5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

accord V6, max00 and 3.2 cl s-type

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:52 PM
  #41  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by maxima00


o mi goodness...who cares anymore, just admit they are faster!
"Do not to others what ye do not wish done to yourself"
RESPECT the elders!
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:54 PM
  #42  
maxima00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 281
Re: Re: ok

You think we have to much pride in our Maxima's because we don't accept "your" facts?!

- You want a CLS owner to "teach" us a lesson.

- You only want to compare 00-01 Auto Maxima's against the CL Type S (duh... 222 VS. 260, wonder who would win ). Next time, don't start a thread and change your mind half way in it because you noticed that you where WRONG! [i]"i see so many posts with people saying how 2000+ maximas are faster, i highly doubt that now. [b]even 2k2'2 will be beat by this car. not badly like i was, but they will. im pretty sure


here comes Mr. superstar to save the day,
shut up man. you don't even know what you are talking about you fool.
this is exactly what i mean about pride and your damn car.
1st - i an wrong about the 3.2CL being a lighter car. i admit it dude.
2nd - YES, a CL 3.2 s-type will/should teach you a lesson.
3rd - i was very unclear in stating what i actually wanted to say. i apologize. but 222 VS 260, so are you admitting we(00 and 01 mx's) can't win because of the HP? then can you please tell that to the stubborn people who keep posting their AUTO maxima's burned a CL s-type!
4th- i still believe the 3.2 CL's s-type will burn some 2k2's, why not? i'm sure 2k2's will burn alot of them as well. don't you agree it would be a very close race?
thanks
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:58 PM
  #43  
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,304
Re: ok ok calm down

when u talked about this "beats" by that...what are u really refering to? race from a dead stop?

I am tired of ppl just determine the result by looking at the numbers but not the situations. If that is ture, u dun need to race anybody anymore and all u have to do is to dyno ur car and put ur HP on ur window. whoever has a high number wins....



Originally posted by maxima00
yes i know stick's will have a much better chance of burning those damn CL's.
i'm not really talking about the driver himself. i'm really talking about the CL auto vs the 2k and 2k1 auto's.
I LOVE my 00 MAX, love it to death. more than my girlfriend!
i spent more money on my car than my girl shoot...
but lets face it guys, 2k and 2k1 auto's
will be beat by a 3.2CL s-type.
ONLY auto's and not 2k2's OK!@!??!? NO MODS TOO!@!!!
please and im not even talking about TL's @!!!!!!!!
do you guys understand now?
thanks
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:02 PM
  #44  
maxima00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 281
Re: Re: ok ok calm down

[QUOTE]Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
[B]when u talked about this "beats" by that...what are u really refering to? race from a dead stop?

I am tired of ppl just determine the result by looking at the numbers but not the situations. If that is ture, u dun need to race anybody anymore and all u have to do is to dyno ur car and put ur HP on ur window. whoever has a high number wins....


yes sorry i mentioned it in my very first post, but the thread has gotten so long wow...
i mean (Both cars auto)from standing point or highway.
will be burned by a CLS. not 2k2's okay? only 00 and 01's.
no mods and anythign like that.
is that understandable? kool thanx
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:04 PM
  #45  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
Re: Re: Re: ok

Originally posted by maxima00
[B]You think we have to much pride in our Maxima's because we don't accept "your" facts?!

- You want a CLS owner to "teach" us a lesson.

- You only want to compare 00-01 Auto Maxima's against the CL Type S (duh... 222 VS. 260, wonder who would win ). Next time, don't start a thread and change your mind half way in it because you noticed that you where WRONG! [i]"i see so many posts with people saying how 2000+ maximas are faster, i highly doubt that now. even 2k2'2 will be beat by this car. not badly like i was, but they will. im pretty sure


