Pioneer vs. Alpine
Re: Pioneer vs. Alpine
Originally posted by MadMax92SE
Looking at the Pioneer 740mp and the Alpine 7894 for head units anybody have either one and what do you think.
Thanks
Looking at the Pioneer 740mp and the Alpine 7894 for head units anybody have either one and what do you think.
Thanks
got it from ebay for $250ish
dont know anything about teh Alpine one though
I heard many times now that Alpine and Eclipse make the best sounding headunits.
Alpines are just laid out kind of ugly and the Eclipse decks are too plain. Pioneers look good though and don't sound bad either. I have a 9200 and it's great.
Alpines are just laid out kind of ugly and the Eclipse decks are too plain. Pioneers look good though and don't sound bad either. I have a 9200 and it's great.
according to the new issue of auto sound and security the DEH-P7400MP has a 6 second cue up time between tracks, which really must suck, and it wont work with CDRW MP3 discs, something to seriously consider, i would take the Alpine on this choice, though i currently run a Pioneer Premier DEX-P98R right now, but i am upgrading to teh Alpine CDA 7998 when it releases
Originally posted by NYCe MaXiMa
I heard many times now that Alpine and Eclipse make the best sounding headunits.
Alpines are just laid out kind of ugly and the Eclipse decks are too plain. Pioneers look good though and don't sound bad either. I have a 9200 and it's great.
I heard many times now that Alpine and Eclipse make the best sounding headunits.
Alpines are just laid out kind of ugly and the Eclipse decks are too plain. Pioneers look good though and don't sound bad either. I have a 9200 and it's great.
Pioneer - slide-by quality on audio processor features/sound quality/performance of the deck as far as audio quality goes, but they go all out on the displays. The consumer-level premier line is a little better, but still just "decent" as far as audio performance goes. But if you like a flashy, glitzy display to show off to your friends (if you're the neon-sticks-in-the-car kinda guy), then pio's right up your alley.
If you're more concerned with the actual audio performance, alpine and eclipse are a better way to go. Alpine is usually a little more expensive than the standard pio/sony/clarion/etc decks, but worth the price. I have an Alpine 7863 myself, and LOVE it except for one minor annoyance (the HPF is active on all speakers and pre-outs...so if you set it for your speakers & have a sub, it will cap the speakers AND the sub...kinda defeats the purpose of having a HPF in the first place - then again, using deck filters isnt the best way to go anyway).

Smooth, sexy, sleek, and functional (tho the green buttons are a bit too colorful - alpine trademark though). No dolphins jumping into the side of morphing buildings all floating around in a vertigo sky here.
If you're more concerned with the actual audio performance, alpine and eclipse are a better way to go. Alpine is usually a little more expensive than the standard pio/sony/clarion/etc decks, but worth the price. I have an Alpine 7863 myself, and LOVE it except for one minor annoyance (the HPF is active on all speakers and pre-outs...so if you set it for your speakers & have a sub, it will cap the speakers AND the sub...kinda defeats the purpose of having a HPF in the first place - then again, using deck filters isnt the best way to go anyway).

Smooth, sexy, sleek, and functional (tho the green buttons are a bit too colorful - alpine trademark though). No dolphins jumping into the side of morphing buildings all floating around in a vertigo sky here.
Alpine for Sound quality... Pioneer for gimicks and useless features.
If you have the money get a non-powered deck and run amps to all your channels. You won't regret it. Ohh, and don't forget to rewire all your speakers too.
If you have the money get a non-powered deck and run amps to all your channels. You won't regret it. Ohh, and don't forget to rewire all your speakers too.
If you have the money get a non-powered deck and run amps to all your channels. You won't regret it. Ohh, and don't forget to rewire all your speakers too.
Yes, definitely Alpine for the most part. Pioneer decks can have a lot more features (if you need them) but fall short in SQ. Alpine is much more SQ oriented. However, if anyone remembers, Alpine used to be the best of the best many years ago. Now, they are built to be more affordable and targeted for younger buyers. Thus, build quality and performance has suffered. IMO, unless you are an audiophile, Alpines make a sound product.
