RSF50A or RSF50V, how to verify?
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
RSF50A or RSF50V, how to verify?
How do I verify if my 5-speed transmission is a RSF50A or an RSF50V? I know for a fact that my car originally came with a RSF50V (The LSD model), but the previous owner DID NOT rebuild it when replacement time came around. He bought another used transmission for 1200$ back in 1998 or 1999.
Last fall I jacked the car up and turned one wheel to see if the other turned in the opposite direction. It did, which I assume must mean that it is the NON-LSD model. But when I showed my tranny to a mechanic today (the tranny is opened, so you can see the gears) he thought it was an LSD because of the way the differencial looked.
He's the second mechanic that told me this, so it does make me wonder. I know for a fact that the wheels turn opposite of one another, and my dad told me a few times while I was doing burnouts at the track that only one wheel was spinning.
All points to the non-LSD model, but is there a way to be absolutely sure?
Last fall I jacked the car up and turned one wheel to see if the other turned in the opposite direction. It did, which I assume must mean that it is the NON-LSD model. But when I showed my tranny to a mechanic today (the tranny is opened, so you can see the gears) he thought it was an LSD because of the way the differencial looked.
He's the second mechanic that told me this, so it does make me wonder. I know for a fact that the wheels turn opposite of one another, and my dad told me a few times while I was doing burnouts at the track that only one wheel was spinning.
All points to the non-LSD model, but is there a way to be absolutely sure?
tranny case on the drivers side- not the clutch side but back of the case side, will have a bulge in it- on the diff casing. I do not have any pictures of a normal tranny, to show ya. Also the driver's side axle seal should be very big vs the passenger side one.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
The drivers' side axle seal is indeed bigger than the passenger side seal. It's about 2.5-inches in diameter instead of 1.75 inches or so for the passenger side axle seal. Does that mean it's a 50A or a 50V?
Originally Posted by JClaw
The drivers' side axle seal is indeed bigger than the passenger side seal. It's about 2.5-inches in diameter instead of 1.75 inches or so for the passenger side axle seal. Does that mean it's a 50A or a 50V?
It should be a 50V, can you take a picture of the tranny from the differential side- bird eye view ? Drivers axle seal should be on the bulged out part of the case, if its flat like the passenger side of the tranny- then its a 50A.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Can't take pictures - but when I turn one side of the differencial with my fingers (the part where the driver side axle connects), the whole gear follows, but when I turn it on the passenger side, the part where the passenger axle connect turns alone, regardless of the rest of the differencial. It turns easily, no resistance.
Originally Posted by JClaw
Last fall I jacked the car up and turned one wheel to see if the other turned in the opposite direction. It did, which I assume must mean that it is the NON-LSD model.
Originally Posted by JClaw
Can't take pictures - but when I turn one side of the differencial with my fingers (the part where the driver side axle connects), the whole gear follows, but when I turn it on the passenger side, the part where the passenger axle connect turns alone, regardless of the rest of the differencial. It turns easily, no resistance.
In a viscous coupling, the torque is transmitted through a shearing action of the silicone oil contained within the housing. A certain amount of energy is "lost" in the fluid. If you spin the driver side wheel slow enough, the passenger side wheel will not rotate.
Originally Posted by JClaw
Just talked to SR20DEN and according to him, that is a non-LSD.
Guess I'm just gonna have to see if the gear fits first hand.
Guess I'm just gonna have to see if the gear fits first hand.
Originally Posted by JClaw
Just talked to SR20DEN and according to him, that is a non-LSD.
Guess I'm just gonna have to see if the gear fits first hand.
Guess I'm just gonna have to see if the gear fits first hand.
Actually I might stand corrected on this one. I haven't seen inside the 50V, only the 32V which, IIRC, looked differently. I think this one might be a 50V.
I thought the way you could tell it was lsd was that where axles go in there is two splines for the axles where as the open only has 1.
The way I can tell that mine is LSD is that its got a big V written on the top
I can take pics or check any thing for you if you want
The way I can tell that mine is LSD is that its got a big V written on the top

I can take pics or check any thing for you if you want
wow you guys have really complicated a very simple question that was answered along time ago
also on the testing of the VLSD you guys have it wrong what your desribing is how to test a LOCKING dif with the VLSD you have to leave one of the tires on the ground
with one tire on the ground if you get alot of resistance stinning the tire in the air its vlsd if there is no resistance its open
all of the 3 VLSD trans ive had in my car spun the tires in the oppisite direction with them both in the air
plus for future reference to identify the 50A from the 50V with the case split. The 50Vs ring gear has almost twice as many bolts holding it the carrier/VLSD than the 50A, so the final drive ratios are not swapable between the 2
also on the testing of the VLSD you guys have it wrong what your desribing is how to test a LOCKING dif with the VLSD you have to leave one of the tires on the ground
with one tire on the ground if you get alot of resistance stinning the tire in the air its vlsd if there is no resistance its open
all of the 3 VLSD trans ive had in my car spun the tires in the oppisite direction with them both in the air
plus for future reference to identify the 50A from the 50V with the case split. The 50Vs ring gear has almost twice as many bolts holding it the carrier/VLSD than the 50A, so the final drive ratios are not swapable between the 2
Originally Posted by subs1000w
wow you guys have really complicated a very simple question that was answered along time ago
also on the testing of the VLSD you guys have it wrong what your desribing is how to test a LOCKING dif with the VLSD you have to leave one of the tires on the ground
with one tire on the ground if you get alot of resistance stinning the tire in the air its vlsd if there is no resistance its open
all of the 3 VLSD trans ive had in my car spun the tires in the oppisite direction with them both in the air
also on the testing of the VLSD you guys have it wrong what your desribing is how to test a LOCKING dif with the VLSD you have to leave one of the tires on the ground
with one tire on the ground if you get alot of resistance stinning the tire in the air its vlsd if there is no resistance its open
all of the 3 VLSD trans ive had in my car spun the tires in the oppisite direction with them both in the air
For both wheels to spin in the same direction, the transmission has to be in neutral.
