Question about the Stillen intake system ... did I screw up my install?
Question about the Stillen intake system ... did I screw up my install?
Was I supposed to take the air temp sensor and drill a hole to screw it into the plastic piece attached to the filter?
Right now it's just sitting where it was placed .. that hood scoop which is absolutely useless ...
Right now it's just sitting where it was placed .. that hood scoop which is absolutely useless ...
Re: Question about the Stillen intake system ... did I screw up my install?
I thought u want to keep the air scoop for the cold air sensor. keep it in there.
Originally posted by ohboiya
Was I supposed to take the air temp sensor and drill a hole to screw it into the plastic piece attached to the filter?
Right now it's just sitting where it was placed .. that hood scoop which is absolutely useless ...
Was I supposed to take the air temp sensor and drill a hole to screw it into the plastic piece attached to the filter?
Right now it's just sitting where it was placed .. that hood scoop which is absolutely useless ...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Take off the scoop and zip tie the sensor to something.
Take off the scoop and zip tie the sensor to something.

I wonder if we'd actually be better off leaving the sensor in the air scoop and sealing up the back end of the scoop to prevent engine heat from contaminating the sensor. Does that make sense?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by y2kse
Hmmmm. If you zip tie the sensor to something inside the engine bay, you'll be removing it from the fresh air stream provided by the air scoop and exposing it directly to heat soak from the engine. The sensor will then send a false reading to the ECU telling it that the intake air temperature is much higher than it is in reality. Is that a good idea?

I wonder if we'd actually be better off leaving the sensor in the air scoop and sealing up the back end of the scoop to prevent engine heat from contaminating the sensor. Does that make sense?
Hmmmm. If you zip tie the sensor to something inside the engine bay, you'll be removing it from the fresh air stream provided by the air scoop and exposing it directly to heat soak from the engine. The sensor will then send a false reading to the ECU telling it that the intake air temperature is much higher than it is in reality. Is that a good idea?

I wonder if we'd actually be better off leaving the sensor in the air scoop and sealing up the back end of the scoop to prevent engine heat from contaminating the sensor. Does that make sense?
Originally posted by y2kse
Hmmmm. If you zip tie the sensor to something inside the engine bay, you'll be removing it from the fresh air stream provided by the air scoop and exposing it directly to heat soak from the engine. The sensor will then send a false reading to the ECU telling it that the intake air temperature is much higher than it is in reality. Is that a good idea?

I wonder if we'd actually be better off leaving the sensor in the air scoop and sealing up the back end of the scoop to prevent engine heat from contaminating the sensor. Does that make sense?
Hmmmm. If you zip tie the sensor to something inside the engine bay, you'll be removing it from the fresh air stream provided by the air scoop and exposing it directly to heat soak from the engine. The sensor will then send a false reading to the ECU telling it that the intake air temperature is much higher than it is in reality. Is that a good idea?