The nice thing about Eclipse is that even the lower-end models have almost the same, if not the same, processor as the upper-end ones. SQ is far above Alpine IMO.
Tony
The nice thing about Eclipse is that even the lower-end models have almost the same, if not the same, processor as the upper-end ones. SQ is far above Alpine IMO.
Tony
Originally posted by MadMax92SE
Eclipse does not make cd players that will read mp3 files though. At least I haven't found any. Looks like the Alpine is goine to win out. Now I need to decide between the 7894 and the 7995.
Thanks
Eclipse does not make cd players that will read mp3 files though. At least I haven't found any. Looks like the Alpine is goine to win out. Now I need to decide between the 7894 and the 7995.
Thanks
Tony
Originally posted by Tony Fernandes
Yes, definitely Alpine for the most part. Pioneer decks can have a lot more features (if you need them) but fall short in SQ. Alpine is much more SQ oriented. However, if anyone remembers, Alpine used to be the best of the best many years ago. Now, they are built to be more affordable and targeted for younger buyers. Thus, build quality and performance has suffered. IMO, unless you are an audiophile, Alpines make a sound product.
The nice thing about Eclipse is that even the lower-end models have almost the same, if not the same, processor as the upper-end ones. SQ is far above Alpine IMO.
Tony
Yes, definitely Alpine for the most part. Pioneer decks can have a lot more features (if you need them) but fall short in SQ. Alpine is much more SQ oriented. However, if anyone remembers, Alpine used to be the best of the best many years ago. Now, they are built to be more affordable and targeted for younger buyers. Thus, build quality and performance has suffered. IMO, unless you are an audiophile, Alpines make a sound product.
The nice thing about Eclipse is that even the lower-end models have almost the same, if not the same, processor as the upper-end ones. SQ is far above Alpine IMO.
Tony
Originally posted by MadMax92SE
Eclipse does not make cd players that will read mp3 files though. At least I haven't found any. Looks like the Alpine is goine to win out. Now I need to decide between the 7894 and the 7995.
Thanks
Eclipse does not make cd players that will read mp3 files though. At least I haven't found any. Looks like the Alpine is goine to win out. Now I need to decide between the 7894 and the 7995.
Thanks
Did alpine just start dropping the prices on their decks for this model year?
I know when I was looking, and bought my 7863, it was real hard to find a discounted/lower price on any alpine decks. Even volume discount places that sold other names pretty cheap had like, $5-10 discounts off normal for their alpine decks. Luckily when the time came that I needed a deck (someone actually jacked my old Clarion pro audio deck? Hehe...I feel sorry for them), the new years models had just come out and they were closing out on the prior year (I think the 7863 was 2000 model line).
I know when I was looking, and bought my 7863, it was real hard to find a discounted/lower price on any alpine decks. Even volume discount places that sold other names pretty cheap had like, $5-10 discounts off normal for their alpine decks. Luckily when the time came that I needed a deck (someone actually jacked my old Clarion pro audio deck? Hehe...I feel sorry for them), the new years models had just come out and they were closing out on the prior year (I think the 7863 was 2000 model line).
What do you guys think of the Alpine HUs that use the V Drive hybrid amp that needs to be hard wired to the battery? I think its 7893 if I'm not mistaken.... a good idea for people who are in between a regular HU and speakers, and a full blown amp? Ideas, do we like this, think it's stupid, ect.?\
Originally posted by Neal728
What do you guys think of the Alpine HUs that use the V Drive hybrid amp that needs to be hard wired to the battery? I think its 7893 if I'm not mistaken.... a good idea for people who are in between a regular HU and speakers, and a full blown amp? Ideas, do we like this, think it's stupid, ect.?\
What do you guys think of the Alpine HUs that use the V Drive hybrid amp that needs to be hard wired to the battery? I think its 7893 if I'm not mistaken.... a good idea for people who are in between a regular HU and speakers, and a full blown amp? Ideas, do we like this, think it's stupid, ect.?\
Originally posted by Menacer
what about panasonic, what do you guys thing of their HU's?
what about panasonic, what do you guys thing of their HU's?