here comes Mr. superstar to save the day,
shut up man. you don't even know what you are talking about you fool.
this is exactly what i mean about pride and your damn car.
1st - i an wrong about the 3.2CL being a lighter car. i admit it dude.
2nd - YES, a CL 3.2 s-type will/should teach you a lesson.
3rd - i was very unclear in stating what i actually wanted to say. i apologize. but 222 VS 260, so are you admitting we(00 and 01 mx's) can't win because of the HP? then can you please tell that to the stubborn people who keep posting their AUTO maxima's burned a CL s-type!
4th- i still believe the 3.2 CL's s-type will burn some 2k2's, why not? i'm sure 2k2's will burn alot of them as well. don't you agree it would be a very close race?
thanks
Bring one on sweetheart... I have a 2K2 Auto, and my buddy has a 2K2 6 speed, let me know when so we can do a double spanking ! .... Just because you got stuck with a slow Maxx.. "Thanks Nissan ".... doesnt mean every other 2K, and 2K2's are slow ...
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:06 PM
  #46  
maxima00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 281
Re: Re: Re: Re: ok

Originally posted by kloogy
Bring one on sweetheart... I have a 2K2 Auto, and my buddy has a 2K2 6 speed, let me know when so we can do a double spanking ! .... Just because you got stuck with a slow Maxx.. "Thanks Nissan ".... doesnt mean every other 2K, and 2K2's are slow ...
holy cow, maximas are not slow!
maximas are out@!
especially 2k2's!
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:06 PM
  #47  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Re: Re: ok ok calm down

[QUOTE]Originally posted by maxima00
[B]
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
when u talked about this "beats" by that...what are u really refering to? race from a dead stop?

I am tired of ppl just determine the result by looking at the numbers but not the situations. If that is ture, u dun need to race anybody anymore and all u have to do is to dyno ur car and put ur HP on ur window. whoever has a high number wins....


yes sorry i mentioned it in my very first post, but the thread has gotten so long wow...
i mean (Both cars auto)from standing point or highway.
will be burned by a CLS. not 2k2's okay? only 00 and 01's.
no mods and anythign like that.
is that understandable? kool thanx
Who cares?? Your comparison was stupid in the first place. Look at the numbers on the CL-S vs 2k-2k1 Auto Maxima. 260hp vs 222..The CL-S wins hands down. Now the 2k2 vs CL-S is a drivers race.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:08 PM
  #48  
maxima00's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 281
Re: Re: Re: Re: ok ok calm down

Originally posted by MAX2000JP


Who cares?? Your comparison was stupid in the first place. Look at the numbers on the CL-S vs 2k-2k1 Auto Maxima. 260hp vs 222..The CL-S wins hands down. Now the 2k2 vs CL-S is a drivers race.

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



SOMEONE is on my side~
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:12 PM
  #49  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by Amazing2


Thanks Russ!
So it's HEAVIER than a 02 Maxima.
Yep, all that sound deading, but I don't mind! I like going 80 with no sound! :P
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #50  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: Re: Re: ok

Originally posted by maxima00
here comes Mr. superstar to save the day,
shut up man. you don't even know what you are talking about you fool.
this is exactly what i mean about pride and your damn car.
1st - i an wrong about the 3.2CL being a lighter car. i admit it dude.
2nd - YES, a CL 3.2 s-type will/should teach you a lesson.
3rd - i was very unclear in stating what i actually wanted to say. i apologize. but 222 VS 260, so are you admitting we(00 and 01 mx's) can't win because of the HP? then can you please tell that to the stubborn people who keep posting their AUTO maxima's burned a CL s-type!
4th- i still believe the 3.2 CL's s-type will burn some 2k2's, why not? i'm sure 2k2's will burn alot of them as well. don't you agree it would be a very close race?
thanks
If you want to start a name calling contest, I will not play with you anymore

Oh, please stop acting like a kid.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:20 PM
  #51  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Okay, one last time
2000 5-speed vs cl-s auto= Driver (manual=good launch blah blah)
2000 auto vs Cl-S auto = Cl-S win
2002 Auto vs Cl-S auto = Driver
2002 6speed vs Cl-S 6 speed= Driver
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:22 PM
  #52  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Yep, all that sound deading, but I don't mind! I like going 80 with no sound! :P


