7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015) Come in and talk about the 7th generation Maxima

Do you miss a manual transmission?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 11:24 PM
  #41  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Per
One point about the manual transmission in a Maxima: The Cadillac CTS is also offered with a manual transmission, but try to find one on a dealer's lot! I would think a manual CTS is only available through special order, but I can't see why Nissan couldn't do the same. After all, they have all the parts from the 2006 model; I doubt there is much difference.
I also realize the 2009 owners are happy with their tranny--nothing wrong with that!
Well I know one big difference, the parent company of that CTS is bankrupt and didn't Nissan say they lost money on the manual due to lack of interest, i.e. sales?

This is a FWD car the last time I checked.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:04 AM
  #42  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 163
From: Florida
Oh i wish i had a G37!
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #43  
Mreim769's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 910
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by Per
One point about the manual transmission in a Maxima: The Cadillac CTS is also offered with a manual transmission, but try to find one on a dealer's lot! I would think a manual CTS is only available through special order, but I can't see why Nissan couldn't do the same. After all, they have all the parts from the 2006 model; I doubt there is much difference.
I also realize the 2009 owners are happy with their tranny--nothing wrong with that!
Two completely different cars with two completely different demographics........ nice comparison
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #44  
Per's Avatar
Per
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 133
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by Mreim769
Two completely different cars with two completely different demographics........ nice comparison
While true, but for that very reason don't you think the desire for manuals would be a lot more among Maxima owners that CTS owners? My read on Maxima owners from this forum is that they tend to be more performance oriented than what I perceive Cadillac owners to be.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #45  
Mreim769's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 910
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by Per
While true, but for that very reason don't you think the desire for manuals would be a lot more among Maxima owners that CTS owners? My read on Maxima owners from this forum is that they tend to be more performance oriented than what I perceive Cadillac owners to be.
While I can see what you are leaning towards with the performance thing I still have to disagree with the comparison. Cadillac owners are known to be a little more of a "high brow" crowd that can dig a little deeper into their pockets for unique options like that. Now I am not saying that Nissan owners are cheap but knowing myself as a Nissan owner I would never pay what the crazy price would be to have a 6 speed bolted on to my max when I could just buy a Altima or something like that. Also I believe, and I may be wrong here, that even as a specialty option that has to be specifically asked for Nissan could never afford to have those kind of things on standby and interupt the manufacter line to do something like this where as Cadillac could no doubt perform this (maybe not so much anymore hehehe )
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #46  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by Mreim769
While I can see what you are leaning towards with the performance thing I still have to disagree with the comparison. Cadillac owners are known to be a little more of a "high brow" crowd that can dig a little deeper into their pockets for unique options like that. Now I am not saying that Nissan owners are cheap but knowing myself as a Nissan owner I would never pay what the crazy price would be to have a 6 speed bolted on to my max when I could just buy a Altima or something like that. Also I believe, and I may be wrong here, that even as a specialty option that has to be specifically asked for Nissan could never afford to have those kind of things on standby and interupt the manufacter line to do something like this where as Cadillac could no doubt perform this (maybe not so much anymore hehehe )
Agreed!! Very well said.
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #47  
Nightshifter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 163
From: Florida
Cadillac CTS vs. Maxima .. hmmm
I just saw a 2009 Maxima ... first time i can see my car from the other drivers point of view... Wow! The car looks fast and sporty to me! More than any Cadillac i saw... I would agree with the 2 different crowds theory (unless you buy that 550 HP V or whatever it is.. too lazy to look it up).
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 03:41 AM
  #48  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by Nightshifter
Cadillac CTS vs. Maxima .. hmmm
I just saw a 2009 Maxima ... first time i can see my car from the other drivers point of view... Wow! The car looks fast and sporty to me! More than any Cadillac i saw... I would agree with the 2 different crowds theory (unless you buy that 550 HP V or whatever it is.. too lazy to look it up).
I try to keep an eye out for other maximas on the road. Cuz when I see one from the other perspective (which isn't often) it's a beautiful sight. I love this car....
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 06:21 AM
  #49  
ChipperX's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 15
From: North Coast
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
Because there are other forms of racing besides quarter and eighth mile straight lines?


Between this . . .

and this


there may be insight to Per's point of view.