Originally posted by TheNip73
I think they look alrigt and I have heard that panasonic has been putting a lot of work into their decks lately. I don't know too much about them so I would also like to get peoples opinions on them. Speak up people.
I think they look alrigt and I have heard that panasonic has been putting a lot of work into their decks lately. I don't know too much about them so I would also like to get peoples opinions on them. Speak up people.
LONG
Originally posted by Menacer
What about sound quality compared to pioneer and alpine?
What about sound quality compared to pioneer and alpine?
BTW...everyone keep in mind that most manufacturers make different levels of quality. I've never been a big fan of Sony CD players, but their CDX-C90 ($1,200) is one helluva unit SQ wise. Pioneer is the same way, but they make a high-end, ultra $$ one as well (can't remember the one). Many others are the same way.
Also keep in mind that SQ is very subjective to most listeners. TRUE SQ is considered by audiophiles to be a CD player that does not color or add anything at all to the original source, which is a CD. When you ask me what the best SQ deck might be I would probably say the Nakamichi CD-700 ($1,750). It plays a CD nearly exactly how the artist intended it to sound without any coloration or distortion or anything else for that matter.
One listener might like the sound of Eclipse CD players better because they sound "warm" and don't hurt your ears. Others may like Alpine because they sound "bright" and more detailed.
With that in mind, you really can't go wrong with most major brands of CD players. It's all subjective. Also keep in mind what else you plan on using in your system. Certain brands should be avoided if used together.
A good example of this would be an Alpine CD player, MB quart speakers, and Alpine amps. In my opinion, all of these components are very "bright" sounding. They may impress the casual uneducated listener that only sits in your car for 10 minutes while you crank the volume up, but try a long trip and see how far you can make it before your ears get fatigued. On the other hand, a lot of people might like this combo. From a purist standpoint, I sure wouldn't.
Holy cow! I really got on a roll!! Sorry.
Tony
Re: LONG
Originally posted by Tony Fernandes
Maybe closer to Pioneer, but not Alpine.
BTW...everyone keep in mind that most manufacturers make different levels of quality. I've never been a big fan of Sony CD players, but their CDX-C90 ($1,200) is one helluva unit SQ wise. Pioneer is the same way, but they make a high-end, ultra $$ one as well (can't remember the one). Many others are the same way.
Also keep in mind that SQ is very subjective to most listeners. TRUE SQ is considered by audiophiles to be a CD player that does not color or add anything at all to the original source, which is a CD. When you ask me what the best SQ deck might be I would probably say the Nakamichi CD-700 ($1,750). It plays a CD nearly exactly how the artist intended it to sound without any coloration or distortion or anything else for that matter.
One listener might like the sound of Eclipse CD players better because they sound "warm" and don't hurt your ears. Others may like Alpine because they sound "bright" and more detailed.
With that in mind, you really can't go wrong with most major brands of CD players. It's all subjective. Also keep in mind what else you plan on using in your system. Certain brands should be avoided if used together.
A good example of this would be an Alpine CD player, MB quart speakers, and Alpine amps. In my opinion, all of these components are very "bright" sounding. They may impress the casual uneducated listener that only sits in your car for 10 minutes while you crank the volume up, but try a long trip and see how far you can make it before your ears get fatigued. On the other hand, a lot of people might like this combo. From a purist standpoint, I sure wouldn't.
Holy cow! I really got on a roll!! Sorry.
Tony
Maybe closer to Pioneer, but not Alpine.
BTW...everyone keep in mind that most manufacturers make different levels of quality. I've never been a big fan of Sony CD players, but their CDX-C90 ($1,200) is one helluva unit SQ wise. Pioneer is the same way, but they make a high-end, ultra $$ one as well (can't remember the one). Many others are the same way.
Also keep in mind that SQ is very subjective to most listeners. TRUE SQ is considered by audiophiles to be a CD player that does not color or add anything at all to the original source, which is a CD. When you ask me what the best SQ deck might be I would probably say the Nakamichi CD-700 ($1,750). It plays a CD nearly exactly how the artist intended it to sound without any coloration or distortion or anything else for that matter.
