Why not SC AND Turbo?!?!
Why not SC AND Turbo?!?!
Dont think this has been covered yet but... I've been looking at that pic of the engine bay Greg has posted on CustomMaxima.com of the turbo'd 4th Gen....and it looks like you could fit an SC and a turbo in the engine with little hassle!! With an IC set-up included...the turbo piping would use the IC (right now my SC is using the IC) and you could just make a custom CAI for the SC that goes down into the passenger side fender well ...with the current SC setup from Stillen you have that long CAI piping stretching across the engine bay which really isnt necessary if you needed extra room you could just go with the custom CAI thats smaller... For those of you who are familiar with the SC and the Turbo setups, there are definately possibilities there...
Now lets assume an SC & a Turbo will fit... will it or wont it work and why or why not? Look at that turbo'd 4th gen pic on custommaxima and you'll see there's still space for the SC... Hmmmmmmm
Just a thought... but does anyone know anything about this?
Deac
Now lets assume an SC & a Turbo will fit... will it or wont it work and why or why not? Look at that turbo'd 4th gen pic on custommaxima and you'll see there's still space for the SC... Hmmmmmmm
Just a thought... but does anyone know anything about this?Deac
redundant systems.
the main reason why people SC a TURBO is so that one can spool up the other one faster, but in our case, having a supercharger spinning the drive pulley and then feeding air into the Turbo's inlet has no point because that turbine will be might be slowed down due to back pressure. then you have to deal with where to put the BOV and having two safety valves and such.
i mean. realistically speaking, SCin' a turbo would be kinda lame, especially if you get an underdrive pulley with that turbo kit, then you can spool up even faster to max boost...
the main reason why people SC a TURBO is so that one can spool up the other one faster, but in our case, having a supercharger spinning the drive pulley and then feeding air into the Turbo's inlet has no point because that turbine will be might be slowed down due to back pressure. then you have to deal with where to put the BOV and having two safety valves and such.
i mean. realistically speaking, SCin' a turbo would be kinda lame, especially if you get an underdrive pulley with that turbo kit, then you can spool up even faster to max boost...
Re: Why not SC AND Turbo?!?!
Sure you could do it, have the piping join together before the tb..... question is... The opening is only so big for the tb and your motor can only handle so much boost. You could reach that max amount of boost b4 you blow the motor just with a tiny pully, or high boost on the turbo........ Seems to me the money would be better spent building up a stronger motor.
Originally posted by SprintMax
its much easier to do Twin Turbo than to do SC and Turbo.. that way you can have a smaller turbo for low rpms and bigger turbo for higher rpms
its much easier to do Twin Turbo than to do SC and Turbo.. that way you can have a smaller turbo for low rpms and bigger turbo for higher rpms
Profile For SprintMax
Year/Make/Model/Trim 1997 Maxima GXE
Color: White
Mods: Turbo and Supercharger
Year/Make/Model/Trim 1997 Maxima GXE
Color: White
Mods: Turbo and Supercharger
...
Originally posted by SprintMax
its much easier to do Twin Turbo than to do SC and Turbo.. that way you can have a smaller turbo for low rpms and bigger turbo for higher rpms
its much easier to do Twin Turbo than to do SC and Turbo.. that way you can have a smaller turbo for low rpms and bigger turbo for higher rpms
Doesn't the Supra have equal size sequential turbochargers, whereas the 300Z has equal size twin turbochargers?
Im sure you guys know that the reason for doing both is to obtain boost at all RPM and the SC can provide boost up to say 3500 RPM and then the turbo kicks in.... at least thats why the did it on the
Lancia group b's back in like 85. and i have seen an ITR in a mag with both and it was pushing almost 400hp and it had stock internals, but who knows how much the vq can take. but this is actually a good idea, youd do good autocrossing. but i think thats right. but if not dont flame. i cant work on cars.