Once you move away from direct control of the mechanical bits, you have to accept somebody else's driving style preferences, as that's what determines the transmission programming (and the range of its capacity to "learn" yours, if such is available). Maybe I'm just a throwback, but a car is a physical, mechanical device, not a video game, so electronically permitting "manual" operation comes off as insulating the driver from what he's doing.

Either automated shifting or continuous variability effectively puts the driver in the position of asking the PCM for permission to drive in whatever way, and that permission can be denied via electronically overriding the "request". Not everybody is comfortable with that. Obviously, such people should not be considering automatic-only cars, but it's a shame that cars that are really nice in so many other respects limit buyer choice in this.

No offense, light, but the basis for manual gear selection is in large part a subjective "feel" kind of thing, related to the driver's evaluation of the situation at hand as well as engine rpm and speed or acceleration requirements. It's not necessarily consistent or predictable, as computer programming prefers. You lose something once throttle and gear selection control are connected in any way.


FWIW, I saw very recently some figures regarding percentage fitment of the three various transmission types. Stumbled across it while investigating transmission fluid, and I think it was a Valvoline-developed report. Anyway, it's in the USA and Japan that automatic transmissions are widely fitted (90%, IIRC). In the US, manuals have remained fairly steady at 8%, and CV's are 1% - 2%. In Europe, the percentage of manual transmissions is much higher at around 80% (Edit - found it - though that 80% is dropping - Link.



Norm
Norm; thanks so much for contributing this information.

We ALL want Nissan to stay in business, but transmission mode is a personal choice, and no amount of arguing for either side will diminish a human being's need to choose and to get what they pay for.

Most drivers who are enthusiasts know that a manual transmission is the preferred way to completely integrate yourself into the driving experience. There is no substitute. The testers at the car magazines know it, and we as Nissan purists know it as well.

I am sure that owning and driving a CVT automobile is an enjoyable experience - especially when it's a Maxima. However, for many, the greatest amount of pleasure is derived from COMPLETELY controlling the vehicle - which involves manually shifting the transmission. Driving a manual transmission requires skill - which impresses anyone who sits in the passenger seat of your car.

My first Maxima (1998 GX) was a 5 speed. I loved it. But when I got my second Maxima (2004 SE), a 6 speed manual, I drove it for hours on end with no destination in mind at all - the sheer joy of upshifting, downshifting, and watching the road spread out before me was the greatest driving pleasure I had ever experienced. Five years later - today - I still drive my 2004 SE 6 speed manual with no destination in mind at all, and I really enjoy the trip. Not because I can sit back and relax, but because I can literally become one with my vehicle - and spank an a$$ now and again (yesterday I trounced a Chevrolet Cobalt SS from a stoplight by 2 car lengths).

No matter how wonderful, fast, accomplished and coveted, I don't want a non-manual Maxima. Let's hope I'm not forced to buy one.

Last edited by ChipperX; Jun 29, 2009 at 06:24 AM.
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #50  
Per's Avatar
Per
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 133
From: San Antonio
I still don't buy the argument that it would cost Nissan a lot of money to offer a manual transmission. After all, the 09 engine is pretty much the same as the 06, so they have, or can remanufacture all the parts. Besides, a manual transmission is cheaper than an automatic--CTS is an example.
Now that I finally got my 06 with the manual, I enjoy it a lot more than the CVT in my Civic.
The paddle shifters are a poor substitute for a manual!
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #51  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
I doubt that the hardware is the issue.

Think certifications, all of them (not just EPA). ABS, traction control, stability control, brake assist (if present), etc., will all need their algorithms tweaked, tested, and certified at least internally within Nissan. From what little I've read concerning ABS from people who have been involved with it, this is not a trivial effort.

We may see the time where if it is in fact available, the MT is the extra-cost option . . . I hope not, but it is a possibility.


Norm
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #52  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Per
I still don't buy the argument that it would cost Nissan a lot of money to offer a manual transmission.
Now that I finally got my 06 with the manual, I enjoy it a lot more than the CVT in my Civic.
The paddle shifters are a poor substitute for a manual!
If manual Maxima's were in such high demand this wouldn't be an issue now would it?

Sorry about the Civic with a CVT, yes that must be pure hell...

Since you have a 06 Maxima with a MANUAL I don't understand why you keep bringing this up???