If you think about it, you would have to turn the engine over in order to rotate both wheels in the same direction with the tranny in gear.
This checking method is also detailed on page MT-8 of the 98 FSM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
I don't think my car was in Neutral when I did the test. I will next time though.
UPDATE: Had to pay 100$ to a Transmission Shop to get the gears on the new shaft. My first 3 gears come from a 2000 Altima and all 3 are indeed slightly more aggressive than the original maxima gears. I am keeping the same 4th, 5th and reverse gears.
I kept the 3.823 Final Drive because the transmission is indeed an RS5F50V and the only alternative final drive is 3.895, and it aint worth it. So my car will pull slightly harder through the first three gears.
I'll be putting that thing back together tomorrow (Saturday) but due to 80% chance of rain I won't be installing it until Sunday.
I've been driving a 145 HP Ford Taurus Station Wagon for the past 2 weeks, so as you can imagine I am now clinically insane from being beaten by Ford Escorts and Toyota Echos.
The 4th gen (and possibly 5th gen) traction bars are pretty much ready, bye bye wheel hop forever.
UPDATE: Had to pay 100$ to a Transmission Shop to get the gears on the new shaft. My first 3 gears come from a 2000 Altima and all 3 are indeed slightly more aggressive than the original maxima gears. I am keeping the same 4th, 5th and reverse gears.
I kept the 3.823 Final Drive because the transmission is indeed an RS5F50V and the only alternative final drive is 3.895, and it aint worth it. So my car will pull slightly harder through the first three gears.
I'll be putting that thing back together tomorrow (Saturday) but due to 80% chance of rain I won't be installing it until Sunday.
I've been driving a 145 HP Ford Taurus Station Wagon for the past 2 weeks, so as you can imagine I am now clinically insane from being beaten by Ford Escorts and Toyota Echos.
The 4th gen (and possibly 5th gen) traction bars are pretty much ready, bye bye wheel hop forever.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
I paid 200$cnd for the 3 gears and the shaft (1-2 set comes with one of the shafts) plus 100$ to the transmission shop.
Also, the Altima gears are just as thick as the maxima gears, thus probably the same strength. They look exactly the same except for the slightly more aggressive ratios.
Also, the Altima gears are just as thick as the maxima gears, thus probably the same strength. They look exactly the same except for the slightly more aggressive ratios.
Originally Posted by JClaw
I doubt there is a .8 second drop in 0-60, that would put me well under 5 seconds. The difference is probably minor, like .1 or .2 at most.
I also highly doubt the nearly 1 second 0-60 time reduction w/the 2000-2k1 Altima tranny....there's never been any official or unofficial time comparisons (which would be difficult or rare to occur anyway). And of course, mag cars can vary alot, but the times I've seen for the 2k/2k1 Altima autos w/the 'revised' TCU/gear trannies ran as slow as the 98-99 autos. Maybe it was driver, track, wear related, but again, not even a VB job will shave a whole second of your 0-60, so I also think maybe a couple of tenths at best.
Originally Posted by niceguy
I also highly doubt the nearly 1 second 0-60 time reduction w/the 2000-2k1 Altima tranny....there's never been any official or unofficial time comparisons (which would be difficult or rare to occur anyway). And of course, mag cars can vary alot, but the times I've seen for the 2k/2k1 Altima autos w/the 'revised' TCU/gear trannies ran as slow as the 98-99 autos. Maybe it was driver, track, wear related, but again, not even a VB job will shave a whole second of your 0-60, so I also think maybe a couple of tenths at best.
Come on guys this is not a supra that does 13's, this is a low 17 second car. The higher the 1/4 mile time the easier it is to drop it. Me adding nitrous made it drop 1 second, added an intake and it went down another .5, you can't do the same with a max and the same amount of nitrous, because the lower the time the harder it is to drop it more. A change in gearing may lower time by .1-.2 on a Maxima but on a slower car it can be a lot more.
Before I was married, I raced many 2k/2k1 auto and manual Altimas....driver skill aside, I never lost to an equally modded 2k/2k1 auto and took out a number of manual stock and lightly modded 2k/2k1s...My point being that the effect of the revised auto and supposed reprogrammed TCUs was negligible in my experience with those models....
JClaw, how adversely will the shorter first gear affect your launch technique? I can see how the 2nd/3rd gears would improve midrange acceleration but will that be offset by scrambling for traction off the line.?
Or is the gearing change more for track purposes where you'll have the benefit of w.bars, slicks,etc...?
Jeremy
JClaw, how adversely will the shorter first gear affect your launch technique? I can see how the 2nd/3rd gears would improve midrange acceleration but will that be offset by scrambling for traction off the line.?
Or is the gearing change more for track purposes where you'll have the benefit of w.bars, slicks,etc...?
Jeremy
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by niceguy
JClaw, how adversely will the shorter first gear affect your launch technique? I can see how the 2nd/3rd gears would improve midrange acceleration but will that be offset by scrambling for traction off the line.?
Or is the gearing change more for track purposes where you'll have the benefit of w.bars, slicks,etc...?
Jeremy
Or is the gearing change more for track purposes where you'll have the benefit of w.bars, slicks,etc...?
Jeremy
The gearing is more aggressive, yes, but I am putting on custom traction bars that eliminate wheel hop at the same time as the tranny (today or tomorrow) so increased gearing but increased traction at the same time. I hope to cut 2.0 60 foots on street tires and possibly a high 1.6 on slicks.