Russ, if maxima00 would stop acting like a kid for a minute, I would tell him that I like the CLS and TLS as much as my Maxima.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:23 PM
  #53  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by Amazing2




Russ, if maxima00 would stop acting like a kid for a minute, I would tell him that I like the CLS and TLS as much as my Maxima.
Sure you do! :P
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:24 PM
  #54  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
Accord V6's are slow compared to Maximas...
Accords are SLOW...Period.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:25 PM
  #55  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Sure you do! :P
I went by the Acura dealer last week to see the 6spd CLS. GREAT car but, up here in Canada, the price diff. is too much to justify it over the 03 Maxima 6spd.!
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #56  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by Amazing2


I went by the Acura dealer last week to see the 6spd CLS. GREAT car but, up here in Canada, the price diff. is too much to justify it over the 03 Maxima 6spd.!

You drive it? I want to drive one, but if I do, it might be bad for my health. :P
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #57  
TimW's Avatar
The silent but deadly Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,691
hmmm

its not that I hate Acuras or the people the drive them, but these asinine posts are a bit annoying.. once again, we are talking about CLS and TL's, not maximas or anything related to them..
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:33 PM
  #58  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: hmmm

Originally posted by TimW
its not that I hate Acuras or the people the drive them, but these asinine posts are a bit annoying.. once again, we are talking about CLS and TL's, not maximas or anything related to them..
ditto.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #59  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
Re: maxima00...

Originally posted by koostermax
so you say the tls is even lighter than the cls and my 2k2 6spd max?

"even 2k2's are 255HP but are much heavier than the CL's.
im not even talking about the TL' S-type here."

check amazing2's post admit that your state is wrong... ain't bashing them tls and cls but just help you see fact from fiction...
I'm not sure about weights...but I remember reading in some major automotive magazine that the TL-S is actually faster than the CL-S.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:36 PM
  #60  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
You drive it? I want to drive one, but if I do, it might be bad for my health. :P
And your wallet
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:39 PM
  #61  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Re: Re: maxima00...

Originally posted by Triple8Sol
I'm not sure about weights...but I remember reading in some major automotive magazine that the TL-S is actually faster than the CL-S.
...because the TL-S was supposedly not stock. It was equipped with what one magazine referred to as "an experimental exhaust manifold". "Experimental exhaust manifold" = Comptech Headers which is over $1000 but produces some insane gains on those cars. Acura did that to hype up the TL-S, but both cars are mechanically identical and their weights are within a few pounds of each other so their real-world-stock performance is identical.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:46 PM
  #62  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Maybe autos that were stock, but not 5spds. stock vs stock, its a close race. Since all 3 cars, 4th and 5th and accords are high 15 sec cars.

The TL or CL NOT type-s has run 15.2 in auto form, so that would take a auto maxima, pre 2k2.
But don't forget the price difference though. B/W a new CL-S or TL-S nd a Max (00-02) it's still a huge price gap. More than enough to get a SC/other mods, and wake&bake an Acura.
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #63  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by SteVTEC
And your wallet


You beat me to it Steve!

Russ, DON'T go there. RESIST!
Old May 28, 2002 | 05:56 PM
  #64  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
Re: Re: Re: maxima00...

Originally posted by SteVTEC
...because the TL-S was supposedly not stock. It was equipped with what one magazine referred to as "an experimental exhaust manifold". "Experimental exhaust manifold" = Comptech Headers which is over $1000 but produces some insane gains on those cars. Acura did that to hype up the TL-S, but both cars are mechanically identical and their weights are within a few pounds of each other so their real-world-stock performance is identical.
Oh ok, that answer sounds good to me! Do you remember which mag it was in?
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:00 PM
  #65  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

Originally posted by Amazing2
:laugh :

You beat me to it Steve!

Russ, DON'T go there. RESIST! : D
No Russ, don't listen to him. You know you want that 6spd bad boy CL-S. You're bored in the stands at the track watching other people run, and you fear those 2k2 Maxima 6spds. Just get that puppy and add an intake and Comptech Headers and you'll be able to seriously beat up on a lot of cars. Plus you hate that gearing hole in your 5AT after 110, and all that stupid idiot proofing on the SportShift.