Hmm maybe this is a conspiracy... LOL
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #53  
Mreim769's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 910
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
If manual Maxima's were in such high demand this wouldn't be an issue now would it?

Sorry about the Civic with a CVT, yes that must be pure hell...

Since you have a 06 Maxima with a MANUAL I don't understand why you keep bringing this up???

Hmm maybe this is a conspiracy... LOL
Man this thread is getting super old. We should see if we can get it booted into the general forums. It appears that everyone that is arguing for a manual 09 Max doesn't even have an 09 Max.
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #54  
Per's Avatar
Per
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 133
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
If manual Maxima's were in such high demand this wouldn't be an issue now would it?

Sorry about the Civic with a CVT, yes that must be pure hell...

Since you have a 06 Maxima with a MANUAL I don't understand why you keep bringing this up???

Hmm maybe this is a conspiracy... LOL
My guess is a manual Maxima would have about the same demand as a manual Lexus IS, a manual G35 sedan, and a manual CTS.
I would have bought an 09 Maxima if it came with a manual, and I would really like for Nissan to reconsider their position. If you are happy with the CVT, fine. I just like my cars my way.
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #55  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Per
My guess is a manual Maxima would have about the same demand as a manual Lexus IS, a manual G35 sedan, and a manual CTS.
I would have bought an 09 Maxima if it came with a manual, and I would really like for Nissan to reconsider their position. If you are happy with the CVT, fine. I just like my cars my way.
That's cool I had two Maxima's with a manual loved both of them but I don't miss it I actually like the performance of the CVT.

As for Lexus the IS F the auto-transmission is amazing....

In your analogy their must be a lot of disappointed Lexus IS F people since the ONLY option they have is a 8-speed Auto but hey it's only the fastest and most powerful Lexus built to date.

But why go to the trouble of creating an automatic transmission that performs better and faster than a manual? After all, the simple yet effective manual transmission is held in high esteem by driving enthusiasts everywhere.

In the process of creating a maximum performance car, Lexus has done nothing less than turn what is typically thought to be a weakness into a solid advantage.

To illustrate the point, let’s get right to the qualities that make it so:

• One of the world’s fastest shift times for street legal production car. At about 0.1 second (upshifts), it’s faster than you.
• Full manual shift control that can be instantly accessed by moving the console-mounted shift lever to “M” and then using either the steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters or the shift lever. In manual mode, it shifts only when you tell it to.
• A direct feel unrivaled by conventional automatics, made possible via clutch lockup (yes, like a manual) employed in second through eight gears
• Ultra-quick throttle blipping downshifts match engine and gear speed to avoid sudden engine braking—an advantage during performance driving, on the track or on the road
• First gear torque multiplication for maximum off-the-line acceleration
• Smooth, yet quick and drama free automatic shifting, if that is what you desire

The transmission team started with a new 8-speed automatic transmission design from the Lexus LS 460. This may sound like physical overkill but IS F would have notably more power than the LS and certainly be driven more aggressively, so a robust design was required.

The cleverly designed gearbox is actually relatively light and uses a special planetary gear set that allows a more compact design. The whole unit weighs only 212 lbs yet has more than enough torque capacity for the IS F’s 5.0-liter engine.

These qualities add up to create a track-worthy, ultra-high performance transmission that works for you by responding to your demands the moment you want or need it to. And unlike other transmissions built for high performance duty, there is no pain required for your gain.

The IS F Sport Direct Shift transmission manages to be both an amazingly effective manual and a refined automatic. One stereotype…dead on arrival.
Old Jun 29, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #56  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
Originally Posted by Per
I still don't buy the argument that it would cost Nissan a lot of money to offer a manual transmission. After all, the 09 engine is pretty much the same as the 06, so they have, or can remanufacture all the parts. Besides, a manual transmission is cheaper than an automatic--CTS is an example.
Now that I finally got my 06 with the manual, I enjoy it a lot more than the CVT in my Civic.
The paddle shifters are a poor substitute for a manual!


As Norm Peterson explained so well in his fine post of 1:22PM Monday, there is much more to producing a manual Maxima than you seem to understand.

And as MaxLoverAz explained so well in his pointed post of 9:50PM Monday, it is not the costs or technical work stopping Nissan from building a manual '09 Maxima; it is the simple fact Nissan built the manual Maxima for 25 years, and by the end of those 25 years, dealers would not accept the manual Maxima because they couldn't give them away. Building them would have been a foolish waste of money.