One listener might like the sound of Eclipse CD players better because they sound "warm" and don't hurt your ears. Others may like Alpine because they sound "bright" and more detailed.
With that in mind, you really can't go wrong with most major brands of CD players. It's all subjective. Also keep in mind what else you plan on using in your system. Certain brands should be avoided if used together.
A good example of this would be an Alpine CD player, MB quart speakers, and Alpine amps. In my opinion, all of these components are very "bright" sounding. They may impress the casual uneducated listener that only sits in your car for 10 minutes while you crank the volume up, but try a long trip and see how far you can make it before your ears get fatigued. On the other hand, a lot of people might like this combo. From a purist standpoint, I sure wouldn't.
Holy cow! I really got on a roll!! Sorry.
Tony
eric
I've been thinking. I would definately like to get one of these HU with detachable, D-mask, or phantom face(alpine 7998) features. Alpine 7995 surely got my attention. Enough with this for now..
What I'm worried is it's security. I'm pretty sure the thieves will KNOW a high quality HU when they see a ugly black back side of the HU from the D-mask or phantom face. So they'll take it. Well, I guess there is warranty for this. But, this can mean scratches on the body or broken window, all that crap etc..
So I'm assuming detachable faces are the best way to go since that face ONLY works with that HU(Am I right on this? Heard this from a friend who wasn't so sure..)
Alpine 7995 got my vote, maybe even my cash soon or later.. What do you guys think
What I'm worried is it's security. I'm pretty sure the thieves will KNOW a high quality HU when they see a ugly black back side of the HU from the D-mask or phantom face. So they'll take it. Well, I guess there is warranty for this. But, this can mean scratches on the body or broken window, all that crap etc..
So I'm assuming detachable faces are the best way to go since that face ONLY works with that HU(Am I right on this? Heard this from a friend who wasn't so sure..)
Alpine 7995 got my vote, maybe even my cash soon or later.. What do you guys think
Originally posted by Max4Good
So I'm assuming detachable faces are the best way to go since that face ONLY works with that HU(Am I right on this? Heard this from a friend who wasn't so sure..)
So I'm assuming detachable faces are the best way to go since that face ONLY works with that HU(Am I right on this? Heard this from a friend who wasn't so sure..)
.....
i've been meaning to ask this for a while now ,but how do most people on here mount their decks? do you use the factory screws or do you used the metal cage? i always used the screws and its not the easiest thing to get out ... so i really havent been to worried about getting my stuff ripped out
although I agree that alpine makes a good head unit, I don't believe you can hear a difference in sound quality between 2 that do "exactly" the same....there is only 3 different dac configurations,well, 2 actually, burr-brown and 1-bit..now some use multiple ones for different reasons, but they are all the same..prices depend on features really..although I agree that your system starts in the head (p9 combo here) it is not the only thing in the system..you could have a 2k$ radio ran with kraco amps and speakers and it will sound like poop..now you could have a 300$ head ran with decent speaks and amps and possibly get an invitation to iasca's world finals if you know what your doing...
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
Originally posted by slickonetoo
although
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
although
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
Originally posted by Pearl96Max
What if ya want 8V preouts??
What if ya want 8V preouts??
umm...then you need a deck that will do that..lol.
I'm not saying alpine is better than pioneer or visa versa, just saying that if you base a deck on "cd" features, you won't hear a difference..features are a differend story and this is why head's are bought...I have the P9 combo because it does what "I" need it too.But may not be necessary for others applications
I don't see any need for upgrades anytime soon here also..which goes to what i'm saying..If you plan on doing something later that needs front rear sub with volume control for sub, then why buy a head with 1 rca out that's not even 2v just because it says MOSFET on the front and has "swimming dolphins"......lol
I have used Kenwood excelon(still have 915 in other vehicle)Alpine Premier Eclipse Denon and Sony ES...there is a whole bookoo of choices out there...just get what you need or need in future...amps and speakers make the system as well..don't buy a 600$ alpine and go for a pyramid amp and jensen speakers that won't work...lol
Also pearl, there is a big difference between 8v continous and 8v peak as well...Eclipse is the only 1 that has a continous deck that isn't balanced that i'm aware of
Originally posted by slickonetoo
although I agree that alpine makes a good head unit, I don't believe you can hear a difference in sound quality between 2 that do "exactly" the same....there is only 3 different dac configurations,well, 2 actually, burr-brown and 1-bit..now some use multiple ones for different reasons, but they are all the same..prices depend on features really..although I agree that your system starts in the head (p9 combo here) it is not the only thing in the system..you could have a 2k$ radio ran with kraco amps and speakers and it will sound like poop..now you could have a 300$ head ran with decent speaks and amps and possibly get an invitation to iasca's world finals if you know what your doing...