Lancia group b's back in like 85. and i have seen an ITR in a mag with both and it was pushing almost 400hp and it had stock internals, but who knows how much the vq can take. but this is actually a good idea, youd do good autocrossing. but i think thats right. but if not dont flame. i cant work on cars.
Originally posted by Moreau
Im sure you guys know that the reason for doing both is to obtain boost at all RPM and the SC can provide boost up to say 3500 RPM and then the turbo kicks in.... at least thats why the did it on the
Lancia group b's back in like 85. and i have seen an ITR in a mag with both and it was pushing almost 400hp and it had stock internals, but who knows how much the vq can take. but this is actually a good idea, youd do good autocrossing. but i think thats right. but if not dont flame. i cant work on cars.
Im sure you guys know that the reason for doing both is to obtain boost at all RPM and the SC can provide boost up to say 3500 RPM and then the turbo kicks in.... at least thats why the did it on the
Lancia group b's back in like 85. and i have seen an ITR in a mag with both and it was pushing almost 400hp and it had stock internals, but who knows how much the vq can take. but this is actually a good idea, youd do good autocrossing. but i think thats right. but if not dont flame. i cant work on cars.
The SC doesn't even start putting out boost until 4000RPM.
With a 2.66" Pulley, 2500RPM.
As i understand it.
A Vortech/Stillen Supercharger for the Maxima helps very little on low end.
Originally posted by iansw
Ummm.
The SC doesn't even start putting out boost until 4000RPM.
With a 2.66" Pulley, 2500RPM.
As i understand it.
A Vortech/Stillen Supercharger for the Maxima helps very little on low end.
Ummm.
The SC doesn't even start putting out boost until 4000RPM.
With a 2.66" Pulley, 2500RPM.
As i understand it.
A Vortech/Stillen Supercharger for the Maxima helps very little on low end.
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
I'm in boost under 2000 rpms (2.87").
I'm in boost under 2000 rpms (2.87").
Then why am I not hitting boost until 3.5k with a 3.25"!?!?!
Man, that makes me feel like i still have more problems!
IanS
Kev don't get him started. He's sensitive that way. 

Originally posted by iansw
Really!?!?
Then why am I not hitting boost until 3.5k with a 3.25"!?!?!
Man, that makes me feel like i still have more problems!
IanS
Really!?!?
Then why am I not hitting boost until 3.5k with a 3.25"!?!?!
Man, that makes me feel like i still have more problems!
IanS
OK, please at least just tell me when boost should kick in with a 3.25" Pulley on an AT.
Man..maybe that will be my next Mod...a smaller pulley.
What do you have going to prevent detonation or problems with the smaller pulley?
IanS
Man..maybe that will be my next Mod...a smaller pulley.
What do you have going to prevent detonation or problems with the smaller pulley?
IanS
Originally posted by iansw
OK, please at least just tell me when boost should kick in with a 3.25" Pulley on an AT.
Man..maybe that will be my next Mod...a smaller pulley.
What do you have going to prevent detonation or problems with the smaller pulley?
IanS
OK, please at least just tell me when boost should kick in with a 3.25" Pulley on an AT.
Man..maybe that will be my next Mod...a smaller pulley.
What do you have going to prevent detonation or problems with the smaller pulley?
IanS
I have water injection to prevent detonation. DanNY aluminum pulleys to prevent meltdown.
"I see".. said the blind man!!
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
I start boosting between 2100-2400 with the 3.25... around 2000 (tad under) with 3.125...
I have water injection to prevent detonation. DanNY aluminum pulleys to prevent meltdown.
I start boosting between 2100-2400 with the 3.25... around 2000 (tad under) with 3.125...
I have water injection to prevent detonation. DanNY aluminum pulleys to prevent meltdown.

Deac
Re: "I see".. said the blind man!!