Nissan did not cancel the manual Maxima; the market did.
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 12:33 AM
  #57  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Mreim769
Man this thread is getting super old. We should see if we can get it booted into the general forums. It appears that everyone that is arguing for a manual 09 Max doesn't even have an 09 Max.
Couldn't agree more.... Close This Thread I Order!

Just kidding Mods....
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 12:37 AM
  #58  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by lightonthehill
Nissan did not cancel the manual Maxima; the market did.
I love that quote lightonthehill!!
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 04:33 AM
  #59  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Originally Posted by lightonthehill
Nissan did not cancel the manual Maxima; the market did.
Sadly, that's where most of the blame lies. The typical customer's preference - never mind what led to it - is a larger part of the market than only part of the enthusiast group's preference will ever be. But it's still bothersome to have one's choices dictated by the preferences of others, however indirectly that comes about.

Whether Nissan was actually taking an actual money loss on each MT car sold or merely didn't make enough over actual cost to make it worth their while to keep it going is secondary. If anything, their "Shift . . . [insert thought here]" approach can be taken as being subtly closer to pro-MT than anything in any direct competitor's televised advertising campaign.


Norm
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 05:45 AM
  #60  
maxger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 231
From: Hfx, N.S.
MaxLoverAz why didn't you get a automatic 370Z with a 7 speed automatic with paddle shifters? The auto is just as fast or faster than a manual 370z.
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 06:42 AM
  #61  
Per's Avatar
Per
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 133
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
That's cool I had two Maxima's with a manual loved both of them but I don't miss it I actually like the performance of the CVT.

As for Lexus the IS F the auto-transmission is amazing....

In your analogy their must be a lot of disappointed Lexus IS F people since the ONLY option they have is a 8-speed Auto but hey it's only the fastest and most powerful Lexus built to date.

But why go to the trouble of creating an automatic transmission that performs better and faster than a manual? After all, the simple yet effective manual transmission is held in high esteem by driving enthusiasts everywhere.

In the process of creating a maximum performance car, Lexus has done nothing less than turn what is typically thought to be a weakness into a solid advantage.

To illustrate the point, let’s get right to the qualities that make it so:

• One of the world’s fastest shift times for street legal production car. At about 0.1 second (upshifts), it’s faster than you.
• Full manual shift control that can be instantly accessed by moving the console-mounted shift lever to “M” and then using either the steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters or the shift lever. In manual mode, it shifts only when you tell it to.
• A direct feel unrivaled by conventional automatics, made possible via clutch lockup (yes, like a manual) employed in second through eight gears
• Ultra-quick throttle blipping downshifts match engine and gear speed to avoid sudden engine braking—an advantage during performance driving, on the track or on the road
• First gear torque multiplication for maximum off-the-line acceleration
• Smooth, yet quick and drama free automatic shifting, if that is what you desire

The transmission team started with a new 8-speed automatic transmission design from the Lexus LS 460. This may sound like physical overkill but IS F would have notably more power than the LS and certainly be driven more aggressively, so a robust design was required.

The cleverly designed gearbox is actually relatively light and uses a special planetary gear set that allows a more compact design. The whole unit weighs only 212 lbs yet has more than enough torque capacity for the IS F’s 5.0-liter engine.

These qualities add up to create a track-worthy, ultra-high performance transmission that works for you by responding to your demands the moment you want or need it to. And unlike other transmissions built for high performance duty, there is no pain required for your gain.

The IS F Sport Direct Shift transmission manages to be both an amazingly effective manual and a refined automatic. One stereotype…dead on arrival.
The technical marvels you describe make a good point. The sad thing is most IS-Fs will be bought by people who will never use those capabilities, and just like a lot of BMWs, rather buy the car for bragging rights, as they drive their cars to impress others, and to show off that they can buy a $60,000 car.
The real truth is most folks here grew up with automatics, and like the convenience, as they can talk/text on their cell phones, and eat their breakfast on their way to work.
Since this is a Maxima enthusiast forum, and for a good part a performance enthusiast forum, I thought a come feedback on the number of folks who would like to see a manual woould be interesting.
I also realize that the folks who bought an 09 Maxima are in the position, like the song says: "If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with". And I can also appreciate the fact they had no choice in transmissions, but chose a Maxima anyway.
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #62  
Mreim769's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 910
From: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
That's cool I had two Maxima's with a manual loved both of them but I don't miss it I actually like the performance of the CVT.

