ECU burned up on highway
#1
ECU burned up on highway
was driving my 01 on the highway and the ECU literately went up in smoke (along with a melted cylinder 1 ignition coil)! Thick nasty smelling smoke started oozing out. IACV Tested out good. Computer was replaced and re-keyed and the same thing happened again on the highway (ignition coil again too)... The culprit..bad Evap canister solenoid (also 15A ELEC Parts fuse melted, not blown). One more thing to worry about on these cars.
#2
was driving my 01 on the highway and the ECU literately went up in smoke (along with a melted cylinder 1 ignition coil)! Thick nasty smelling smoke started oozing out. IACV Tested out good. Computer was replaced and re-keyed and the same thing happened again on the highway (ignition coil again too)... The culprit..bad Evap canister solenoid (also 15A ELEC Parts fuse melted, not blown). One more thing to worry about on these cars.
#3
was driving my 01 on the highway and the ECU literately went up in smoke (along with a melted cylinder 1 ignition coil)! Thick nasty smelling smoke started oozing out. IACV Tested out good. Computer was replaced and re-keyed and the same thing happened again on the highway (ignition coil again too)... The culprit..bad Evap canister solenoid (also 15A ELEC Parts fuse melted, not blown). One more thing to worry about on these cars.
To me, this is another proof that Nissan engineers have done an extremely poor job of protecting the the ECU/other from failures of the various actuators.
Not sure why your #1 coil melted but I haven't looked at this in much detail yet.
#4
Very interesting - thanks for posting and sharing your experience!
To me, this is another proof that Nissan engineers have done an extremely poor job of protecting the the ECU/other from failures of the various actuators.
Not sure why your #1 coil melted but I haven't looked at this in much detail yet.
To me, this is another proof that Nissan engineers have done an extremely poor job of protecting the the ECU/other from failures of the various actuators.
Not sure why your #1 coil melted but I haven't looked at this in much detail yet.
GM killed well over 100 people to save 90 cents/unit (and waited for bankruptcy, so they can't be sued or imprisoned). This is a typical design choice from all of them.
Last edited by Child_uv_KoRn; 03-20-2016 at 06:37 PM.
#5
As nice as these cars are thats the last thing you expect from Nissan is not to care for there customers. Good thing car did not catch on fire that is a scary thing,but good thing your ok.
#6
#7
The only solution is better fusing. The 15A fuse (#20) used by Nissan will not protect the driving transistor which probably can take 6A at most; more likely, only 3A or so. Unfortunately, you just can't use a smaller fuse because there are too many other things on it.
#8
A while back there was a forum member who went through and soldered fuses into his ECM. He's long-gone from here but I PDF'ed our emails and messages. I should post them all here, maybe we could re-create his project to take away some worries.
#9
Well, that's what they have done. However, to control the "pluming" into the fuel system they have used an e-valve, and it looks like the e-valve has shorted, taking ECU with it. If you eliminate the valve, the pluming would be uncontrolled resulting in driveability problems.
The only solution is better fusing. The 15A fuse (#20) used by Nissan will not protect the driving transistor which probably can take 6A at most; more likely, only 3A or so. Unfortunately, you just can't use a smaller fuse because there are too many other things on it.
The only solution is better fusing. The 15A fuse (#20) used by Nissan will not protect the driving transistor which probably can take 6A at most; more likely, only 3A or so. Unfortunately, you just can't use a smaller fuse because there are too many other things on it.
hhhmmm
#10
Replacing the fuse will not help - there are simply too many things on it: EC-COOLF, SC-START, EL-ESCD, EC-PGC/V, EC-VENT/V, EC-SWL/V, EC-BYPS/V, EC-VIAS/V, EL-NATS (this is directly from 2k FSM, pg. EL-16).
However, one could perhaps provide an additional fuse. From the diagram on p. EL-16: The power connection forks as it leaves the 15A fuse. The latter six subsystems (from EC-PGC/V to EL-NATS) are supplied via the second fork (R/Y wire). One could insert a fuse right at this exit point; this would require one splice and the use of a fuse adapter such as this one: http://www.delcity.net/store/Mini-Lo...apter/p_810069 .