Originally posted by Deac
Well... if we're gting into low-end and then high end boost, it should work if you have an SC pulley that allows the SC to kick in around 2000 rpm or less then the turbo would kick in at around 4000 to 4500... then it would make more sense to SC a turbo. But lets not forget about the "deltagate external wastegate" thats said to come with the new bolt-on turbo kit!! Isn't the function of this device to allow the turbo to spool up faster and at lower RPM?!?!? If this is the case, then the SC would not be needed unless the SC provided for more low end torque and quicker acceleration on the low end than the wastegate.... if so substitute the SC for the wastegate! Hmmmm... more food for thought!!!
Deac
Well... if we're gting into low-end and then high end boost, it should work if you have an SC pulley that allows the SC to kick in around 2000 rpm or less then the turbo would kick in at around 4000 to 4500... then it would make more sense to SC a turbo. But lets not forget about the "deltagate external wastegate" thats said to come with the new bolt-on turbo kit!! Isn't the function of this device to allow the turbo to spool up faster and at lower RPM?!?!? If this is the case, then the SC would not be needed unless the SC provided for more low end torque and quicker acceleration on the low end than the wastegate.... if so substitute the SC for the wastegate! Hmmmm... more food for thought!!!

Deac
Re: Re: "I see".. said the blind man!!
Originally posted by Stephen Max
How could you handle the extra boost that the turbo produces over what the SC is providing?
How could you handle the extra boost that the turbo produces over what the SC is providing?
I always liked the turbo setup with NO2 until it spools up.
Re: Re: Re: "I see".. said the blind man!!
Originally posted by theMax
I think this is your answer right here. The "weak link" is not the turbo/SC its your engine. You can always increase bost, but the engine/tranny seems to be the weak link.
I always liked the turbo setup with NO2 until it spools up.
I think this is your answer right here. The "weak link" is not the turbo/SC its your engine. You can always increase bost, but the engine/tranny seems to be the weak link.
I always liked the turbo setup with NO2 until it spools up.
if you are running acceptable amounts of boost from both the SC and the Turbo, your engine or tranny should'nt be in jeopardy... I've been running 9psi w/my SC and there are guys who have safely run 10 or 11psi so far which start your SC boost at around 2k rpms and from what I understand, the turbo-kit run 9psi of turbo-boost. If you are still within the safe limits, should'nt you still be ok or are there still other drawbacks?...
I'm still trying to get feedback is all...Deac
Re: Re: Re: Re: "I see".. said the blind man!!
Originally posted by Deac
if you are running acceptable amounts of boost from both the SC and the Turbo, your engine or tranny should'nt be in jeopardy... I've been running 9psi w/my SC and there are guys who have safely run 10 or 11psi so far which start your SC boost at around 2k rpms and from what I understand, the turbo-kit run 9psi of turbo-boost. If you are still within the safe limits, should'nt you still be ok or are there still other drawbacks?...
I'm still trying to get feedback is all...
Deac
if you are running acceptable amounts of boost from both the SC and the Turbo, your engine or tranny should'nt be in jeopardy... I've been running 9psi w/my SC and there are guys who have safely run 10 or 11psi so far which start your SC boost at around 2k rpms and from what I understand, the turbo-kit run 9psi of turbo-boost. If you are still within the safe limits, should'nt you still be ok or are there still other drawbacks?...
I'm still trying to get feedback is all...Deac
with the Lancias, i think they had it so that the SC puts out boost, and then it somehow stops i believe, but im no mechanic, and then the turbo kicks in. of course the SC will have to be set up specially for such an application, that way boost is made easier, and i think they used big turbos to make more power at higher RPM, with the SC to eliminate lag, so really thats what the SC does... so unless u r racing, it may not be the way to go.. but it has been done for like 20 years, and its apparently a really good idea if you have it built right. Look in Super Street issue with the burgundy integra on the cover. it can make 345 hp all day on stock internals, and like 400 and something on max boost. if i had the cash id do it..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
Keyno McMike
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
Sep 21, 2015 07:18 AM