I wonder if we'd actually be better off leaving the sensor in the air scoop and sealing up the back end of the scoop to prevent engine heat from contaminating the sensor. Does that make sense?
Originally posted by 2K2DEMAX
As far as I know, the temperature sensor does not contribute to the operation of the engine but is only used for diagnostic purposes (as per the ESM). Therefore it really doesn't matter where it's placed (at least for engine optimization/operation purposes).
As far as I know, the temperature sensor does not contribute to the operation of the engine but is only used for diagnostic purposes (as per the ESM). Therefore it really doesn't matter where it's placed (at least for engine optimization/operation purposes).
HeheheIf things stay heat soaked, underhood intakes would be useless.
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
I've also heard this but haven't verified it in the ESM yet. Once the car starts moving, air flow into the engine bay will cool down the sensor (same idea as intake air). Wouldn't this be the same as if you left the sensor in the scoop (this is not a question)?
Hehehe
If things stay heat soaked, underhood intakes would be useless.
I've also heard this but haven't verified it in the ESM yet. Once the car starts moving, air flow into the engine bay will cool down the sensor (same idea as intake air). Wouldn't this be the same as if you left the sensor in the scoop (this is not a question)?
HeheheIf things stay heat soaked, underhood intakes would be useless.
. Once the airbox is removed the temperature sensor is exposed to the hot engine air even if it remains in the scoop.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by 2K2DEMAX
I concur with your rhetorical question
. Once the airbox is removed the temperature sensor is exposed to the hot engine air even if it remains in the scoop.
I concur with your rhetorical question
. Once the airbox is removed the temperature sensor is exposed to the hot engine air even if it remains in the scoop.
I don't know if having the sensor in a semi-enclosed housing (aka, the air scoop) helps prevent it from becoming heat soaked. But whether or not that's the case, there's really no good reason to remove the air scoop and relocate the sensor. So for me it's a moot point.
Also, I understand that the sensor does provide information to the ECU that the ECU uses to adjust air/fuel ratios. If that's the case, heat soaking the sensor may adversely affect engine performance. (BTW, I just got off the phone with Dave Burnette and he's of the same opinion.)
BUT WAIT! We're not through yet.
Consider this. You want the sensor to read the actual air temperature entering the intake. If you isolate the sensor from engine heat and expose the air filter to engine heat, the sensor may actually send temperature information to the ECU that's lower than the air temperature entering the throttle body. What affect might that have on A/F ratios?
Are we having fun yet?
Originally posted by y2kse
Right . . . hence my idea about sealing up the back of the scoop to prevent heat from contaminating the sensor. Keep in mind that when the OEM air box is attached to the scoop, the sensor is not subject to heat soak at all.
I don't know if having the sensor in a semi-enclosed housing (aka, the air scoop) helps prevent it from becoming heat soaked. But whether or not that's the case, there's really no good reason to remove the air scoop and relocate the sensor. So for me it's a moot point.
Also, I understand that the sensor does provide information to the ECU that the ECU uses to adjust air/fuel ratios. If that's the case, heat soaking the sensor may adversely affect engine performance. (BTW, I just got off the phone with Dave Burnette and he's of the same opinion.)
BUT WAIT! We're not through yet.
Consider this. You want the sensor to read the actual air temperature entering the intake. If you isolate the sensor from engine heat and expose the air filter to engine heat, the sensor may actually send temperature information to the ECU that's lower than the air temperature entering the throttle body. What affect might that have on A/F ratios?
Are we having fun yet?
Right . . . hence my idea about sealing up the back of the scoop to prevent heat from contaminating the sensor. Keep in mind that when the OEM air box is attached to the scoop, the sensor is not subject to heat soak at all.
I don't know if having the sensor in a semi-enclosed housing (aka, the air scoop) helps prevent it from becoming heat soaked. But whether or not that's the case, there's really no good reason to remove the air scoop and relocate the sensor. So for me it's a moot point.
Also, I understand that the sensor does provide information to the ECU that the ECU uses to adjust air/fuel ratios. If that's the case, heat soaking the sensor may adversely affect engine performance. (BTW, I just got off the phone with Dave Burnette and he's of the same opinion.)
BUT WAIT! We're not through yet.
Consider this. You want the sensor to read the actual air temperature entering the intake. If you isolate the sensor from engine heat and expose the air filter to engine heat, the sensor may actually send temperature information to the ECU that's lower than the air temperature entering the throttle body. What affect might that have on A/F ratios?
Are we having fun yet?