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
although I agree that alpine makes a good head unit, I don't believe you can hear a difference in sound quality between 2 that do "exactly" the same....there is only 3 different dac configurations,well, 2 actually, burr-brown and 1-bit..now some use multiple ones for different reasons, but they are all the same..prices depend on features really..although I agree that your system starts in the head (p9 combo here) it is not the only thing in the system..you could have a 2k$ radio ran with kraco amps and speakers and it will sound like poop..now you could have a 300$ head ran with decent speaks and amps and possibly get an invitation to iasca's world finals if you know what your doing...
basically what I am saying, get what you need..want..if you need 4v outputs or better with 3 way lineout and sub volume control or just a head that is only being used to power up some factory speakers, go for it as for alpine to pioneer, you won't be able to hear a difference trust me......
Excellent advice on choosing whatever deck suits your purpose as far as features go, but I have to disagree with you on not being able to tell the difference in SQ between decks. Although I will stipulate that quite a few people won't be able to say "Hey, that Alpine sounds much more detailed than that Pioneer", you will find that even more people, like myself, hear a WORLD of difference from one deck to another. But...you said it...someone with a lot of knowledge can build a system with a $300 head and it will sound great. Well put!
Tony
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tony Fernandes
Hey slick,
Excellent advice on choosing whatever deck suits your purpose as far as features go, but I have to disagree with you on not being able to tell the difference in SQ between decks. Although I will stipulate that quite a few people won't be able to say "Hey, that Alpine sounds much more detailed than that Pioneer", you will find that even more people, like myself, hear a WORLD of difference from one deck to another. But...you said it...someone with a lot of knowledge can build a system with a $300 head and it will sound great. Well put!
Tony [/QUOTE
thanks tony....if you were to compare decks features aside, you'd be surprised in what you hear believe it or not..now a 500$ alpine comared to a 150 or even 300$ pioneer yea you'll hear it...totally differend dac array's but a 500$ alpine to a 500$ premier with the same dac's you won't..I value your opinion as such you do mine though not at all trying to flame just make a point
Hey slick,
Excellent advice on choosing whatever deck suits your purpose as far as features go, but I have to disagree with you on not being able to tell the difference in SQ between decks. Although I will stipulate that quite a few people won't be able to say "Hey, that Alpine sounds much more detailed than that Pioneer", you will find that even more people, like myself, hear a WORLD of difference from one deck to another. But...you said it...someone with a lot of knowledge can build a system with a $300 head and it will sound great. Well put!
Tony [/QUOTE
thanks tony....if you were to compare decks features aside, you'd be surprised in what you hear believe it or not..now a 500$ alpine comared to a 150 or even 300$ pioneer yea you'll hear it...totally differend dac array's but a 500$ alpine to a 500$ premier with the same dac's you won't..I value your opinion as such you do mine though not at all trying to flame just make a point
hmmm,
this thread is helpful, and its cool that people arent fighting, just pointing out stuff that some of us would have never thought about. so would you guys take the 7995 over the 7893? my friend wants to get the 7894 but i like the 7995, what do you think?
actually i just visited crutchfield (its a good reference site, for the decks they have
love the big pics). i overlooked that the 7995 does not have V-Drive. my friend really want a blue one thats why the 7893. what do you guys think about this? is that a good deck? would you run references or kappas off of it? he wants kappa but i say reference.
also what was it your talking about that one of the decks did something to the outputs while the 7995 didnt? somethink like limited the signal?
what if we ran a jbl 80.4 off a 7995, would that sound good or do you guys think that the JL 300.4 is the best way to go? hes on a budget, so am I, but it would be nice to get good stuff and make it last vs. wanna upgrade
still the budget comes into play.
thanks for reading the post and your input is appreciated.