Come on, just go for an innocent little test drive. It's not like you'd be crazy enough to trade your car in after only a single model year.



























Let's see if we can make Russ be the first person to be paying $50k for an 03 CL-S 6spd....after all the money he lost on all those trade-in's.

Old May 28, 2002 | 06:14 PM
  #66  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: maxima00...

Originally posted by Triple8Sol


I'm not sure about weights...but I remember reading in some major automotive magazine that the TL-S is actually faster than the CL-S.
The TL-S is not faster than the CL-S, that was proven, just so happens that TL-S had headers on it :P
Old May 28, 2002 | 06:16 PM
  #67  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ok....

lol!! Never Steve!
Old May 28, 2002 | 08:36 PM
  #68  
mpc578's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 682
A honest opinion

Since I have owned both a 2001 cl-s auto and a 2002 maxima 6 speed, i feel i can give a pretty fair opinion on the faster car. Agreeing with other replies, if it were the two cars I owned against each other (no mods) I would say the Maxima wins. If it was a Cl-S 6 sp. vs. the Maxima 6 sp. it would definitely come down to the drivers, probably too close to call...I think election officials from Florida should come in and figure it out..I hear they are good at deciding close outcomes.
Old May 28, 2002 | 09:07 PM
  #69  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
I can only reply to my experience.. TL-S VS Stock Max 2K2 Auto..= Smoked side of Acura, since my margin was 2 cars, can a CL-S 6 speeed make that up... If He can .. can he make up 4 car lenghts, which is what I lost to Leftcoast, in his 6 speed .... So if your CL-S speed demon, can beat me by 4 cars..... then brag about owning a Max 6 speed !........ Stop Talking on the boards... let's settle it at the track !
Old May 28, 2002 | 11:21 PM
  #70  
ColgateU's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 52
The reason the TL-S is a bit quicker than the CL-S is because of the heavier CL-S rims which add additional unsprung weight. And I don't know why I keep hearing this Comptech Header equipped cars B.S. being sent to the magazines. I think that's just everyones disbelief that the TL-S/CL-S are that quick. Stock, at E-town, my TL-S mustered out a 14.78 1/4 mile (and that was my first time ever to the track), which is prety consistent with what around 6 different car magazines say the TL-S runs. With the headers, I hope to be running around a 14.4. I'll keep you guys posted when I actually get time to go back to the track. Hopefully, I'll see a 2K2 6-speed to run with.

Also, does anyone know if there is a big difference in weight between a 2k2 maxima and an I35, because every magazine has shown the TL-S to dust the I35 in comparo tests. If so, a 2k2 auto vs. TL-S race is not so much a drivers race after all.
Old May 29, 2002 | 03:20 AM
  #71  
Max_Gator's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,039
Originally posted by ColgateU
Stock, at E-town, my TL-S mustered out a 14.78 1/4 mile (and that was my first time ever to the track), which is prety consistent with what around 6 different car magazines say the TL-S runs. With the headers, I hope to be running around a 14.4. I'll keep you guys posted when I actually get time to go back to the track. Hopefully, I'll see a 2K2 6-speed to run with.

Well, just to throw some fuel on the fire. 14.7s are common by 4th/5th 5spd with bolt ons. Combine that with superior top end (at least for 5th gens) after the 1/4 when the S hits 4th and us slow old 222 hp guys can save our dignity.

I know, I know . . . it is modded vs. stock, and you'd run faster with headers, but that ought to be enough to cause some concern next time you pull up to one.
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:43 AM
  #72  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You beat the driver, not the car. Please get that in your head.
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:44 AM
  #73  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your stupid for a TL-S owner for sure. CL-S has the same exact rims, as the TL-S. LOL! Also the TL-S is 200lb heavier, its bigger, its got 4 doors. It is more rare to see a TL-S in the 14s than CL-S.