As per the ESM (I wish I had it in front of me so that I could scan the page...I loaned it to Max_Gator to diagnose the VIAS problem) the temperature sensor plays no part in the air/fuel calculations but is only used for diagnostic purposes. This is the basis of my assertion. If that's incorrect (the ESM) or if I read it incorrectly then I stand corrected.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by 2K2DEMAX
As per the ESM (I wish I had it in front of me so that I could scan the page...I loaned it to Max_Gator to diagnose the VIAS problem) the temperature sensor plays no part in the air/fuel calculations but is only used for diagnostic purposes.
As per the ESM (I wish I had it in front of me so that I could scan the page...I loaned it to Max_Gator to diagnose the VIAS problem) the temperature sensor plays no part in the air/fuel calculations but is only used for diagnostic purposes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DTC P0110 INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE SENSOR
Component Description:
The intake air temperature sensor is mounted to the air duct housing. The sensor detects intake air temperature and transmits a signal to the ECM.
The temperature sensing unit uses a thermistor which is sensitive to the change in temperature. Electrical resistance of the thermistor decreases in response to the temperature rise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, the ESM does not indicate what the ECM does with the signal it receives from the sensor.
Originally posted by y2kse
OK. Here's what the ESM says:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DTC P0110 INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE SENSOR
Component Description:
The intake air temperature sensor is mounted to the air duct housing. The sensor detects intake air temperature and transmits a signal to the ECM.
The temperature sensing unit uses a thermistor which is sensitive to the change in temperature. Electrical resistance of the thermistor decreases in response to the temperature rise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, the ESM does not indicate what the ECM does with the signal it receives from the sensor.
OK. Here's what the ESM says:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
DTC P0110 INTAKE AIR TEMPERATURE SENSOR
Component Description:
The intake air temperature sensor is mounted to the air duct housing. The sensor detects intake air temperature and transmits a signal to the ECM.
The temperature sensing unit uses a thermistor which is sensitive to the change in temperature. Electrical resistance of the thermistor decreases in response to the temperature rise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately, the ESM does not indicate what the ECM does with the signal it receives from the sensor.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
All right. The ESM goes on to say:
------------------------------------------------------------------
On Board Diagnosis Logic
Malfunction is detected when:
(Malfunction A) an excessively low or high voltage from the sensor is sent to ECM,
(Malfunction B) rationally incorrect voltage from the sensor is sent to ECM, compared with the voltage signal from engine coolant temperature sensor.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I suppose you could infer from this that the sensor is used only to provide diagnostic data. But the problem is that the ESM is just that, a Service Manual, not an Operations Manual. It doesn't care what function the sensor actually performs or how the ECM uses the data it collects from it. The only thing a Service Manual cares about is how to fix the sensor and/or it's affected components when an error is generated. So unless you've got something else you can refer me to, I'm just not prepared to conclude that the Service Manual addresses the operational aspects of the sensor and its affected components, especially in light of this article:
http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h32.pdf
I've looked through the rest of the section and I can't find anything else that speaks to this. Let me know if you've got something else you can refer me to, 2K2DEMAX. Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------
On Board Diagnosis Logic
Malfunction is detected when:
(Malfunction A) an excessively low or high voltage from the sensor is sent to ECM,
(Malfunction B) rationally incorrect voltage from the sensor is sent to ECM, compared with the voltage signal from engine coolant temperature sensor.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I suppose you could infer from this that the sensor is used only to provide diagnostic data. But the problem is that the ESM is just that, a Service Manual, not an Operations Manual. It doesn't care what function the sensor actually performs or how the ECM uses the data it collects from it. The only thing a Service Manual cares about is how to fix the sensor and/or it's affected components when an error is generated. So unless you've got something else you can refer me to, I'm just not prepared to conclude that the Service Manual addresses the operational aspects of the sensor and its affected components, especially in light of this article:
http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h32.pdf
I've looked through the rest of the section and I can't find anything else that speaks to this. Let me know if you've got something else you can refer me to, 2K2DEMAX. Thanks.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by 2K2DEMAX
As far as I know, the temperature sensor does not contribute to the operation of the engine but is only used for diagnostic purposes (as per the ESM). Therefore it really doesn't matter where it's placed (at least for engine optimization/operation purposes).
As far as I know, the temperature sensor does not contribute to the operation of the engine but is only used for diagnostic purposes (as per the ESM). Therefore it really doesn't matter where it's placed (at least for engine optimization/operation purposes).
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by 2K1HoMax
yes it does contribute to engine operation, a simple explanation of this is that cold air is denser then hot air, so if he air temp sensor senses that hot air is goin into the engine, the injecters are goin to throw in slightly less fuel, since hot air isnt as dense as hot air, also when the sensor picks up cold air, the injecters dump in more fuel in balance things out, but if the sensor it left unpluged, the injectors are gonna be blind as to how dense the air is, so they will just dump in the max ammount that cold air would need, so it creates slightly more power, but the check engine light will go on, trust me i know, it makes a small diff in power, so people dont go unplugging these things and calling it a mod....
yes it does contribute to engine operation, a simple explanation of this is that cold air is denser then hot air, so if he air temp sensor senses that hot air is goin into the engine, the injecters are goin to throw in slightly less fuel, since hot air isnt as dense as hot air, also when the sensor picks up cold air, the injecters dump in more fuel in balance things out, but if the sensor it left unpluged, the injectors are gonna be blind as to how dense the air is, so they will just dump in the max ammount that cold air would need, so it creates slightly more power, but the check engine light will go on, trust me i know, it makes a small diff in power, so people dont go unplugging these things and calling it a mod....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by y2kse
So if I understand what you're saying, 2K1HoMax, you want the air temp sensor to remain as cold as possible in order to force the fuel injectors to inject the maximum amount of fuel possible into the the cylinders. That would mean that you DO NOT want to expose the sensor to heat soak from the engine, correct?
So if I understand what you're saying, 2K1HoMax, you want the air temp sensor to remain as cold as possible in order to force the fuel injectors to inject the maximum amount of fuel possible into the the cylinders. That would mean that you DO NOT want to expose the sensor to heat soak from the engine, correct?
(damn explantions take too long, why am i so technical
)
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by 2K1HoMax
so i personally would either leave it in the tube, or just place it in a cooler inside my car.
so i personally would either leave it in the tube, or just place it in a cooler inside my car.

