6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008) Discussion of the 6th generation Maxima. Come see what others are saying.

Exaust going on next week....question about tubing sizes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #1  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Exaust going on next week....question about tubing sizes

I'm having a local shop fab up a mandrel bent catback for me.

My question has to deal w/ the tubing sizes. I believe the stock main pipe is 2.25" that has the crimped section.

There's a couple ways for me to have them do the exhaust.

1) 2" main pipe split into 2" tubes for each muffler
2) 2.25" main pipe split into two 2.25" tubes for each muffler
3) 2.5" main pipe split into 1.875"-2" tubes for the muffler (cattmans spec's)

Any suggestions? I'm leaning towards #3 but figured I'd throw it out here and see what others had to say

Current performance mods are Fujita CAI, IM spacers, cattman y-pipe.

Last edited by JG1; Oct 5, 2007 at 09:25 AM.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
curious... what are they charging u for work/install... might be cheaper to get the NEW cattman catback...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
curious... what are they charging u for work/install... might be cheaper to get the NEW cattman catback...
No it's not.

$350 for mandrel bent piping including a resonator and all installation. I paid $275 (total) for these


So $625 for a full catback exhaust installed. Cattman is like $900 (delivered) plus I have to do the installation. I also don't like the mufflers cattman uses.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Wow, Option 3 gets small!!! A GReddy SP-II catback is 2.5" diameter piping front to rear...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by chernmax
Go with option 3. A GReddy SP-II catback is 2.5" diameter piping...
And w/ 2.5" piping all the way back you lose power....not enough back pressure.

A lot of people have problems w/ this.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #6  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by JG1
And w/ 2.5" piping all the way back you lose power....not enough back pressure.

A lot of people have problems w/ this.
That's where tuning comes in. And for me, I always knew I'd get a Turbo so I prepared early and 2.5" to 3" is an optimal piping diameter for a Turbo...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Originally Posted by JG1
No it's not.

$350 for mandrel bent piping including a resonator and all installation. I paid $275 (total) for these


So $625 for a full catback exhaust installed. Cattman is like $900 (delivered) plus I have to do the installation. I also don't like the mufflers cattman uses.
I have those mufflers good choice... sounds sick! 625 is nto bad at all.. GL and post some pics and more info
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #8  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by chernmax
That's where tuning comes in. And for me, I always knew I'd get a Turbo so I prepared early and 2.5" to 3" is optimal for a Turbo...
Even w/ a tune they say it's still hard to not lose low end w/ the 2.5" piping all the way back.

For a turbo setup your good to good w/ that size piping.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
I have those mufflers good choice... sounds sick! 625 is nto bad at all.. GL and post some pics and more info

Thanks.

I was orginally going to go w/ the Remus but sent them back. These magnaflows are pretty nice.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #10  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
remus are nice also but a little much for my wallet for mufflers..

now is u r a steet pimp like chern u gots ALLLLLLLL DA MONEY! hahaha

jk boss..

anyway.... Gl..
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by JG1
Even w/ a tune they say it's still hard to not lose low end w/ the 2.5" piping all the way back.

For a turbo setup your good to good w/ that size piping.
No low end loss here, that's what headers are for...

And depending on weather (I have a 5AT), I run High 13's or Low 14's on the track...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #12  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Originally Posted by chernmax
And depending on weather (I have a 5AT), I run High 13's or Low 14's on the track...

Mmmm... 13's in a 6th gen ... N/a ....mmmm... cant wait for m Nssanworkspacerkit...MMMMM...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #13  
Majestic_MAx05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 980
Originally Posted by JG1
No it's not.

$350 for mandrel bent piping including a resonator and all installation. I paid $275 (total) for these


So $625 for a full catback exhaust installed. Cattman is like $900 (delivered) plus I have to do the installation. I also don't like the mufflers cattman uses.
Sweet!!!! I got these too!!! Sound reall nice!!!
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #14  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
Mmmm... 13's in a 6th gen ... N/a ....mmmm... cant wait for m Nssanworkspacerkit...MMMMM...
Headers, CAI, UPD, IM Spacers, Cattback, Ported/Polished IM and Dyno Tuning with an APEXi Super AFC-II all contibute!!!