This still leaves one question open: Will a single 3A fuse (or 4A or 5A, or ... ?) be sufficient to power all six subsystems, while protecting against the failure of the EVAP valve?
Last edited by maxiiiboy; 03-21-2016 at 03:21 PM.
#11
The fuse blew out all right, the only thing we can argue about is the manner in which it exactly blew up ...... (slow torture vs. sudden blow).
Replacing the fuse will not help - there are simply too many things on it: EC-COOLF, SC-START, EL-ESCD, EC-PGC/V, EC-VENT/V, EC-SWL/V, EC-BYPS/V, EC-VIAS/V, EL-NATS (this is directly from 2k FSM, pg. EL-16).
However, one could perhaps provide an additional fuse. From the diagram on p. EL-16: The power connection forks as it leaves the 15A fuse. The latter six subsystems (from EC-PGC/V to EL-NATS) are supplied via the second fork (R/Y wire). One could insert a fuse right at this exit point; this would require one splice and the use of a fuse adapter such as this one: http://www.delcity.net/store/Mini-Lo...apter/p_810069 .
This still leaves one question open: Will a single 3A fuse (or 4A or 5A, or ... ?) be sufficient to power all six subsystems, while protecting against the failure of the EVAP valve?
Replacing the fuse will not help - there are simply too many things on it: EC-COOLF, SC-START, EL-ESCD, EC-PGC/V, EC-VENT/V, EC-SWL/V, EC-BYPS/V, EC-VIAS/V, EL-NATS (this is directly from 2k FSM, pg. EL-16).
However, one could perhaps provide an additional fuse. From the diagram on p. EL-16: The power connection forks as it leaves the 15A fuse. The latter six subsystems (from EC-PGC/V to EL-NATS) are supplied via the second fork (R/Y wire). One could insert a fuse right at this exit point; this would require one splice and the use of a fuse adapter such as this one: http://www.delcity.net/store/Mini-Lo...apter/p_810069 .
This still leaves one question open: Will a single 3A fuse (or 4A or 5A, or ... ?) be sufficient to power all six subsystems, while protecting against the failure of the EVAP valve?
Last edited by Child_uv_KoRn; 03-21-2016 at 04:56 PM.
#12
The computers were far beyond repair..It was burnt soo bad...I opened it and for chips were charred and ashy..the circuits also were gone..
#13
You crazy whackos and your "logic" but, seriously how dare you suggest such a good idea.
#14
It has only one drawback: How do you check and/or replace the fuse?
And let's admit that we should expect to be replacing the fuse 2, 3, or more times as we try to find the right fuse value. So, we want a fuse that's logically in-line, but physically located somewhere convenient (like the fuse box). As you said, splicing it in at the Evap valve connector (that's where it would have to be) and then routing two new wires to "somewhere convenient" would fit the bill perfectly.
BTW, that's the solution I have arrived to for the IACV. I have not implemented it yet - I am just too hesitant to start messing with the harness.
#15
Yes, that's the ideal solution.
It has only one drawback: How do you check and/or replace the fuse?
And let's admit that we should expect to be replacing the fuse 2, 3, or more times as we try to find the right fuse value. So, we want a fuse that's logically in-line, but physically located somewhere convenient (like the fuse box). As you said, splicing it in at the Evap valve connector (that's where it would have to be) and then routing two new wires to "somewhere convenient" would fit the bill perfectly.
BTW, that's the solution I have arrived to for the IACV. I have not implemented it yet - I am just too hesitant to start messing with the harness.
It has only one drawback: How do you check and/or replace the fuse?
And let's admit that we should expect to be replacing the fuse 2, 3, or more times as we try to find the right fuse value. So, we want a fuse that's logically in-line, but physically located somewhere convenient (like the fuse box). As you said, splicing it in at the Evap valve connector (that's where it would have to be) and then routing two new wires to "somewhere convenient" would fit the bill perfectly.
BTW, that's the solution I have arrived to for the IACV. I have not implemented it yet - I am just too hesitant to start messing with the harness.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
reallywildstuff
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
11
10-28-2019 05:16 PM
2014Maxima
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
1
04-23-2016 04:57 PM
Maxima 97 SE
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
02-29-2016 09:04 PM