Seriously, I agree with you that we're just as well off leaving the scoop in place and keeping the sensor in the scoop. Thanks for the info.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by y2kse
Well I was thinking the same thing, except I was trying to figure out a way to pack some dry ice into the front of the air scoop.
Seriously, I agree with you that we're just as well off leaving the scoop in place and keeping the sensor in the scoop. Thanks for the info.
Well I was thinking the same thing, except I was trying to figure out a way to pack some dry ice into the front of the air scoop.

Seriously, I agree with you that we're just as well off leaving the scoop in place and keeping the sensor in the scoop. Thanks for the info.
) but im personally just leaving mine alone, im not gonna risk nothing for couple of hp.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
What is the purpose of O2 sensors?
What is the purpose of O2 sensors?
So it appears as if several systems impact on A/F ratios, Kev.
Guest
Posts: n/a
We've had this discussion before.
Air temp Sensor is used to send info to ECM. How and Why ?
Air Temp vs MAF's reading of actual air coming in calculates actual "density" of air being ingested, and along those lines is the correct mixture of fuel added to the air, and once combusted the o2 picks up wether the A/F Ratio is rich, lean or stoich, and adjust accordingly w/ timing changes and injector pulse width changes, which I will not go into.
Amazing what you learn reprogramming the 5th Gen ECU. Yeah, read the sig.
Air temp Sensor is used to send info to ECM. How and Why ?
Air Temp vs MAF's reading of actual air coming in calculates actual "density" of air being ingested, and along those lines is the correct mixture of fuel added to the air, and once combusted the o2 picks up wether the A/F Ratio is rich, lean or stoich, and adjust accordingly w/ timing changes and injector pulse width changes, which I will not go into.
Amazing what you learn reprogramming the 5th Gen ECU. Yeah, read the sig.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
What is the purpose of O2 sensors?
What is the purpose of O2 sensors?
. i kinda worked a way around it, but i bet i cant pass emissons now, but i still hate that damn light.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Chimp Dj
We've had this discussion before.
Air temp Sensor is used to send info to ECM. How and Why ?
Air Temp vs MAF's reading of actual air coming in calculates actual "density" of air being ingested, and along those lines is the correct mixture of fuel added to the air, and once combusted the o2 picks up wether the A/F Ratio is rich, lean or stoich, and adjust accordingly w/ timing changes and injector pulse width changes, which I will not go into.
Amazing what you learn reprogramming the 5th Gen ECU. Yeah, read the sig.
We've had this discussion before.
Air temp Sensor is used to send info to ECM. How and Why ?
Air Temp vs MAF's reading of actual air coming in calculates actual "density" of air being ingested, and along those lines is the correct mixture of fuel added to the air, and once combusted the o2 picks up wether the A/F Ratio is rich, lean or stoich, and adjust accordingly w/ timing changes and injector pulse width changes, which I will not go into.
Amazing what you learn reprogramming the 5th Gen ECU. Yeah, read the sig.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by 2K1HoMax
im still waitin on that reprogramable ecu of yours. i want that thing.
im still waitin on that reprogramable ecu of yours. i want that thing.
Just remember depending on project goals w/ your car, you will be spending ALOT of time on a dyno, testing and tuning. This isn't some G-Force ECU, you just slap in, and run. This system allows full tailoring of every mod on your car, so everything works as a "system", and not just "mods."
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Chimp Dj
Thank one of my friends who told me about it. I just hounded the manufacturer in Japan for it, just to test and see what happens.
Just remember depending on project goals w/ your car, you will be spending ALOT of time on a dyno, testing and tuning. This isn't some G-Force ECU, you just slap in, and run. This system allows full tailoring of every mod on your car, so everything works as a "system", and not just "mods."
Thank one of my friends who told me about it. I just hounded the manufacturer in Japan for it, just to test and see what happens.
Just remember depending on project goals w/ your car, you will be spending ALOT of time on a dyno, testing and tuning. This isn't some G-Force ECU, you just slap in, and run. This system allows full tailoring of every mod on your car, so everything works as a "system", and not just "mods."
(See http://www.theracersgroup.com/theprogram_unichip.html.)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Chimp Dj
Thank one of my friends who told me about it. I just hounded the manufacturer in Japan for it, just to test and see what happens.
Just remember depending on project goals w/ your car, you will be spending ALOT of time on a dyno, testing and tuning. This isn't some G-Force ECU, you just slap in, and run. This system allows full tailoring of every mod on your car, so everything works as a "system", and not just "mods."
Thank one of my friends who told me about it. I just hounded the manufacturer in Japan for it, just to test and see what happens.
Just remember depending on project goals w/ your car, you will be spending ALOT of time on a dyno, testing and tuning. This isn't some G-Force ECU, you just slap in, and run. This system allows full tailoring of every mod on your car, so everything works as a "system", and not just "mods."
but those things cost as much as a new car.
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Please note sarcasm when I posted about O2 sensors.
Please note sarcasm when I posted about O2 sensors.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by y2kse
Is it similar to The PROgram Piggyback ECU/UNICHIP, Chimp Dj?
(See http://www.theracersgroup.com/theprogram_unichip.html.)
Is it similar to The PROgram Piggyback ECU/UNICHIP, Chimp Dj?
(See http://www.theracersgroup.com/theprogram_unichip.html.)
True programmable ECU, there is software to program the ECU, you will need several hours on the dyno to fully realize the car's potential.
Kev has been shown the system, so enough w/ emails about it doesn't exist.
-Peace
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Chimp Dj
IT'S NOT A PIGGYBACK ECU. This system is similar to AEM's EMS.
True programmable ECU, there is software to program the ECU, you will need several hours on the dyno to fully realize the car's potential.
Kev has been shown the system, so enough w/ emails about it doesn't exist.
-Peace
IT'S NOT A PIGGYBACK ECU. This system is similar to AEM's EMS.
True programmable ECU, there is software to program the ECU, you will need several hours on the dyno to fully realize the car's potential.
Kev has been shown the system, so enough w/ emails about it doesn't exist.
-Peace