MrGone
this thread is helpful, and its cool that people arent fighting, just pointing out stuff that some of us would have never thought about. so would you guys take the 7995 over the 7893? my friend wants to get the 7894 but i like the 7995, what do you think?
actually i just visited crutchfield (its a good reference site, for the decks they have
love the big pics). i overlooked that the 7995 does not have V-Drive. my friend really want a blue one thats why the 7893. what do you guys think about this? is that a good deck? would you run references or kappas off of it? he wants kappa but i say reference.also what was it your talking about that one of the decks did something to the outputs while the 7995 didnt? somethink like limited the signal?
what if we ran a jbl 80.4 off a 7995, would that sound good or do you guys think that the JL 300.4 is the best way to go? hes on a budget, so am I, but it would be nice to get good stuff and make it last vs. wanna upgrade
still the budget comes into play.thanks for reading the post and your input is appreciated.
MrGone
Originally posted by MrGone
hmmm,
this thread is helpful, and its cool that people arent fighting, just pointing out stuff that some of us would have never thought about. so would you guys take the 7995 over the 7893? my friend wants to get the 7894 but i like the 7995, what do you think?
actually i just visited crutchfield (its a good reference site, for the decks they have
love the big pics). i overlooked that the 7995 does not have V-Drive. my friend really want a blue one thats why the 7893. what do you guys think about this? is that a good deck? would you run references or kappas off of it? he wants kappa but i say reference.
also what was it your talking about that one of the decks did something to the outputs while the 7995 didnt? somethink like limited the signal?
what if we ran a jbl 80.4 off a 7995, would that sound good or do you guys think that the JL 300.4 is the best way to go? hes on a budget, so am I, but it would be nice to get good stuff and make it last vs. wanna upgrade
still the budget comes into play.
thanks for reading the post and your input is appreciated.
MrGone
hmmm,
this thread is helpful, and its cool that people arent fighting, just pointing out stuff that some of us would have never thought about. so would you guys take the 7995 over the 7893? my friend wants to get the 7894 but i like the 7995, what do you think?
actually i just visited crutchfield (its a good reference site, for the decks they have
love the big pics). i overlooked that the 7995 does not have V-Drive. my friend really want a blue one thats why the 7893. what do you guys think about this? is that a good deck? would you run references or kappas off of it? he wants kappa but i say reference.also what was it your talking about that one of the decks did something to the outputs while the 7995 didnt? somethink like limited the signal?
what if we ran a jbl 80.4 off a 7995, would that sound good or do you guys think that the JL 300.4 is the best way to go? hes on a budget, so am I, but it would be nice to get good stuff and make it last vs. wanna upgrade
still the budget comes into play.thanks for reading the post and your input is appreciated.
MrGone
I have the Alpine 7977 (last yr model of 7995) running 6.5 Infinity References in the doors (components) and the rear deck (2-way) and JL Audio Subs in the hatch. The sound is far superior to my old setup of a 500 dollar pioneer deck ,pioneer speakers which were amped similar to my current setup and with the same subs and sub amp I am currently using.
The Infinity reference series speakers are plenty loud and very clear. They get 60 watts each from my Rockford amp while my subs get 150 a piece from a Phoenix Gold amp I have had for ages (Excellent Product!). I don't know much about JBL or JL amps so I can't recommend much. Kappas are nice but probally not necessary or worth the money. Get the 7995 deck FOR SURE . You will notice a difference in the cleanliness of your sound. I can't stress enough the quality of this deck. All of my friends and even the installer have commented on how clean the deck and system sound. The higher grade components are worth it. Last note of advice. Don't get the 7995 if your not running a good amp (seems like you are -- JBL or JL), if you buy a good deck and crappy amps you'll get crappy sound. Save up and do things right. It will save you money and despair in the long run.
BTW on reading my post as it was originally posted it may have appeared I was implying JL and JBL make crappy amps. NO -- they are good amps. Get something of at least that quality.