And I'll bet Warren "Ramberg" is faster, he has the same setup as my current one and he has NOS!!! There's also another 6th Genner in the DC area that I have raced with at Capital and on Juice he runs in the Mid-High 13's also.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #15  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
Originally Posted by chernmax
Headers, CAI, UPD, IM Spacers, Cattback, Ported/Polished IM and Dyno Tuning with an APEXi Super AFC-II all contibute!!!

And I'll bet Warren "Ramberg" is faster, he has the same setup as my current one and he has NOS!!! There's also another 6th Genner in the DC area that I have raced with at Capital and on Juice he runs in the Mid-High 13's also.
Chernski, i bet u r mid to low 13's with those mods... The place u run at, is it high in elavation cause' that does affect a run ...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #16  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
Chernski, i bet u r mid to low 13's with those mods... The place u run at, is it high in elavation cause' that does affect a run ...
Actually low elevation close to sea level...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #17  
Fastmax05's Avatar
"Ok,Whats next?!?!"
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,858
From: 805, CA
sweet... first time i ran my max it was at 4k feet... i was so upset... then found a elvation calculator .. LOL
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #18  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by JG1
I'm having a local shop fab up a mandrel bent catback for me.

My question has to deal w/ the tubing sizes. I believe the stock main pipe is 2.25" that has the crimped section.

There's a couple ways for me to have them do the exhaust.

1) 2" main pipe split into 2" tubes for each muffler
2) 2.25" main pipe split into two 2.25" tubes for each muffler
3) 2.5" main pipe split into 1.875"-2" tubes for the muffler (cattmans spec's)

Any suggestions? I'm leaning towards #3 but figured I'd throw it out here and see what others had to say

Current performance mods are Fujita CAI, IM spacers, cattman y-pipe.
That would pretty much depends on what you want out of it. Option 1 is not worth the money, might as well keep stock pipings.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:45 PM
  #19  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by RHMax
That would pretty much depends on what you want out of it. Option 1 is not worth the money, might as well keep stock pipings.
I'm guessing cattman spec'd option is going to give the best overall performance.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #20  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by RHMax
That would pretty much depends on what you want out of it. Option 1 is not worth the money, might as well keep stock pipings.

I listed option 1 because thats what jsmithsole is running.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 12:55 PM
  #21  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by JG1
I listed option 1 because thats what jsmithsole is running.
I think he's running 2.25"(stock size).
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #22  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by RHMax
I think he's running 2.25"(stock size).
I had asked him threw PM's and he said 2" from the resonator back to the mufflers. Maybe he's running 2.25" into the resonator and 2" out...


Do you happen to know the stock size of the piping going to each muffler (after the split)? Is that 2.25" as well?
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #23  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by JG1
I had asked him threw PM's and he said 2" from the resonator back to the mufflers. Maybe he's running 2.25" into the resonator and 2" out...


Do you happen to know the stock size of the piping going to each muffler (after the split)? Is that 2.25" as well?
Yes, mandrel bent; I think that's why there's the crimp section before the split.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #24  
DeusExMaxima's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,353
From: Upland CA
How bout Option 4: Single 2.5" exhaust back to single larger muffler. I have heard that the single muffler makes more power and sounds better. It is cheaper and, of course, is lighter weight. The disadvantage is that it makes the rear unsymmetrical which some people don't like. The solution is to make a "dummy muffler" so it looks like there are two mufflers.

I am considering this as an alternative exhaust, possibly for track only. Im not sure yet.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #25  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by RHMax
Yes, mandrel bent; I think that's why there's the crimp section before the split.

I wonder if it's not best just to mimic the stock setup and use 2.25" from the y-pipe back to the mufflers.