I checked out the AEM EMS at http://www.lightningmotorsports.com/aemems.htm. That system appears to completely replace the OEM ECU. So I'm assuming that the Programmable ECU you're referring to does the same thing.
Also, Lightning Motorsports sells the AEM EMS for $1400. Is that approximately what the Programmable ECU will sell for? Or has a price for the Programmable ECU been established yet?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by y2kse
Easy does it, Chimp Dj. I never suggested it doesn't exist.
I checked out the AEM EMS at http://www.lightningmotorsports.com/aemems.htm. That system appears to completely replace the OEM ECU. So I'm assuming that the Programmable ECU you're referring to does the same thing.
Also, Lightning Motorsports sells the AEM EMS for $1400. Is that approximately what the Programmable ECU will sell for? Or has a price for the Programmable ECU been established yet?
Easy does it, Chimp Dj. I never suggested it doesn't exist.

I checked out the AEM EMS at http://www.lightningmotorsports.com/aemems.htm. That system appears to completely replace the OEM ECU. So I'm assuming that the Programmable ECU you're referring to does the same thing.
Also, Lightning Motorsports sells the AEM EMS for $1400. Is that approximately what the Programmable ECU will sell for? Or has a price for the Programmable ECU been established yet?
Yes, it replaces the OEM ECU, pricing has not been 100% established. The manufacturer sells ECU/software + accessories needed, it will not be more than the AEM EMS, though. I will have better idea after mid June. Too close to getting license back, and don't wanna take the drive to dyno test and tune.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Chimp Dj
It's not you, I have "fans"(Maxtor, and others) on the forum.
It's not you, I have "fans"(Maxtor, and others) on the forum.

I'll stand by for more info . . .
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Please note sarcasm when I posted about O2 sensors.
Please note sarcasm when I posted about O2 sensors.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sonic7
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
8
Aug 20, 2015 12:23 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM




