.....TunerMaxima's Sell it or Keep it Thread......
he lives in Ontario....unless it has been changed recently , I dont think we can get r32's here ....not allowed
My $.02 worth. Granted, your Maxima has some things that won't change. But it's a VERY nice car in other respects, otherwise you wouldn't have owned 2 (counting the prior 03 TE). I agree with Rochester's first comment. Just drive the car for the time being! Until your life situation warrants another car. For now I don't think you can beat the price/performance/useability of what you currently own. That said, if you MUST have a MT do a swap, as you said "it'll cost less than a new car", maintain the resale value of the car as an AE, make the 3.0L feel much stronger, and get better mileage in the process.

I was seduced by the looks of the Coupe for a long time. But I'm over that now.
If you're looking at the G-Sedan, you know that the 2007 G35 model was the new (current) body style, but the old 3.5VQ engine, right? They didn't introduce the 3.7L in the Sedan until 2009. I bet you there are some 2007-2008 models to be had for a reasonable cost.
Last edited by Rochester; Nov 7, 2011 at 10:10 AM.
I just got 3 compliments from guys at my new job on the Maxima today (first day). They all thought it was around 2005, 2007, etc. These are domestic guys obviously, they new it was a Maxima but that's all they knew.
That solidifies it's styling, still relevant to be sure. And very clean.
I know it conflicts with being true to your nature, but you really don't have to reply. Honest.
With a nice lip kit, it could get nominated for MOTM. 
Spontaneous external validation is sweet. However, I know you well enough to say I know that you know who's opinion matters. You know?
(That would be mine, btw. And then maybe yours.)

(That would be mine, btw. And then maybe yours.)
Last edited by Rochester; Nov 7, 2011 at 06:45 PM.

Well done sir.
i SOOOo want to be MOTM.... oh wait, MOTQ????You know I know bro! But yes, random compliments on the car are nice. Especially from guys that spend ridiculous amounts on their fair-weather cars, and race cars. Seems I'm in league with a number of gear heads, even more so than when I was working for one of the biggest names in Cascar for quite a few years...... guess it has to do with surplus income, something my old employer didn't allow for (except for himself of course).
I had an automatic maxima once, and it sucked the life out of the car, so I understand the need for a manual. If you are going to swap your car, definitely look at selling it and buying another one... if you look hard and long, you will come across some good examples that you can swap your parts to. If your current car has absolutely no rust, low km, and is basically better than anything out there, then look at swapping the 5-speed LSD into it. Don't bother with the 3.5L + 6speed swap... too much $$, you are better off selling your car for an 02-03.
If it were me however, and I felt like p!ssing away money, I would be looking to buy an 07+ G35 6-speed sedan.
If it were me however, and I felt like p!ssing away money, I would be looking to buy an 07+ G35 6-speed sedan.
Glad you've got that settled! Personally, I like the look of the new G35/G37 sedan body, but I certainly don't love it. Even the coupe isn't great IMO. Now with a nice lip kit, etc, I'm sure it could come together as a very nice looking car, but now we're talking about some more serious coin into a car that I have potentially just spent 13-20k on.
I just got 3 compliments from guys at my new job on the Maxima today (first day). They all thought it was around 2005, 2007, etc. These are domestic guys obviously, they new it was a Maxima but that's all they knew.
That solidifies it's styling, still relevant to be sure. And very clean.
I just got 3 compliments from guys at my new job on the Maxima today (first day). They all thought it was around 2005, 2007, etc. These are domestic guys obviously, they new it was a Maxima but that's all they knew.
That solidifies it's styling, still relevant to be sure. And very clean.
You're right on both counts. His AE is a truly great car, by any measure... except for the 3.0 AT. But that's obvious.
I definitely wouldn't recommend doing major engine/tranny work with such low miles, it would kill the reliability of the vehicle and probably decrease its value. You would have a hard time selling it after and it might just be a headache for you later on.

One of my buddies has a WRX and despite what some guys on this forum think, its reaaaallly quick, way faster than a Maxima. Drop in a turbo back exhaust and a COBB access port and you're pushing well over 300AWHP. Not to mention its great for the winters.

One of my buddies has a WRX and despite what some guys on this forum think, its reaaaallly quick, way faster than a Maxima. Drop in a turbo back exhaust and a COBB access port and you're pushing well over 300AWHP. Not to mention its great for the winters.
A friend of mine bought an old XT coupe. It's an awkward looking car, and the interior is even worse. Then again, he only paid $600 for it.

I also have a friend who drives a 2008 WRX 6MT, with a turbo-back, COBB tuning, some intercooler mod that I don't understand, etc. It's modded somewhat lightly, and it's disgustingly fast. Kind of scary, actually.
And if you put some snows on it for winter, that AWD Subby would be unstoppable on the white-stuff.
its very miniscule but front 5mm spacers, definately helped the steering radius alot when compared to their size and price.
i find pulling in parking spots and tight turning like that are alot better now from this little mod.
if u think the turning/suspension is still sloppy after the TEINS ... why dont you look into more handling improvements? It should really help. I have a LTB Stage II and its a different car. And SFC's over all seem like the best for comfort
Good Luck with whatever you do. i have no idea but what happened to your 5.5 gen that u picked up?
Also... remember all the work you put into your grille... do u really want to give that up?
i find pulling in parking spots and tight turning like that are alot better now from this little mod.
if u think the turning/suspension is still sloppy after the TEINS ... why dont you look into more handling improvements? It should really help. I have a LTB Stage II and its a different car. And SFC's over all seem like the best for comfort
Good Luck with whatever you do. i have no idea but what happened to your 5.5 gen that u picked up?
Also... remember all the work you put into your grille... do u really want to give that up?

I'll stop whoring the thread...I was just wondering what mileage you are getting.
I guess I was hoping better mileage was common....I think I am getting bad gas mileage. I got better than that with my boosted 4th gen (~25mpg), my third gen ~27-28, and my non boosted fourth gen ~29....all of those are 5 speed though. And this car is slower than all of them 
I'll stop whoring the thread...I was just wondering what mileage you are getting.

I'll stop whoring the thread...I was just wondering what mileage you are getting.
Do you remember the Subaru SVX? Again, a strange looking but awesome performing car. It was a technological marvel, AWD with 4 way variable torque split controlled by the ABS/TCS system. 300HP NA H6 3.3L boxer engine coupled to a 6 speed AT with OD/TC lock in all gears. A 5 seat coupe with such good aerodynamic characteristics it was speed limited to 155MPH because, (I'll never forget reading this, I had to put the magazine down and think about it!) Subaru felt it was unsafe to go any faster on wet roads. But those aircraft style 1/2 windows looked so weird. Not a big seller the limited production SVX was dropped after a 1 1/2 year run. If I could find one in good condition I'd be tempted.
I love that car; like others have said: I don't care for the styling but that thing just goes. There's a split-second pause and then BAM, AWD FTMFW. Perhaps a few Maxie's could hang, but you'd be hard-pressed to outrun that thing.
Do you remember the Subaru SVX? Again, a strange looking but awesome performing car. It was a technological marvel, AWD with 4 way variable torque split controlled by the ABS/TCS system. 300HP NA H6 3.3L boxer engine coupled to a 6 speed AT with OD/TC lock in all gears. A 5 seat coupe with such good aerodynamic characteristics it was speed limited to 155MPH because, (I'll never forget reading this, I had to put the magazine down and think about it!) Subaru felt it was unsafe to go any faster on wet roads. But those aircraft style 1/2 windows looked so weird. Not a big seller the limited production SVX was dropped after a 1 1/2 year run. If I could find one in good condition I'd be tempted.
My 01 SE with 4AT (with working VIAS) is getting on average between 20-22 MPG in mostly stop & go city driving. There's one 5 mile stretch of 50 MPH 2 lane on my daily drive. Is this good, bad or typical?
Maybe technological marvel = Mechanical nightmare! Funny thing is the same H6 engine gets rave reviews in the Legacy/Outback.
Those strange things were like $35K brand new back in the late 80's. 
Yes on all counts.
I also have a friend who drives a 2008 WRX 6MT, with a turbo-back, COBB tuning, some intercooler mod that I don't understand, etc. It's modded somewhat lightly, and it's disgustingly fast. Kind of scary, actually.
And if you put some snows on it for winter, that AWD Subby would be unstoppable on the white-stuff.