Originally posted by ColgateU
The reason the TL-S is a bit quicker than the CL-S is because of the heavier CL-S rims which add additional unsprung weight. And I don't know why I keep hearing this Comptech Header equipped cars B.S. being sent to the magazines. I think that's just everyones disbelief that the TL-S/CL-S are that quick. Stock, at E-town, my TL-S mustered out a 14.78 1/4 mile (and that was my first time ever to the track), which is prety consistent with what around 6 different car magazines say the TL-S runs. With the headers, I hope to be running around a 14.4. I'll keep you guys posted when I actually get time to go back to the track. Hopefully, I'll see a 2K2 6-speed to run with.

Also, does anyone know if there is a big difference in weight between a 2k2 maxima and an I35, because every magazine has shown the TL-S to dust the I35 in comparo tests. If so, a 2k2 auto vs. TL-S race is not so much a drivers race after all.
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:45 AM
  #74  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Max_Gator


Well, just to throw some fuel on the fire. 14.7s are common by 4th/5th 5spd with bolt ons. Combine that with superior top end (at least for 5th gens) after the 1/4 when the S hits 4th and us slow old 222 hp guys can save our dignity.

I know, I know . . . it is modded vs. stock, and you'd run faster with headers, but that ought to be enough to cause some concern next time you pull up to one.
With alot of bolt ons of course its common, but we are talking about stock. We can say with bolt ons the CL-S or TL-S can hit 14.1-14.3. Which it has commonly.
Old May 29, 2002 | 07:15 AM
  #75  
Max_Gator's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,039
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


With alot of bolt ons of course its common, but we are talking about stock. We can say with bolt ons the CL-S or TL-S can hit 14.1-14.3. Which it has commonly.
I was not talking about stock vs. stock.

I was talking about modified 2k/2k1 and CL-S/TL-S stock, wasn't that clear?
Old May 29, 2002 | 07:24 AM
  #76  
EF-9's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 112
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Your stupid for a TL-S owner for sure. CL-S has the same exact rims, as the TL-S. LOL! Also the TL-S is 200lb heavier, its bigger, its got 4 doors. It is more rare to see a TL-S in the 14s than CL-S.

Well, the TL-S is equipped with 17X6.5 rims and the CL-S 17X7. So I dont know how much a weight difference between the two rims. I know for a fact that CL-S is lighter than TL-S like 80-90 lbs..
Old May 29, 2002 | 07:27 AM
  #77  
bill99gxe's Avatar
Evil Administrator - "The Problem"
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,101
Do any of you people have something better to do then have measuring contests and/or penisenvy? Good heavens. Wouldn't 5 plus pages of bandwidth in these forums be better spent improving the Maxima instead of arguing over some stupidass 1/4 mile times and trying to split hairs over how much a driver weighs and whether they are competent?

Facts:

The TL is a great car.
The CL is a great car.
The Maxima is a great car.
The Accord is a great car.

None of them are really all that comparable against each other. You have 2 premium brands against 2 mainstream brands, and then a "4-door V6 sports car" versus a 4 banger/V6 reliable family transportation that does the job great for the price. All accomplish the same thing in different ways. Be proud of what you've been blessed with instead of brow-beating others perfectly fine rides. Keep the flames where they belong: on GM's so called "world class" vehicles.





Oh, I almost forgot:

Hondas and Acuras ROCK!
Old May 29, 2002 | 07:32 AM
  #78  
Amazing2's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 341
Bill has spoken!

Old May 29, 2002 | 07:34 AM
  #79  
Mustang1999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,026
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Nice, I spanked 2 2k2 auto 3.5 nissan vehicles in my CL-S...... Altima was both
*cough* *cough* I thought you didn't race this car Russ.... shame shame...
Old May 29, 2002 | 07:55 AM
  #80  
ColgateU's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 52
Hey, RussMaxManiac,

Who the hell do you think you are calling me a fool. First thing, the CL-S/TL-S have different rims, so who's the idiot. Personally, I think the only fool is you. I think about 99.99% of this board agrees.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:16 PM.