As for Lexus the IS F the auto-transmission is amazing....

In your analogy their must be a lot of disappointed Lexus IS F people since the ONLY option they have is a 8-speed Auto but hey it's only the fastest and most powerful Lexus built to date.

But why go to the trouble of creating an automatic transmission that performs better and faster than a manual? After all, the simple yet effective manual transmission is held in high esteem by driving enthusiasts everywhere.

In the process of creating a maximum performance car, Lexus has done nothing less than turn what is typically thought to be a weakness into a solid advantage.

To illustrate the point, let’s get right to the qualities that make it so:

• One of the world’s fastest shift times for street legal production car. At about 0.1 second (upshifts), it’s faster than you.
• Full manual shift control that can be instantly accessed by moving the console-mounted shift lever to “M” and then using either the steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters or the shift lever. In manual mode, it shifts only when you tell it to.
• A direct feel unrivaled by conventional automatics, made possible via clutch lockup (yes, like a manual) employed in second through eight gears
• Ultra-quick throttle blipping downshifts match engine and gear speed to avoid sudden engine braking—an advantage during performance driving, on the track or on the road
• First gear torque multiplication for maximum off-the-line acceleration
• Smooth, yet quick and drama free automatic shifting, if that is what you desire

The transmission team started with a new 8-speed automatic transmission design from the Lexus LS 460. This may sound like physical overkill but IS F would have notably more power than the LS and certainly be driven more aggressively, so a robust design was required.

The cleverly designed gearbox is actually relatively light and uses a special planetary gear set that allows a more compact design. The whole unit weighs only 212 lbs yet has more than enough torque capacity for the IS F’s 5.0-liter engine.

These qualities add up to create a track-worthy, ultra-high performance transmission that works for you by responding to your demands the moment you want or need it to. And unlike other transmissions built for high performance duty, there is no pain required for your gain.

The IS F Sport Direct Shift transmission manages to be both an amazingly effective manual and a refined automatic. One stereotype…dead on arrival.
Great read! Thanks for a relevant post. I recently, well more like 6 months ago, tried the EVO X with the Twin Clutch Sportronic Shift Transmission. Quick quick shifts and super cool throttle blips.
Old Jun 30, 2009 | 09:48 AM
  #63  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by maxger
MaxLoverAz why didn't you get a automatic 370Z with a 7 speed automatic with paddle shifters? The auto is just as fast or faster than a manual 370z.
None were on the lot except in Magnetic Black which in AZ is not a very wise color choice. I test drive both and I really have no preference over either one and since I'm old and don't go to the track anymore except to watch the speed thing isn't an issue with me. I don't have to row gears to feel my mojo.
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #64  
boondoxmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,415
From: Boston, MA
I really like the look of the new maxima, but the none manual was the deal breaker for me. I recently checked out the new g37 at a local dealer and wasn't able to find a 6 speed on the lot. Dealer tells me that when they get em they sell them right away. This tells me that there is still a market for manuals. I believe it was a selling stragery for nissan to move buyers upscale to infiniti if they want a manual. That being said I do believe we will see a manual tranny 7th gen before the 8th gen appears. The maxima used to be a very popular car among auto magazine writes, but nissan has killed what most people loved about the car. I plan on driving my 03 6 speed into the ground and moving on from nissan after that. Subaru is looking really good right now.
Old Jul 1, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #65  
Per's Avatar
Per
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 133
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by boondoxmax
I recently checked out the new g37 at a local dealer and wasn't able to find a 6 speed on the lot. Dealer tells me that when they get em they sell them right away.
That has been my experience as well. I've checked out manual Altimas, and they disappear quickly. I have a hard time buying the urban myth about manual Maximas or others lingering on the lot. We drove a manual G37 a couple of weeks ago, but disliked the clutch engagement, and the Maxima rides nicer, is roomier, and has more amenities.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
Mar 12, 2020 12:06 AM
James92SE
1st-3rd Generations Classifieds (1981-1994)
4
Oct 8, 2015 04:57 PM
pjgreek
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
12
Sep 9, 2015 09:30 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:34 PM.