2004 Maxima dyno?
I had the same quesiton, you've probably already found this, but here it is again jsut in case . .. http://www.forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=390731
Yup,, that's what I figured from your time, still not a bad time. I can't find a 5spd in my area for ****, only 300+ miles away, but think it might be worth a drive, or maybe a sway ... eitehr way, it's a summer project to make my little 95 with 2 leather boots in the console.
Oh yea, BTW it's an 03, tehy didn't have that color in 02
Oh yea, BTW it's an 03, tehy didn't have that color in 02
its a decent time, im trying to hit 15.0, dare i say 14.9 with my set up before i move onto the 00vi, ecu, and stage 2+ vb from maximum tuning. 5 spd swap is too much money, and downtime, otherwise i'd be all over it. I also couldnt find a 5 spd withing 400 miles of me either, so dont feel bad. Sorry about the mix up on the year, either way, its still hot. I love how that color looks.
yeah, i'd better be in the 14s with those mods listed, but im trying to hit 14.999 without them. Summertime, those mods will come. I want to get as low as possible first with the basic I/Y/E set up everyone on the org has. If you dont want your JWT Ecu anymore, let me know
heres one i ran across
http://forums.nycmaximas.org/showthread.php?t=2478
http://forums.nycmaximas.org/showthread.php?t=2478
LOL. It looks like its not happening. I don't clean, I don't suck ****, and it could include cable if you paid for it. And its not an apartment. More of a warehouse with a bathroom and heater.
You can check out my dyno at www.cardomain.com/id/ramberg page 1.
Originally Posted by ramberg
Here it is, 310 at the crank.


Originally Posted by 02SEleeper
I had a quick question. Is the 261 all motor, or are you slipping her some juice? Can you give a list of your mods? The reason why I asked is I’m hoping to put down 240~245 to the wheels.
I was thinking the same thing. He put down about 25 more WHP than a stock 350Z with only an intake and catback basically, which we all know don't really do much. And he's an auto to boot. Inflated #'s...
Originally Posted by nismology
I was thinking the same thing. He put down about 25 more WHP than a stock 350Z with only an intake and catback basically, which we all know don't really do much. And he's an auto to boot. Inflated #'s...
Originally Posted by Glude
That dyno is wack IMO. No way you are putting down those numbers, but it is on a mustang dyno.
Originally Posted by nismology
And he's an auto to boot. ..
Originally Posted by ramberg
WTF You think they frudged the numbers on the dyno? I tell you what, I am a few miles from your home town till Sat. If you want to take me to a dyno shop in your area PM me. If the numbers are right you pay for it. If not I will take you to dinner.
Originally Posted by C MAX
and what does that have to do with hp. im a auto and pushing well over 260hp to the wheels so whats your point. ramberg got a legit dyno whether the numbers are 100% accurate isnt the point. its a baseline for 2004 and he's one of the few with a dyno, give the man a chance to dyno a few more times then you can judge from a avg.
His dyno indicates nearly 320 HP to the crank with virtually NO real power mods. You cannot blame me for my skepticism.
Somebody should run a Cartest with his WHP numbers and compare them to real-world auto 1/4 mile runs with his mods to compare.
Originally Posted by nismology
A manual with your same mods would be putting out over 300 WHP. What's YOUR point? Autos suck more power by virtue of the speed difference between the engine/torque converter and the tranny itself. Cars that have a lock-up torque converter feature in all gears don't have this problem. Maxima autos aren't one of them.
His dyno indicates nearly 320 HP to the crank with virtually NO real power mods. You cannot blame me for my skepticism.
Somebody should run a Cartest with his WHP numbers and compare them to real-world auto 1/4 mile runs with his mods to compare.
His dyno indicates nearly 320 HP to the crank with virtually NO real power mods. You cannot blame me for my skepticism.
Somebody should run a Cartest with his WHP numbers and compare them to real-world auto 1/4 mile runs with his mods to compare.
i have a custom level ten tranny so thats the point. you cannot compare auto vs manual becasue every car is different in its own way becasue of whats done to them. ive raced five speeds with the same mods and more and still won (meccanoble) so there goes your theory.
Originally Posted by C MAX
the point is dont throw out blatant info becasue of your personal preference.
i have a custom level ten tranny so thats the point. you cannot compare auto vs manual becasue every car is different in its own way becasue of whats done to them. ive raced five speeds with the same mods and more and still won (meccanoble) so there goes your theory.
i have a custom level ten tranny so thats the point. you cannot compare auto vs manual becasue every car is different in its own way becasue of whats done to them. ive raced five speeds with the same mods and more and still won (meccanoble) so there goes your theory.
If he had a 6-speed it would be much more believable. But again, i believe that mustang dynos read high.
Originally Posted by nismology
Somebody should run a Cartest with his WHP numbers and compare them to real-world auto 1/4 mile runs with his mods to compare.
Originally Posted by nismology
Maybe you were quicker because your auto shifts faster than a manual could. Ever thought of that? We're not talking about which tranny would produce a quicker car. We're talking about which tranny puts out more WHP per mod (this is the DYNO forum). Big difference. Not only that, using your car as an example doesn't make much sense. Your tranny isn't stock.
If he had a 6-speed it would be much more believable. But again, i believe that mustang dynos read high.
If he had a 6-speed it would be much more believable. But again, i believe that mustang dynos read high.
Originally Posted by C MAX
and what does that have to do with hp. im a auto and pushing well over 260hp to the wheels so whats your point. ramberg got a legit dyno whether the numbers are 100% accurate isnt the point. its a baseline for 2004 and he's one of the few with a dyno, give the man a chance to dyno a few more times then you can judge from a avg.
Thanks for the help. I am not a pro at these things,I go by what the slips say. I do not know anywhere in my area that has a different dyno machine then the mustang. I f I find a different one in my travels, I will get a dyno. Like I said in one of the replys I installed a CE y-pipe and will have the redynoed with the mustang dyno. Later Warren
Originally Posted by C MAX
nismo im messing with you. but the point is the dyno doesnt pick out what is making the hp so 2 same cars can have two different readings. until other 2004 dyno what is real and what is not. but ramberg got a dyno and this is what it said and yes mustang dynos arent the best but close.
Get it on a dynojet and it will clear things up ... I also realize you're not here to impress anyone, and if you get the dyno to see teh difference between the y-pipe w &w/o on a mustang that's cool too, or in my words to everyone, would be --> it better be cool, but on here we are used to dynojets, so it gives a better baseline for other FWD 3.5L's
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Get it on a dynojet and it will clear things up ... I also realize you're not here to impress anyone, and if you get the dyno to see teh difference between the y-pipe w &w/o on a mustang that's cool too, or in my words to everyone, would be --> it better be cool, but on here we are used to dynojets, so it gives a better baseline for other FWD 3.5L's