Basicaly just get rid of the crimped section.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #26  
redls1's Avatar
MAXIN' ON
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,310
From: TN
I have a big exhaust with no resonator but havent been to the track or anything so I cant compare it to anything except my wifes car but I also have the fujita.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #27  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by redls1
I have a big exhaust with no resonator but havent been to the track or anything so I cant compare it to anything except my wifes car but I also have the fujita.
huh?
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #28  
redls1's Avatar
MAXIN' ON
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,310
From: TN
Pipe size Im in between 2.5" and 3" but I didnt notice anything when it was changed, my wife has a maxima also but no mods.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #29  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
The power on these cars comes from the headers, not the catback.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 02:47 PM
  #30  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
The power on these cars comes from the headers, not the catback.
well cattman claims about 12 whp from his catback system...
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #31  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Show me a dyno and I'll STFU.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #32  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Show me a dyno and I'll STFU.

That, you would have to ask him, as I didn't make the claim.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #33  
JG1's Avatar
JG1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 423
From: NJ
Quoted from an email from Brian:

"Every once in a while I’ll hear some “common knowledge” that’s just profoundly incorrect. I can’t even imagine how a part like this would lose power. I know from our experience that its quite difficult to design an exhaust part for VQ engines that loses power, it is very “immune” to a lack of backpressure. I simply do not believe that this is true.



These rumors typically get started because someone compares dyno runs that aren’t comparable. Unfortunately, most vehicle owners (and a lot of dyno shops) are profoundly ignorant about setting up dyno tests properly so that the major variables are controlled and the before and after results are comparable. They end up with absurdly over- or under-stated results, don’t recognize them as such or understand why they got the oddball results, and trot those numbers out as the gospel truth.



Obviously we don’t test the Greddy, but we know that our catback with a 2.5” main tube routinely makes 10-12whp. The ideal setup is a full exhaust system – header set and y-pipe (designed together, as ours are) and catback exhaust.



Brian C Catts
Cattman Perfornance"
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #34  
Apollos2's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,761
From: Denver, Colorado
Originally Posted by JG1
I wonder if it's not best just to mimic the stock setup and use 2.25" from the y-pipe back to the mufflers.

Basicaly just get rid of the crimped section.

Depending on what you got up front on the engine or plan on. I don't know you mods.
Do you have the new Cattman y pipe? I have a stock one but replaced the crimped section after the resonator. What I don't know about, is if the stock resonator is restrictive, http://www.hottexhaust.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=14444). If it is you can replace it then top it off with the wicked mufflers you just bought. I bet it would work just fine.

I also think there may be something to that single exhaust. Knowing Deus he'll figure it out one way of the other. Always blazing a trail
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #35  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Cattman's referring to a load based dyno I'm sure.

I still have my stock muffler on I also know of a car near 250whp that still has stock catback and muffler.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #36  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Cattman's referring to a load based dyno I'm sure.

I still have my stock muffler on I also know of a car near 250whp that still has stock catback and muffler.
The stock resonator has a restriction at entry, and the crimp section before the split also reduces the flow at higher RPM. I make power with stock mufflers, with new piping and resonator; 12 WHP with K&N panel filter. It's not as much as headers, but definitely an improvement.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #37  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by RHMax
The stock resonator has a restriction at entry, and the crimp section before the split also reduces the flow at higher RPM. I make power with stock mufflers, with new piping and resonator; 12 WHP with K&N panel filter. It's not as much as headers, but definitely an improvement.
Our catbacks exhaust are single and have a horrendous crimp too.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #38  
RHMax's Avatar
Newbie just Registered
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,795
From: LA/OC, CA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Our catbacks exhaust are single and have a horrendous crimp too.
Yes, I know. I had a 5th gen too. The crimp is good for lowend, and only lowend. Get rid of that and you should see a handful of HP.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #39  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
You know what's good for low end/throttle response? Larger MAF housing That's where it's at.

Can't wait until one of you A34 cats does it. Glude, where you at?
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #40  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
^^^Still got much knowledge to gain and time to do it.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:56 AM.