Yes on all counts.
I also have a friend who drives a 2008 WRX 6MT, with a turbo-back, COBB tuning, some intercooler mod that I don't understand, etc. It's modded somewhat lightly, and it's disgustingly fast. Kind of scary, actually.
And if you put some snows on it for winter, that AWD Subby would be unstoppable on the white-stuff.
. Off of my tangent though, in relation to what the next step should be, I wouldn't be looking in the direction of a TL-S, at least if your speaking of the post-2004 model, that I was sure didn't even come in S form until 2006, in which case it would probably be out of your price range. TL-S' before that were nice cars, but sadly only came in an automatic which I can tell you is BORING, considering I've driven in my friends CL (virtually the same car as the TL) and the automatic makes those engines much more lackluster. That said there is also a huge issue with early Honda automatic transmissions in those cars, so if you were to step in that direction, I'd say go for a late model CL-S with a 6 speed, although that won't be any faster in a straight line than a 5.5 Max 6 speed, and it has 2 less doors...
Good point. I am impatient with this car though... For me it's go or stop time right now.
And I'm looking at FI.....
......That's one way to kill the AT once and for all and enable myself into the 5speed 
I would already have one if the fuel mileage wasn't so darn terrible. They're amazing cars, but I can't get passed the fuel mileage. This is the same reason I've had to remove the beloved IS300 from my list (a car on my want list for a long time, I cant get over the agressive stance, and RWD, just gorgeous cars).
yeah seems average for the AT. I'm averaging 18-22 MPG, although, that's not 100% Accurate because of conversions in the Canadian Gallon, etc. But within a few MPG.
Fact is, I drive this car hard, I'm hard on cars. The fact that it's automatic is making me drive it harder, manually shifting, etc. So the reliability of this car is going downhill very fast, at least for the tranny. And I cringe for the engine being forced into such sporatic shifts with no warning or smooth clutch engagement.
Anyways.....I need to cool my trigger finger on the SC.... I would much prefer a Turbo but can't do the lack luster reliability and constant tuning nonsense, no time for it. So if I do boost, i think SC is the most realistic.
And I guess that takes me back to the poor fuel economy....... Man I wish we had Low-Sulfur diesel sooner over here!!!!! There would be so many bomb Diesel sedans!!
And John, I saw you rubbing it, it's ok man.
And I'm looking at FI.....
......That's one way to kill the AT once and for all and enable myself into the 5speed 
Fact is, I drive this car hard, I'm hard on cars. The fact that it's automatic is making me drive it harder, manually shifting, etc. So the reliability of this car is going downhill very fast, at least for the tranny. And I cringe for the engine being forced into such sporatic shifts with no warning or smooth clutch engagement.
Anyways.....I need to cool my trigger finger on the SC.... I would much prefer a Turbo but can't do the lack luster reliability and constant tuning nonsense, no time for it. So if I do boost, i think SC is the most realistic.
And I guess that takes me back to the poor fuel economy....... Man I wish we had Low-Sulfur diesel sooner over here!!!!! There would be so many bomb Diesel sedans!!
And John, I saw you rubbing it, it's ok man.
Do you remember the Subaru SVX? Again, a strange looking but awesome performing car. It was a technological marvel, AWD with 4 way variable torque split controlled by the ABS/TCS system. 300HP NA H6 3.3L boxer engine coupled to a 6 speed AT with OD/TC lock in all gears. A 5 seat coupe with such good aerodynamic characteristics it was speed limited to 155MPH because, (I'll never forget reading this, I had to put the magazine down and think about it!) Subaru felt it was unsafe to go any faster on wet roads. But those aircraft style 1/2 windows looked so weird. Not a big seller the limited production SVX was dropped after a 1 1/2 year run. If I could find one in good condition I'd be tempted.
The late 80's was an awesome time. Worthy cars were just starting to emerge from the crap of the late 70's to early 80's.

I found this pic really interesting. A Focus with the SHO V-6
Last edited by T_Behr904; Nov 8, 2011 at 07:30 PM.

Amazing car
Yesterday afternoon, I visited my local Infiniti Dealership (again) and got the ball rolling for a spring-time purchase of a certified pre-owned '09-'10 Sedan 6MT in Lakeshore Slate.
Your car was beautiful. Why'd you get rid of it?




