of Nexen n7000's 235/45-17 on my OEM SE rims and purchased them based solely on price alone knowing that speed would be off slightly due to smaller overall diameter of tire. They were much cheaper than the stock 225/50-17 size at the time and unfortunately looked much smaller due to height. I learned my lesson...

I am now running 245/45-17 Firestone Firehawk GTz's on the OEM and love them. Fit good, overall diameter is almost identical to stock and speed is almost dead on and they do not bubble or appear to be too big for the width of the rim.

I prefer the straight up metric look. Rim and tire almost equal width up and down. Felt 225/50-17 seemed too small for the OEM wheels.

Again, personal preference.
nismopc is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 07:43 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Gemner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,393
235s look alright on the OEM rim, but 245s are definitely too wide. I have 245 DRs on the stock wheels and I definitely would not feel that they are the right size for my everyday tires
Gemner is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 08:05 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nismopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 1,806
Originally Posted by Gemner
235s look alright on the OEM rim, but 245s are definitely too wide. I have 245 DRs on the stock wheels and I definitely would not feel that they are the right size for my everyday tires
Again personal preference, but I see nothing wrong with...





nismopc is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 08:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Gemner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,393
those are some skinny 245s. mine bow quite a bit more
Gemner is offline  
Old 04-06-2010, 08:23 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nismopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 1,806
Originally Posted by Gemner
those are some skinny 245s. mine bow quite a bit more
Not sure if you cared, but specs are:

245/45R17
Load Index 95 = 1521lbs (690kg) per tire
Speed Rating “W” = 168mph (270kph) 95W SL
Treadwear: 400
Traction: AA
Temperature: A400 AA A
Max load 1521 lbs.
Max PSi 51 psi
Tread Depth 11/32"
weight 27lbs.
Width Range 7.5-9"
Measured Width 8"
Sect. Width 9.4"
Tread Width 8.1"
Overall Diameter 25.7"
Revs per Mile 811
Country of Origin "JP" = JAPANJP
nismopc is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 01:07 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
M1RAG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, ONT
Posts: 1,044
Thanks for all the info, guys! A lot of people have chimed in with really good opinions and information. The reason I want to go with such a wide rear wheel is because the competition on the show circuit down here in Toronto is really heating up and my wheels are just not cutting it anymore compared to some of my competitors in the maxima class, IMHO. I realize how heavy a 19x10" wheel is, and also the fact that having a wider rear wheel in a FWD car serves no real purpose. Right now I could buy new 19" inch wheels and add a z32 tt BBK, or go S/C...either way I'm kind of torn between whether I want to drop about $2000 CDN more on the maxima or just put it towards getting another ride next spring....ugh
M1RAG3 is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 01:57 PM
  #29  
Play with my balls
iTrader: (151)
 
Deckdout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
275/30/19 on a 9.5 in the rear here, +42 offset. see ya.
Deckdout2 is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 02:22 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
nismopc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lewis Center, OH
Posts: 1,806
Originally Posted by Deckdout2
275/30/19 on a 9.5 in the rear here, +42 offset. see ya.
And looks d@mn good too!!!
nismopc is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 02:55 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Gemner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hayward, CA
Posts: 1,393
275 is way too wide, you should be running a 225
Gemner is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 05:06 PM
  #32  
Member
 
glockfanbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Gemner
this is only true if you dont consider the danger of looking like a tool

glockfanbob is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 05:09 PM
  #33  
Member
 
glockfanbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by hot_wax_tree
c6 corvett has on the base model 19x10" wheels with 285/35 that give you a hint of the proper size...why would you even want wheels that wide in the rear only? it makes no sense AT ALL

Because he has a super limited edition rear wheel drive maxima with 525 hp so he needs it for traction purposes.
glockfanbob is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 07:17 PM
  #34  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (13)
 
WhoDatBuuL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phila.
Posts: 1,018
wow ... to wide !!!
WhoDatBuuL is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 08:09 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte Nc
Posts: 1,224
Originally Posted by Deckdout2
275/30/19 on a 9.5 in the rear here, +42 offset. see ya.
Damn, never new you were running 275's. I was just about to post if possible to run 275's in our rears with 9.5. There goes my answer.
e-subliminal-2 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 05:53 AM
  #36  
Play with my balls
iTrader: (151)
 
Deckdout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
Originally Posted by Gemner
275 is way too wide, you should be running a 225
You're right, cause this is only my 8th set of wheels. I don't know what I'm talking about.

Originally Posted by e-subliminal-2
Damn, never new you were running 275's. I was just about to post if possible to run 275's in our rears with 9.5. There goes my answer.
That's cause I wasn't before. I just got my new set from the Powder coating shop this past Tuesday. Will be mounting them on the car this weekend.
Deckdout2 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 05:54 AM
  #37  
Play with my balls
iTrader: (151)
 
Deckdout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
Originally Posted by nismopc
And looks d@mn good too!!!
Actually, this is not even on the Millie's you see in my sig. Even though those did look good, I'm running that size on another set I picked up.
Deckdout2 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 06:03 AM
  #38  
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
essential1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1
I cant wait to see how the 275s look out back in your car bro. I happen to love the fat meaty tire look out back with wheels like yours. (contrary to popular belief) I wanna see how close it comes to the strut mainly
essential1 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 07:14 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte Nc
Posts: 1,224
+1^. Post pics paramy if you would.
e-subliminal-2 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 07:46 AM
  #40  
Play with my balls
iTrader: (151)
 
Deckdout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,542
Originally Posted by essential1
I cant wait to see how the 275s look out back in your car bro. I happen to love the fat meaty tire look out back with wheels like yours. (contrary to popular belief) I wanna see how close it comes to the strut mainly
Originally Posted by e-subliminal-2
+1^. Post pics paramy if you would.
There will be a thread dedicated to that.
Deckdout2 is offline  


Quick Reply: 19 x 10" in the rear - Will they fit?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 AM.